
Monty Haul |

I wasn't sure. My pure RAW feelings would be that if you make a normal action then you add your attribute modifier. And if you attack with your off hand as a bonus then you forgo the bonus damage on the second attack. The reason here being game balance.
On the other hand my non RAW feeling would say that the reason for not including the attribute damage is because I'm not trained/used with the off hand, hence the drop in damage.
Rather than thinking of it as specifically from an off-hand, I think of the bonus attack from TWF as being kind of 'subsidiary' to the attack action in terms of focus.
So the reason it does less damage is that it's more an opportunistic slash made during your 'main attack', rather than an attack with the same level of concentration as you give to your primary attack.
As a consequence, I figure when you can put all your thought into just the throw, you have more time/focus on that attack and the stat bonus is justified on that basis.

Silvio Callgari Pazzi |

Rather than thinking of it as specifically from an off-hand, I think of the bonus attack from TWF as being kind of 'subsidiary' to the attack action in terms of focus.
So the reason it does less damage is that it's more an opportunistic slash made during your 'main attack', rather than an attack with the same level of concentration as you give to your primary attack.
As a consequence, I figure when you can put all your thought into just the throw, you have more time/focus on that attack and the stat bonus is justified on that basis.
I'll buy that :)

Pik |

A 'short rest' is 1 hour. The boss is currently not coming out, but that seems like a long time sitting around 'resting'. And that's if we can truly rest while within bow-shot of someone we know wants to kill us and knows we're here.
Then again, if he'll let us, I'm fine with waiting. :)

Monty Haul |

Looks like no short rest. Kraz has benefitted from the first cure wounds - who is taking the second?
Also a couple of bookkeeping things - I realised I wasn't making CON saves when those concentrating on spells took damage. (DC10 or half the damage you took, whichever is greater or you lose the spell). I forgot that Pik's faerie fire and Dorin's hunter's mark ran the risk of dissipating. My preference (unless it matters for some reason during the monster turn) is for the PCs to do it when their turn comes up, but I'm happy to do whichever the spellcasters prefer. Would you rather I make those rolls when you take damage? Or to leave it for you?
Sorting the villagers out, interrogating the prisoners and so forth would only have taken ten-fifteen minutes, so Dorin you're hunter's mark still has plenty of time to run.

![]() |

Its too much bookkeeping for you, and I think it should be our responsibility. Then I'll try to remember and in fact we can all remind each other about concentrating on our spells and it sounds like Pik will be on the case. Otherwise as we level up this could be a nightmare trying to remember which people have what running.
Cheers
FW

Silvio Callgari Pazzi |

Silvio took his healing from the healing potion because I found it more dramatic to pull out the arrow and chug a healing potion than being healed by a spell :) My options would be to top off Kraz or to mend Rath's wounds.

Monty Haul |

Just a note on posting frequency. I have a bunch of clients with "this must be done by Christmas" issues and, of course, they generally bring them in the week before christmas....Sorry I've been a little slow.
Going forward, we're also away for a week and a half in Fiji (yay!) from Boxing day until about the 4th of January.
That shouldn't impact on my posting times, however we did once visit a resort where I couldn't get my internet to work except through my phone (which was hideously expensive). Long story short - I'm hoping the Christmas/New Year break won't impact on my presence here at all, but there is a chance things will be a little disjointed over that time. Apologies if that's the case. (I may feel a little guilty lying around the pool neglecting my PBP duties as I decide between scuba diving or another massage, but not that guilty...) :p

Monty Haul |

Hi all.
Really sorry for the unexpected (and protracted!) delay. Trust me, after spending close to forty eight hours in transit I REALLY wish that hadn't happened. :/ (Cancelled flights, overbooked replacement flights and missed connecting flights all add up to a crappy way to finish a holiday).
I realise PBPs live or die on momentum, so hopefully the last fortnight hasn't killed this off. I've just updated the gameplay thread (I would have handwaved the last bit of battle had I known I would be out of action for so long, but there you go...)
Would you each mind posting here, just to confirm that everyone is still on board? Alternatively, if you've moved on to other games in the interim or whatever, please let me know that too (either here or by PM, whichever suits) rather than drifting away.
Apologies again - you'll be happy to know I have no further holidays booked until May. :)

Pik |

hp +5 (+4 from Con)
Ability Score Improvement: +2 Charisma
Added Cantrip Known: Prestidigitation
Added Spells Known: Silence
Spell Slots: +1 2nd-level

Pik |

How would you like to handle Cutting Words? Normally I need to declare as a reaction after an action but before the roll itself. I'd prefer not to delay the game like that. Would you prefer that I declare the possible use of the ability on my turn and the conditions? Or would it be possible to declare afterwards (despite knowing the results of the rolls.)
I'm good either way, or with any alternative you think up.

