Succubus in a grapple.


Rules Questions

1,551 to 1,600 of 2,087 << first < prev | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | next > last >>

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Kileanna wrote:
Don't die on me, thread! There is still too much fun we can have together!

After a suitable rest, the thread rises up again. This time its post-count is even bigger than it was before!


4 people marked this as a favorite.

So, people kept comparing succubi and erinyes. Some also bring in other possibly seductive creatures, like Lillends.

But I don't remember anyone trying to make a list of creatures that have a focus on seduction or "acts of passion" explicitly mentioned. So, let's try. So far, I found...
Gancanagh,
Vendenopterix,
Fungus Queen,
Pairaka,
Erodaemon.
And Green Hags, I guess, but I'm not linking to them.
And of course succubi, which need no link.

Anything big I missed? I didn't count unique beings, so Arshea is out.

Some things I noticed:
And Gancanagh are the only ones referred to as male, but most of these have some shapechange ability.
Also, we got one CG, one CN, two NE, and three (counting green hags and succubi) CE entries, so while there's some alignment weighting, evil has no monopoly on "grappling".

Now to the interesting part:
What would be the easiest way to set up a grappling competition with all of these as competitors? And how much protection (death ward, immunity to disease against the pairaka (and maybe in general, in this kind of contest) would you need?


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Suggest it to Nocticula as a way to pass the time for an afternoon? Let her make the arrangements.

As for protection, that depends. Are you concerned about half-fiends? Half-azatas?


5 people marked this as a favorite.
Lathiira wrote:
Suggest it to Nocticula as a way to pass the time for an afternoon? Let her make the arrangements.

I'm throwing this in as a call-out in my WotR game. When they get to the palace and the big meeting "You interrupted a very important series of experiments."


3 people marked this as a favorite.
CrimsonVixen wrote:
Lathiira wrote:
Suggest it to Nocticula as a way to pass the time for an afternoon? Let her make the arrangements.
I'm throwing this in as a call-out in my WotR game. When they get to the palace and the big meeting "You interrupted a very important series of experiments."

Ooo, can I have a cameo? Please? Pretty please? With a cherry and sugar and whip cream on top?


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Maybe I should rephrase that last to 'With a cherry? And sugar? And a whip? And cream? On top?' LOL


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Rajnish Umbra, Shadow Caller wrote:

So, people kept comparing succubi and erinyes. Some also bring in other possibly seductive creatures, like Lillends.

But I don't remember anyone trying to make a list of creatures that have a focus on seduction or "acts of passion" explicitly mentioned. So, let's try. So far, I found...

Try to say Vendenopterix in a grapple...see?, it's just not as sexy as succubus in a grapple.


4 people marked this as a favorite.
Lathiira wrote:
Maybe I should rephrase that last to 'With a cherry? And sugar? And a whip? And cream? On top?' LOL

A good example on how punctuation changes everything xD


4 people marked this as a favorite.
Lathiira wrote:
CrimsonVixen wrote:
Lathiira wrote:
Suggest it to Nocticula as a way to pass the time for an afternoon? Let her make the arrangements.
I'm throwing this in as a call-out in my WotR game. When they get to the palace and the big meeting "You interrupted a very important series of experiments."
Ooo, can I have a cameo? Please? Pretty please? With a cherry and sugar and whip cream on top?

Consider the cameo approved. Helping out the Queen of the Succubi. I'll stat something up for a suitable encounter when we get to the meat of book four.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

So, how well could a nymph and succubus work together as a pair of seduction focused bounty hunters? Does every bounty become a fun catch?


1 person marked this as a favorite.

This must be a thing!


2 people marked this as a favorite.

"I'd buy that for a dollar!"

If you recognize that reference, here's a succubus-shaped cookie.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Hannibull Rektor wrote:

"I'd buy that for a dollar!"

If you recognize that reference, here's a succubus-shaped cookie.

Robocop! Now gimme dat bikkie!


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Garbage-Tier Waifu wrote:
Hannibull Rektor wrote:

"I'd buy that for a dollar!"

If you recognize that reference, here's a succubus-shaped cookie.

Robocop! Now gimme dat bikkie!

I'd rather just get a bike...


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Freehold DM wrote:
I'd rather just get a bike...

