Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ

Odraude's page

Goblin Squad Member. Pathfinder Society Member. 5,948 posts. No reviews. 1 list. 1 wishlist. 2 Pathfinder Society characters.


1 to 50 of 5,948 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

I'd probably still play one. Wouldn't be the first time I've played something with a Con of 10 before and survived.

Good immunities, but their biggest weakness really is the low HP they have. Surprised they don't get bonus HP like golems do. Or some form of DR/Hardness to help them out a bit. While immunities are nice, it's not like you are going to be facing mind destroying spells every encounter.

Fun fact: Blackguard is apparently pronounced Blaggard. Never knew until I was watching Darby O'Gill and the Little People and one of the bad guys was called that. True story.

Kicking this off for some collective brainstorming. These could be anything, from stars and planets to comets and meteors to space stations and generation ships.

1. A red dwarf star with its own planet that orbits close to an earth-like planet and causes problems for the denizens.

2. A comet that has a powerful ice elemental demigod trapped inside of it.

3. A massive cylindrical spaceship is on a course through the solar system. No telling what alien wonders await inside.

1 person marked this as a favorite.
James Jacobs wrote:
Odraude wrote:
Honestly, I can't imagine it would be hard to filing off some serial numbers and make it generic. Especially for things like lasers and AI and vortex guns and such. Little conversion and filing and boom, should be a piece of cake.
You are 100% correct.

Sweet. Am I 100% correct in thinking that this book has rules for a gravity gun? :D

Course, that is fine in your setting. But even in the base assumption for the game, according to the bestiar, undead do not need to eat, drink, or sleep. With the possible exception of the dhampir, which I think is a monstrous humanoid. So, thats why in Golarion and the base setting, taking a creature's blood/life energy/flesh without needing the sustenance and against their will is evil. They don't have Porphyri and don't spread vampirism via pathogen. They, like all undead, are the result of magic.

And honestly, at that point, if you are making the reason for being a vampire biological, I'd just go ahead and change them to monstrous humanoids instead of undead.

Honestly, I can't imagine it would be hard to filing off some serial numbers and make it generic. Especially for things like lasers and AI and vortex guns and such. Little conversion and filing and boom, should be a piece of cake.

Well I could see the book separated into the eras with each of the "punks" done as subsections of the eras.

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Joshua Goudreau wrote:

I would love to see a hardcover in the RPG line that adds other tech levels to the game for those who enjoy something a little different. I'm envisioning a book that includes more options for everything from the Renaissance era tech we have touched on all the way through this sort of sci-fi tech. Something setting neutral for folks that want different tech levels, be it steampunk or sci-fi or the weird 20th-Century we saw a glimpse of in Rasputin Must Die!. I am sure there would be calamatous uproar from the community, but having a place on the RPG line would remove it from Golarion cannon and put it purely in the realm of optional.

So, the way to make this happen, is to support books like this one and show that something larger and more inclusive would find it's niche and be worth the investment to produce.

Well, some GMs would say that this being in the hardcover line would mean that it isn't options. But screw them :D

I wanna see Steampunk, Dieselpunk, Magicpunk, Clockpunk, Atompunk, and Cyberpunk rules in here. Maybe even some styles of space (Retro Futurism Space Age of the 50s-70s, Hard Science Fiction, Weird Space Science of the 1800's to early 1900's like War of the Worlds, Barsoom Series, and First Men on the Moon). There are so many popular genres that could be touched on in a book like this. It would be awesome to see. And frankly, it would help me with my time travelling adventure I wanna do :)

jimibones83 wrote:
I have to wonder if paizo thinks they would lose support for Golarion by publishing a book like we're talking about though. Golarion is their cash cow for sure so it's a reasonable deterrent. My thoughts on it though are that any loss they may experience, if any, would be hardly noticeable. On the flip side they'd get a respectable chunk of business that was once going to other systems. I would continue to purchase the same paizo lines I always have because Golarion's an awesome setting that I love to play in. It's not the only setting I like to play in though. I play multiple games a week and playing the same setting in every game gets old, so I like to mix it up. Cyberpunk is fun as well. If there were a book or a line to support that, paizo would get my money where as right now it goes elsewhere. This is why I was so happy to hear about the tech guide and iron gods, and why I will be even happier to hear of like products:)

Well, their AP line is their bread and butter last I heard. So I think they will be fine. But I'm not a business major so...

Just a minor quip, Zemi/Cemi are actually Caribbean in nature, from the native Taino there. I actually have them statted up as outsiders. Once I finish them, I'll post them.

Otherwise, great list.

Of course, some player will never spot the awe that you seek. It happens. Probably a good idea to game with people that share your playstyle.

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Fantasy culture is much more present in our society than it was in the past. Therefore, people already have an idea of what fantasy should be and if you don't deviate from it, you'll never get that wonder and awe.

