Still no Leshy iconic? Really?


Pathfinder Second Edition General Discussion

1 to 50 of 54 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>

1 person marked this as a favorite.

We'll be getting an Automaton Runesmith and an Iruxi Necromancer (which I now want to see if they can summon giant dinosaur fossils :D ).

We still have no Leshy iconic... despite Paizo's sudden pivot to make them a core ancestry...

Are Leshies still niche? Has their popularity faded out? Are they waiting for a more nature-friendly class to be added?


3 people marked this as a favorite.

Really.

I'm happy to see non-core iconics, and if that means not artificially rushing a leshy iconic, that seems okay. That doesn't mean leshy is unpopular - we regularly get shown them in NPC art for adventures or books. The last three Paizo Lives have featured new leshy art.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

I can't go to a PFS game without hearing people complain and/or joke about Rain in Cloudy Day.

No way is that guy not an iconic leshy.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Do we have a necromancer iconic yet?


3 people marked this as a favorite.
lemeres wrote:
Do we have a necromancer iconic yet?

They're on the cover of Impossible Magic! An iruxi, which also means we'll be getting some cool non-human skeleton art.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
QuidEst wrote:
lemeres wrote:
Do we have a necromancer iconic yet?
They're on the cover of Impossible Magic! An iruxi, which also means we'll be getting some cool non-human skeleton art.

Iruxi necromancer? Ok. I'm still good.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
QuidEst wrote:

Really.

I'm happy to see non-core iconics, and if that means not artificially rushing a leshy iconic, that seems okay. That doesn't mean leshy is unpopular - we regularly get shown them in NPC art for adventures or books. The last three Paizo Lives have featured new leshy art.

Well, not really asking to force a Leshy, but there were good ways to add one...

- A nature-themed Animist
- A Peachchild Leshy Examplar of Shizuru, with a Japanese wandering warrior design
- A Wood Kineticist / Phytokineticist... although I heard that Paizo wanted a new face, but swap back to P1E's iconic.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Leshy are really popular so I'm sure it'll happen at some point. But I don't think the thinking is around when it feels right for the character.

But Leshy show up in so much stuff that its bound to happen.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Tridus wrote:

Leshy are really popular so I'm sure it'll happen at some point. But I don't think the thinking is around when it feels right for the character.

But Leshy show up in so much stuff that its bound to happen.

That is if we get more classes. That's also something to consider.

A Leshy iconic can happen, but it's still weird that we haven't seen one ever since they were promoted to core.

Cognates

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I don't think any of the classes we've had since they've become core have really fit, with the possible exception of animist. The iconics kind of "have" to play to type because they're a visual representation of what that class is.


4 people marked this as a favorite.

Given that Animist is particularly based on real-world beliefs, I think there's especial reason to not go with a "sillier" ancestry.

Sovereign Court

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Iruxi for necromancer is cool. It's been hinted repeatedly that bone magic is a big deal for them.

I'd be happy to see a leshy iconic at some point, but necromancer really was a great one for iruxi. Who, you know, also didn't have an iconic yet.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

Yeah, I'm really digging the fact that the necromancer iconic is an iruxi. It's nice to get more non-human iconics, it's interesting to see an iconic whose base ancestry grants a flaw to the main stat of their class (assuming necromancer is still Int, of course), and expanding on iruxi beliefs and their use of bone magic sounds like an excellent way of introducing non-unholy types of necromancy to the playerbase more widely.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Now granted, automaton is an assumption. It might be an awakened clockwork or an awakened construct, or as someone else was hoping, a wyrwood, the way Battlecry! gave us the Jotunborn ancestry plus two classes. This might be two classes plus a unique construct ancestry.

That aside, a leshy would be cool, but not many opportunities to use a leshy, as it would most fit with say, an animist, a druid, or a mystic. If we dig into 1E classes, perhaps the shaman could do, but the shaman was mostly rolled into animist.

