>>Ask *James Jacobs* ALL your Questions Here!<<


Off-Topic Discussions

68,601 to 68,650 of 83,732 << first < prev | 1368 | 1369 | 1370 | 1371 | 1372 | 1373 | 1374 | 1375 | 1376 | 1377 | 1378 | next > last >>
Paizo Employee Creative Director

1 person marked this as a favorite.
AlgaeNymph wrote:
How would you feel about a Pathfinder/Dragonlance crossover?

Uninterested.

Silver Crusade

James Jacobs wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Been doing anything fun lately?
I suppose. Been trying to at least.

Well I hope you succeed in having fun ^w^


Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber

So what is the Creative Director James Jacobs currently up to?

Correct me if I am wrong, but I always figured that you would be in charge of the more experimental or out-of-the-ordinary releases at paizo. And since the current experiment is probably Starfinder and you are not involved in it (as far as I can tell), I was wondering what secret projects you might be cooking up under the radar.

So are there any crazy/experimental/unusual things currently on your desk? Anything you would care to vaporously hint at?


Quote:
It was flavor (not fluff... that word's gross)

My apoligies. In portuguese, all flavor is normally called "fluff", but not with the same meaning of the word that you got in english.

Paizo Employee Creative Director

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Nullpunkt wrote:

So what is the Creative Director James Jacobs currently up to?

Correct me if I am wrong, but I always figured that you would be in charge of the more experimental or out-of-the-ordinary releases at paizo. And since the current experiment is probably Starfinder and you are not involved in it (as far as I can tell), I was wondering what secret projects you might be cooking up under the radar.

So are there any crazy/experimental/unusual things currently on your desk? Anything you would care to vaporously hint at?

As I have been for the past year or two... working on products that I can't talk about yet because they haven't been announced yet. If the track record continues (see Bestiary 6, Adventurer's Guide, Curse of the Crimson Throne, and Book of the Damned), I'll be able to talk about them after they're announced, but I can't tell you WHEN they're going to be announced because that isn't information I'm privy to.

My title, as Creative Director, does not imply that I'm in charge of "experimental" or "Out of the ordinary" releases at Paizo, in any event, as the four books (which are to a certain extent expansions on reprinted seed material) I've mentioned above as the things I've been working on over the past few years are hardly experiments. Other than having more world content appear in the hardcover line... but I view that less as an experiment and more as a relief. :-P

Paizo Employee Creative Director

shadowkras wrote:
Quote:
It was flavor (not fluff... that word's gross)
My apoligies. In portuguese, all flavor is normally called "fluff", but not with the same meaning of the word that you got in english.

Fair enough.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
James Jacobs wrote:
The Fox wrote:

James, this came up in a Play-by-Post game that I'm GMing, and I'm looking for your take.

The PCs face a couple of shapechangers—with the Change Shape supernatural ability—who are disguised as humans. The players get suspicious because the two shapechangers are acting kind of funny.

One of the PCs casts detect magic. Would this spell allow the caster to detect the presence of a magical disguise (assuming the Knowledge [arcana] check succeeds)?

I was inclined to say that since it is a (Su) ability, detect magic would not discern the disguise, but I'm not sure. Luckily for me as GM, Merisiel's high Perception check was sufficient to see through the ruse before it came up.

Detect magic would detect a supernatural ability's aura—it IS magic, after all. The DC to identify the school of magic involved for something like a supernatural ability that's active and ongoing is 15 + 1/2 caster level.

Unfortunatley, that really doesn't help much at all for supernatural abilities, which almost never have specific caster levels listed. In place of a caster level, in this case, I would say the DC is 15 + 1/2 the HD of the creature from which the supernatural ability came from. I'd then say it was a transmutation effect, but nothing else—it's not a spell, so it doesn't have sub-schools like "polymorph".

there is a line in detect magic that says elemental and outsiders don't automaticaly detect as magic unless they were summoned or something to that effect, would that be different if they had always on supernatural abilities?