So in order to do that, you should stray from the familiar. make something really different that players wouldn't know. Most are familiar with henotheism and monotheism. throw in some animism and astrology. Don't stick with standard monsters, make your own. or reskin monsters. But as long as you make a setting that is a checklist of what is considered normal for a fantasy setting, you won't get that awe back.

2 people marked this as a favorite.

It fits though. We are noticeable and we ain't going away for a while :D

3 people marked this as a favorite.

If you die, the undead are still there. At least until someone can free them of their curse. That's kind of what you are doing when you force them into undead forms. Cursing them with unlife, trapping the spirit, and denying them an afterlife corrupts it in the Physical World. You're essentially doing evil things to people. That's the deal with that ;)

People doing evil things to innocents is tragic. But that's kind of the point of evil. For example, a leader knows their town is in danger and as a last ditch effort, makes a deal with a devil to protect the city. Lo and behold, the city is saved. So now when the leader dies, the soul belongs to the devil for all eternity to be tortured and turned into the building block of Hell. Is that fair or just? The leader made this decision to save their town, so they did good. But even then, they signed their soul away and while it's unfair that they are being tortured, that's the point of evil. Just like daemons steal souls and harvest them for their own purposes. Those might be goodly souls, but at the moment, they are powering a terrible engine of destruction against their will. Because daemons are evil. Or a legion of vampires forced into their condition by an evil elder vampire. Sure they didn't ask to be vampire spawn, but the elder vampire needed troops. Because vampires are evil.

That's the point of evil. They do evil things to good people and corrupt and break them. Evil is unfair and cruel because it simply is. And the point of good is to reverse that and save said innocents from their fate. Or, prevent it from happening in the first place.

Considering by raw that undead can be turned back to their living form via resurrection and true resurrection, I imagine a trapped soul that is freed from undeath isn't doomed to an afterlife in the evil planes.

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Perhaps. Either way, definitely want Ultimate Technology. I am part of the Ultimate Technology Initiative. Or UTI for short ;)

Get one as a cohort and ride it. See if your GM will allow it to take a class in, say, fighter.

1 person marked this as a favorite.
DM_aka_Dudemeister wrote:
Advanced Genre Guide.

I like that. I've honestly felt that the d20 system is robust enough to use it with different genres. Obviously changes would have to be made. But I'd love to see this book. Maybe a chapter on different styles of fantasy genres and how to run them, then another on the other genres (pulp, space, cyberpunk).

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Can't forget Colonial Tech. Or Enlightenment Tech. The in-between of Renaissance and Steam Era :)

Worg is an option for Leadership, if I recall correctly.

5 people marked this as a favorite.

That means it is our duty as gamers... no! As free men and women to buy this! It worked for Distant Worlds and Rasputin Must Die!, so it'll work here!

God's speed, soldiers. ._.7

3 people marked this as a favorite.

I would commit terrible atrocities and war crimes just to have an Ultimate Technology. It would fit with the rules for Stone and Bronze Age weapons we have already. I could see them adding more Renaissance tech and Industrial Age tech in addition to the WWI tech, WWII tech, Atomic Age Tech, Information Age Tech, and Future Tech.

2 people marked this as a favorite.

All this talk about health insurance makes me sad I'm leaving my current job. While the pay was mediocre, I was part of the ICUBA health plan, which is pretty nice. Just got new glasses practically free. Gotta love that flex card. I'm pretty sure that the company my girlfriend works at (Akamai) has insurance that covers the gender reassignment surgery. Unsure thought. I'd have to ask her.

Got me birthday coming up and the ladyfriend is coming up to visit. Along with a surprise. Woohoo :)

Sub-Creator wrote:
Auren "Rin" Cloudstrider wrote:
Rathendar wrote:
Not seeing it your way here.
just as humans use cattle on farms for sustenance required to survive, vampires use free humans for sustenance. at least vampires don't cage their "meal tickets" the way humans do. humans keep cattle encaged behind small fences on a farm to be raised for nothing more than to die and feed their human masters, vampires don't do that to humans at all.

I'm actually a little bit concerned that, in your personal view, humans equate to nothing more than cattle. ;)

Humans are intellectual superior beings to cows. Vampires are not intellectually superior beings compared to humans, but are equally intellectual due to the fact that they are human undead. If a vampire that once was human maintains its human intelligence, it should realize without doubt that killing other humans is an inherently evil act that one should not do. That it chooses to do so, treating another human being as nothing more than a (relatively) mindless animal, indicates the inherently evil nature of the vampire.

Especially since, if blood is all it needs, it could simply take the blood from the cow.

Just sayin'.

