Nobody Worthknowing |
Tower Shield Training reverts to normal armor training when not using a tower shield, so first off there is NO downside to gaining it instead of normal armor training. At worst, you're where any other fighter would be. If you DO use a tower shield, though, you basically get an extra two points deducted from armor check penalty and +1 max dex over regular armor training's values (ie, at AT III you'd have 5 lower check penalty and +4 max dex, for example).
So it's strictly better than normal armor training. They do lose weapon training for other class features, though, which may be annoying for you.
Starbuck_II |
Tower Shield Training reverts to normal armor training when not using a tower shield, so first off there is NO downside to gaining it instead of normal armor training. At worst, you're where any other fighter would be. If you DO use a tower shield, though, you basically get an extra two points deducted from armor check penalty and +1 max dex over regular armor training's values (ie, at AT III you'd have 5 lower check penalty and +4 max dex, for example).
So it's strictly better than normal armor training. They do lose weapon training for other class features, though, which may be annoying for you.
Doesn't weapon training loss mean you hit goes down and you can't use Duelist gloves?
I could see 5 levels being good dip for anyone wishing to use a Tower Shield: as this removes penalty to hit from Tower shield.Trinam |
And it only required a UMD check for a spell not even on the class' spell list in order to kill the bat. Assuming the bat is just a bat and not an AC or a leadership cohort mount.
Oh and that other guy with his DC whatever spell at level 10, but as was pointed out he was trying to use a rule that doesn't actually exist to heighten a dazing spell and have it all count for the heighten.
But yes, the tornado killed the bat.