
LMPjr007 |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

Please, please, make extra, extra sure all these cards are completely error-free. The nature of the product really necessitates that.
If you want a nice add on to the Buff Deck I would suggest our Buff Sheet, best of all it's free. Enjoy!

![]() |

Well, now that the list has been posted, can I request that you change it to 3 columns instead of 4, so the names of the spells/powers don't wrap? It'll make the list a lot easier to read, and it won't even take up more room, since the lack of wrapping should cut the list size down.
Looking at the list, I'm dismayed at how much is missing - Good Hope, Stoneskin, Inspire Competence, all of the cleric domain powers, sorcerer bloodline powers, etc.
Don't get me wrong - it'll still be a useful product, and I'll probably still buy it. But I think we could come up with a big enough "missing card" list for a "Buff Deck 2" product right now.

![]() |

Well, now that the list has been posted, can I request that you change it to 3 columns instead of 4, so the names of the spells/powers don't wrap? It'll make the list a lot easier to read, and it won't even take up more room, since the lack of wrapping should cut the list size down.
I don't see any wrapping, even at four columns.
There again I'm viewing the list on a 1920x1200 display.Looking at the list, I'm dismayed at how much is missing - Good Hope, Stoneskin, Inspire Competence, all of the cleric domain powers, sorcerer bloodline powers, etc.
Don't get me wrong - it'll still be a useful product, and I'll probably still buy it. But I think we could come up with a big enough "missing card" list for a "Buff Deck 2" product right now.
I'll definitely be buying it (not really hard to predict - it comes as part of one of my subscriptions). But I suspect you're probably right that there are whole lot of other buffs that could be there. In fact one could argue that it's precisely the less common ones that should be featured, because those are the ones that will be less familiar to most players. Anyone want to start a thread to collect suggestions?

![]() |

Well, now that the list has been posted, can I request that you change it to 3 columns instead of 4, so the names of the spells/powers don't wrap? It'll make the list a lot easier to read, and it won't even take up more room, since the lack of wrapping should cut the list size down.
Looking at the list, I'm dismayed at how much is missing - Good Hope, Stoneskin, Inspire Competence, all of the cleric domain powers, sorcerer bloodline powers, etc.
Don't get me wrong - it'll still be a useful product, and I'll probably still buy it. But I think we could come up with a big enough "missing card" list for a "Buff Deck 2" product right now.
If you get the PDF of the cards (not sure if they are going to offer one or not yet) Then you can take the blank cards and make the cards yourself? If they do not offer the PDF of the deck then make your own cards with those conditions and powers on them if you like. Not to difficult if you think about it :)

![]() |

These look spectacular. Certainly going to get 2+ of these for my group. I really hope there is a ssecond set to cover the buffs not contained here. Well done, yet again!
ust a coupleof queries:
Out of interest what's on the other side of the cards? Do they look like the box cover?
Where bard abilities left off for a reason?
Is the haste card wrong? haste doesn't add to ranged attacks?

![]() |

Haste doesn't give a bonus to ranged attacks? (Looking at 3rd sample card.)
Please, please, make extra, extra sure all these cards are completely error-free. The nature of the product really necessitates that.
Thanks for pointing that out; that will be fixed before it goes to print (we'll update the sample card later this week, hopefully) and we're taking another pass on the whole set.

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

In there's still time, might you want to add "+6 with 3 or more ranks of Acrobatics" to Total Defense?

![]() |

How do bonuses that change with level appear on the cards - like magic vestments. Any chance of seeing a proview of one of these types of card?
We explain it in the text, and just show the lowest-level buff in the lower stat section. If you use these effects at higher levels, I'd suggest maybe doing up one of the blank cards for the level you're using.

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

I don't suppose the cards are able to be dry erased? That would make the blank cards so much more useful.
Nope. I don't even know if our card printer could *do* that, but if they could, it would jack the price up quite a bit.
The should erase fairly well if you write lightly with soft pencil, though. You could also put them in clear plastic sleeves and write on that with a grease pencil.

