Purple Vibrant Ioun Stone Clarification


Pathfinder Society

Shadow Lodge

I'm currently running a fighter/archer build and really digging it.

I'm looking for a way to boost my AC and came across the cracked vibrant purple Ioun Stone.

My idea is to have shield cast into it thus turning my Shield bonus from 0 --> 4 (and AC from 22 --> 26) when activated.

First Question: Are cracked ioun stones legal in PFS? I've heard both.

Second Question: If this is a legal option, if I buy a scroll of shield and have a caster put it in the stone does the stone how many times can I use the stone before it needs to be recharged? Once? Once per day? Or could I use it whenever I choose? Easy enough to buy a wand of shield and have the caster replenish the stone as needed but if I could save the 2 PP I would.

Thanks!

5/5 5/55/55/5

Cracked Ioun stones are pfs legal.

This stone stores three levels of spells, as a ring of spell storing. Stored spells in the stone must be placed by a spellcaster but can be used by anyone (see ring of minor spell storing).

Cracked: This stone stores one spell level, as a ring of spell storing (minor). Price: 2,000 gp.

So if all you want is shield, I'll assume you want the el cheapo 2k version. It stores 1 level of spell, so it stores 1 shield. You'll have to get shield recast into the sphere every time.

The shield spell stays in the stone accross scenarios as long as it was put there by an NPC.

You should buy NPC spellcasting services (they're cheaper than scrolls) At the start of the adventure, and some scrolls for your party members to recharge your rock with throughout the day.

Shadow Lodge

Thanks! I'll just buy a wand of shield for 2 PP and that way can recharge as needed. Thanks!

Sczarni 3/5

The Cracked Vibrant Purple Prism Ioun Stone is listed in Seekers of Secrets. All cracked, flawed and normal Ioun Stones from this book are legal.

Your character would have to buy 1 shield spell scroll (or casting, as Wolf said) and have it cast into the stone. Once used, it would function just as if your character had been able to cast it upon himself. It would need to be recharged after every use.

Edit: Drat... Ninja'd.

Shadow Lodge

Just thought of a possible hiccup...

Does the fact that the target of Shield is "personal" prevent it from being cast into an ioun stone?

Thoughts?

3/5

I would say not. If so, nobody could ever create a magic item which requires a 'personal' spell as an ingredient to create it.
The shield badge (brooch of shielding?)comes to mind, for example.
Just like a Wand of Shield, or a Scroll of Shield.

Remember, the act of putting it into an item does not make you acually cast the spell itself...
The acual casting of the spell is done when -completing- the casting of the spell with the last trigger word.
It's like wizards who prepare a spell for the day: They study in their spellbook, learning the spell they want to cast that day, but they don't acually finish it. The moment they finish the spell learned for that day is the acual 'release/casting' of the spell. The last trigger word...

Otherwise I'd be feeling very sorry for all those people trying to create a necklace of fireballs or trying to put it in a ring of spell storing.....and fireball isn't even a personal spell :)

You can cast a shield spell into the ioun stone.

Sovereign Court 5/5

Nobody's mentioned it yet so I'll throw out that cracked/flawed ioun stones give no enhancement when placed in a wayfinder, only full ioun stones will give the bearer the listed resonant power.

Dark Archive

Todd Lower wrote:
Nobody's mentioned it yet so I'll throw out that cracked/flawed ioun stones give no enhancement when placed in a wayfinder, only full ioun stones will give the bearer the listed resonant power.

orly?

Sovereign Court 5/5

Name Violation wrote:
Todd Lower wrote:
Nobody's mentioned it yet so I'll throw out that cracked/flawed ioun stones give no enhancement when placed in a wayfinder, only full ioun stones will give the bearer the listed resonant power.
orly?

Yes, really. :-)

Liberty's Edge 5/5

I've always questioned whether the ioun stone can actually be targeted with a personal spell. I don't allow it in home games, but the general consensus seems to be that it is legit in PFS.