That is a good point to bring up. In the setting and rules, there is nothing stopping a vampire from hunting animals, or even having an ally donate blood so it doesn't feed on the innocents. Granted, I'd imagine it'd be like getting bad weed or coke cut with baking soda, but it'd be something a good aligned vampire could do in the setting and rules.

In my game, the victims have to be sapient creatures and animal blood/donated blood only resets the hunger DC penalty by half. It doesn't totally get rid of it.

Auren "Rin" Cloudstrider wrote:
i don't really use official golarion as published, i use a more customized variation with a higher level of magic and features pulled from anime and action cinema.

And that's fine. In your setting, you run how things work. You are the master of your world and the rules of nature. I'm just pointing out the flaw in the argument comparing undead to predators in the base setting. The disconnect is largely through the different perceptions of undeath in different media.

Also, this topic is about Golarion. Hence the title. And the forum it is in.

brad2411 wrote:
James Jacobs says that the Vampires hunger is supernatural. Quote. But thats for golarion.

Under the Undead Creature Type, it states that undead do not need to eat. And the bestiary says they have to feast on creature's blood. So it is safe to assume that their hunger is not biological in nature.

Better to stick with the actual myth, as it pays respect to the culture that it is from.

7 people marked this as a favorite.

That's not how it works. While there is no need, the drive is there. It's a part of the curse. Again, undead do not follow normal biological processes. The curse of undeath forces them to find blood, or flesh (for ghouls), or life force (for shadows) because that's an inherent propery of the curse of undeath. It's like a drug to them. They are addicted and if they don't get their fix, they start to lose it. Unless you've been through that type of withdrawal, it is difficult to understand the force that kind of addiction has. With most undead (ghosts being one exception), this is every day life.

Again, in your setting, you can do whatever you want. But in Golarion and the basic setting, undead feed because of an insane drive caused by the curse of undeath. That's why it's a curse, not a biological function. Zombies and vampires in Pathfinder aren't alternate species of humans like in Underworld/Blade, nor are they infected biological creatures like in Dawn of the Dead/I am Legend. They are dead and cursed via magic, not science.

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Actually, that's not how vampires work at all in Golarion. Vampires don't need the sustenance since they are undead. From Blood of the Night:

“Hunger” is perhaps a misleading term to describe a vampire's lust for flesh, consciousness, or youth. As unliving things, they technically require no sustenance, and yet ravenousness is often considered a key characteristic of those who walk without life. In truth, this desire is driven not by need, but by psychological greed. Feasting grants the undead no physical nourishment, but does fill them with a pleasure and power they can't attain by any other means. For undead, the act of feeding can be likened to that of an addict satiating her inner demon.

In addition, under the rules for undead, undead do not need to actually eat. The issue is that you are looking at vampires (and zombies) in a modern, more biological light. This is something you see in modern movies like Underworld, I Am Legend, any zombie movie since Dawn of the Dead, etc. However, in Golarion and the game, undeath is magic. There is no biological reason why undead feast, just like there is no biological reason why outsiders don't need to sleep. Almost no undead needs to actually feed to survive because they are magic. Unlike a tiger, which actually does require sustenance to survive.

So, in regards to Golarion and the setting neutrality of Pathfinder, you are incorrect about vampires requiring food. However, in your own setting, you can obviously do what you want.

So, if there is stuff for PoW2, does that mean it's safe to buy PoW 1 now?

Having used them, the Called Shots rule is pretty fun and useful. Also, I allow people to substitute a coup de grace attack to instead remove a limb or deal a Debilitating Blow. Very fun and flavorful and the PCs love it.

I'd hesitate to say they suck just because of one spell.

Yea I'd prefer seeing it in Bestiary 5.

feather tokens are my favorite.

Sorry, there aren't stats, but I thought they discuss how to build one.

They have that in Mythic Monsters Revisited. Would be cool to see it in the BEstiary though

While you cannot sunder it, in Ultimate Combat, there are rules for called shots where you can cripple wings. Ask your GM about it and see if they are okay with it.

5 people marked this as a favorite.

The suffering is real fellas :p

I'm actually statting the Black Tamanous right now. Probably will have it up tonight, as I'm trying to balance cleaning my apartment and moving with it.

I've got a small New World Bestiary on my Arcadia topic here that I've been working on. Now that I'm ready for my move, I can actually do some stat work here and there.

James Jacobs wrote:
Rysky wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
Odraude wrote:
I noticed in Occult Mysteries that there is a book called the Secrets of the Dreaming Dark. Is this inspired by the Dreaming Dark from the Eberron universe?
Then was the naming pure coincidence or are they perhaps inspired by the same source? What was Pathfinder's inspiritation for the book and its name?

It's most likely parallel design. Turns out, when you combine decades of game design with specific words, you'll have duplicates and parallel design.

