Babylon 5


Television

51 to 100 of 199 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | next > last >>
Grand Lodge

thejeff wrote:
Kajehase wrote:
"Boom. Boom boom boom. Boom boom. Boom! Have a nice day!"

"No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. What? Look, somebody's got to have some damn perspective around here! Boom. Sooner or later. BOOM!"

That's what you call a Russian perspective. Suck on that Chekov!


Babylon 5 was the perfect example of something that has only been done a few times before or since. A show where the arc is defined in the beginning. So many shows go off the rails because they don't know the pace to put out the overarching storyline. If they go too fast, the show peaks and they need to figure out what they hell they do next. If it goes too slow, they need to add cheap filler and often this crashes the show before they get to the good part.

It also hit the sweet spot - it got enough attention from the networks to get budget and airtime, but not so much that the executives took the reins. Sadly, the latter is what killed Crusade.

Zooty Zoot-zoot!

p.s. for new fans to the series there are three trilogies of novels that add amazing backstory to the show. Sadly, some of them are out of print and not available as E-books.

One is about the Rise and Fall of the Centauri - focusing on Londo and Vir.
The second is about Bester and the rise and fall of the Psi Corps. You'll see the character very differently after this.
The third is about the techno-mages. It reveals the true nature of who they are and what they do.

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Philo Pharynx wrote:

Babylon 5 was the perfect example of something that has only been done a few times before or since. A show where the arc is defined in the beginning.

It's a good example... It's not perfect because due to how the show was screwed up with so much by executive meddling. Straczynski ended the arc early at the end of the 4th season as he was sure the show would be canceled. Then it got another year which wound up being padding and the show that would have ended the fourth season and the series, was moved to end the fifth and last instead. Which is why Ivanaova appears in it despite the actress having quit the show a year earlier.

Grand Lodge

Philo Pharynx wrote:

Babylon 5 was the perfect example of something that has only been done a few times before or since. A show where the arc is defined in the beginning. So many shows go off the rails because they don't know the pace to put out the overarching storyline. If they go too fast, the show peaks and they need to figure out what they hell they do next. If it goes too slow, they need to add cheap filler and often this crashes the show before they get to the good part.

It also hit the sweet spot - it got enough attention from the networks to get budget and airtime, but not so much that the executives took the reins. Sadly, the latter is what killed Crusade.

Zooty Zoot-zoot!

p.s. for new fans to the series there are three trilogies of novels that add amazing backstory to the show. Sadly, some of them are out of print and not available as E-books.

One is about the Rise and Fall of the Centauri - focusing on Londo and Vir.
The second is about Bester and the rise and fall of the Psi Corps. You'll see the character very differently after this.
The third is about the techno-mages. It reveals the true nature of who they are and what they do.

The technomage arc of books are the only ones considered canon by JMS himself.

Silver Crusade

Babylon 5, when it hit its stride, was fantastic. Seasons 2, 3, and 4 is what sci fi television should be measured against. Some of the best character development in any TV show. Even among the minor characters.


Pathfinder Starfinder Society Subscriber

They handled the story arc well for the first four seasons, but they had to rush some things in the 4th season because they were not sure that there would be a 5th season. That left the 5th season to leave a distinct impression of "Now what?" You could have gone straight from the end of season 4 to the finale and not missed anything vital.

The other issue with the arc is that the build-up was rather slow by the standards of the time. I am sure I was not the only one who lost interest about halfway through the first season. Now imagine that the next episode I saw was from halfway through the third season -- and how my reaction was "What have I been missing here?"


LazarX wrote:
Philo Pharynx wrote:

Babylon 5 was the perfect example of something that has only been done a few times before or since. A show where the arc is defined in the beginning.

It's a good example... It's not perfect because due to how the show was screwed up with so much by executive meddling. Straczynski ended the arc early at the end of the 4th season as he was sure the show would be canceled. Then it got another year which wound up being padding and the show that would have ended the fourth season and the series, was moved to end the fifth and last instead. Which is why Ivanaova appears in it despite the actress having quit the show a year earlier.

Well, as good an example as you ever see in American TV.

Liberty's Edge

LazarX wrote:
Philo Pharynx wrote:

Babylon 5 was the perfect example of something that has only been done a few times before or since. A show where the arc is defined in the beginning.

