How sustainable is our current model of civilization?


Off-Topic Discussions

301 to 350 of 1,314 << first < prev | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | next > last >>

Nuuuuuuu it's the gnumunists!!!


are they related to the gnumenorians?

oh, oh, and when a goblin uses the phrase, "intellectual property" I place that in the same category as such phrases as, jumbo shrimp, and military intelligence.


Racists and plutocrats, you will all pay!!!

Except for Comrade Gnomunist who is quite correct that there are no copyright laws on the collective but here in the belly of the beast, in the words of Tracy Marrow,

I gotta get paid tonight, you're motherf@$~ing right
think of my grip, check my biznitch, keep my game tight.

Vive le Galt!


2 people marked this as a favorite.

GNUMENORIANS IS ONLY LEGENDS

THERE IS NO GNUMENOR, WAS NO GNUMENOR, AND WILL BE NO GNUMENOR

NO ONE KNOWS OF GNUMENOR

NOT ASK OF GNUMENOR

REGIME NOT HAVE GNUMENORIANS IN SECRET RESEARCH FACILITIES DEVELOPING MIND-CONTROL

BECAUSE THERE IS NO GNUMENORIANS

NOW STOP ASKING, OR YOU BECOME SAUSAGE


Comrade Anklebiter wrote:

Racists and plutocrats, you will all pay!!!

Except for Comrade Gnomunist who is quite correct that there are no copyright laws on the collective but here in the belly of the beast, in the words of Tracy Marrow,

I gotta get paid tonight, you're motherf@&@ing right
think of my grip, check my biznitch, keep my game tight.

Vive le Galt!

I pay all the time; having the means to pay for goods and services is what puts me above the unwashed masses.

I swear, the things you have to explain to goblins . . .


Comrade Anklebiter wrote:

Racists and plutocrats, you will all pay!!!

Except for Comrade Gnomunist who is quite correct that there are no copyright laws on the collective but here in the belly of the beast, in the words of Tracy Marrow,

I gotta get paid tonight, you're motherf@#+ing right
think of my grip, check my biznitch, keep my game tight.

Vive le Galt!

PENSIVE SIGH

REGIME THINKS YOU ARE IN THE CORRECT

COMRADE ANKLEBITER'S PLAN FOR INSIDER COLLAPSE OF PIG-DOG SYSTEM IS A GO

BUT KEEP SECRET. WE HAVE NICE-PERSON OUTSIDER IMAGE TO MAINTAIN


1 person marked this as a favorite.

You're next, Dice! After Terquem and all you other pig-dogs!

Huh? What, Comrade Gnomunist? Oh.

Uh, nevermind, Dice, Terquem, everybody, nothing to worry about. You can all go back to yelling at dear Sissyl. Nothing to see here.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Gnomunist Cultural Attaché wrote:
Comrade Anklebiter wrote:

Racists and plutocrats, you will all pay!!!

Except for Comrade Gnomunist who is quite correct that there are no copyright laws on the collective but here in the belly of the beast, in the words of Tracy Marrow,

I gotta get paid tonight, you're motherf@#+ing right
think of my grip, check my biznitch, keep my game tight.

Vive le Galt!

PENSIVE SIGH

REGIME THINKS YOU ARE IN THE CORRECT

COMRADE ANKLEBITER'S PLAN FOR INSIDER COLLAPSE OF PIG-DOG SYSTEM IS A GO

BUT KEEP SECRET. WE HAVE NICE-PERSON OUTSIDER IMAGE TO MAINTAIN

That's how I started out, but then m'lord Dice started feeding me his table scraps and letting me sleep on the hearth, and I was all, "Of course I want to be a stooge of the plutocracy, sleeping inside beats the hell out of the goblin-kennels."

Both Doodlebug and m'lord Dice want me to redeem myself through labor, but Doodlebug wants to give my earnings to the needy, whereas m'lord Dice gives me sips of his wine when he's feeling jolly. What would you do?


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Comrade Anklebiter wrote:

You're next, Dice! After Terquem and all you other pig-dogs!

Huh? What, Comrade Gnomunist? Oh.