Though, they did reveal during the stream last Friday that a new character would be appearing in Operation Hellmouth as Valeros' daughter, and also revealed that some of the iconics in Godsrain became mythic. So part of me wonders if this is a narrative to open the gates for a new set of iconics in a potential PF3E. Valeros' daughter replacing Valeros the way Chk Chk replaced Keskodai. This could be an opportunity to bring in a leshy as say, a druid.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
JiCi wrote:
Tridus wrote:

Leshy are really popular so I'm sure it'll happen at some point. But I don't think the thinking is around when it feels right for the character.

But Leshy show up in so much stuff that its bound to happen.

That is if we get more classes. That's also something to consider.

A Leshy iconic can happen, but it's still weird that we haven't seen one ever since they were promoted to core.

AFAIK there's a playtest coming up, and those are almost always new classes. So I think we can expect a couple more classes.

Horizon Hunters

2 people marked this as a favorite.
JiCi wrote:

Well, not really asking to force a Leshy, but there were good ways to add one...

- A nature-themed Animist
- A Peachchild Leshy Examplar of Shizuru, with a Japanese wandering warrior design
- A Wood Kineticist / Phytokineticist... although I heard that Paizo wanted a new face, but swap back to P1E's iconic.

Blue Spruce is my 'Pine Needle' Leaf Leshy, an Air/Wood Kineticist (PFS).


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Aww, I was rooting (no pun intended) for a Leshy Necromancer iconic! I still think it could have been cute- using the themes of natural decay and plant life to make a less "dark" Necromancer is a popular trope these days.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Ascalaphus wrote:
It's been hinted repeatedly that bone magic is a big deal for [Iruxi].

Isn't that also the case for Kholo?


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Justnobodyfqwl wrote:
Aww, I was rooting (no pun intended) for a Leshy Necromancer iconic! I still think it could have been cute- using the themes of natural decay and plant life to make a less "dark" Necromancer is a popular trope these days.

I could see this as being a way for Necromancers to turn over a new leaf . . . .

Sovereign Court

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Ravingdork wrote:
Ascalaphus wrote:
It's been hinted repeatedly that bone magic is a big deal for [Iruxi].
Isn't that also the case for Kholo?

For sure. I guess bones are everywhere :P

Kholo necromancer could be interesting, too, cuz the bonus to Int and Str put the more scythey builds in reach.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Tridus wrote:
JiCi wrote:
Tridus wrote:

Leshy are really popular so I'm sure it'll happen at some point. But I don't think the thinking is around when it feels right for the character.

But Leshy show up in so much stuff that its bound to happen.

That is if we get more classes. That's also something to consider.

A Leshy iconic can happen, but it's still weird that we haven't seen one ever since they were promoted to core.

AFAIK there's a playtest coming up, and those are almost always new classes. So I think we can expect a couple more classes.

Hmmm...

- Arcanist? rolled into other classes;
- Brawler? that's an archetype;
- Hunter? there's already the ranger;
- Medium? the animist is close to that;
- Mesmerist? I keep thinking that the entire class should be a Conscious Mind for the Psychic;
- Ninja? not necessary;
- Samurai? that can be an archetype;
- Shaman? that's also the animist;
- Shifter? that's the only class I can think of...
- Skald? that should be a "muse" for the Bard;
- Spiritualist? rolled into the Summoner;

Most of these could be exclusive archetypes, just like how we got the Bloodrager, Slayer and Inquisitor.

The Shifter, using Starfinder's evolutionist as its chassis, with various specializations, such as "plant", could work for a Leshy. It's also the only class I can think of ^^;


1 person marked this as a favorite.
JiCi wrote:

- Shifter? that's the only class I can think of...

Pff, too bad iconics tend to be iconic about showing off their class fantasy rather than ironic. A plant being representing the class that transforms into animals and/or monsters might not be at the top of the list of options, but it would be pretty hilarious.

As much as leshy necromancer would have been fun for me personally (esp. fungus leshy), I'm glad we got our lizard bone shaman. Even moreso than kholo they've always been associated with bone magic to me (not that I would have minded a kholo necro either... what would have been wicked).


4 people marked this as a favorite.

Everyone was hoping for the Necromancer to be a Leshy, and here I was picturing a world where Nyctessa from Hell's Vengeance makes a return and the Runesmith was a Leshy!