It's a good example... It's not perfect because due to how the show was screwed up with so much by executive meddling. Straczynski ended the arc early at the end of the 4th season as he was sure the show would be canceled. Then it got another year which wound up being padding and the show that would have ended the fourth season and the series, was moved to end the fifth and last instead. Which is why Ivanaova appears in it despite the actress having quit the show a year earlier.

The first half of season 5 is meh (but still watchable) but the second half is solid.

It was more of a disappointment when it first aired after the nonstop awesome of Season 4 and then waiting week between so-so episodes. Really, it holds up better on binge watching. When you know what's coming and realize the small stuff is part of the larger end.

Scarab Sages

Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Maps, Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber

JMS had the fifth season story arc mapped out, but he left it on notepaper in his hotel room while at a convention and a maid threw them away thinking they were trash. He only remembered about half of what he had written down.

In the final episode it is 20 years later Sheridan was visiting people and places from his time as commander of B5. I know it was filmed as the 4th season finale (an episode was shot at the beginning of the 5th season filming and used as the 4th season finale), but I wish JMS could have included Captain Lochley in some way - a 1 or 2 minute appearance would not have hurt.

Liberty's Edge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

"I try never to get involved in my own life. Too much trouble."


1 person marked this as a favorite.

"Because with you, I will always know where I stand."


Pathfinder Starfinder Society Subscriber

The main issue I have with the latter part of season 5 is that its writers seemingly did not look at the already written and filmed finale. When I saw the finale, I was disappointed at the relative lack of setup for it in the immediately preceding episodes.

Londo's "gift" to the Sheridans looked like it was a setup for the finale when I first saw it -- but in fact it was a setup for a series of events that took place in the intervening years and was never shown on TV.


David knott 242 wrote:

The main issue I have with the latter part of season 5 is that its writers seemingly did not look at the already written and filmed finale. When I saw the finale, I was disappointed at the relative lack of setup for it in the immediately preceding episodes.

Londo's "gift" to the Sheridans looked like it was a setup for the finale when I first saw it -- but in fact it was a setup for a series of events that took place in the intervening years and was never shown on TV.

The finale had been filmed already at the end of season 4 - then they were told they actually did get a 5th season.

The last episode of what we think of as season 4 was actually shot as the first episode of season 5, but put in as a placeholder to keep the series finale as the actual series finale.

As far as the hard sci-fi goes, my favorite part of that is actually the human space-fighters (the Star Fury for show watchers), an actual, honest, acts-like-an-actual-SPACE-fighter instead of the airplanes-in-space we see in other shows/films.

Liberty's Edge

And then the Mimbari and Centauri fighters with their singularity reactors flip Newton the bird.


Krensky wrote:
And then the Mimbari and Centauri fighters with their singularity reactors flip Newton the bird.

The Cenaturi fighters couldn't do that from the write-ups I remember. While they had anti-grav tech, it required size to pull off. One of Londo's potential heirs was in awe of the Star Fury in the 10 years after shorts.

The Minbari stuff, yeah. They could put grav generators into a ring Delenn wore on her finger.

The heirachy of how badass space fighters were in B5 is pretty much ranked - Minbari, then Star Furies, then everything else.

Grand Lodge

The StarFury advantage was that it was designed SOLEY to operate in space, whereas the others were essentially aircraft designs extrapolated for space use. operating both atmosphere and space, thereby a compromise design.

Liberty's Edge

I could have sworn Centauri fighters ignored momentum like that too.

* Shrug

Regardless, the Thunderbolt is a better ride than the Star Fury. And... the things... are better than the Mimbari fighters. Presumably Vorlons had better too, but I don't think they show off anything that small.

Grand Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Krensky wrote:

I could have sworn Centauri fighters ignored momentum like that too.

* Shrug

Regardless, the Thunderbolt is a better ride than the Star Fury. And... the things... are better than the Mimbari fighters. Presumably Vorlons had better too, but I don't think they show off anything that small.

The idea of space combat for a Vorlon.

"Rocks Fall, Planet Dies"


LazarX wrote:
thejeff wrote:
Or transporters either, since I know those bother you as well.
Do the mass to energy conversion of a single human body mass and it should bother you as well. Especially when it makes whole copies of humans from NOTHING.

While I do find B5 far superior to Star Trek, lets not kid ourselves that B5 is some sort of hard science mecca. Stuff like Hyperspace and telepaths are as far as we can tell just as magical as teleporters and warp drive. And B5 borrowed pretty heavily from things like Lord of the Rings for it's structure.

Their shows...meant to entertain...that's all.