Paizo Employee Creative Director

serithal wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
The Fox wrote:

James, this came up in a Play-by-Post game that I'm GMing, and I'm looking for your take.

The PCs face a couple of shapechangers—with the Change Shape supernatural ability—who are disguised as humans. The players get suspicious because the two shapechangers are acting kind of funny.

One of the PCs casts detect magic. Would this spell allow the caster to detect the presence of a magical disguise (assuming the Knowledge [arcana] check succeeds)?

I was inclined to say that since it is a (Su) ability, detect magic would not discern the disguise, but I'm not sure. Luckily for me as GM, Merisiel's high Perception check was sufficient to see through the ruse before it came up.

Detect magic would detect a supernatural ability's aura—it IS magic, after all. The DC to identify the school of magic involved for something like a supernatural ability that's active and ongoing is 15 + 1/2 caster level.

Unfortunatley, that really doesn't help much at all for supernatural abilities, which almost never have specific caster levels listed. In place of a caster level, in this case, I would say the DC is 15 + 1/2 the HD of the creature from which the supernatural ability came from. I'd then say it was a transmutation effect, but nothing else—it's not a spell, so it doesn't have sub-schools like "polymorph".

there is a line in detect magic that says elemental and outsiders don't automaticaly detect as magic unless they were summoned or something to that effect, would that be different if they had always on supernatural abilities?

No. If they had constant spell-like abilities, then yes... but you'd detect those spells, not the creature itself.


Pathfinder RPG Ultimate Equipment FAQ wrote:
A klar counts as a light shield for the purpose of using it as a shield (for instance, it grants a +1 shield bonus to AC, has a –1 armor check penalty, and has a 5% arcane spell failure chance). For the purpose of using it as a weapon, it is a one-handed weapon that deals 1d6 slashing damage, but it is otherwise similar to using a spiked shield (for instance, the damage doesn’t stack with the bashing ability, you lose the shield bonus to AC when attacking with the klar unless you have Improved Shield Bash, and so on). As a side note, anywhere that lists klars as counting as shields with “armor spikes” is a typo that will be handled in the next errata.

I think I now understand how a klar works in all ways except for making one from special materials. There are a few different ways you could interpret it and I am not sure which one is correct.

If I treat a klar as a weapon made of mithral then it would cost 3000 gp because it weighs 6 lbs but since that is the entire weight, it would make sense that the shield part is then also mithral and therefore masterwork. This option seems pretty simple but not very flexible. Also very few materials affect both weapons and shields.

The FAQ says that in most ways to treat a klar as a spiked shield which makes sense for a lot of materials but fails for anything priced by weight because a light steel spiked shield is 6 lbs + 5 lbs for shield spikes while the whole klar is 6 lbs so it is unclear how much of the klar is spike and how much is shield.

You could instead treat the klar a double weapon and use the appropriate rules for special materials that have them (silver, cold iron). So for example, if I wanted to make a klar with a cold iron spike and a living steel shield with both parts being masterwork then the cost would be 12gp (base cost) + 6gp (+50% for cold iron) + 300gp (masterwork weapon) + 100gp (living steel shield) + 150gp (masterwork shield) = 568gp. This makes the most sense to me but is also more complicated.

On a somewhat related note, if I made one end of the double weapon out of mithral which you pay for by the pound, would I only use half the weapons weight to calculate the cost? And since mithral halves the weight, I assume it would only halve the half that is mithral making the whole weapon weigh 25% less?

Paizo Employee Creative Director

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Button Mash wrote:
Pathfinder RPG Ultimate Equipment FAQ wrote:
A klar counts as a light shield for the purpose of using it as a shield (for instance, it grants a +1 shield bonus to AC, has a –1 armor check penalty, and has a 5% arcane spell failure chance). For the purpose of using it as a weapon, it is a one-handed weapon that deals 1d6 slashing damage, but it is otherwise similar to using a spiked shield (for instance, the damage doesn’t stack with the bashing ability, you lose the shield bonus to AC when attacking with the klar unless you have Improved Shield Bash, and so on). As a side note, anywhere that lists klars as counting as shields with “armor spikes” is a typo that will be handled in the next errata.