Hm. A Succubus on a motorcycle. Leather-clad, of course. Revving, inviting you to hop on...

You'd have to grapple her just to hold on for dear life!


2 people marked this as a favorite.

*hands Garbage-Tier Waifu the succucookie* Stay out of trouble!


3 people marked this as a favorite.
VRMH wrote:
Freehold DM wrote:
I'd rather just get a bike...

Hm. A Succubus on a motorcycle. Leather-clad, of course. Revving, inviting you to hop on...

You'd have to grapple her just to hold on for dear life!

Kickstarter Sophie from Reaper. I need to finish painting it, and then the hard part, finding a game where a latex-clad succubus on a motorcycle is an appropriate character.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

This is the only thread in the Rules forum that doesn't cause me pain. I just get a funny feeling, like when I used to climb the rope in gym class back in middle school.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
CrimsonVixen wrote:
Lathiira wrote:
CrimsonVixen wrote:
Lathiira wrote:
Suggest it to Nocticula as a way to pass the time for an afternoon? Let her make the arrangements.
I'm throwing this in as a call-out in my WotR game. When they get to the palace and the big meeting "You interrupted a very important series of experiments."
Ooo, can I have a cameo? Please? Pretty please? With a cherry and sugar and whip cream on top?
Consider the cameo approved. Helping out the Queen of the Succubi. I'll stat something up for a suitable encounter when we get to the meat of book four.

You're too kind, mistress. If you need my existing stats, PM me as I still have them from the school :)


3 people marked this as a favorite.
CrimsonVixen wrote:
VRMH wrote:
Freehold DM wrote:
I'd rather just get a bike...

Hm. A Succubus on a motorcycle. Leather-clad, of course. Revving, inviting you to hop on...

You'd have to grapple her just to hold on for dear life!

Kickstarter Sophie from Reaper. I need to finish painting it, and then the hard part, finding a game where a latex-clad succubus on a motorcycle is an appropriate character.

Iron Gods.


4 people marked this as a favorite.
Trinam wrote:
CrimsonVixen wrote:
VRMH wrote:
Freehold DM wrote:
I'd rather just get a bike...

Hm. A Succubus on a motorcycle. Leather-clad, of course. Revving, inviting you to hop on...

You'd have to grapple her just to hold on for dear life!

Kickstarter Sophie from Reaper. I need to finish painting it, and then the hard part, finding a game where a latex-clad succubus on a motorcycle is an appropriate character.
Iron Gods.

...

...

...

*scribble scribble scribble*


6 people marked this as a favorite.
CrimsonVixen wrote:
VRMH wrote:
Freehold DM wrote:
I'd rather just get a bike...

Hm. A Succubus on a motorcycle. Leather-clad, of course. Revving, inviting you to hop on...

You'd have to grapple her just to hold on for dear life!

Kickstarter Sophie from Reaper. I need to finish painting it, and then the hard part, finding a game where a latex-clad succubus on a motorcycle is an appropriate character.

Hard... or hard-core!?

In fact, there's plenty of fun to go around!

Even with Paizo-only, just grappling grabbing a few hints of things, you can grab just about any AP, re-fluff it, and you're good to go!

Don't, uh... don't read anything into the language of this post.

>.>

*cough*

Rajnish Umbra, Shadow Caller wrote:
And of course succubi, which need no link.

You are a daggum liar, and thus a bad person, and should feel bad.

>:I

(Totally awesome for the rest of the post, but otherwise bad. You know.)

That said, keep this in mind as far as the alignment charts go: the fungus queen is essentially just a variant/corrupted succubus-spawn, so it's questionable how "separate" they would be, in counting toward or against the number of chaotic evils. While they are a fundamentally different creature, when asking how much evil is represented by a concept, the fungus queens are grown from the corpse of succubi. Similarly, I'd be cautious about citing the half-succubus (aka "Alu-fiend" - see below).

Anyway, to add to your list...

I added the unique ones, because they kept coming up. This is an ill-organized list, as I wasn't spending much time on it. Mostly, I just grabbed things that looked kind of relevant from various word searches on d20pfsrd.com... nonetheless, hope it helps!