Liberty's Edge 1/5

Todd Lower wrote:
Name Violation wrote:
Todd Lower wrote:
Nobody's mentioned it yet so I'll throw out that cracked/flawed ioun stones give no enhancement when placed in a wayfinder, only full ioun stones will give the bearer the listed resonant power.
orly?
Yes, really. :-)

Cracked/flawed Ioun stones still give there standard power when in a wayfinder it is only the Resonance that they do not gain.

Liberty's Edge 4/5

will work just fine. would recommend inplanting it in arm for easy access. putting it in the wayfinder gets you nothing.

The Exchange 4/5 5/5

So there's two things to remember here. First, the Vibrant Purple Ioun Stone's description says "see ring of spell storing".

Ring of Spell Storing, Minor wrote:

A minor ring of spell storing contains up to three levels of spells (either divine or arcane, or even a mix of both spell types) that the wearer can cast. Each spell has a caster level equal to the minimum level needed to cast that spell. The user need not provide any material components or focus to cast the spell, and there is no arcane spell failure chance for wearing armor (because the ring wearer need not gesture). The activation time for the ring is the same as the casting time for the relevant spell, with a minimum of 1 standard action.

For a randomly generated ring, treat it as a scroll to determine what spells are stored in it. If you roll a spell that would put the ring over the three-level limit, ignore that roll; the ring has no more spells in it.

A spellcaster can cast any spells into the ring, so long as the total spell levels do not add up to more than three. Metamagic versions of spells take up storage space equal to their spell level modified by the metamagic feat. A spellcaster can use a scroll to put a spell into the minor ring of spell storing.

The ring magically imparts to the wearer the names of all spells currently stored within it.

Part two is how to activate it. Although the activation type is not specifically called out, the spell trigger activation method seems most fitting. Just like a wand it does not require components and takes as long to cast as the spell in it (minimum one standard action).

PRD wrote:
Spell Trigger: Spell trigger activation is similar to spell completion, but it's even simpler. No gestures or spell finishing is needed, just a special knowledge of spellcasting that an appropriate character would know, and a single word that must be spoken. Spell trigger items can be used by anyone whose class can cast the corresponding spell. This is the case even for a character who can't actually cast spells, such as a 3rd-level paladin. The user must still determine what spell is stored in the item before she can activate it. Activating a spell trigger item is a standard action and does not provoke attacks of opportunity.

So any spell can be cast into the ioun stone but unless you can normally cast that spell you will have to UMD to activate it. Also remember that (for PFS purposes) the spell takes effect at the minimum caster level.

Dark Archive 5/5

Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Maps Subscriber

Ring of spell storing is not called out in the list of spell trigger items, so it is a use activated magic item because that is the default for wondrous items. Default form of use activation would be intent + command word. It's activation time is specified by the spell stored. The spell stored can be any spell that fits within the limits of the ring of spell storing / ioun stone.

There is no difference between PFS and normal PFRPG for a ring of spell storing or equivalent, as the ring specifies minimum caster level of the spell upon activation.

All of the components, gestures, foci, et cetera were presented or consumed during the caster putting the spell into the spell-storing item.

The Exchange 4/5 5/5

TetsujinOni wrote:
Ring of spell storing is not called out in the list of spell trigger items, so it is a use activated magic item because that is the default for wondrous items. Default form of use activation would be intent + command word. It's activation time is specified by the spell stored. The spell stored can be any spell that fits within the limits of the ring of spell storing / ioun stone.

Do you have a reference for this? I did a forum search before posting and could find no answer. I will certainly agree that both rings and wondrous items have the text that they are "usually" command word activated, but the ring of spell storing specifically says "...that the wearer can cast." Items that allow the wearer to cast spells fall into the spell completion (scrolls) or spell trigger (wands and staves) categories.

Compare the ring of spell storing to ring of blinking (On command, this ring makes the wearer blink, as the blink spell) or ring of invisibility (By activating this simple silver ring, the wearer can benefit from invisibility, as the spell).

So I'd love to see a developer ruling on this (my monk would love to have stones of shield, mage armor, lead blades, and about 15 stones of true strike that he wouldn't need to UMD) but it does seem to read as spell trigger.

