Two ways: one is to coordinate with the player of the barbarian and have a back story, where due to shared experiences the only magic users he trusts is your witch and the other magus. Or maybe 'tolerates' depending on the circumstances. Maybe you all came from the same tribe or something.
The other way is for him to be an anti-intellectual, not necessarily anti-magic. He hates the magic of wizards and sorcerors because they do things like torture children if it's helpful to them in some way to gain power. The kind of witchery you practice is less about power and more about means to an end, perhaps.
i'd suggest that you explain your magic as purely psycological, and you're merely pretending to cast spells to scare the enemy. if he buys that, all good.
the other option is to have your character get it out in the open, and be very respectful of his dislike/fear of magic ("will you allow me to heal you with my magic?" "i have a spell that can help, but you're going to have to trust me...") and under no circumstances give him reason to doubt your intent.
either way, tread carefully. AM BARBARIAN is not to be trifled with, partcularly if he's right next to your caster.
What's a "AM Barbarian"?
AM BARBARIAN is basically a build of barbarian designed to distroy spellcasters, and who hates anyone who can cast spells with a passion. in this instance the reference means a barbarian who hates spellcasters.
Well if he hates just arcane magic or could be convinced to just hate arcane magic...you can just lie to him and tell him your magic comes from the gods. I mean how will he be able to tell the difference?
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
I second the talk to the player approach. Work together.
I saw someone suggest to think about the "no blocking" rule of improv, as well as the "Yes, and..." technique when dealing with conflicting character concepts. Two scenarios
A: My character hates wizards
B: Well, that's going to be a problem, because my character is a witch (block!)
A: If you play a witch, my character will kill you because he hates wizards, and a witch is basically a wizard, so don't play a witch okay? (block!)
vs.
A: My character is a barbarian who hates wizards
B: (Yes, and) My character is a witch, but maybe I saved your character's life and earned your trust
A: (Yes, and) My barbarian has grown to trust your character... maybe the hates wizards thing is more of a "wizards are guilty until proven innocent, and sometimes when the battle rage is in me I don't ask a lot of questions" thing, rather than an "I will kill every wizard ever starting with you" thing
Bravo for trying to find a solution yourself, a couple of questions.
Is the player actually going to play his concept and kill player characters, or is he just distrustful of spell casters(eg. many people are distrustful of certain asians currently weather thats right or wrong but the number of people who would begin an unprovoked attack is thankfully small, i suspect in brevory just like irl people like that would be imprisoned)?
If so why would the swordlords give him a writ for kingmaker, the AP has a built in GM veto and he should use it, will the GM not deal with it(unprovoked attacks on player characters rarely make for a stable group)?
Has the player of the barbarian suggested any way around the problem, at the end of the day an all melee party can work but then he's dictating what you can and cannot play, i see it as his responsibilityto deal with the problem he's created tbh...
Finally as a witch, i'd just tell him my powers aren't magic they come from my ancestors who stand in <insert made up plane here> at the side of <insert made up patron name here> who ask him to interceed on my hehalf. Really i'm just an expert with some funky tricks.
Or for the magus...
Get the gm to give you some weird Numerian tech, its does nothing but provide your casting ability, a strange blue light shines out from between his armour and on his chest, arms and head sit vaguely spiderlike objects made from a dull blue metal. I had an accident as a child and i was saved by the Numerian priests, it hurts sometimes but look i can do this <casts shocking grasp> isn't that cool?!?
Just a couple of idea's.
Just to add a thought, if you plan on playing a plague patron witch and start animating corpses then i would give a good reason to any good party member to strike you down.
When i played kingmaker my NG ranger didn't allow the wizard to animate dead.
AM BARBARIAN was an exercise in building a powerful character without any spell casting ability. The character uses all caps, speaks in broken english, and is generally smug and badass. Some people think the AM stands for anti-magic but it's just I am being butchered. Many proponents of caster superiority posted various builds designed to "take out" AM BARBARIAN because the AM BARBARIAN method for dealing with castys was to charge any caster looking type individual at extreme distance. AM BARBARIAN doesn't necessarily hate casters the characters mount is a synthesist summoner, the character is just very effective at what it does and the idea devolved into a series of one upsmanship between AM BARBARIAN and other character types most notably casters.
So the other players character while having a back story that does make them hostile to spell casters could cause inter party conflict it's really only a role play issue and you could both probably come up with a solution as to why they would tolerate your use of magic.
Honestly, I'd put it to the barbarian like this.
"I can animate these, the dead bodies of our fallen foes, and send them back at the people who are trying to kill the people we both care about, or we can simply send the people we care about against the people who want to kill them. I, however, want to preserve the lives of the people in our city and if that means I have to be a bad guy to do it, then that is what I will do."
And one could very well hear it like this:
"I can call forth the powers of evil in order to create vile undead abominations out of the bodies of our fallen foes, who are trying to kill the people we both care about, or we can simply lead the good people we care about against the evil people who want to kill us all. I, however, want to preserve the lives of people in our city and not risk our necks, if that means i have to be an evil guy to do it, then that is what i will do."
In other words, there's no requirement in the class to hate magic users, the player has just decided to be a jerk?
Tell the player- "don't be a jerk".
Maybe suggest that a game system where the default assumption is that every party will have an arcane caster isn't really the place to play someone who hates all arcane casters. Some archetypes, hexes, feats, rage powers, etc. are meant for NPCs, not PCs and superstitious is arguably among them.
If two thirds of the party are arcanists and the third player hates arcanists he's the odd man out.
Better yet, what's a PM barbarian?
A better example than Caramon for central character wizard hating in the Dragonlance Chronicles was Sturm Brightblade.
Get the gm to give you some weird Numerian tech, its does nothing but provide your casting ability, a strange blue light shines out from between his armour and on his chest, arms and head sit vaguely spiderlike objects made from a dull blue metal. I had an accident as a child and i was saved by the Numerian priests, it hurts sometimes but look i can do this <casts shocking grasp> isn't that cool?!?
This is a pretty cool idea, actually. I might use it myself! ;)