UNIQUE:
- Spirit of Adoration
- Menotherian
- Devil, Lilith (3PP)
- Devil, the Desire (3PP)
- Devil, Demoriel (3PP)
- Devil, Belial
- Demon, Nocticula
- Demon, Caizel (3PP)
- Demon, Beluiri (3PP)
- Arshea

TEMPLATE
- Half-Succubus

NON-UNIQUE {some are dubious or "weak"}:
- Alraune
- Angel, Dapsara {more "beauty-in-general" than "desire" but still}
- Demon, Cambion
- Demon, Incubus {eh; they're still horrid in every way}
- Demon, Kithangian
- Demon, Lilitu {only some}
- Devil, Addiction {dubious}
- Doppleganger {dubious}
- Dream Eater
- Drow (also?)
- Fey, Encantado {dubious}
- Fey, Fossergrim
- Fey, Nereid
- Rusalka
- Ecstasy Feeder
- Hag, Green (see also, hags in general)
- Harpy
- Inphidian, Dancer
- Maenad
- Medusa
- Satyr
- Seilenos
- Selkie

DUBIOUS CONNECTION
- Lustspawn
- Fleshdreg
- Psychic Stalker
- Intellect Devourer
- Fey, Forlarren
- Ooze, Emotion

OTHER LUSTFUL CREATURES
- Gorynych


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Lathiira wrote:
Maybe I should rephrase that last to 'With a cherry? And sugar? And a whip? And cream? On top?' LOL

Can I get dibs on the concession stand?

Oh, and be careful at the rumble. There are rumors of a witch with the cook people hex about. I hear she's giving out succucookies. Make sure you leave with everyone you came with.

/cevah


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Cevah wrote:
Lathiira wrote:
Maybe I should rephrase that last to 'With a cherry? And sugar? And a whip? And cream? On top?' LOL

Can I get dibs on the concession stand?

Oh, and be careful at the rumble. There are rumors of a witch with the cook people hex about. I hear she's giving out succucookies. Make sure you leave with everyone you came with.

/cevah

I thought you already had the contract for concessions!


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Lathiira wrote:
Cevah wrote:
Lathiira wrote:
Maybe I should rephrase that last to 'With a cherry? And sugar? And a whip? And cream? On top?' LOL

Can I get dibs on the concession stand?

Oh, and be careful at the rumble. There are rumors of a witch with the cook people hex about. I hear she's giving out succucookies. Make sure you leave with everyone you came with.

/cevah

I thought you already had the contract for concessions!

I did. But that was for the previous round you were involved in. Don't you remember? This is a whole 'nother event. Hopefully better attended, cause if it doesn't have many viewers, how will I ever make a profit?

/cevah

Sneaks off to see if he can get a better diviner than last time.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

Yeah, but while that was last round cevah, I didn't think the contract would be up for renewal till 2020 or so. *checks fine print* Nope, see, you're still good.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

I'd have thought nymphs would be a natural link to add to those lists, yet neither has them? What gives?

After all, nymphs and succubi go together like... well, you get the idea.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
TheAlicornSage wrote:
nymphs and succubi go together like... well, you get the idea.

...like they're grappling?


4 people marked this as a favorite.

I have it on good authority that nymphs like to play and tease. However, they are conflict-averse. A grappling session where levels can be drained would seem like combat to them.

However, having them parade the cards indicating the round number in a multi-round event, or single rounds for many pairs, is another matter. Wonder if I can get them to assist in the booth. Nah. Having all the customers have to touch everything because they got blinded won't help. Better to have a succubus do the assisting and modeling.

/cevah

PS: @Lathiira, I think I overlooked the fine print. Thanks.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Cevah wrote:


PS: @Lathiira, I think I overlooked the fine print. Thanks.

No problem. Always happy to help a friend!


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Cevah wrote:

I have it on good authority that nymphs like to play and tease. However, they are conflict-averse. A grappling session where levels can be drained would seem like combat to them.

However, having them parade the cards indicating the round number in a multi-round event, or single rounds for many pairs, is another matter. Wonder if I can get them to assist in the booth. Nah. Having all the customers have to touch everything because they got blinded won't help. Better to have a succubus do the assisting and modeling.

/cevah

PS: @Lathiira, I think I overlooked the fine print. Thanks.

