Pistolero, No Simple or Martial Weapon Proficiency?


Rules Questions

Dark Archive

15 people marked this as FAQ candidate.

Weapon Proficiency

A pistolero only gains proficiency with one-handed firearms. She must take Exotic Weapon Proficiency (firearm) to gain proficiency with two-handed firearms and firearm siege engines.

This means they are only proficient with with one-handed firearms and nothing else.

Is this intentional, or an oversight?

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder PF Special Edition, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Name Violation wrote:

Weapon Proficiency

A pistolero only gains proficiency with one-handed firearms. She must take Exotic Weapon Proficiency (firearm) to gain proficiency with two-handed firearms and firearm siege engines.

This means they are only proficient with with one-handed firearms and nothing else.

Is this intentional, or an oversight?

It's intentional. That's why it's called the Pistolero, not the Rifelero.

It looks like they also lose simple and martial weapon proficiency as well.


He is pointing out that vanilla gunslinger gets simple and martial proficiency as well. Probably just an oversight.


Yeah, we've never played it that way.

Dark Archive

Mythic +10 Artifact Toaster wrote:
He is pointing out that vanilla gunslinger gets simple and martial proficiency as well. Probably just an oversight.

exactly. no daggers, clubs, anything else


Well it isn't a problem because a pistolero gets pistol training on top of gun training, so gets to add DEX twice to damage rolls at level 5, doing more damage than anyone else. Sure RAI is different but that's what is written. Plus you can always hit someone with a pistol for as much damage as a dagger anyway.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

The way that the passage is phrased, I believe it's indicating that the pistolero only gains firearms proficiency with pistols - not that it is removing all proficiency save for pistols.

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder PF Special Edition, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Xaratherus wrote:
The way that the passage is phrased, I believe it's indicating that the pistolero only gains firearms proficiency with pistols - not that it is removing all proficiency save for pistols.

It does say While most gunslingers have favorite firearms, there are those rare ones who choose to specialize in one-handed firearms exclusively. The "exclusively" at the end seems to confirm the RAW.


LazarX wrote:
Xaratherus wrote:
The way that the passage is phrased, I believe it's indicating that the pistolero only gains firearms proficiency with pistols - not that it is removing all proficiency save for pistols.
It does say While most gunslingers have favorite firearms, there are those rare ones who choose to specialize in one-handed firearms exclusively. The "exclusively" at the end seems to confirm the RAW.

So long as my pistolero gets to stack gun training and pistol training, okay. : D


I think that it's ambiguously-worded and that the RAI does not intend to take away the other proficiencies - but having said that I must admit that comparing it against the Musket Master archetype for the Cavalier, strict RAW would imply that they only gain Firearm (Pistol).

Clicking FAQ on this one.


Out of curiosity, is there any other class or archetype that isn't proficient with the club?

Grand Lodge

blahpers wrote:
Out of curiosity, is there any other class or archetype that isn't proficient with the club?

Monk of the Empty Hand.


Oh yeah, that one! Thematically awesome, but somewhat lackluster early on without burning feats on Catch Off-Guard and Throw Anything. At least he can still flurry.


cnetarian wrote:
Well it isn't a problem because a pistolero gets pistol training on top of gun training, so gets to add DEX twice to damage rolls at level 5, doing more damage than anyone else. Sure RAI is different but that's what is written. Plus you can always hit someone with a pistol for as much damage as a dagger anyway.

Exept bonuses from similar source dont stack.

blahpers wrote:
Out of curiosity, is there any other class or archetype that isn't proficient with the club?

Unarmed Fighter. Seriously, fighter that is not proficient in simple weapons? Obviously not intention.


blahpers wrote:


So long as my pistolero gets to stack gun training and pistol training, okay. : D

You don't.

Double-application of the same ability score doesn't stack.

Dark Archive

Throne wrote:
blahpers wrote:


So long as my pistolero gets to stack gun training and pistol training, okay. : D

You don't.

Double-application of the same ability score doesn't stack.

from different sources it does

like an alchemist throwing a bomb and usin kirin style to add double int to danage

The Exchange Owner - D20 Hobbies

Name Violation wrote:
from different sources it does

Correct, but the assertion is that Dex or Int is the same source and therefore wouldn't stack with itself.


James Risner wrote:
Name Violation wrote:
from different sources it does
Correct, but the assertion is that Dex or Int is the same source and therefore wouldn't stack with itself.

The ability score is the destination or the recipient, not the source. The source is the power\feat\class feature that's granting the bonus. In this case, the granted bonus is untyped, so since they're from different sources, by RAW they should stack.

The Exchange Owner - D20 Hobbies

Xaratherus wrote:
The source is the power\feat\class feature that's granting the bonus.

I don't agree and neither of us has any rule in the Core that proves either side. So we are left with two RAW interpretations. One permissive and one non-permissive.


The long and short of it is that, like many UC archetypes, RAW is hastily-written and error prone. If you stick to strict RAW, you have a gunslinger who can't swing a freaking club without going "LOL WHICH END GOES WHERE" and and has both pistol training and an ability that anybody with two brain cells to rub together knows was intended to be replaced by pistol training. So use your judgment as to how to adjudicate the situation.


James Risner wrote:
Xaratherus wrote:
The source is the power\feat\class feature that's granting the bonus.
I don't agree and neither of us has any rule in the Core that proves either side. So we are left with two RAW interpretations. One permissive and one non-permissive.

If that's true then dragon style does not function since unarmed strikes already add strength to damage.

Which is a more likely interpretation, the one that lets other rules function, or the interpretation that renders them nonfunctional?


Specific overrides general. Or like a lot of things you can apply common sense. In the case of the ops thread assume the only thing being modified is his firearms proficiency.

The Exchange Owner - D20 Hobbies

Atarlost wrote:
dragon style does not function since unarmed strikes already add strength to damage.

Bad example, as it says "you can add 1-1/2 times your Strength bonus" so instead of adding 1 times you add 1-1/2 times.

Paizo Employee Design Manager

Xaratherus wrote:

Correct, but the assertion is that Dex or Int is the same source and therefore wouldn't stack with itself.

The ability score is the destination or the recipient, not the source. The source is the power\feat\class feature that's granting the bonus. In this case, the granted bonus is untyped, so since they're from different sources, by RAW they should stack.

James Jacobs disagrees with you on that one.


JJ rules as a GM, not a rules designer. He's often right, of course. Anyway, different thread topic.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

All characters have proficiency in simple weapons by default, save for Druids, Monks, and Wizards. For all classes aside from those three, simple weapon proficiency is a foregone conclusion. So, at the very least, a Pistolero is proficient in all simple weapons along with pistols. More likely, they simply lose the broad "all firearms" proficiency:

PRD wrote:
Weapon and Armor Proficiency: Gunslingers are proficient (with all simple and martial weapons), (and with all firearms). (They are proficient with all light armor).

That's how I'd expect it to be parsed and the replacement is occurring in the second segment (and with all firearms).

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Rules Questions / Pistolero, No Simple or Martial Weapon Proficiency? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.