Little potato guy in scribbled-on armor, their undeniable cuteness the only thing that can break through the dhampir's ingrained evil.

Paizo Employee Community & Social Media Specialist

2 people marked this as a favorite.

I am also DYING for a leshy iconic!!!!


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Maya Coleman wrote:
I am also DYING for a leshy iconic!!!!

A Wayne Reynolds drawn leshy? Sigh me up! Maybe one of those upcoming playtest classes?

Envoy's Alliance

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber

Did they mention new playtests? I didn't watch the stream.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
JiCi wrote:

We'll be getting an Automaton Runesmith and an Iruxi Necromancer (which I now want to see if they can summon giant dinosaur fossils :D ).

We still have no Leshy iconic... despite Paizo's sudden pivot to make them a core ancestry...

Are Leshies still niche? Has their popularity faded out? Are they waiting for a more nature-friendly class to be added?

Well Leshy are wall flowers but eventually one will step out into the sun and bloom into an iconic.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Zoken44 wrote:
Did they mention new playtests? I didn't watch the stream.

Maya hinted we'd be getting a playtest early this year in the Fall Errata 2025 thread.

Maya Coleman wrote:
Gisher wrote:

Thanks for the update, Maya. :)

I get it. This has been a crazy year for Paizo, and this errata wasn't the highest priority. Hopefully things will be a bit calmer for all of you next year.

We have a lot of things planned, including a playtest straight off!! So, we hope you all have a good year with us too ^_^

Link to that post can be found HERE.


Sibelius Eos Owm wrote:
JiCi wrote:

- Shifter? that's the only class I can think of...

Pff, too bad iconics tend to be iconic about showing off their class fantasy rather than ironic. A plant being representing the class that transforms into animals and/or monsters might not be at the top of the list of options, but it would be pretty hilarious.

retty sure they could get creative, with the shifting Leshy transforming into animals made of trees, bushes and hedges :)


2 people marked this as a favorite.
JiCi wrote:
Tridus wrote:
JiCi wrote:
Tridus wrote:

Leshy are really popular so I'm sure it'll happen at some point. But I don't think the thinking is around when it feels right for the character.

But Leshy show up in so much stuff that its bound to happen.

That is if we get more classes. That's also something to consider.

A Leshy iconic can happen, but it's still weird that we haven't seen one ever since they were promoted to core.

AFAIK there's a playtest coming up, and those are almost always new classes. So I think we can expect a couple more classes.

Hmmm...

- Arcanist? rolled into other classes;
- Brawler? that's an archetype;
- Hunter? there's already the ranger;
- Medium? the animist is close to that;
- Mesmerist? I keep thinking that the entire class should be a Conscious Mind for the Psychic;
- Ninja? not necessary;
- Samurai? that can be an archetype;
- Shaman? that's also the animist;
- Shifter? that's the only class I can think of...
- Skald? that should be a "muse" for the Bard;
- Spiritualist? rolled into the Summoner;

Most of these could be exclusive archetypes, just like how we got the Bloodrager, Slayer and Inquisitor.

The Shifter, using Starfinder's evolutionist as its chassis, with various specializations, such as "plant", could work for a Leshy. It's also the only class I can think of ^^;

Does this not assume 1 to 1 parity with 1e, which they haven't been doing for a while now? Guardian and Commander do not have first party PF 1e class equivalents. Runesmith meanwhile has the Mesmerist gimmick of implanting magic into your allies/yourself, and while the name Necromancer has been around a lot this Necromancer in Pf 2e feels way different than any of the ones from PF 1e.

For all we know they could make like an Entropy Mage of Time and make it a Mushroom Leshy. The classes could very well be wildly different from anything we've seen yet and fit Leshy surprisingly well. Or heck, even be something wildly out of left field for what people might expect from a Leshy. Like a full on Mech Suit using class.


Crouza wrote:
JiCi wrote:
Tridus wrote:
JiCi wrote:
Tridus wrote:

Leshy are really popular so I'm sure it'll happen at some point. But I don't think the thinking is around when it feels right for the character.