Also, though they go together, that is because they are both "classic beauties" in the original monster manuals/Bestiaries. Nymphs themselves are never particularly described as lustful or lusty; it's a similar reason to why I left dryads off the list, despite the fact that many (such as that bestiary one and the one in Serpent's Skull and Kingmaker) being implied to be great beauties/not averse to using their wiles. Similarly, the bloudwedds, I think (though I'm much rockier on that creature).

Anyway, compare that to, say, the nereid I linked above which explicitly affects those sexually attracted to her (or those that could be). Hence the inclusion of the nereid instead of the other three - beauty and charm need not go with sexual attraction (though they certainly help!).

Certainly could be added - but as I said, the list above was ill-organized and the results of simple word-searches hastily slapped together (lust, desire, sex, gender, and maybe something else? I do t recall).

And now, alas, I'm on my phone... so not from me.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

... but don't let that stop you!

(Or -however temporarily - kill the momentum of this thread...)


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Oh, hey, AlgeaNymph: if you happen to have it, could you PM me a link to that thing I wrote/typed up for you in someone's thread that one time? Also include a reminder if I missed anything? My memory is spotty. Also, I might repost it here, if it's valid.

That said, I'm not likely to be able to post it soon...


2 people marked this as a favorite.

When a succubus is grappling a porcupine, why she's not taking any damage from the quills? I know she has Damage Reduction, but what actually happens?


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Adjoint wrote:
When a succubus is grappling a porcupine, why she's not taking any damage from the quills? I know she has Damage Reduction, but what actually happens?

I bet it feels more like a bath loofah and the spines give pleasurable stimulation.

/cevah


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Adjoint wrote:
When a succubus is grappling a porcupine, why she's not taking any damage from the quills? I know she has Damage Reduction, but what actually happens?
Cevah wrote:

I bet it feels more like a bath loofah and the spines give pleasurable stimulation.

/cevah

Succubus, Porcupine

Succubus' CMB is +11, Porcupine's CMD is 9. The Porcupine is being pinned. The tail slap being 1d3 damage, on a critical will do 6 damage at most(20/x2), can't get through the Succubi's DR 10/Cold iron or Good(Porcupine is True Neutral).

My money is on a sensation similar to a Wartenberg Wheel or Vampire Gloves.

Liberty's Edge

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber

So, a succubus can keep some porcupines in a container and grab one when she showers?

A pinned Porcupine piercing the Succubus as she patiently drains the poor prickly loofah.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Well, with all those quills, she might be able to use one as a hairbrush I suppose.

For that matter, now I have this image of a succubus keeping a porcupine as an odd pet. Might have to put this into a campaign at some point....


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Is it okay to use Summon Monster just to get a likely outsider's number so you can call them later?


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Umbral Reaver wrote:
Is it okay to use Summon Monster just to get a likely outsider's number so you can call them later?

Since those spells let you do more than send the creature into combat if you communicate with them, why not? You could fill your little black book with any number of creatures that way.


4 people marked this as a favorite.
Umbral Reaver wrote:
Is it okay to use Summon Monster just to get a likely outsider's number so you can call them later?

Depends on the GM of the game you're in. I've had to tell my players that "Summon Booty Call" is not a spell in the book.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Umbral Reaver wrote:
Is it okay to use Summon Monster just to get a likely outsider's number so you can call them later?

Sure, but if an outsider gives you their true name (the outsider equivalent of a number) just because you've summoned them, then they're either very stupid or have some ulterior motives. Although the common name may suffice, as with Daemons.

You know what, I've never considered exactly what you can direct your summoned monsters to do. The description of Summon Monster mostly talks about directing them to attack with the understanding that they will obey you, regardless of, say, alignment differences. But it also states that "you can direct it not to attack, to attack particular enemies, or to perform other actions".
Does giving out information, including names (true or otherwise), count as "performing other actions"? I doubt that's the intention (that's basically the whole point of Bind Sage, a calling spell), but what is the exact nature of the implicit contract between you and a summoned creature?

Dark Archive

2 people marked this as a favorite.

I think we don't summon actual living outsiders. To get that we have to call them.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
CrimsonVixen wrote:
Umbral Reaver wrote:
Is it okay to use Summon Monster just to get a likely outsider's number so you can call them later?
Depends on the GM of the game you're in. I've had to tell my players that "Summon Booty Call" is not a spell in the book.