Monty Haul |

I played a bard in a PBP recently, and I used to finish my post with a set of conditions under which I'd use cutting words. That worked well enough (but if you wouldn't mind putting it right at the end of your post, I suspect that will make me notice it more).
I'm just about to adjudicate the party's actions and the giant leader will act next, so if you see this and have time - perhaps you'd like to declare for this round in the meantime?

Silvio Callgari Pazzi |

Round 2, Hunters Mark, Collosus Slayer
Dorin marks the leader as his prey and moves in for an attack.
[dice=WH Att]1d20+7
[dice=WH Dam]1d8+4+2+1d6
I might be off but isn't Collossus Slayer +1d8 to damage, instead of 1d6?
Or rather, after further review: Aren't you missing a damage die?

Dorin Stonehammer |

Nope Collosus Slayer only applies after the enemy has been damaged, and he was not yet damaged when I attacked...next round, I will add 1d8, and maybe even hit the damn thing.The current 1d6 is for Hunter's Mark.

Monty Haul |

The leader and most wounded giant are locked in melee with Dorin and Kraz. The rock thrower is ten feet behind them. Silvio is twenty feet from the melee and Coronei, Pik and Rath are thirty feet away.
He's forty feet from you (you moved up to be thirty feet away from the melee and he moved up just behind them before throwing the rock.

Pik |

Oh...I thought I was 60 feet (the range of the spells), but I think I see what happened. The melee folk met in the middle. Bah!
As a side note, this is why Cutting Words is a pain in pbp. I would have certainly used it to avoid being hit even with being 5 off, but I really can't predict all of the ways in which the enemies are going to act every round. (I'd actually probably use Cutting Words even if the enemy hit with a 21, since it'd be worth the effort even with a 1/6 chance of winning given it's me being hit.)

Monty Haul |

Yeah, I played a bard in a PBP and had similar issues. Some of my ooc options at the end of the post turned into quite substantial paragraphs - I'm happy to work on a way around that. I'm also happy to take you at your word if you think you would have used it "at the table" (it's pretty clear to all of you that these giants hit hard) - go ahead and roll retrospectively, if you like.
Going forward, perhaps you can put some complicated "if....then....unless the other....except when I'm the one being attacked...." sort of algorithm in your profile? Then you could just reference "Cutting words option 1 or option 2 if I'm attacked" or something like that.
Happy to hear other suggestions.

Monty Haul |

By the way (to everyone) I've been locked out of the messageboards for some reason, so it's taking me quite a lot of hoop-jumping to get here to check the thread (and will be several more to get to the gameplay thread, I suspect).
I've emailed Paizo, but bear with me if I go somewhat quiet for a day or so. (Gosh I'm getting sick of typing things like that!)

Kraz Thadoom |

I've had my account get squirrely before as well.. I emailed Paizo, but they never got back to me. A couple days later it was working fine again so.. As far as posting goes I always copy my text before previewing and submitting. I've had to many posts get eatin and then have to retype the whole thing, so its just a habit for me now.

Pik |

Yeah, I played a bard in a PBP and had similar issues. Some of my ooc options at the end of the post turned into quite substantial paragraphs - I'm happy to work on a way around that. I'm also happy to take you at your word if you think you would have used it "at the table" (it's pretty clear to all of you that these giants hit hard) - go ahead and roll retrospectively, if you like.
Going forward, perhaps you can put some complicated "if....then....unless the other....except when I'm the one being attacked...." sort of algorithm in your profile? Then you could just reference "Cutting words option 1 or option 2 if I'm attacked" or something like that.
Happy to hear other suggestions.
I'll work on one this evening and see how far I get. I'll try to keep it as simple as possible, but no promises! :)