Galnörag |
I'm confused by the stat block a little:
1) snakes +2 (1d4+1)
and
Snakes (Ex) A kamadan’s snakes attack simultaneously; this is always a secondary attack.
So the kamadan has a single attack for all its snakes that deals 1d4+1? (this is just clarification)
2) "The breath weapon of a polar [b]kamadan 3[b] is particularly cold"
I think this is just an editing mistake, at some point before the name polar kamadan, some one said "lets have some kamadan variants, kamadan 1 is the base and looks like a normal leopard, kamadan 2 looks like a black leopard, and kamadan 3 like a snow leopard." But before they were formally named, at least kamadan 3 was named kamadan 3. Or there is an errant 3?
James Jacobs Creative Director |
I'm confused by the stat block a little:
1) snakes +2 (1d4+1)
and
Snakes (Ex) A kamadan’s snakes attack simultaneously; this is always a secondary attack.So the kamadan has a single attack for all its snakes that deals 1d4+1? (this is just clarification)
2) "The breath weapon of a polar [b]kamadan 3[b] is particularly cold"
I think this is just an editing mistake, at some point before the name polar kamadan, some one said "lets have some kamadan variants, kamadan 1 is the base and looks like a normal leopard, kamadan 2 looks like a black leopard, and kamadan 3 like a snow leopard." But before they were formally named, at least kamadan 3 was named kamadan 3. Or there is an errant 3?
1) Correct. The kamadan's snakes attack similarly to how a medusa's snakes attack—as a single mass of bites. (We did this in both cases because giving either monster lots of separate snake attacks would end up with it doing FAR too much damage.)
2) The extra "3" is a typo in the blog post. There should be no 3 there at all. (Looking in Bestairy 3, the point where the "3" would show up is on a line break, and I suspect that when we copy-pasted the text from the PDF that all of the line breaks carried over as hard line breaks and so we had to go in and manually remove those and in the process hit the 3 instead of the "ENTER" key on the numerical pad to do so on that line.)
Drejk |
Damn, if it would shown 2 weeks ago I would use it instead of manticores on a "random" encounter when our party traveled outside the city. Luckily they will probably wander around more trying to reach nomad clans meeting at holy place in a few weeks.
Also, party half-elf fighter will be happy - Kamadan's breath is supernatural and thus magical so won't put him to sleep like nonmagical poison used by Xtabay.
BTW: I assume that its damage dice for all natural attacks are deliberately lowered from the standard values for Large creature? It has realy weak claws - two steps below standard.
James Jacobs Creative Director |
BTW: I assume that its damage dice for all natural attacks are deliberately lowered from the standard values for Large creature? It has realy weak claws - two steps below standard.
Yup. Even with lowered standard values, it's still doing slightly more damage per round on average than a CR 4 creature should. We adjust the standard attack values all the time for this reason.
James Jacobs Creative Director |
Paris Crenshaw Contributor |
Justin Franklin |
Excellent! Paizo fires up the WABAC Machine and fields a replacement for the displacer beast. As Mairkurion said, "Well played."
Except for the displacement part. ;)
Paris Crenshaw Contributor |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Paris Crenshaw wrote:Excellent! Paizo fires up the WABAC Machine and fields a replacement for the displacer beast. As Mairkurion said, "Well played."Except for the displacement part. ;)
Stickler. Bad doggy! Get back into your unnaturally geometric box!
Thanks for the backup, ulgulanoth. ;)
Paris Crenshaw Contributor |
Jim Groves Contributor, RPG Superstar 2010 Top 4 |
James Jacobs Creative Director |
Gorbacz wrote:*whisper *sadly copyright existJustin Franklin wrote:*cough* Coeurl *cough*Paris Crenshaw wrote:Excellent! Paizo fires up the WABAC Machine and fields a replacement for the displacer beast. As Mairkurion said, "Well played."Except for the displacement part. ;)
We statted them up in Pathfinder #22, actually... I think that's what Gorbacz was coughing about. They're not open content, but that doesn't mean you can't use them in your Pathfinder game at all.
James Jacobs Creative Director |
Paris Crenshaw Contributor |
Drejk |
James Jacobs wrote:Ooooh! Aaaaah!Christopher Paul Carey wrote:James Jacobs wrote:Fixed. :-)
2) The extra "3" is a typo in the blog post. There should be no 3 there at all.Woo hoo!
