Name Violation |
15 people marked this as FAQ candidate. |
Weapon Proficiency
A pistolero only gains proficiency with one-handed firearms. She must take Exotic Weapon Proficiency (firearm) to gain proficiency with two-handed firearms and firearm siege engines.
This means they are only proficient with with one-handed firearms and nothing else.
Is this intentional, or an oversight?
LazarX |
Weapon Proficiency
A pistolero only gains proficiency with one-handed firearms. She must take Exotic Weapon Proficiency (firearm) to gain proficiency with two-handed firearms and firearm siege engines.
This means they are only proficient with with one-handed firearms and nothing else.
Is this intentional, or an oversight?
It's intentional. That's why it's called the Pistolero, not the Rifelero.
It looks like they also lose simple and martial weapon proficiency as well.
cnetarian |
Well it isn't a problem because a pistolero gets pistol training on top of gun training, so gets to add DEX twice to damage rolls at level 5, doing more damage than anyone else. Sure RAI is different but that's what is written. Plus you can always hit someone with a pistol for as much damage as a dagger anyway.
LazarX |
The way that the passage is phrased, I believe it's indicating that the pistolero only gains firearms proficiency with pistols - not that it is removing all proficiency save for pistols.
It does say While most gunslingers have favorite firearms, there are those rare ones who choose to specialize in one-handed firearms exclusively. The "exclusively" at the end seems to confirm the RAW.
blahpers |
Xaratherus wrote:The way that the passage is phrased, I believe it's indicating that the pistolero only gains firearms proficiency with pistols - not that it is removing all proficiency save for pistols.It does say While most gunslingers have favorite firearms, there are those rare ones who choose to specialize in one-handed firearms exclusively. The "exclusively" at the end seems to confirm the RAW.
So long as my pistolero gets to stack gun training and pistol training, okay. : D
Xaratherus |
I think that it's ambiguously-worded and that the RAI does not intend to take away the other proficiencies - but having said that I must admit that comparing it against the Musket Master archetype for the Cavalier, strict RAW would imply that they only gain Firearm (Pistol).
Clicking FAQ on this one.
DarkPhoenixx |
Well it isn't a problem because a pistolero gets pistol training on top of gun training, so gets to add DEX twice to damage rolls at level 5, doing more damage than anyone else. Sure RAI is different but that's what is written. Plus you can always hit someone with a pistol for as much damage as a dagger anyway.
Exept bonuses from similar source dont stack.
Out of curiosity, is there any other class or archetype that isn't proficient with the club?
Unarmed Fighter. Seriously, fighter that is not proficient in simple weapons? Obviously not intention.
James Risner Owner - D20 Hobbies |
Xaratherus |
Name Violation wrote:from different sources it doesCorrect, but the assertion is that Dex or Int is the same source and therefore wouldn't stack with itself.
The ability score is the destination or the recipient, not the source. The source is the power\feat\class feature that's granting the bonus. In this case, the granted bonus is untyped, so since they're from different sources, by RAW they should stack.
James Risner Owner - D20 Hobbies |
blahpers |
The long and short of it is that, like many UC archetypes, RAW is hastily-written and error prone. If you stick to strict RAW, you have a gunslinger who can't swing a freaking club without going "LOL WHICH END GOES WHERE" and and has both pistol training and an ability that anybody with two brain cells to rub together knows was intended to be replaced by pistol training. So use your judgment as to how to adjudicate the situation.
Atarlost |
Xaratherus wrote:The source is the power\feat\class feature that's granting the bonus.I don't agree and neither of us has any rule in the Core that proves either side. So we are left with two RAW interpretations. One permissive and one non-permissive.
If that's true then dragon style does not function since unarmed strikes already add strength to damage.
Which is a more likely interpretation, the one that lets other rules function, or the interpretation that renders them nonfunctional?
James Risner Owner - D20 Hobbies |
Michael Sayre Design Manager |
Correct, but the assertion is that Dex or Int is the same source and therefore wouldn't stack with itself.
The ability score is the destination or the recipient, not the source. The source is the power\feat\class feature that's granting the bonus. In this case, the granted bonus is untyped, so since they're from different sources, by RAW they should stack.
James Jacobs disagrees with you on that one.
Kazaan |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
All characters have proficiency in simple weapons by default, save for Druids, Monks, and Wizards. For all classes aside from those three, simple weapon proficiency is a foregone conclusion. So, at the very least, a Pistolero is proficient in all simple weapons along with pistols. More likely, they simply lose the broad "all firearms" proficiency:
Weapon and Armor Proficiency: Gunslingers are proficient (with all simple and martial weapons), (and with all firearms). (They are proficient with all light armor).
That's how I'd expect it to be parsed and the replacement is occurring in the second segment (and with all firearms).