Uh, nevermind, Dice, Terquem, everybody, nothing to worry about. You can all go back to yelling at dear Sissyl. Nothing to see here.

It's too late, Doodlebug; I named names.


[Smacks Dicey]


Well, gobbo, it seems the yelling is over for now.

The snow is falling. It is time to bury the dead.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Dicey the House Goblin wrote:
Comrade Anklebiter wrote:

You're next, Dice! After Terquem and all you other pig-dogs!

Huh? What, Comrade Gnomunist? Oh.

Uh, nevermind, Dice, Terquem, everybody, nothing to worry about. You can all go back to yelling at dear Sissyl. Nothing to see here.

It's too late, Doodlebug; I named names.

We ARE watching you, citizen.

No one escapes the sight of the Regime.

<Steps back into the shadows while pointing at his eyes. Then trips on a step and ruins the moment>

By Gnomsky! This I why I keep telling everyone back home we shouldn't be working with goblins!

<Crawls away into hiding>


Comrade Anklebiter wrote:

Comrade Le Couard, as a representative of French socialism and the Bellflower Network, I humbly apologize for stepping on your sexy feet.

If you will join me and the Commonwealth Party of Galt (M-L) in an international general strike against environmental degradation and capitalism and Terquem's violation of intellectual copyright laws, I'd be much obliged.

Small-sized humanoids of all lands, unite!

It reminds me that I meant (but forgot) to congratulate you on the way you handled your boss some days ago, about your female coworker. Proud day to be you, or something like that.


Smarnil le couard wrote:
It reminds me that I meant (but forgot) to congratulate you on the way you handled your boss some days ago, about your female coworker. Proud day to be you, or something like that.

Incoherent yelling until the stooges do what I say! It is the Anklebiter way! Too bad it doesn't work all the time...

Merci beaucoups, camarade.


Man, I'm running out of things to do on my vacation. I did all of the things I could do during the week earlier in the week and now I'm just waiting for the weekend so I can debauch all over again.

Well, if I'm not here, I'll be watching the second season of The Walking Dead...


Comrade Anklebiter wrote:

Man, I'm running out of things to do on my vacation. I did all of the things I could do during the week earlier in the week and now I'm just waiting for the weekend so I can debauch all over again.

Well, if I'm not here, I'll be watching the second season of The Walking Dead...

Ooh, watch it! It gets pretty interesting, and there are some awesomely nasty scenes.


Yeah, it's pretty great. I'm taking a bit of a breather.

Spoiler:
Morning after pills, walkers in the barn, little girl lost, oh my!!


Comrade Anklebiter wrote:
Man, I'm running out of things to do on my vacation. I did all of the things I could do during the week earlier in the week and now I'm just waiting for the weekend so I can debauch all over again.

Maybe you should work on a scheme to get another one ?


At the moment the scheme is just to wait until May and pick three more weeks.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Comrade Anklebiter wrote:
At the moment the scheme is just to wait until May and pick three more weeks.

Machiavellian ! I love it !

The Exchange

Comrade Anklebiter wrote:

You're next, Dice! After Terquem and all you other pig-dogs!

Huh? What, Comrade Gnomunist? Oh.

Uh, nevermind, Dice, Terquem, everybody, nothing to worry about. You can all go back to yelling at dear Sissyl. Nothing to see here.

Passes Goblin Comrade a positron tactical fish sandwich in brown paper bag.

"Do not detonate until you are clear of the fifty Gnome blast radius."

The Exchange

Comrade Anklebiter wrote:

Man, I'm running out of things to do on my vacation. I did all of the things I could do during the week earlier in the week and now I'm just waiting for the weekend so I can debauch all over again.

Well, if I'm not here, I'll be watching the second season of The Walking Dead...

Where are you? if near a beach get yourself a pack of welding rods and big long steel rods and pop down the beach before an electrical storm.

Make lightning glass: insert the welding rods in the sand at 45 degrees in a circle facing inward and put some big metal poles up around it and take wire with alligator clips and connect the welding rods to the poles so when lightning strikes it activates the welding rods and melts glass in the shape of a bowl.