The inspiration for the "Dreaming Dark" title was a combination of the Dark Tapestry and the fact that the great old ones and outer gods who are so strongly associated with that region are also strongly associated with dreams.

In other words, both the designer of the book for Pathfinder and the element in Eberron were likely both drawing inspiration from Lovecraft, who utilizes themes of dreams and darkness a LOT in his writing.

Yeah, sorry, I wasn't trying to imply you ripped off Eberron. Rather, I really love Eberron and the Dreaming Dark and I thought it was cool to see a nod to that. One thing that really felt compelling to me in Lovecraft's work was his Dreamlands. I always loved that and my favorite of his books is The Dream Quest of the Unknown Kadath.

2 people marked this as a favorite.

I'm the opposite. I view undeath as a curse, like in most literature. Being undead is a terrible curse. It's not a biological thing like you see in modern films. It's a curse that poisons your mind into becoming evil. Difference between a vampire and a tiger is that a vampire actually doesn't need to feed to stay alive. Granted, it'll be very unhappy without blood, but it doesn't need to feed. Feeding is more like a drug. A drug that gets them addicted and spirals them down into oblivion. Now mechanically they can go for animal blood. I allow that in my settings, but animal blood doesn't have the same satisfaction that real living sapient blood does. It'd be like doing pure cocaine for a long time, then having to ween off with cut, unpure stuff. For a vampire that has had human blood, it will barely stave off the hunger, but for a fresh vampire, it can help while they find a cure.

Mind you, one thing I don't do is make the vampire automatically evil right when it is turned. I do give the afflicted a chance to look for a cure and fight it. Because fighting the curse is more compelling than both "All vampires are evil automatically" and "Vampires can be of any alignment, it's cool." Tragedy is always more interesting to me anyways ;)

As for mindless undead, I view them as evil too. Like someone said, they don't need sustenance. They just automatically kill anything near them because they are mindless malice personified. Again, undeath is a curse and I feel it should be treated as such.

This doesn't mean that people who are turned into undead against their will are automatically going to Hell/Abyss/Abaddon when they are released. Most are thankful for being freed from their curse to finally move on to the Great Beyond. In how I run, clerics and shamans even bless the souls after they have been freed from the husk of undeath as a ceremony of good will and peace, ensuring that their actions during the curse do not affect their afterlife.

Now, there are always exceptions to the rule. Ghosts are a good example. of this. A revanant would be another one. In fact, in my setting, I have statted a Taino undead called the hupia that can be of any alignment. However, even in these cases, undeath is a curse. They all want to be free and move onto the Great Beyond, but cannot. In the case of the hupia, they are an intermediary position of the reincarnation cycle in my setting. They are spirits that became frightened at the prospect of moving on, so ran away from the realm of the dead. But in doing that, they doomed themselves into undeath. Some aren't accepted by their family while others are, but at the end, they are cursed with living forever long past their loved ones and never joining them in a better afterlife. Though there is a cure (read the statblock).

That said, I do change how undeath and death is viewed. Some view them with scorn and will hunt and kill them. Others view them with pity and mercifully aid them with their consent. If a guy is turned into a vampire against his will, some clerics will aid them in a cure or, if asked, a peaceful death surrounded by their loved ones. There is even an undead Death Deity I use that embraces undead into his arms and allow them to pass onto the Great Beyond.

At the end of the day, I find undeath being a curse much more compelling and less stifling creativity-wise than others allow. But, I also do it differently than most GMs do.

Considering no one has the book and we can't see how they changed Blessings and such, it's hard to say how the Warpriest is going to be like.

Not that it's going to stop people from doing their self-serving "warpriest pity-me" party before the book actually drops.

Honestly, given my general curiosity and my constant tiffs with Sincubus, I always hover a person's name if it's purple :p

3 people marked this as a favorite.

Honestly, given the setting I run, this class will probably see so much usage. Between Vodou, Shinto, Nagualism, and Santeria, I can use all of the archetypes presented here.

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I've been waiting for a spiritual shaman class since I played a shaman in 4ed. So happy to finally have one :D

Issue I have found with online play is that people have access to a huge distraction; their computer. So things slow to a freaking crawl.

People hated Gladiator?

Also, looks interesting.

I blame Occult Mysteries, but I've been doing some light research and development of astrology and numerology for this. I'll have to share my ideas a bit later. But nothing like reading this stuff and listening to some 70s prog rock. Gotta love blaring King Crimson while reading about astrology :)

Interesting. And it's my favorite price!!

I like Bulwark, but I think there is an ability already called that. So we should think of a cool name or something. :)

I noticed in Occult Mysteries that there is a book called the Secrets of the Dreaming Dark. Is this inspired by the Dreaming Dark from the Eberron universe?

1 to 50 of 5,948 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2014 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.