Dark Archive 5/5

Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Maps Subscriber
Belafon wrote:
TetsujinOni wrote:
Ring of spell storing is not called out in the list of spell trigger items, so it is a use activated magic item because that is the default for wondrous items. Default form of use activation would be intent + command word. It's activation time is specified by the spell stored. The spell stored can be any spell that fits within the limits of the ring of spell storing / ioun stone.
Do you have a reference for this? I did a forum search before posting and could find no answer. I will certainly agree that both rings and wondrous items have the text that they are "usually" command word activated, but the ring of spell storing specifically says "...that the wearer can cast."

Based on

prd wrote:

Wondrous Items

This is a catch all category for anything that doesn't fall into the other groups. Anyone can use a wondrous item (unless specified otherwise in the description).

Physical Description: Varies.

Activation: Usually use-activated or command word, but details vary from item to item.

and

prd wrote:

Rings

Rings bestow magical powers upon their wearers. Only a rare few have charges—most magic rings are permanent and potent magic items. Anyone can use a ring.

A character can only effectively wear two magic rings. A third magic ring doesn't work if the wearer is already wearing two magic rings.

Physical Description: Rings have no appreciable weight. Although exceptions exist that are crafted from glass or bone, the vast majority of rings are forged from metal—usually precious metals such as gold, silver, and platinum. A ring has AC 13, 2 hit points, hardness 10, and a break DC of 25.

Activation: A ring's ability is usually activated by a spoken command word (a standard action that does not provoke attacks of opportunity) or its effects work continually. Some rings have unusual activations, as mentioned in the ring's specific description.

and the lack of detail specifying otherwise, anyone can activate a ring of spell storing to cast the spell from it with a command word to cast the spell contained. The unusual activation of a ring of spell storing is only called out as the speed of the action - this makes it even usable for things like liberating command or saving finale.

That's all the reference I've got for it, but it's also the most common interpretation that I've seen, and would be surprised to find a GM enforcing this as a spell trigger activation. The only spell trigger items I am aware of are staves and wands.

Shadow Lodge

Belafon said wrote:
So any spell can be cast into the ioun stone but unless you can normally cast that spell you will have to UMD to activate it. Also remember that (for PFS purposes) the spell takes effect at the minimum caster level.

I disagree with that assessment. In reading the description of the vibrant purple stone is notes nothing about UMD check, but specifically states "Anyone" can cast it. If it were similar to a wand in necesitating a UMD check, then what's special about it?

Bottom line: My archer's AC is going up 4! :)

5/5

Jeff Morse wrote:
would recommend inplanting it in arm for easy access.

I doubt his archer has the skills necessary to accomplish that.

Remember - it takes a standard action to cast, and only lasts 1 minute.

4/5

if you have to use an action to activate the shield spell from the stone...

and you have to UMD a wand of shield to put the spell in their in the first place, every time...

why not cut out the middle man (stone), and just use the wand on yourself?

Silver Crusade 5/5

Presumably because you don't have a UMD high enough to guarantee success every time, while the stone can be activated always. Also, if you have a caster in the party that can use the wand, you don't even have to UMD it.

5/5 5/55/55/5

EvilMinion wrote:

if you have to use an action to activate the shield spell from the stone...

and you have to UMD a wand of shield to put the spell in their in the first place, every time...

why not cut out the middle man (stone), and just use the wand on yourself?

Draw wand use wand uses up a move and a standard as opposed to a move

Using the stone is guaranteed, using the wand isn't.

Edit:Also, you can get a party member to do it for a longer lasting shield. On that note, you may want to get a pearl of power level 1 if you regularly have a wizard in the party. They're almost bound to have shield in their book.

Scarab Sages 4/5

Exactly. It's all about action economy and having a hand free. My ninja, for example, two-weapon fights. So drawing a wand to use in combat becomes problematic.

Also, you can always pay to have a spell put into the stone between scenarios, just like with any spell storing item.

Silver Crusade 5/5

BigNorseWolf wrote:


Edit:Also, you can get a party member to do it for a longer lasting shield. On that note, you may want to get a pearl of power level 1 if you regularly have a wizard in the party. They're almost bound to have shield in their book.