I think I now understand how a klar works in all ways except for making one from special materials. There are a few different ways you could interpret it and I am not sure which one is correct.

If I treat a klar as a weapon made of mithral then it would cost 3000 gp because it weighs 6 lbs but since that is the entire weight, it would make sense that the shield part is then also mithral and therefore masterwork. This option seems pretty simple but not very flexible. Also very few materials affect both weapons and shields.

The FAQ says that in most ways to treat a klar as a spiked shield which makes sense for a lot of materials but fails for anything priced by weight because a light steel spiked shield is 6 lbs + 5 lbs for shield spikes while the whole klar is 6 lbs so it is unclear how much of the klar is spike and how much is shield.

You could instead treat the klar a double weapon and use the appropriate rules for special materials that have them (silver, cold iron). So for example, if I wanted to make a klar with a cold iron spike and a living steel shield with both parts being masterwork then the cost would be 12gp (base cost) + 6gp (+50% for cold iron) + 300gp (masterwork weapon) + 100gp (living steel shield) + 150gp (masterwork shield) = 568gp. This makes the most sense to me but is also more...

Please keep it to non-rules questions on this thread.

Grand Lodge

Hey James have you started playing mass effect Andromeda yet?

If so, what do you think of it?

What are you playing as?

And who might you romance?


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Which Archdevil did you most enjoy statting up?


Which empyreal lord did you most enjoy statting up?

Dark Archive

If i am an ecclesitheurge(ACG) and get the ability of Bonded Holy Symbol,
can i get a familiar by feat Eldritch Heritage(to achieve the Arcane Bond from Arcane Bloodline)?

Paizo Employee Creative Director

Therrux wrote:

Hey James have you started playing mass effect Andromeda yet?

If so, what do you think of it?

What are you playing as?

And who might you romance?

Yes.

It's a mediocre Mass Effect game so far, but even a mediocre Mass Effect game is better than most other games.

A tech/combat combo.

Peebee.

Paizo Employee Creative Director

Cole Deschain wrote:
Which Archdevil did you most enjoy statting up?

I didn't stat up any of them; I hired a freelancer to do them. Mephistopheles is my favorite, probably.

Paizo Employee Creative Director

2 people marked this as a favorite.
AlgaeNymph wrote:
Which empyreal lord did you most enjoy statting up?

I didn't stat up any of them; I hired a freelaner to do them. Of the three in Bestiary 6, Black Butterfly is my favorite.

Paizo Employee Creative Director

nebulainfi wrote:

If i am an ecclesitheurge(ACG) and get the ability of Bonded Holy Symbol,

can i get a familiar by feat Eldritch Heritage(to achieve the Arcane Bond from Arcane Bloodline)?

Rules questions need to be asked in the rules forums.


James Jacobs wrote:
AlgaeNymph wrote:
Which empyreal lord did you most enjoy statting up?
I didn't stat up any of them; I hired a freelancer to do them. Of the three in Bestiary 6, Black Butterfly is my favorite.

Wait, weren't you were in charge of statting them this time?

Paizo Employee Creative Director

AlgaeNymph wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
AlgaeNymph wrote:
Which empyreal lord did you most enjoy statting up?
I didn't stat up any of them; I hired a freelancer to do them. Of the three in Bestiary 6, Black Butterfly is my favorite.
Wait, weren't you were in charge of statting them this time?

Nope. I was in charge of developing the whole book though, which is different than doing the initial builds of the stats. But it did involve rebuilding all the stats as a way of checking math and balance and all that.


Did one freelancer do all the archdevils, one do all the empyreal lords, etcetera?

