Then why not change the wording to something that makes more sense, like;
Benefit: When you gain a level in a favored class, you may gain +1 Hit Point and +1 Skill Rank, or you can choose an alternate class reward.
That makes it much simpler and explains the intent of the feat without much confusion.
Nevan Oaks wrote:
The feat originally appeared in Curse of the Crimson Throne(specifically A History of Ashes, P. 28) and was worded as such:Prerequisites: Str 15, Two-Weapon Fighting, Weapon
Focus (earth breaker), Weapon Focus (klar)
Benefit: As long as you are fighting with an earth
breaker and a klar (and you make attacks with your klar as
your offhand attack), you can fight with both weapons as if
you were wielding a double weapon, and retain your shield
bonus to your Armor Class granted by your klar. Treat your
klar as a light weapon for the purposes of determining
your total penalty to attack.
I was being sarcastic...
Had something like this just come up in a game I'm running:
Player got hit by an SLA that replicated confusion and also did 1d6 nonlethal/caster level. The player had diehard, and eventually got to the point where his nonlethal exceeded his current HP and knocked him out. our group thought it hilarious that even though he's hard to kill, he can still get KTFO.
Channel Smite requires a melee attack, which means it only works if you're using an attack action against the creature, and it does extra damage=your channel energy damage(will save for half).
The Agile Tongue feat allows you to use melee touch attacks with your tongue, which is only useful if you hold the charge on a spell or some other similar ability.
Now unless you're using the aforementioned ability, and discharging a touch spell(or similar ability)with your tongue, then channel smite won't work with the feat, because it calls it out as being "extra damage" which means if you're using your tongue and doing no damage to begin with, then you can't get the extra damage from channel smite.
Caleb was subjected to the Iron Maiden's curse beforehand, so his Constitution was dropped significantly, and was caught unawares by the Gray ooze. after being dropped to 0 HP and grabbed, he took his final swing at the ooze and hit, but it wasn't enough to kill it, so he started to bleed and also took damage from the Ooze's slime. Unfortunately, the next person on the initiative count was the ooze, so he had no chance to be healed...
Sorry for the necro, but this issue came up in my group recently also, so we're curious about initial grapple rule as well. specifically a flying character was grappled by a huge creature with 15 feet of reach and the grab special ability. The grap triggered off of an Attack of Opportunity, and the flying character was then moved to a square behind the huge creature above a 1000 foot pit(that the creature just climbed out of), and when the flying creature was knocked unconcious, the creature released the grapple and dropped him into the pit.
I've noticed 1 little problem with the bloodrager: at 3rd level, the table states that they get a bloodline power, when according to the text(for the class feature and under all of the bloodlines), they don't get a bloodline power until 4th level. Were they supposed to get something else at 3rd, possibly a bloodline feat, or is it just a dead level?
Tell me where in the CRB it says it has to be a "hand" appendage for the purposes of discharging a touch spell. I'm not seeing it.
A spiked heavy shield does 1d6 damage. Add bashing onto that(which increases the damage die by 2 steps)and it becomes 2d6(1d6->1d8->2d6)
Tiny Coffee Golem wrote:
Start a forest fire, that should round them all up in a blaze.
Create Pit is 1 example, and that way of thinking is metagaming. Besides, Forcecage has a reflex save as well, and can also take you out of a fight.
Iron will and Improved are both really good, but as you said, the bard uses saving finale on you for rerolls, take steel soul instead.
Stand still is a great feat. It would be better if it wasn't a naked combat maneuver check. At least with trip and disarm, you can add your weapon bonus and relevant feats/features to the roll. Stand Still is best employed by brawlers, unfortunately. Another combination you want to consider since you're a 2 weapon warrior is combat reflexes and pin down. keeping an enemy nearby so you can full attack is awesome.
I've only had 1 problem with the TWF Double-Barreled Pistol strategy abuse, and that's because of the following rule:
"If you get multiple attacks because your base attack bonus is high enough, [b]you must make the attacks in order from highest bonus to lowest.[b] If you are using two weapons, you can strike with either weapon first. If you are using a double weapon, you can strike with either part of the weapon first."