ShinHakkaider |

The way that I make item cards reusable is to buy plastic card sleeves (at this point I have quite a few of them) and small postit's. I write what I need to on the post it, then stick it to the card and put them both in the sleeve.
That way when (if it's a disposable item) the PC's use the item and hand it back to me I can just remove the post it.

![]() |

I actually have considered getting some cheap card sleeves and using permanent marker on them for buffs I'll reuse. Then I just have to put the blank card in them and the info should be in the right place. Just change sleeves for different spells. That way I won't have to rewrite every time I use it. At least I hope that'll work. :) We'll see in a few weeks (hopefully)

![]() |

I actually have considered getting some cheap card sleeves and using permanent marker on them for buffs I'll reuse. Then I just have to put the blank card in them and the info should be in the right place. Just change sleeves for different spells. That way I won't have to rewrite every time I use it. At least I hope that'll work. :) We'll see in a few weeks (hopefully)
I have a ton of them from when I played magic in the Airforce that I don't use. I've debated throwing them out constantly, but have somehow not done so yet. So, if you want some Eric, I'll give you some for free. Might give you a reason to come down to one of our sessions. :P

![]() |

From what little I saw of these, they look pretty handy.
But they almost immediately vanished into my wife's gaming supplies, so I guess I'm going to have to pick up a second set if I want to get to use them. Maybe my FLGS will have some on the shelves before Kublacon ...

gbonehead Owner - House of Books and Games LLC |

I picked up a bunch of decks, and while my players were very happy with them, the lack of stuff from books other than the Core Rulebook and APG was rather noticeable.
So ... any chance of a second buff deck that does the same thing but includes material beyond that from the first two books?
Pretty please? I promise to buy 4 decks of that, too :)

moon glum RPG Superstar 2015 Top 8 |
The preview image for the Haste card has been updated.
The preview image for barbarian's rage shows it has giving a +2 *morale* bonus to attack and damage on the bottom of the card. However, the morale bonus is actual to Strength and Constitution (which in turn provides an extra bonus to attack and damage due to a higher strength). The bonus to attack and damage should be unnamed. Likewise, the bonus to Fortitude saves is unnamed, while the bonus to Will saves is a morale bonus.

Joseph Wilson |

The preview image for barbarian's rage shows it has giving a +2 *morale* bonus to attack and damage on the bottom of the card. However, the morale bonus is actual to Strength and Constitution (which in turn provides an extra bonus to attack and damage due to a higher strength). The bonus to attack and damage should be unnamed. Likewise, the bonus to Fortitude saves is unnamed, while the bonus to Will saves is a morale bonus.
+4 morale bonus to str = +2 bonus to att/dmg. They are essentially the same thing. One doesn't happen without the other. At my table, at least, I'd rule exactly as the card says. I don't think it's a mistake.

moon glum RPG Superstar 2015 Top 8 |
moon glum wrote:+4 morale bonus to str = +2 bonus to att/dmg. They are essentially the same thing. One doesn't happen without the other. At my table, at least, I'd rule exactly as the card says. I don't think it's a mistake.
The preview image for barbarian's rage shows it has giving a +2 *morale* bonus to attack and damage on the bottom of the card. However, the morale bonus is actual to Strength and Constitution (which in turn provides an extra bonus to attack and damage due to a higher strength). The bonus to attack and damage should be unnamed. Likewise, the bonus to Fortitude saves is unnamed, while the bonus to Will saves is a morale bonus.
But it is a mistake. If you received another morale bonus to strength, it wouldn't stack, but you can still receive a morale bonus to hit from a spell, say.
It works with other types of bonuses as well. For example, a belt of giant strength gives an enhancement bonus to strength, which provides a strength bonus to hit and damage, but that doesn't mean that you don't also get the enhancement bonus from a magic weapon.

Joseph Wilson |

But it is a mistake. If you received another morale bonus to strength, it wouldn't stack, but you can still receive a morale bonus to hit from a spell, say.
It works with other types of bonuses as well. For example, a belt of giant strength gives an enhancement bonus to strength, which provides a strength bonus to hit and damage, but that doesn't mean that you don't also get the enhancement bonus from a magic weapon.
Well reasoned. I cede the point.