But Leshy show up in so much stuff that its bound to happen.

That is if we get more classes. That's also something to consider.

A Leshy iconic can happen, but it's still weird that we haven't seen one ever since they were promoted to core.

AFAIK there's a playtest coming up, and those are almost always new classes. So I think we can expect a couple more classes.

Hmmm...

- Arcanist? rolled into other classes;
- Brawler? that's an archetype;
- Hunter? there's already the ranger;
- Medium? the animist is close to that;
- Mesmerist? I keep thinking that the entire class should be a Conscious Mind for the Psychic;
- Ninja? not necessary;
- Samurai? that can be an archetype;
- Shaman? that's also the animist;
- Shifter? that's the only class I can think of...
- Skald? that should be a "muse" for the Bard;
- Spiritualist? rolled into the Summoner;

Most of these could be exclusive archetypes, just like how we got the Bloodrager, Slayer and Inquisitor.

The Shifter, using Starfinder's evolutionist as its chassis, with various specializations, such as "plant", could work for a Leshy. It's also the only class I can think of ^^;

Does this not assume 1 to 1 parity with 1e, which they haven't been doing for a while now? Guardian and Commander do not have first party PF 1e class equivalents. Runesmith meanwhile has the Mesmerist gimmick of implanting magic into your allies/yourself, and while the name Necromancer has been around a lot this Necromancer in Pf 2e feels way different than any of the ones from PF 1e.

For all we know they could make like an Entropy Mage of Time and make it a Mushroom Leshy. The classes could very well be wildly different from anything we've seen yet and fit Leshy surprisingly well. Or heck, even be something wildly out...

I can name plenty of cool ideas and things I'd like, but it'd be surprising to be right.

Guessing what classes Paizo is going to put out is tricky at this point, and "concepts that they did before that still feel missing" is the best odds you're going to get.

Envoy's Alliance

Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber

kind of wishing they'd drop hints like they did with the War of Immortals Play test, where they were teasing the iconics, talking about letters in the name.

I'm going to float the idea, what if it's another SF2e playtest? Evolutionist and Nanocyte!

For PF2e: Maybe Shifter and displacer (a class focused on teleporting)

Paizo Employee Community & Social Media Specialist

8 people marked this as a favorite.

Oh I also wanted to say! I think there is still hope for a leshy iconic! While it's not currently in the works, several team members also want one. So maybe if we're loud enough, we can make it happen!


8 people marked this as a favorite.
Maya Coleman wrote:
Oh I also wanted to say! I think there is still hope for a leshy iconic! While it's not currently in the works, several team members also want one. So maybe if we're loud enough, we can make it happen!

Just have to keep planting the seeds so they can take root in their imagination until it blooms with inspiration.


Crouza wrote:
JiCi wrote:
Tridus wrote:
JiCi wrote:
Tridus wrote:

Leshy are really popular so I'm sure it'll happen at some point. But I don't think the thinking is around when it feels right for the character.

But Leshy show up in so much stuff that its bound to happen.

That is if we get more classes. That's also something to consider.

A Leshy iconic can happen, but it's still weird that we haven't seen one ever since they were promoted to core.

AFAIK there's a playtest coming up, and those are almost always new classes. So I think we can expect a couple more classes.

Hmmm...

- Arcanist? rolled into other classes;
- Brawler? that's an archetype;
- Hunter? there's already the ranger;
- Medium? the animist is close to that;
- Mesmerist? I keep thinking that the entire class should be a Conscious Mind for the Psychic;
- Ninja? not necessary;
- Samurai? that can be an archetype;
- Shaman? that's also the animist;
- Shifter? that's the only class I can think of...
- Skald? that should be a "muse" for the Bard;
- Spiritualist? rolled into the Summoner;

Most of these could be exclusive archetypes, just like how we got the Bloodrager, Slayer and Inquisitor.

The Shifter, using Starfinder's evolutionist as its chassis, with various specializations, such as "plant", could work for a Leshy. It's also the only class I can think of ^^;

Does this not assume 1 to 1 parity with 1e, which they haven't been doing for a while now? Guardian and Commander do not have first party PF 1e class equivalents. Runesmith meanwhile has the Mesmerist gimmick of implanting magic into your allies/yourself, and while the name Necromancer has been around a lot this Necromancer in Pf 2e feels way different than any of the ones from PF 1e.