Problem with fighting the gnomunists is that they could subject you to a gnome invasion...

The Exchange

Sissyl wrote:
Problem with fighting the gnomunists is that they could subject you to a gnome invasion...

I know the secret of their origin: Gnomes are earth elementals...they can move through earth like a fish through water.


Political power comes from the barrel of a Lantan gun.

Vive le Bachuan!

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Sissyl wrote:
So because I tell you I am not convinced, I let my whims define reality? Because I am not a climatologist, I don't get to have a dissenting opinion?

You're fully allowed to have a dissenting opinion. But let me ask you this, is the person who's never read anything more mature than the New York Daily News equally qualified to render an opinion on the safety of a nuclear power plant as a trained nuclear engineer?

Climatology is a science which draws on diverse fields such as meterology, biology, and geology, and to a minor amount, astronomy, when one considers all the factors that go into the engine of climate. Learning the trade involves a fairly rigourous amount of schoolwork. One can acquire a casual understanding by reading basic texts, but climate modeling is not a simple cake to bake.

Americans understandably have a skeptical and frequently reductionist approach to science. They are predisposed to finding simple answers to problems and generally mistrust those they see as "complicating things".

Unfortunately somethings don't lend themselves to simple reduction. Climate science is one of them. What we can see is studies of major climatic shifts in the past and make comparisons to our present situation.

One of the things that's different about this shift as I understand it, is it's speed compared to similar shifts which occured in the past due to natural processes. (excluding things like events which occured due to massive meteor strikes and supervolcanoes in the Yellowstone Class).

One of the things that's going considerably faster than usual is the CO2 buildup. This is something that can be graphed along with our industrial activity.

One of the things we can also graph is sea level, which rise is a documented fact. Sea levels have risen a few feet in my lifetime and the higher sea level directly impacted on why Hurricane Sandy was such a destructive storm last year, more so than the same storm would have been decades ago. We can chart the number of tropical depressions per year that achieve name status and that number is also going up. Now we can either ignore all these changes or seek to do something about them.

As time progresses our options become fewer but we're still far from the point where we should just fold our hands and give up.


I apologize in advance for being harsh here, but I honestly think the climate hysteric view that holding the Right Views allows you to lecture people has gone just a bit too far now.

I know enough about science, indeed, have done enough research myself, to know what kind of errors are okay and not. Don't equate me with any uneducated yokel, and I resent that implication. Also, I am not an american.

This chart shows pretty clearly that you are a very, very old person. Congratulations on reaching your EXTREMELY advanced age. Is this an example of letting whims dictate reality, would you say?

Science worth the name is reductionist in nature. Reductionism means that the whole is equal to the sum of the parts AND counting their various interrelationships. Holism means there is something else as well, that the whole is MORE than the sum of the parts and their respective relationships. Like... yeah, we can measure all this stuff, but to understand, there is a True Message, a Holy Central Tenet that you Must Understand and Accept to Believe the Right Way. Needless to say, all that does is clothe religion in the trappings of science, which can only bring harm to human understanding of the phenomenon in question.

Correlation does not equate causation. Just because you can chart CO2 buildup along with our industrial development doesn't mean causation is true. Otherwise, the known increase in storks would be the probable cause of increased worldwide nativity, and the frequency of pirates would be a leading cause of global temperature increase.

Seriously... if what you write is your argumentation against what I say, stop limiting your information sources to New York Daily Times and read up on some basic principles of science.


Sissyl wrote:

...which was even claimed by the climate hysterics only two years ago to be untrue. They were very clear on this: There is NO increased frequency of storms over the last decades, rather a bit fewer ones.

Then a few big storms with media coverage happen, and suddenly each one of them is direct, incontrovertible proof of the AGW hypothesis.

Climatolgists have been warning of increased levels of extreme weather for years and years.