LazarX wrote:
Krensky wrote:

I could have sworn Centauri fighters ignored momentum like that too.

* Shrug

Regardless, the Thunderbolt is a better ride than the Star Fury. And... the things... are better than the Mimbari fighters. Presumably Vorlons had better too, but I don't think they show off anything that small.

The idea of space combat for a Vorlon.

"Rocks Fall, Planet Dies"

Some of the big fleet battle scenes in later seasons did show Vorlon (and for that matter Shadow) fighter class vessels. We just didn't get a whole lot of scenes of their ships in action compared to the races.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber

"The Parliament of Dreams"

Planet-buster weapons shown that just made the viewer go... "Aw ****, did that just do what I THINK it did?"

Liberty's Edge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Folks, remember that Hama is watching it for the first time.

Liberty's Edge RPG Superstar 2008 Top 32, 2011 Top 16

MMCJawa wrote:
LazarX wrote:
thejeff wrote:
Or transporters either, since I know those bother you as well.
Do the mass to energy conversion of a single human body mass and it should bother you as well. Especially when it makes whole copies of humans from NOTHING.

While I do find B5 far superior to Star Trek, lets not kid ourselves that B5 is some sort of hard science mecca. Stuff like Hyperspace and telepaths are as far as we can tell just as magical as teleporters and warp drive. And B5 borrowed pretty heavily from things like Lord of the Rings for it's structure.

Their shows...meant to entertain...that's all.

While I'm not disagreeing with your overall point, I wouldn't call telepaths magical. We're just discovering what can be done with the brain - read an article yesterday that researchers were able to allow brain to brain signals across rooms. Sure it used equipment to do it, but if that's possible, it's certainly not magical sounding that at some point we figure out science that allows more telepath type abilities.

Grand Lodge

JoelF847 wrote:
MMCJawa wrote:
LazarX wrote:
thejeff wrote:
Or transporters either, since I know those bother you as well.
Do the mass to energy conversion of a single human body mass and it should bother you as well. Especially when it makes whole copies of humans from NOTHING.

While I do find B5 far superior to Star Trek, lets not kid ourselves that B5 is some sort of hard science mecca. Stuff like Hyperspace and telepaths are as far as we can tell just as magical as teleporters and warp drive. And B5 borrowed pretty heavily from things like Lord of the Rings for it's structure.

Their shows...meant to entertain...that's all.

While I'm not disagreeing with your overall point, I wouldn't call telepaths magical. We're just discovering what can be done with the brain - read an article yesterday that researchers were able to allow brain to brain signals across rooms. Sure it used equipment to do it, but if that's possible, it's certainly not magical sounding that at some point we figure out science that allows more telepath type abilities.

Spoiler:
What you're describing is a long way from telepathy. The man's right in that essence.. telepathy, esp, all of that new age junk is modern fantasy, not science-based.

While B5 isn't "hard" sf by any means it resorted to a lot less deus ex machina. Nor was there any reset button. Characters changed and evolved. G'kar grows beyond his focus on revenge, Mollari desends into his long night, Garibaldi becomes estranged from his fellow B5 crew thanks to mental manipulations by Psi Cop Bester and never really reconciles with them. And Sheridan... becomes really really scary.

Liberty's Edge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

* Sigh...

Lazar, the OP is watching the show for the first time.


LazarX wrote:
While B5 isn't "hard" sf by any means it resorted to a lot less deus ex machina. Nor was there any reset button. Characters changed and evolved. G'kar grows beyond his focus on revenge, Mollari desends into his long night, Garibaldi becomes estranged from his fellow B5 crew thanks to mental manipulations by Psi Cop Bester and never really reconciles with them. And Sheridan... becomes really really scary.

Spoiler:
Yes, it's a large story arc rather than separate episodic stories.

That certainly has nothing to do with being SF rather than fantasy.

Might make it a better show. It's certainly a big part of what I liked about it.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

Seriously people. Spoilers. Have some respect.

Babylon 5 is one of my favorite Sci-fi series of all time though, probably even ahead of the Rebooted BSG.

Liberty's Edge

Peter Stewart wrote:

Seriously people. Spoilers. Have some respect.

Babylon 5 is one of my favorite Sci-fi series of all time though, probably even ahead of the Rebooted BSG.

This.

Normally I'd agree that this thread doesn't need to worry about spoilers, but when the OP explicitly says they're watching it for the first time maybe we could try to be vague or use the spoiler tag for his sake? Remember how you felt watching the Star Fury gun camera footage scene, or the reveal of the WS or Earth Force One's appearance.

