Vic Wertz Chief Technical Officer |
yoda8myhead |
Marc Radle wrote:Wow, great illustration! Who did it? It kind of reminds me of Todd Lockwood's stuff from the early Third Edition.Now that Sarah's back, we've identified and credited the artist: Eric Belisle.
Are there plans to extend the CUP to allow references to material posted in the online fiction and use of fiction art?
Vic Wertz Chief Technical Officer |
Vic Wertz wrote:Are there plans to extend the CUP to allow references to material posted in the online fiction and use of fiction art?Marc Radle wrote:Wow, great illustration! Who did it? It kind of reminds me of Todd Lockwood's stuff from the early Third Edition.Now that Sarah's back, we've identified and credited the artist: Eric Belisle.
Hmm. *Referring* to the fiction is certainly not going to be an issue. (Republishing it wholesale is definitely not on the table, though.) As for the art, we'll have to discuss it.
yoda8myhead |
yoda8myhead wrote:Hmm. *Referring* to the fiction is certainly not going to be an issue. (Republishing it wholesale is definitely not on the table, though.) As for the art, we'll have to discuss it.Vic Wertz wrote:Are there plans to extend the CUP to allow references to material posted in the online fiction and use of fiction art?Marc Radle wrote:Wow, great illustration! Who did it? It kind of reminds me of Todd Lockwood's stuff from the early Third Edition.Now that Sarah's back, we've identified and credited the artist: Eric Belisle.
I didn't expect to be able to reprint the fiction, but was thinking of including events from them in wiki articles on larger issues, such as Radovan or Whispering lilies. We'll hold off on adding the image of Radovan to the wiki until there's a decision on whether we can legally use it or not. Thanks, Vic!
Matthew Morris RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8 |
Charles Evans 25 |
Okay, so what kind of maniac druid of Nethys is responsible for 'whispering lilies'? Their use fits nicely with Jegarre's character as developed so far, but they seem somewhat unnatural, even for a magical world.
So, did some crazy nature-loving devotee of Nethys (into the 'showing the wonders of magic' side of the religion) breed them?
Charles Evans 25 |
My grumpiness over the existence of whispering lilies (as opposed to the use of them) aside, it is interesting to see Jegarre's perspective featured. Portraying the personal viewpoint of the intellectual superman that is a Sherlock Holmes or Holmes-inspired figure (as I take Jegarre to be) in a manner accessible to the public can be tricky. For whatever reason, I think Conan Doyle only did it once (with 'The Adventure of the Lion's Mane' if I recall correctly) in the original Holmes canon.
I'm curious to see how it works out long-term.
Best wishes to you, Dave.
yoda8myhead |
Okay, so what kind of maniac druid of Nethys is responsible for 'whispering lilies'? Their use fits nicely with Jegarre's character as developed so far, but they seem somewhat unnatural, even for a magical world.
So, did some crazy nature-loving devotee of Nethys (into the 'showing the wonders of magic' side of the religion) breed them?
If that's what you need to tell yourself to explain it, then sure. Why not? I happen to find them an interesting and inspiring, and have already come up with some adventure hooks and ways to add them into my own games. Isn't that the point of the fiction?
Charles Evans 25 |
Charles Evans 25 wrote:If that's what you need to tell yourself to explain it, then sure. Why not? I happen to find them an interesting and inspiring, and have already come up with some adventure hooks and ways to add them into my own games. Isn't that the point of the fiction?Okay, so what kind of maniac druid of Nethys is responsible for 'whispering lilies'? Their use fits nicely with Jegarre's character as developed so far, but they seem somewhat unnatural, even for a magical world.
So, did some crazy nature-loving devotee of Nethys (into the 'showing the wonders of magic' side of the religion) breed them?
[utter twaddle] No. The point of fiction is the discovery of truth by the voyage into the unknowable, though that truth may come in many forms. Too many out of place notes in the harmony of the whole cause a voyage to founder if the voyage has been embarked upon with preparations undertaken for an entirely different set of conditions. [/utter twaddle]
;)Montalve |
If that's what you need to tell yourself to explain it, then sure. Why not? I happen to find them an interesting and inspiring, and have already come up with some adventure hooks and ways to add them into my own games. Isn't that the point of the fiction?
[utter twaddle] No. The point of fiction is the discovery of truth by the voyage into the unknowable, though that truth may come in many forms. Too many out of place notes in the harmony of the whole cause a voyage to founder if the voyage has been embarked upon with preparations undertaken for an entirely different set of conditions. [/utter twaddle]
;)
i sort of agree with Charles :P
fiction i itself its a trip in more than one way... if it brings something useful or nor to the table its something very different but that is NOT the point of fiction... that is the DM work to use referecne from every source available be it related fiction or not.
this piece of fiction brings interest elements... unfortunately is specifically directed to those who have already read CoT fictions, others who have not done so will be short in more than one regard in the references mentioned. is hard to care about a character that you feel like a pompous uncaring noble with no more references of he being scolded by his superiors and taking his time to realize he has loss an asset somewhere.
and while interesting... seeign things from Jeggare point of view while helping with the mood, feel pompous and its a harsh read for casual readers.
Charles Evans 25 |
Further (random) thought:
Whilst I have difficulty imagining Jegarre ever having been involved romantically with most women, I wonder how a man fascinated by the plant world would deal with a dryad...? :)
(Not that any romantic entanglement would necessarily last unless the dryad was curious about humanoids capable of immense detachment - could a fey perhaps find the purity of abstract reason fascinating and possibly worshipful?)
Dave Gross Contributor |
Marc Radle wrote:Wow, great illustration! Who did it? It kind of reminds me of Todd Lockwood's stuff from the early Third Edition.Now that Sarah's back, we've identified and credited the artist: Eric Belisle.
This Eric Belisle fellow is fantastic. I just had a sneak peek at the next illustration, which I presume is also by Belisle--and please tell me his name is pronounced just like "Belial."
His version of Jeggare is perfect. At first it didn't strike me as my mental image of the Count, but then I realized that was because the illustration was so much better at marrying his physical description to his behavior. Now I can't imagine Jeggare looking any other way.
Vic Wertz Chief Technical Officer |