IPCC Third Assessment Report "Climate Change 2001" wrote:


Models project that increasing atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases result in changes in frequency, intensity, and duration of extreme events, such as more hot days, heat waves, heavy precipitation events, and fewer cold days. Many of these projected changes would lead to increased risks of floods and droughts in many regions, and predominantly adverse impacts on ecological systems, socio-economic sectors, and human health (see Table SPM-2 for details). High resolution modeling studies suggest that peak wind and precipitation intensity of tropical cyclones are likely to increase over some areas. There is insufficient information on how very small-scale extreme weather phenomena (e.g., thunderstorms, tornadoes, hail, hailstorms, and lightning) may change.

Sovereign Court

What I still don't understand is how someone can accept CO2 build up and then suggest it'll sort it self out. I'm sure the other pollutants like lead, arsenic, mercury, or even radiation will sort themselves out as well . . . but I suppose the difference there is that those pollutants leave corpses.


Guy Humual wrote:
What I still don't understand is how someone can accept CO2 build up and then suggest it'll sort it self out. I'm sure the other pollutants like lead, arsenic, mercury, or even radiation will sort themselves out as well . . . but I suppose the difference there is that those pollutants leave corpses.

There are sinks.

Natural processes that remove atmospheric carbon dioxide.

They are in principle correct that levels of atmospheric carbon will 'sort themselves out. However, that would require that both Anthropogenic CO2 producing activities and natural sources of CO2 reduce to a level below that which natural sinks can remove each year from the atmosphere. Even if that where to happen, it would require some time to take place.

However, I think your slightly misrepresenting them. I think from what I have seen, such argument are usually much more along the lines of "we don't need to worry about CO2 because natural systems wouldn't let it run out of control"

Ofcaurse the answer to any such silliness is...Venus.


Most likely they're right. We could be on track for a runaway greenhouse effect ala Venus, but I don't think any of the models suggest that.

Short of that, CO2 build up will sort itself out. Not really a problem at all. As some of the deniers are also fond of pointing out, the earth's been much warmer than it is now in the past.

Of course, it'll take 10s or 100s of thousands of years to sort out, if not longer, and won't really start until we stop pumping the carbon into the atmosphere, either because we wise up, run out of fossil fuels or crash back to a pre-industrial level. From the planetary point of view, that's just part of the feedback loop. Just the natural systems taking care of the problem. The rapid change will also wipe out a lot of species that can't move or change fast enough to cope, but that's OK too. Just more open niches for new species to evolve into.

From the right point of view, it's not really a big deal.

Sovereign Court

Of course there are tons of natural sinks, but there are also plenty of natural producers besides the burning of fossil fuel, and the levels of greenhouse gasses we see in the atmosphere would seem to suggest that these sinks aren't able to keep up.


thejeff wrote:

Most likely they're right. We could be on track for a runaway greenhouse effect ala Venus, but I don't think any of the models suggest that.

Short of that, CO2 build up will sort itself out. Not really a problem at all. As some of the deniers are also fond of pointing out, the earth's been much warmer than it is now in the past.

Of course, it'll take 10s or 100s of thousands of years to sort out, if not longer, and won't really start until we stop pumping the carbon into the atmosphere, either because we wise up, run out of fossil fuels or crash back to a pre-industrial level. From the planetary point of view, that's just part of the feedback loop. Just the natural systems taking care of the problem. The rapid change will also wipe out a lot of species that can't move or change fast enough to cope, but that's OK too. Just more open niches for new species to evolve into.

From the right point of view, it's not really a big deal.

I don't think we are in disagreement at all.

The only point I would make is your in danger of falling into an naturalistic fallacy.

Just because all this is natural on the right scale, does not mean it is something we really want to be living through ;)

Sovereign Court

thejeff wrote:
From the right point of view, it's not really a big deal.

Well as George Carlin said "The planet is fine, the people are f@$ked"

I should point out that it's the late George Carline so there's going to be bad language.


Sissyl wrote:


Correlation does not equate causation. Just because you can chart CO2 buildup along with our industrial development doesn't mean causation is true. Otherwise, the known increase in storks would be the probable cause of increased worldwide nativity, and the frequency of pirates would be a leading cause of global temperature increase.

Ok...Then what is causing the increase in CO2? And why does the isotopic signature match what we would expect if the majority of the input was from burning fossil fuels?

