I just don't understand how casters are better...


Pathfinder First Edition General Discussion

751 to 760 of 760 << first < prev | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | next > last >>

Marthkus wrote:

There were no encounter powers. Some of the tricks were once per day (crap).

But most were unlimited in use.

Nope, they weren't.

Using Skill Tricks wrote:
Unless otherwise noted, a skill trick can be performed only once per encounter (or once per minute, for scenes that don’t involve combat or other conflict). (Complete Scoundrel, Page 84)

But yeah, some were daily powers, which is even worse.


Fabius Maximus wrote:
Marthkus wrote:

There were no encounter powers. Some of the tricks were once per day (crap).

But most were unlimited in use.

Nope, they weren't.

Using Skill Tricks wrote:
Unless otherwise noted, a skill trick can be performed only once per encounter (or once per minute, for scenes that don’t involve combat or other conflict). (Complete Scoundrel, Page 84)
But yeah, some were daily powers, which is even worse.

I refuse to believe in such nonsense.

But then again, my group always used a copy of the indexes from before they were taken down.


Who cares who is better than whom, it's a role-playing game. It's not about being powerful, it's about playing a character you enjoy playing and all having a great time doing so.


Tharkon wrote:
Who cares who is better than whom, it's a role-playing game. It's not about being powerful, it's about playing a character you enjoy playing and all having a great time doing so.

There is more than one style of gaming. I enjoy a beer 'n' pretzels game with Three Stooges-like characters. I also enjoy a hard-mode tactical game in which you need to tweak out your party ruthlessly to avoid being monster food. A game that would accommodate BOTH of those styles, instead of just one of them, would be really nice.


Tharkon wrote:
Who cares who is better than whom

Lots of people cares, as evidenced in this thread for example.


Tharkon wrote:
Who cares who is better than whom, it's a role-playing game. It's not about being powerful, it's about playing a character you enjoy playing and all having a great time doing so.

Would you have fun in a game where one plays iron man with his power suit, someone else plays Thor, Hulk and Cap America and you get to play Pepper Potts?

I mean she's cute, has brains and such. She sure would be a blast to play.

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Holy sh!t how is this thread not locked?


zombie thread! ZOMBIE THREAD! Its... ALiiiiiiive!


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Please. It's December. Welcome the zombies, and invite them in for holiday cheer.


Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
A highly regarded expert wrote:
Please. It's December. Welcome the zombies, and invite them in for holiday cheer.

Heh...besides everyone knows that core-only rogues and monks are the most awesome :) *kidding* couldn't resist...

751 to 760 of 760 << first < prev | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / General Discussion / I just don't understand how casters are better... All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in General Discussion