For all we know they could make like an Entropy Mage of Time and make it a Mushroom Leshy. The classes could very well be wildly different from anything we've seen yet and fit Leshy surprisingly well. Or heck, even be something wildly out...

A mech using class would be amazing. I suspect it'd get made for SF rather than PF, but the image of a tiny leshy riding around in a green man-sized tree mech, or a big, skeletal fungal mech would be awesome!


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Perpdepog wrote:
Crouza wrote:
JiCi wrote:
Tridus wrote:
JiCi wrote:
Tridus wrote:

Leshy are really popular so I'm sure it'll happen at some point. But I don't think the thinking is around when it feels right for the character.

But Leshy show up in so much stuff that its bound to happen.

That is if we get more classes. That's also something to consider.

A Leshy iconic can happen, but it's still weird that we haven't seen one ever since they were promoted to core.

AFAIK there's a playtest coming up, and those are almost always new classes. So I think we can expect a couple more classes.

Hmmm...

- Arcanist? rolled into other classes;
- Brawler? that's an archetype;
- Hunter? there's already the ranger;
- Medium? the animist is close to that;
- Mesmerist? I keep thinking that the entire class should be a Conscious Mind for the Psychic;
- Ninja? not necessary;
- Samurai? that can be an archetype;
- Shaman? that's also the animist;
- Shifter? that's the only class I can think of...
- Skald? that should be a "muse" for the Bard;
- Spiritualist? rolled into the Summoner;

Most of these could be exclusive archetypes, just like how we got the Bloodrager, Slayer and Inquisitor.

The Shifter, using Starfinder's evolutionist as its chassis, with various specializations, such as "plant", could work for a Leshy. It's also the only class I can think of ^^;

Does this not assume 1 to 1 parity with 1e, which they haven't been doing for a while now? Guardian and Commander do not have first party PF 1e class equivalents. Runesmith meanwhile has the Mesmerist gimmick of implanting magic into your allies/yourself, and while the name Necromancer has been around a lot this Necromancer in Pf 2e feels way different than any of the ones from PF 1e.

For all we know they could make like an Entropy Mage of Time and make it a Mushroom Leshy. The classes could very well be wildly different from anything we've seen yet and fit Leshy surprisingly well. Or heck, even

...

A leshy biohacker would be pretty top notch.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Perpdepog wrote:
A mech using class would be amazing. I suspect it'd get made for SF rather than PF, but the image of a tiny leshy riding around in a green man-sized tree mech, or a big, skeletal fungal mech would be awesome!

Strength of Thousands book 1 has some Leshy doing this with a 10' plant "mech" that it controls. It's pretty fun. Just means there is precedent in Golarian!

Cognates

3 people marked this as a favorite.

I would caution getting too hyped about the next playtest being classes. While we are due this years pathfinder class playtest sooner or later, there is still the starship combat playtest that was mentioned. If Paizo haven't changed their mind (and I really hope they haven't, I'd love them to stick the landing on the rules), that is probably the next playtest.

Cognates

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Also WRT to iruxi necromancer I'm super glad that's what Paizo went with. It's a good way to have a "good" necromancer, since Iruxi have strong traditions about using the bones of their ancestors for good. It's definetly going to help give players inspiration for their own "good" necromancers. I was a bit worried when it was revealed it would end up like certain DnD subclasses that attract ... particular ... players.

I have stories about conquest paladins I could tell you all.


Tridus wrote:
Perpdepog wrote:
A mech using class would be amazing. I suspect it'd get made for SF rather than PF, but the image of a tiny leshy riding around in a green man-sized tree mech, or a big, skeletal fungal mech would be awesome!
Strength of Thousands book 1 has some Leshy doing this with a 10' plant "mech" that it controls. It's pretty fun. Just means there is precedent in Golarian!

Yep. I'm running a group through Strength of Thousands right now. I was just too lazy to bring it up as an example and put it behind spoiler tags, lol.