CO2 increases and fossil fuels


Sissyl wrote:
Correlation does not equate causation. Just because you can chart CO2 buildup along with our industrial development doesn't mean causation is true. Otherwise, the known increase in storks would be the probable cause of increased worldwide nativity, and the frequency of pirates would be a leading cause of global temperature increase.

CO2's nature as a greenhouse gas is a fairly well understood principle. We know it absorbs longwave radiation, we can measure it's ability to do so and we know that this increases it's temperature. We've known it's a greenhouse gas since the mid-1800's.

With various measuring tools on satellites we can actually measure which types of molecules are absorbing energy. We did this and found that CO2 had increased how much longwave radiation it was absorbing. Now, when something absorbs longwave radiation it gets hotter. When it gets hotter it starts emitting longwave radiation. Now the CO2 in our atmosphere is emitting longwave radiation and a significant portion of this is coming back to Earth, though some does escape into space.

Satellites are measuring less longwave radiation escaping the atmosphere. Surface measurements are showing increased longwave radiation. We know that CO2 absorbs and emits longwave radiation in a greenhouse manner, we've tested it in labs. We know the increased CO2 is from anthropogenic sources.

This isn't correlation, this is causation.


Guys... seriously. Get a grip. I have said what I intend to say in this. I answered LazarX because I found his insinuations offensive and his arguments pathetic. You keep claiming that I don't have the right to question the climatologists' arguments because I am not a climatologist myself, and yet even someone showing a severe lack of basic scirntific principles feels he is entitled to lecture me. You act like piranhas. If someone dares to question the tenets of the Church of the Holy AGW, you keep beating them over the head with the latest Scripture without even trying to understand what your victim is saying. I don't want to hear your Scripture anymore. Your behaviour is apalling and is, to be absolutely honest, quite unlikely to convince anyone. Even if you are Right.

The Exchange

So OZONE formed in electrical storms falls in rain (and is 3 times the amount recommended for exposure 90 micro-grams/cubic centimetre causing crimping in the red blood cell) and is heavier than water so it must settle to the bottom of the ocean and push the ocean upward.

The Exchange

Sissyl wrote:
Guys... seriously. Get a grip. I have said what I intend to say in this. I answered LazarX because I found his insinuations offensive and his arguments pathetic. You keep claiming that I don't have the right to question the climatologists' arguments because I am not a climatologist myself, and yet even someone showing a severe lack of basic scirntific principles feels he is entitled to lecture me. You act like piranhas. If someone dares to question the tenets of the Church of the Holy AGW, you keep beating them over the head with the latest Scripture without even trying to understand what your victim is saying. I don't want to hear your Scripture anymore. Your behaviour is apalling and is, to be absolutely honest, quite unlikely to convince anyone. Even if you are Right.

It is not just AGW, you gotta be on the "correct" side of all issues or you get that treatment


No. AGW is magnitudes worse than more or less everything else.


Not really. We jump on Andrew's nonsense all the time. (Well, I don't, cause I've given up on him.)

You say stupid stuff on line you get jumped on. You do it too. You just have a different definition of "stupid stuff".

AGW, Gun Control, Creationism, racism, welfare/libertarianism. All sorts of things are flashpoints. Hell, you get the same kind of treatment for being on the wrong side of RPG edition wars.

For the record, I was going to jump in on the "feet of sea level rise" thing, but then I saw you'd already done it and he didn't come back and defend it. I don't know where he got that from. Sea level rise has actually been higher on the US East Coast apparently, but it's still a matter of inches not feet.


I don't recall ever jumping on Madame Sissyl. Well, except during the drug-fuelled orgy and that was consensual.

Goblins do it in the street!


Regarding my view of the Church of AGW: once someone loses their trust in you, it doesn't much matter what data you bring up. It will keep being regarded as suspect, even if you start telling the truth. The IPCC and other parts of environmentalism have lied enough times and blatantly enough that they can go die somewhere for all I care. I have not been impressed by their previous doomsaying, which would happen in fifty years, so why should I think they suddenly are right? They are STILL shouting about something that will happen in fifty years. You know why? Because anything more close to home will generate data that could prove them wrong.