Emphasis mine. So let's say you are a 2 pistol gunslinger who uses the glove of storing and weapon cord to maximize your attacks, and you have a bonus of +20/+20/+15/+15/+10/+10/+5 when TWFing(no rapid shot for simplicity's sake), and you fire right, then left, drop left, reload right then shoot. You're now ignoring the rule that says "highest to lowest bonus" by shooting all of your right handed shots, and THEN your left handed shots. By the rules, if you're TWFing, you'd have to alternate hands each shot, in order to go from highest bonus to lowest bonus. That puts a stop to abusing the weapon cord trick, since it's a swift action to retrieve the weapon. The glove of storing, not so much.
well pack tactics increases it to +4 when flanking with your war beast, whereas outflank increases it to +4 when flanking with someone else who has the teamwork feat, so there's no point in giving your war beast the teamwork feat, but you and your other allies might want to still take outflank, so you can get a +4 when flanking with them.
That's a typo. An Earth Breaker is a 2 handed weapon, and a Klar is treated as a light shield, meaning you normally can't wear a Klar while wielding an Earth Breaker. The feat lets you bypass that. Also Birthplace of Legends just recently came out, there's no way it was written with the 3.5 rules in mind.
You mention needing Diehard for getting into the class a few times, but the only feat requirements are: Dodge, Endurance and Toughness. Another thing to point out is if you're enlarged and using the lunge feat with a reach weapon, you can actually hit people that are up to 5 squares away, since being enlarged with a reach weapon lets you hit someone from 15-20 ft away in the first place.
Also why are you so adamant about putting keen on kukris as a dex rogue? landing a crit isn't that great unless you're adding something meaningful to it aside from weapon enhancement damage. If you made them Keen Agile Kukris, it would make more sense, since then you'd be getting your DEX to damage, then doubling it each time you landed a crit, but other than that, and you're fishing for sub-par crits.
I am not sure how holding a weapon, like a Greatsword in hand, is related to wielding, and being able to attack with Armor Spikes, or other non-hand weapons.
You can wield a Greatsword using two hands, but if you hold it only using 1 hand, you're no longer wielding it since it requires 2 hands to wield.
As the subject implies, I have a 1st level Fighter that is multiclassing into Wizard for his 2nd level(Eldritch Knight is the plan), and I was curious about something;
Angry Wiggles wrote:
4a. The bite attack would be at 1.5Xstr IF you did not make any other attacks that round, weapon or otherwise. If you make a weapon attack or unarmed strike, all natural attacks are treated as secondary attacks for that round.
Uh, that's not how it works. You only get 1.5 STR if it is your only natural attack, not if it's the only natural attack you're attacking with.
By RAW, I can agree with that, but GMing in my group, I allow it. It makes sense to be able to take your hand of/on a weapon even when it's not your turn if you're able to reach into a quiver and pull out an arrow, which seems like it would require more effort than shifting your grip on a polearm, spear and so on to punch someone when they're in your face.
If I am wielding a Reach Weapon in 2 hands and also wearing a weapon(such as Armor Spikes, a Cestus, Spiked Gauntlets etc...) am I able to make an Attack of Opportunity with either weapon?
For example, if a foe is 15 feet away, and moves into 1 of my adjacent squares, he provokes an AoO because he moves through my Reach Weapon's threatened area. He then uses an action that would normally provoke an AoO while adjacent to me(sheathe a weapon, cast a spell, shoot a bow etc...), am I able to hit him with an AoO with my worn weapon(a Cestus)?
I would assume the answer is yes, and here's why:
Thoughts and FAQs appreciated.
Good question, but I think the answer is no, since 1 of the 2 domains you get from cleric has to be your domain for inquisitors, and inquisitions replace the domain feature of inquisitors, if you have levels in cleric, you HAVE to take 1 of the domains for inquisitor, otherwise you're not replacing anything, and just adding on to it, which would break the rules.
Barry Armstrong wrote:
EDIT: Ninja'd by Nicos!
Well, Mark does call out light weapons requiring limbs to be wielded, so let's roll with that for these examples;
Wow... re-reading that... every single one of the domain/bloodline touch powers provokes. Thats... asinine.
Not entirely, only the ones that are ranged and ones that are spell-like abilities. Unfortunately you always provoke when attacking with a ranged weapon(point-blank master and similar abilities excepted), but supernatural abilities generally don't provoke unless otherwise noted, and spell-like abilities CAN be cast defensively.
Time's Memory wrote:
I certainly agree that the potion would be "used" even if you didn't swallow it -- no spitting it back in the bottle.