Let Hama have those same moments.

Scarab Sages

1 person marked this as a favorite.

So......no mentioning that hot Vorlon on Vorlon action?


My biggest disappointment was that Crusade only got a season. I love Gary Cole, try to watch him in anything he is in.


+1 to the call for Spoilers (although you can be sure I'm going to open every one that I find . . .).

Dark Archive

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Telepaths:

Forgive me if I'm mistaken, it's been a long time, but weren't telepaths the result of Vorlon manipulation of the younger races genetic code? So, in that sense, couldn't telepathy actually be a "thing" in the future?


Marik Whiterose wrote:
** spoiler omitted **

Spoiler:
IIRC, yes, though the genetic manipulation was in the past, I believe. Like the manipulation that made humans see Vorlons as angels.

But yes, if you've got godlike aliens messing with things, anything could be a "thing". Of course, if you've got godlike aliens messing with things, you're pretty much out of hard SF territory anyway.

Dark Archive

I liked the variability of the races and technology on the show.

On Star Trek (which I also love and am not dissing at all), it seems like just about anyone the Federation runs into (Klingons, Romulans, Ferengi, Cardassians, Breen, Jem Hadar, etc.) has the same sort of shields, warp drive, transporters, tractor beams, etc. as the Federation. On Babylon 5, the Humans and Narn ships we see don't even have artificial gravity (the Human ships rotate, and the one Narn ship I remember, everyone was strapped in). The Centauri and Minbari (and presumably Vorlons) do have artificial gravity technology, in one instance to the degree of having a hand held gravity manipulating device!

And yet, as to the 'hard' science, I'm not sure any sci-fi show really fits the harsher definitions. Most of them have aliens, or genetically enhanced people, or faster than light travel, or telepathy, or hand held directed energy weapons, or 'sensors' that can read 'life signs' from space (*my* body doesn't emit anything detectable through the vacuum of space, not even when I've eaten chili!), or lightsabers, or whatever, and I tend not to worry about that sort of thing.

As sci-fi goes, it's maybe a bit 'harder' than one that includes a 'Q Continuum' (and about the same as the one based around 'The Force'), but hardly reality-based.

Upside, it's got characters like Bester. Oh, he's fun.

Sovereign Court

A wizard named Elric, quoting Gandalf. I fell of my chair.


Set wrote:

I liked the variability of the races and technology on the show.

On Star Trek (which I also love and am not dissing at all), it seems like just about anyone the Federation runs into (Klingons, Romulans, Ferengi, Cardassians, Breen, Jem Hadar, etc.) has the same sort of shields, warp drive, transporters, tractor beams, etc. as the Federation. On Babylon 5, the Humans and Narn ships we see don't even have artificial gravity (the Human ships rotate, and the one Narn ship I remember, everyone was strapped in). The Centauri and Minbari (and presumably Vorlons) do have artificial gravity technology, in one instance to the degree of having a hand held gravity manipulating device!

And yet, as to the 'hard' science, I'm not sure any sci-fi show really fits the harsher definitions. Most of them have aliens, or genetically enhanced people, or faster than light travel, or telepathy, or hand held directed energy weapons, or 'sensors' that can read 'life signs' from space (*my* body doesn't emit anything detectable through the vacuum of space, not even when I've eaten chili!), or lightsabers, or whatever, and I tend not to worry about that sort of thing.

As sci-fi goes, it's maybe a bit 'harder' than one that includes a 'Q Continuum' (and about the same as the one based around 'The Force'), but hardly reality-based.

Upside, it's got characters like Bester. Oh, he's fun.

IIRC, the B5 RPG had a pretty simple tech level chart of 1 through 7. Humans were a 3, Centauri a 4, Minbari a 5, Vorlonns a 6, and the First Ones a 7. The big difference between 6 and 7 was that at 6, humans still understood the theory behind how it worked, even if the actual nuts and bolts were centuries beyond them. At a 7, not even the base science behind it was understood.

And Bester was an awesome guy you love to hate. For some reason, I always picture him when the A Perfect Circle cover of the Beatles 'Imagine' played on the radio. Maybe because the tone they sang it in changed the vibe from 'imagine how wonderful this could be' into 'imagine having no choice.'

Scarab Sages

I was always under the impression that the Vorlons and Shadows were grouped as part of the First Ones, just sort of the last of the first ones to come along.