Unfortunately, this is not the case. Spells cast from spell storing items are always at minimum caster level in PFS.

The Exchange 5/5 RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16

Katie, even if they are cast into the spell-storing item by PCs who are higher level?

I understand that spellcasting srvices, purchased wands, scrolls, etc. are all at minimum caster level.

But you're suggesting a break between PFS and the general Pathfinder rules as to how spell-storing items work.

Sovereign Court 4/5 5/5 ***

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Chris Mortika wrote:
I understand that spellcasting srvices, purchased wands, scrolls, etc. are all at minimum caster level.

Since when did you have to purchase spellcasting services at minimum caster level?

Silver Crusade 5/5

Chris Mortika wrote:

Katie, even if they are cast into the spell-storing item by PCs who are higher level?

I understand that spellcasting srvices, purchased wands, scrolls, etc. are all at minimum caster level.

But you're suggesting a break between PFS and the general Pathfinder rules as to how spell-storing items work.

Actually it's not specific to PFS, but in the description of a ring of spell storing it says

From the prd wrote:


A minor ring of spell storing contains up to three levels of spells (either divine or arcane, or even a mix of both spell types) that the wearer can cast. Each spell has a caster level equal to the minimum level needed to cast that spell. The user need not provide any material components or focus to cast the spell, and there is no arcane spell failure chance for wearing armor (because the ring wearer need not gesture). The activation time for the ring is the same as the casting time for the relevant spell, with a minimum of 1 standard action.

So I erred in saying specific to PFS, but the ioun stone specifically says it works like a ring of spell storing. So you can only store it at minimum caster level.

Shadow Lodge

EvilMinion wrote:
why not cut out the middle man (stone), and just use the wand on yourself?

Because Shield is a personal spell...thus only the person casting or using the wand can cast it on themselves. Shield of faith bypasses this, but then I would only gain +2 AC instead of +4.

Make sense?

Shadow Lodge

Also, I know the spell only lasts for 1 minute, but that's 10 rounds and it's usually pretty easy to know when you're going to be put into combat in PFS scenarios.

Worse case scenario we get surprised and I take my first standard action to cast it on myself.

Shadow Lodge

Since the stone is the only way my Archer can cast the spell shield it's the only way my character can get the +4.

Shadow Lodge

More to the point since my UMD sucks (-1 charisma) and the fighter has very few skill points per level it wouldn't make sense to be a fighter who focuses on UMD.

The Exchange 4/5 5/5

1 person marked this as FAQ candidate.
TetsujinOni wrote:
...and the lack of detail specifying otherwise, anyone can activate a ring of spell storing to cast the spell from it with a command word to cast the spell contained. The unusual activation of a ring of spell storing is only called out as the speed of the action - this makes it even usable for things like liberating command or saving finale.

So after thinking about this for a while I decided to move the question of activation type to the rules forum.

What kind of activation method does a Ring of Spell Storing use?

I would ask that we not rehash the arguments for or against one method in that thread; I worded it as neutrally as I could and am hoping for a developer response. But please hit the FAQ button if you are so moved. :)

In the meantime I won't be enforcing spell trigger activation on PFS players, I'll use command word as that is the more liberal interpretation.

And now a couple of asides:

Why I think command word activation for cracked vibrant purple ioun stones violates design goals (which has nothing to do with the RAW of the ring and are just my thoughts):
Having a slotless 2000 gp item that allows you to cast ANY level one personal range spell without spellcasting ability or a UMD skill seems to violate the design principle of personal range spells. They are supposed to be limited to specific classes or those who invest heavily in the ability to use them. So many classes would benefit from being able to have shield. Two Handed, Two Weapon, or ranged Fighters, Barbarians, Rangers, Paladins. Heck even Clerics or Oracles. Gunslingers. Monks. Cavaliers who love to two-hand that lance. Wildshaping Druids. I personally have a lot of 3rd and 4th level characters who would save up to buy a stone as soon as they hit 13 fame and keep true strike in it for the BBEG.