I often wish I was a Believer. I am not.

Still... I am well aware it will not matter what I think. The environmentalists will get their totalitarian zero-growth society. Maybe one day when you are standing in the bread queues, you will think back on this discussion.


Sissyl wrote:
Still... I am well aware it will not matter what I think. The environmentalists will get their totalitarian zero-growth society.

Hmm. I doubt it.

Quote:
Maybe one day when you are standing in the bread queues, you will think back on this discussion.

I think either way (totalitarian zero-growth society or democratic capitalist rapaciously growing, slash-and-burning everything its way society) our grandkids are going to be much more familiar with bread-lines than we are.


Sissyl wrote:

Regarding my view of the Church of AGW: once someone loses their trust in you, it doesn't much matter what data they bring up. It will keep being regarded as suspect, even if you start telling the truth. The IPCC and other parts of environmentalism have lied enough times and blatantly enough that they can go die somewhere for all I care. I have not been impressed by their previous doomsaying, which would happen in fifty years, so why should I think they suddenly are right? They are STILL shouting about something that will happen in fifty years. You know why? Because anything more close to home will generate data that could prove them wrong.

I often wish I was a Believer. I am not.

Still... I am well aware it will not matter what I think. The environmentalists will get their totalitarian zero-growth society. Maybe one day when you are standing in the bread queues, you will think back on this discussion.

I think you've been lied to, but I don't think it's been the IPCC. It's wherever you've been getting the climate denier nonsense from. You've been hitting pretty much the standard lines: ClimateGate emails, hockey stick, "But it snowed in <warm place>".

We're no getting a totalitarian zero-growth society from the IPCC. At least not until economies start collapsing from the results of climate change, since we're probably not going to do anything but keep burning fossil fuels faster and faster. Once it's undeniable and panic sets in, along with famines and huge population displacements, all bets are off.

If you're still around when the climate gets bad, maybe you'll think back on this discussion.


Cute, thejeff. Cute, but no cigar. Climategate is a big deal. The Hockey stick is a clear fabrication. Ignoring that is stupid. Have you read the Climategate emails?

Liberty's Edge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber

Yes. Have you read the investigation? Have you read all the emails and not just the cherrypicked and quotemined ones? You are aware the scientists in question were invetigated and cleared of wrongdoing, right? Oh, wait, that's probably part of the AGW conspiracy. Just in case, I present an article on said invesitgation.

And I'll now save my head from this particular wall. You're right, the experts are wrong and we're idiots for not seeing it as clearly as you do. Got it.


Sissyl wrote:
Cute, thejeff. Cute, but no cigar. Climategate is a big deal. The Hockey stick is a clear fabrication. Ignoring that is stupid. Have you read the Climategate emails?

What is significant about the climate gate emails?

Is it the fact that no less than seven major investigations into the emails and the scientists involved found no evidence of academic fraud?

That only minor methadological issues where found(by the way, the researchs welcomed this review)?

Was it that the only real criticism of CRU from these investions was that they where not open enough, and been unpleasant about some deniers in private emails between colligues, and that even those reports which where critical of this, stated that the behaviour was largely understandable, given the levels of harressment the group had been subjected to by climate change deniers?

Or perhaps it is the fact that climate change deniers are so desperate to blacken the name of legitimate climate research that they will illegally access academic systems and distribute researcher private emails to one another.

Or is it perhaps that climate change deniers are so ignorant of the subject that they actually think the climate gate emails are some kind of proof of malfeasance.

i'd love to know specifically what you think the problem is, that the emails highlight.


omg the scientists used the word trick! they're tricking us! Not describing ... a perfectly legitimate technique for normalizing data to a better standard in a vernacular instead of technical terms. We all know scientists want to be 100% precise all day every day so they NEVER let their guard down and let vernacular into their speech.. or thoughts...

They also have pointy ears.

Liberty's Edge

Pathfinder Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber

I thought those were horns.

301 to 350 of 1,314 << first < prev | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Gamer Life / Off-Topic Discussions / How sustainable is our current model of civilization? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.