First Ones:
Yeah, the Vorlons and Shadows are First Ones. They're just the ones that stayed behind to "guide" the younger races instead of exploring the galaxy at large.

I was never sure that the First Ones are even biological. I think they're just living energy.

Also, I remember seeing what the Vorlons really look like to be a huge "Oh S#&~" moment.

Season 3 and 4:
Both sides are holding back until late season 3, when the planet killers come out.

Also, keep in mind that the little Vorlon personal ships could make warp gates and kill the main Shadow battleships. I think the warp gate is something the Vorlons invented, and they passed a crappier version of it to the Minbari, who in turn passed it on to other races.


G'kar is my favorite alien from any scifi series or movie. I liked him when he sang to his supper and rescued Sinclair's errant ladyfriend. I loved him when he was explaining to that same woman why he rescued her. And I am still in awe about how Andreas Katsulas could express himself under that makeup. Na'toth was funny. I may have a soft spot for narns in general.

First Ones:

I thought there was a pecking order among the first ones based on how large their population was.
Lorien was at the top, the unnamed five who came to help the alliance at Corianna VI were next, with Shadows and Vorlons being less powerful than them.

ZOG.
Zog?! Zog yes? zog no?

Seasons 3 and 4:

There is one thing that slightly bothered me upon rewatching seasons 3 and 4 years later. With JMS writing all the stories, dialogue got a bit theatrical in some spots. I don't know how to express it better.

Still, B5 remains on shared top ranking (with Farscape, which is a totally different show) in my books.

You are not ready for immortality.


Naal wrote:

G'kar is my favorite alien from any scifi series or movie. I liked him when he sang to his supper and rescued Sinclair's errant ladyfriend. I loved him when he was explaining to that same woman why he rescued her. And I am still in awe about how Andreas Katsulas could express himself under that makeup. Na'toth was funny. I may have a soft spot for narns in general.

** spoiler omitted **

** spoiler omitted **

You are not ready for immortality.

Spoiler:
I think the pecking order was more age than population. Lorien was supposedly the oldest.

You are probably right. I have to rewatch the entire series to confirm this, of course. Woe is me!

Spoiler:

Note to self, skip "Gray 17 is missing" this time.


Aberzombie wrote:
I was always under the impression that the Vorlons and Shadows were grouped as part of the First Ones, just sort of the last of the first ones to come along.

The guide was written from the human perspective at the start of the show - at the time the Vorlonns were just thought to be really old (and extremely enigmatic), and nobody on Earth had a clue about the Shadows.

Grand Lodge

Set wrote:

I liked the variability of the races and technology on the show.

On Star Trek (which I also love and am not dissing at all), it seems like just about anyone the Federation runs into (Klingons, Romulans, Ferengi, Cardassians, Breen, Jem Hadar, etc.) has the same sort of shields, warp drive, transporters, tractor beams, etc. as the Federation.

There are differences. Federation and Klingons use matter-antimatter reactors to power their warp drives. Romulans use artificially created black holes.


Once I mentioned liking B5 and all the Trekkies and Jedi/Siths in the room gave me a nasty look.


DaemonAngel wrote:

Once I mentioned liking B5 and all the Trekkies and Jedi/Siths in the room gave me a nasty look.

Happened to a friend at a convention. There was a Star Trek vs Star Wars panel - he mentioned liking them both to the consternation of everyone on it, then mentioned B5 and the trek guys started to lose it.

Well, when Mrs. Star Trek herself appeared on B5 I think many of them were quite unhappy.

Scarab Sages

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Grey Lensman wrote:


Well, when Mrs. Star Trek herself appeared on B5 I think many of them were quite unhappy.

One of the better guest appearances on the show. And a great episode!


Entil'za veni. In Valen's Name. We live for the One, we die for the One.

Sovereign Court

I see a lot of Star Trek actors making guest appearances.

Grand Lodge

Hama wrote:

I see a lot of Star Trek actors making guest appearances.

I think the official seal of approval is when one of them is Majel Roddenberry. Walter Koenig was the only one with a recurring role... one of the series best villains in the form of Alfred Bester. (a name which should ring bells in any scifi geek)


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Right now I am "watching" Star Trek: The Next Generation for the first time (i.e. it is playing on netflix while I do research-related work at home).

I was pretty happy to hear a familiar voice last night and releasing that the actor who played G'kar also had a reoccurring role as a Romulan commander.

51 to 100 of 199 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Gamer Life / Entertainment / Television / Babylon 5 All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.