Here's a partial list of other personal range spells I find useful (others may not, some have different spells they love). Comprehend languages, disguise self, expeditious retreat, lead blades. If you are adventuring with a paladin you can even get grace. (You have to get it from a character, an NPC will have to be a cleric per PFS rules and it's a level 2 spell for them.)

And that's just the problem with personal range spells. There's plenty of spells (like entangle or color spray) that really don't seem to be meant to be easily available to non-casters.

Maybe it is intended to be that way and I'm completely misreading the situation. Maybe the designers decided command word activation was fine (before the cracked stone came along) when the cheapest option was the minor ring of spell storing which costs 18000 gp and uses one of your precious ring slots.

Why saving finale doesn't actually work:
It's an immediate action used immediately after the target fails a saving throw. Since the ring (and therefore the stone) requires a standard action at minimum, the moment for the saving finale has passed by the time you can cast it.

Dark Archive 5/5

Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Maps Subscriber
Belafon wrote:
TetsujinOni wrote:
...and the lack of detail specifying otherwise, anyone can activate a ring of spell storing to cast the spell from it with a command word to cast the spell contained. The unusual activation of a ring of spell storing is only called out as the speed of the action - this makes it even usable for things like liberating command or saving finale.

So after thinking about this for a while I decided to move the question of activation type to the rules forum.

What kind of activation method does a Ring of Spell Storing use?

I would ask that we not rehash the arguments for or against one method in that thread; I worded it as neutrally as I could and am hoping for a developer response. But please hit the FAQ button if you are so moved. :)

In the meantime I won't be enforcing spell trigger activation on PFS players, I'll use command word as that is the more liberal interpretation.

And now a couple of asides:

** spoiler omitted **...

Good catch, I forgot they minimum of a standard action'd the spell storing ring.

I also agree that the cracked vibrant purple ioun stone may be dramatically mispriced.

Grand Lodge 4/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.
TetsujinOni wrote:
Belafon wrote:
TetsujinOni wrote:
...and the lack of detail specifying otherwise, anyone can activate a ring of spell storing to cast the spell from it with a command word to cast the spell contained. The unusual activation of a ring of spell storing is only called out as the speed of the action - this makes it even usable for things like liberating command or saving finale.

So after thinking about this for a while I decided to move the question of activation type to the rules forum.

What kind of activation method does a Ring of Spell Storing use?

I would ask that we not rehash the arguments for or against one method in that thread; I worded it as neutrally as I could and am hoping for a developer response. But please hit the FAQ button if you are so moved. :)

In the meantime I won't be enforcing spell trigger activation on PFS players, I'll use command word as that is the more liberal interpretation.

And now a couple of asides:

** spoiler omitted **...

Good catch, I forgot they minimum of a standard action'd the spell storing ring.

I also agree that the cracked vibrant purple ioun stone may be dramatically mispriced.

Figured out the pricing, and it appears to be correct, following my assumptions:

Ring of Spell Storing, holds up to 3 spell levels, 18,000
Note that 18,000 is also the cost for a +3 weapon enhancement.

Cracked vibrand purple prism Ioun stone, holds up to 1 spell level, 2,000
Note that that price is equivalent to a +1 weapon enhancement.

So, cost is apparently equal to the total number of spell levels the spell storing item can hold, squared, times 2,000 gold.

1 = 2,000
2 = 8,000
3 = 18,000
4 = 32,000
5 = 50,000
and so forth.

It makes for a visually dramatic price difference between the ring and the Ioun stone, but the ruing also has a lot more flexibility, to boot.

It is entirely possible that the Ioun stone pricing should be doubled for being slotless, or it might be possible that the ring price should be decreased for being slotted. Not my call.

But it means that I no longer feel guilty for buying the Ioun stones, since the price appears to actually be in the right neighborhood...

Edit: ALso note that the price is not dissimilar to that for Pearls of Power (which cost half, but are more flexible for prepared casters) and whatever the version for spontaneous casters is called, which is the same price, and, like the PoP, more flexible in many ways.

Community / Forums / Organized Play / Pathfinder Society / Purple Vibrant Ioun Stone Clarification All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.