And it is a very fun fight.


BotBrain wrote:
I would caution getting too hyped about the next playtest being classes. While we are due this years pathfinder class playtest sooner or later, there is still the starship combat playtest that was mentioned. If Paizo haven't changed their mind (and I really hope they haven't, I'd love them to stick the landing on the rules), that is probably the next playtest.

Personally, that would be incredibly disappointing.


If the leshy iconic "issue" (not really an issue, but let's pretend it's one) drag until pathfinder 3, Lini better start feeling nervous. Druid is *the* perfect fit for a leshy class, given that leshies were first created to be druid variant on the "craft construct", and then a druid specific familiar. And also, the whole plant/nature thing.

Anyway, off the top of my head, the class that don't exist yet that would most fit a leshy iconic would be a spontaneous primal spellcasting class (something which I'm still surprised animist didn't end up being), a primal bounded spellcasting class (which could be "shifter-lite"), an actual shifter class, or.... to completely sidestep the (admitedly very important to leshy) nature element and instead lean in the "discovery and curiosity" aspect of things and become an item based class, like an alchemist but for all other item instead of specifically alchemy and consumables. Altho I'm not too sure such class in the works, given that alchemist is already a bit controversial.

Paizo Employee Community & Social Media Specialist

1 person marked this as a favorite.
BotBrain wrote:
I would caution getting too hyped about the next playtest being classes. While we are due this years pathfinder class playtest sooner or later, there is still the starship combat playtest that was mentioned. If Paizo haven't changed their mind (and I really hope they haven't, I'd love them to stick the landing on the rules), that is probably the next playtest.

You will see!!!!!


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Maya Coleman wrote:
BotBrain wrote:
I would caution getting too hyped about the next playtest being classes. While we are due this years pathfinder class playtest sooner or later, there is still the starship combat playtest that was mentioned. If Paizo haven't changed their mind (and I really hope they haven't, I'd love them to stick the landing on the rules), that is probably the next playtest.
You will see!!!!!

♫ ...into your imagination! ♫

We'll begin with a spin
Traveling in the world of my creation
What we'll see will defy
Explanation

If you want to view paradise
Simply look around and view it
Anything you want to, do it
Want to change the world?
There's nothing to it

There is no life I know
To compare with pure imagination
Living there, you'll be free
If you truly wish to be

If you want to view paradise
Simply look around and view it
Anything you want to, do it
Want to change the world?
There's nothing to it

There is no life I know
To compare with pure imagination
Living there, you'll be free
If you truly wish to be

♫ ♪ ♬

Envoy's Alliance

Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber

CANDYMAN CLASS CONFIRMED!

Cognates

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Would willy wonka count as some kind of bizzare alchemist?

Envoy's Alliance

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber

Oh, absolutely, especially in that weird Prequel


Hear me out: bring back the ninja class. Leaf leshy ninja.


4 people marked this as a favorite.
Maya Coleman wrote:
BotBrain wrote:
I would caution getting too hyped about the next playtest being classes. While we are due this years pathfinder class playtest sooner or later, there is still the starship combat playtest that was mentioned. If Paizo haven't changed their mind (and I really hope they haven't, I'd love them to stick the landing on the rules), that is probably the next playtest.
You will see!!!!!

Just wanted to let Paizo know that it's okay to go ahead and release the playtest today. I am ready to see.

Wayfinders

Leshys are my new favorite playable species. I'm playing a Finadar root leshy anti-tech superstition barbarian named Grounded Root. As a root leshy, their main motivation is to stand their ground! The last scenario I played in ended up in a nice forest, so I'm playing a different character next game so Grounded Root can stand their ground for a while longer.

I think one problem with having a Leshy iconic is that there are so many types of Leshy to pick from. But if I had to pick one, it would be Root Leshy, and I stand my ground on that opinion.

There are 2 or 3 other players with Leshy characters in our local group, so they still seem pretty popular. It doesn't hurt that the Leshy minis look great.

1 to 50 of 54 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder Second Edition / General Discussion / Still no Leshy iconic? Really? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.