Scarab Sages Contributor, RPG Superstar 2008 Top 4, Legendary Games

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Steve Geddes wrote:
Did one freelancer do all the archdevils, one do all the empyreal lords, etcetera?

One freelancer did all the archdevils. :)

Paizo Employee Creative Director

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Steve Geddes wrote:
Did one freelancer do all the archdevils, one do all the empyreal lords, etcetera?

Whenever there was a like group of creatures, such as archdevils or qlippoth lords or the Wild Hunt, I made sure that all of the creatures in that category went to the same freelancer. To do otherwise is madness and lunacy and poor planning, I think! :P


James Jacobs wrote:
AlgaeNymph wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
AlgaeNymph wrote:
Which empyreal lord did you most enjoy statting up?
I didn't stat up any of them; I hired a freelancer to do them. Of the three in Bestiary 6, Black Butterfly is my favorite.
Wait, weren't you were in charge of statting them this time?
Nope. I was in charge of developing the whole book though, which is different than doing the initial builds of the stats. But it did involve rebuilding all the stats as a way of checking math and balance and all that.

And making sure they didn't have gimpy mental stats, or otherwise seemed underpowered?


James Jacobs wrote:
Steve Geddes wrote:
Did one freelancer do all the archdevils, one do all the empyreal lords, etcetera?
Whenever there was a like group of creatures, such as archdevils or qlippoth lords or the Wild Hunt, I made sure that all of the creatures in that category went to the same freelancer. To do otherwise is madness and lunacy and poor planning, I think! :P

Makes sense to me, but the behind the scenes stuff is always interesting (and not always intuitive to me).

Cheers, James. :)

Paizo Employee Creative Director

1 person marked this as a favorite.
AlgaeNymph wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
AlgaeNymph wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
AlgaeNymph wrote:
Which empyreal lord did you most enjoy statting up?
I didn't stat up any of them; I hired a freelancer to do them. Of the three in Bestiary 6, Black Butterfly is my favorite.
Wait, weren't you were in charge of statting them this time?
Nope. I was in charge of developing the whole book though, which is different than doing the initial builds of the stats. But it did involve rebuilding all the stats as a way of checking math and balance and all that.
And making sure they didn't have gimpy mental stats, or otherwise seemed underpowered?

Whether or not they seem underpowered to you depends on you.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

So, about the incoming Great Old Ones in the Bestiary... are any of them Paizo/James Jacobs Originals like Xhamen-Dor, or will all three of them be immediately familiar to Mythos fans?

Paizo Employee Creative Director

Cole Deschain wrote:
So, about the incoming Great Old Ones in the Bestiary... are any of them Paizo/James Jacobs Originals like Xhamen-Dor, or will all three of them be immediately familiar to Mythos fans?

All three are Great Old Ones from Lovecraft. They've been waiting a LOT longer to see print in the game than any chump of an upstart I've come up with.


Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Starfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
James Jacobs wrote:
AlgaeNymph wrote:
How would you feel about a Pathfinder/Dragonlance crossover?
Uninterested.

What about Planescape/Pathfinder?

Paizo Employee Creative Director

1 person marked this as a favorite.
FallenDabus wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
AlgaeNymph wrote:
How would you feel about a Pathfinder/Dragonlance crossover?
Uninterested.
What about Planescape/Pathfinder?

Also uninterested, but even MORE so, since we already have a wealth of extraplanar material for Pathfinder that's approaching the amount of lore TSR put out for Planescape, but has still only barely scratched the surface of what we can do to explore the planes of the Great Beyond.

I'd rather build something new, in other words, than build something for someone else.


Well, Mr. Jacobs, people are asking you what was your favorite creatures in Bestiary 6, so I have to ask: which is your favorite kaiju in the book?

Paizo Employee Creative Director

The Gold Sovereign wrote:
Well, Mr. Jacobs, people are asking you what was your favorite creatures in Bestiary 6, so I have to ask: which is your favorite kaiju in the book?

Until we announce what kaiju are in the book, I'm not gonna say.


Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Starfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
James Jacobs wrote:
FallenDabus wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
AlgaeNymph wrote:
How would you feel about a Pathfinder/Dragonlance crossover?
Uninterested.
What about Planescape/Pathfinder?

Also uninterested, but even MORE so, since we already have a wealth of extraplanar material for Pathfinder that's approaching the amount of lore TSR put out for Planescape, but has still only barely scratched the surface of what we can do to explore the planes of the Great Beyond.

I'd rather build something new, in other words, than build something for someone else.

I totally get why you'd feel that way. I blend the two setting frequently and love it, but then again, neither of them are mine. Totally love what you guys have done with the Planes and am always excited to see more.

One more for you: I don't recall if Oni are getting any coverage in Book of the Damned. My gut says yes, but part of me thinks no since they aren't extraplaner and don't have the [Evil] subtype. Are Oni a yes, no, or unrevealed?

Thanks as always for the time you take putting up with us and answering our questions!

Liberty's Edge

Wait,
Are we getting qlippoth lords in bestiary 6?


James Jacobs wrote:
The Gold Sovereign wrote:
Well, Mr. Jacobs, people are asking you what were your favorite creatures in Bestiary 6, so I have to ask: which is your favorite kaiju in the book?
Until we announce what kaiju are in the book, I'm not gonna say.

I thought you did tell us their names in the Bestiary 6 product discussion, didn't you? It wasn't an "official announcement", but we did get their names here.

I will be patient and wait for further information and official announcements, as I really appreciate knowing your opinion.


James Jacobs wrote:


What about Planescape/Pathfinder?

Also uninterested, but even MORE so, since we already have a wealth of extraplanar material for Pathfinder that's approaching the amount of lore TSR put out for Planescape, but has still only barely scratched the surface of what we can do to explore the planes of the Great Beyond.

I'd rather build something new, in other words, than build something for someone else.

Agreed. The Great Beyond and the Great Wheel have enough differences to be pretty significantly unique, but enough similarities that you wouldn't get immediate culture shock over meeting each other. Sorta a worst-of-both-worlds for crossover, characters who'll assume many things are the same and, while normally wrong, would get it close enough to work until they actually had to interact with a group in depth (imagine someone thinking they could bribe Daemons ala how they would Yugoloth, or expecting the lack of sophistication of Slaad from Proteans).

Hm... just about the only D&D game settings I'd think about crossing over are Dark Sun and Eberron, since they're pretty different. Though.. come to think of it, I'd probably just use Akiton rather than Athas if I wanted to world hop to someplace desert-y and brutal...

Paizo Employee Creative Director

4 people marked this as a favorite.
FallenDabus wrote:

One more for you: I don't recall if Oni are getting any coverage in Book of the Damned. My gut says yes, but part of me thinks no since they aren't extraplaner and don't have the [Evil] subtype. Are Oni a yes, no, or unrevealed?

Yes. Oni are fiends, so we're covering them and the oni daimyo. It's not a huge section, but they're there.

Paizo Employee Creative Director

Paladinosaur wrote:

Wait,

Are we getting qlippoth lords in bestiary 6?

As revealed in a recent blog, yes.

Paizo Employee Creative Director

2 people marked this as a favorite.
The Gold Sovereign wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
The Gold Sovereign wrote:
Well, Mr. Jacobs, people are asking you what were your favorite creatures in Bestiary 6, so I have to ask: which is your favorite kaiju in the book?
Until we announce what kaiju are in the book, I'm not gonna say.

I thought you did tell us their names in the Bestiary 6 product discussion, didn't you? It wasn't an "official announcement", but we did get their names here.

I will be patient and wait for further information and official announcements, as I really appreciate knowing your opinion.

I guess I did. I'm not sure which one is my favorite though; they all ended up pretty cool.

Paizo Employee Creative Director

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Davia D wrote:
...had non-question stuff...