But it could be!

PRD wrote:
Independent Research: A wizard can also research a spell independently, duplicating an existing spell or creating an entirely new one. The cost to research a new spell, and the time required, are left up to GM discretion, but it should probably take at least 1 week and cost at least 1,000 gp per level of the spell to be researched. This should also require a number of Spellcraft and Knowledge (arcana) checks.

Someone needs to get to work on this immediately.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Mikaze wrote:

I don't know....I can see a grappler managing a succubus-proof hold...

Attack from behind, grappler's arms up under the succubus' arms, reaching back and pulling those arms back, reach back under the succubus' wings, push them up, hands on the back of the succubus' head, holding that down, pin to the ground,...

After all these years, I hadn't noticed how Mikaze's words can be interpreted totally the opposite he intended to.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Halek wrote:
I think we don't summon actual living outsiders. To get that we have to call them.

The exact flavor of what summoning does isn't made all that clear, but I'm reasonably certain that we're not just creating entities that look and work like outsiders out of thin air. That would be a creation spell, not summoning.

The rules state:
Core Rulebook wrote:
Summoning: a summoning spell instantly brings a creature or object to a place you designate. When the spell ends or is dispelled, a summoned creature is instantly sent back to where it came from, but a summoned object is not sent back unless the spell description specifically indicates this. A summoned creature also goes away if it is killed or if its hit points drop to 0 or lower, but it is not really dead. It takes 24 hours for the creature to reform, during which time it can’t be summoned again.

Everything about this clearly says that you are bringing individual outsiders into this world which simply have a special clause about being sent back when their hit points are depleted. Especially the line about outsiders needing to reform after getting killed while summoned implies that it is an actual, living, individual outsider.

I know James Jacobs once said something different (that the creature is created by the spell), but that's simply not supported by the rules.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Alexandros Satorum wrote:
Mikaze wrote:

I don't know....I can see a grappler managing a succubus-proof hold...

Attack from behind, grappler's arms up under the succubus' arms, reaching back and pulling those arms back, reach back under the succubus' wings, push them up, hands on the back of the succubus' head, holding that down, pin to the ground,...

After all these years, I hadn't noticed how Mikaze's words can be interpreted totally the opposite he intended to.

Tried that with Crimson, forgot about the tail....


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Lathiira wrote:
Alexandros Satorum wrote:
Mikaze wrote:

I don't know....I can see a grappler managing a succubus-proof hold...

Attack from behind, grappler's arms up under the succubus' arms, reaching back and pulling those arms back, reach back under the succubus' wings, push them up, hands on the back of the succubus' head, holding that down, pin to the ground,...

After all these years, I hadn't noticed how Mikaze's words can be interpreted totally the opposite he intended to.
Tried that with Crimson, forgot about the tail....

Ok, picturing Crimson and Lathiira in this scenario...purely for rules reasons...honest! Is it getting warm in here?


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Lathiira wrote:
Alexandros Satorum wrote:
Mikaze wrote:

I don't know....I can see a grappler managing a succubus-proof hold...

Attack from behind, grappler's arms up under the succubus' arms, reaching back and pulling those arms back, reach back under the succubus' wings, push them up, hands on the back of the succubus' head, holding that down, pin to the ground,...

After all these years, I hadn't noticed how Mikaze's words can be interpreted totally the opposite he intended to.
Tried that with Crimson, forgot about the tail....

That tail is a tricky thing isn't it? Certainly can provide a...circumstance bonus to escape artist checks?.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
CrimsonVixen wrote:
Lathiira wrote:
Alexandros Satorum wrote:
Mikaze wrote:

I don't know....I can see a grappler managing a succubus-proof hold...

Attack from behind, grappler's arms up under the succubus' arms, reaching back and pulling those arms back, reach back under the succubus' wings, push them up, hands on the back of the succubus' head, holding that down, pin to the ground,...

After all these years, I hadn't noticed how Mikaze's words can be interpreted totally the opposite he intended to.
Tried that with Crimson, forgot about the tail....
That tail is a tricky thing isn't it? Certainly can provide a...circumstance bonus to escape artist checks?.

That it most certainly did!

1,551 to 1,600 of 2,087 << first < prev | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Rules Questions / Succubus in a grapple. All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.