And woah... look at the fancy new shading on quotes!!!!
Shiny?
I wonder how much quoting of quotes we'll manage before it gives up...
James Jacobs Creative Director |
Epic Meepo RPG Superstar 2009 Top 16, 2012 Top 32 |
James Jacobs Creative Director |
Matthew Morris RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8 |
Mairkurion {tm} wrote:However much it takes to not let the kamadan have all-around vision. No more, no less.James Jacobs wrote:How almost? -3?Dragon78 wrote:Shouldn't the Kamadan have all-round vision?Nah. His snakes are near-sighted and almost blind.
Ok... Now I want one of our artists to draw a Kamadan w.glasses.
Dr. Mairkenstein |
Mairkurion {tm} wrote:However much it takes to not let the kamadan have all-around vision. No more, no less.James Jacobs wrote:How almost? -3?Dragon78 wrote:Shouldn't the Kamadan have all-round vision?Nah. His snakes are near-sighted and almost blind.
You've won this round, James Jacobs, but next time, it won't be so easy!
Muahahahaha-
Drejk |
James Jacobs wrote:Ok... Now I want one of our artists to draw a Kamadan w.glasses.Mairkurion {tm} wrote:However much it takes to not let the kamadan have all-around vision. No more, no less.James Jacobs wrote:How almost? -3?Dragon78 wrote:Shouldn't the Kamadan have all-round vision?Nah. His snakes are near-sighted and almost blind.
They wear corrective lenses those days.
Kavren Stark |
hellharlequin wrote:We statted them up in Pathfinder #22, actually... I think that's what Gorbacz was coughing about. They're not open content, but that doesn't mean you can't use them in your Pathfinder game at all.Gorbacz wrote:*whisper *sadly copyright existJustin Franklin wrote:*cough* Coeurl *cough*Paris Crenshaw wrote:Excellent! Paizo fires up the WABAC Machine and fields a replacement for the displacer beast. As Mairkurion said, "Well played."Except for the displacement part. ;)
Coeurl also wasn't game content, and I doubt A.E. Van Vogt's estate or whatever publisher has current rights to The Voyage of the Space Beagle* would mind that creature turning up in Pathfinder; it's free advertising, after all, and doesn't include nearly enough content from the story to constitute an actionable infringement of their copyright -- most book reviews would probably include more.
* Or would that be Erik Mona? It seems like exactly the sort of thing he'd snap up for Planet Stories if it happened to be out of print with the rights available for a reasonable price.
James Jacobs Creative Director |
Coeurl also wasn't game content, and I doubt A.E. Van Vogt's estate or whatever publisher has current rights to The Voyage of the Space Beagle* would mind that creature turning up in Pathfinder; it's free advertising, after all, and doesn't include nearly enough content from the story to constitute an actionable infringement of their copyright -- most book reviews would probably include more.
* Or would that be Erik Mona? It seems like exactly the sort of thing he'd snap up for Planet Stories if it happened to be out of print with the rights available for a reasonable price.
Actually, we secured permission from Van Vogt's estate to print the stats for the Coeurl, but they didn't want it to be open content, which is why that's one of the few non-open rules bits we've published in a Pathfinder product.
James Jacobs Creative Director |
Yeah I remember that AP, the Coeurl is cool, I wish it was open content.
Why? Do you do a lot of publishing of d20 products?
Open content doesn't matter for games you run or play in. You can use all the coeurls you want in your home game as long as you're not publishing that game as a public resource or product.
The_Minstrel_Wyrm |
I'd like to make a request that someone "nudges" WizKids to include a kamadan mini in a future Pathfinder Battles set (or maybe an encounter pack).
Also wouldn't mind seeing the "Dusk" and "Polar" variants as minis too. :)
~Dean
Set |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
I'm totally going to reflavor the dusk kamadan as a lion with cobra heads peeking out of it's mane, for use in Osirion.
The nastier version will be a dire lion with *spitting* cobra heads... :)
Was it created in the Nexian flesh-forges? Did the cult of Lamashtu have something to do with it's creation? Did the mysterious naga have a hand in framing it's cruel symmetry? Yes. To all.
Thanks to a Qadiri satrap, who brought some back for his personal menagerie (and their subsequent escape), they can also be found in Qadira, now.