Please keep the comments here to questions.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Keeping it Kaiju:

Which of Godzilla's enemies across all of the continuities is your favorite?

Which kaiju or robot that's teamed up with him do you like the most?

Thoughts on Gorgo?

Which of the three recognized "eras" (Showa, Heisei, Millennium) of Toho kaiju flicks prior to Shin Gojira do you most enjoy?

Favorite non-Toho kaiju film?

Scarab Sages

Are you working on any new classes or magic systems? Also have you seen the new Samurai Jack, yet? It's so good.

Paizo Employee Creative Director

Cole Deschain wrote:

Keeping it Kaiju:

Which of Godzilla's enemies across all of the continuities is your favorite?

Which kaiju or robot that's teamed up with him do you like the most?

Thoughts on Gorgo?

Which of the three recognized "eras" (Showa, Heisei, Millennium) of Toho kaiju flicks prior to Shin Gojira do you most enjoy?

Favorite non-Toho kaiju film?

Biollante.

Mothra.

Gorgo is a fun movie but not nearly as good as Godzilla.

Cloverfield.

Paizo Employee Creative Director

BMovieMonster wrote:
Are you working on any new classes or magic systems? Also have you seen the new Samurai Jack, yet? It's so good.

No to both.


Do you like Gamera?

(if applicable:)
Best Gamera film?

Best Gamera villain?

Paizo Employee Creative Director

Davia D wrote:

Do you like Gamera?

(if applicable:)
Best Gamera film?

Best Gamera villain?

I like the gamera trilogy that came out in the late 90s quite a lot, but the other gamera movies are pretty wretched.

Legion is far and above my favorite gamera villain.


I just wrapped up Iron Gods after two years. It's been a blast and I think everyone has enjoyed it immensely. Will we be seeing more of the Dominion of the Black in Starfinder?

Paizo Employee Creative Director

DebugAMP wrote:
I just wrapped up Iron Gods after two years. It's been a blast and I think everyone has enjoyed it immensely. Will we be seeing more of the Dominion of the Black in Starfinder?

I have no idea. I'm pretty much not involved in Starfinder at all.


James Jacobs wrote:
AlgaeNymph wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
AlgaeNymph wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
AlgaeNymph wrote:
Which empyreal lord did you most enjoy statting up?
I didn't stat up any of them; I hired a freelancer to do them. Of the three in Bestiary 6, Black Butterfly is my favorite.
Wait, weren't you were in charge of statting them this time?
Nope. I was in charge of developing the whole book though, which is different than doing the initial builds of the stats. But it did involve rebuilding all the stats as a way of checking math and balance and all that.
And making sure they didn't have gimpy mental stats, or otherwise seemed underpowered?
Whether or not they seem underpowered to you depends on you.

I'm pretty sure the problems in Bestiary 4, which I don't want a repeat of, aren't just in my head. I recall reading that empyreal lords are supposed to be "cool good," so seeing them get as much love in the design process as demon lords and great old ones would go a long way in establishing that.

And now an actual question (and something completely different):

You've compared Magnimar and Kintargo to San Francisco before, something this San Franciscian finds interesting. What exactly does "like San Francisco" mean to you?

Paizo Employee Creative Director

3 people marked this as a favorite.
AlgaeNymph wrote:


You've compared Magnimar and Kintargo to San Francisco before, something this San Franciscian finds interesting. What exactly does "like San Francisco" mean to you?

San Francisco is one of my favorite cities. I've always admired its topography, its iconic bridges, its liberal bent, the variety of its food, and its diversity. And so there's a big bridge in Magnimar, and it's very diverse, and it's quite the opposite of more traditional/conservative Korvosa.

68,601 to 68,650 of 83,732 << first < prev | 1368 | 1369 | 1370 | 1371 | 1372 | 1373 | 1374 | 1375 | 1376 | 1377 | 1378 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Gamer Life / Off-Topic Discussions / >>Ask *James Jacobs* ALL your Questions Here!<< All Messageboards