The Raven Black |
If outer planes still work on alignment basis though, I don't see why harrow would remove them since makes sense to me that fortune telling implement would be based on the cosmic forces
Indeed. Hell cards for the LE cards and so on. Likely how the cards are known in setting too since the people on Golarion likely do not know of any Alignment thing but they know of Hell, Heaven, the Abyss ...
James Jacobs Creative Director |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
CorvusMask wrote:If outer planes still work on alignment basis though, I don't see why harrow would remove them since makes sense to me that fortune telling implement would be based on the cosmic forcesIndeed. Hell cards for the LE cards and so on. Likely how the cards are known in setting too since the people on Golarion likely do not know of any Alignment thing but they know of Hell, Heaven, the Abyss ...
That's one potential way to go, but Hell and Nirvana and the Boneyard are much more evocative and flavorful concepts and words than, say, "lawful evil" or whatever, which would make the cards associated with them feel like they should reflect that. It'd be weird for not all the "Heaven" cards to look like their art and concepts are associated with heaven. AKA: Renaming them to match the outer planes is a bit too spicy.
James Jacobs Creative Director |
4 people marked this as a favorite. |
Ok. Im really enjoying reading this and can't wait to run it but I have a question. I get the one Pathfinder Society reference but is there any significance to the scenario that is name-dropped in chapter 3.
There's a significant NPC in that chapter who played a very important role several years back in Pathfinder Society, but apart from setting up where that NPC is today in the context of this adventure (both mentally and physically), that scenario doesn't have a lot of tie-in to Stolen Fate. At least, not intentionally.
MadScientistWorking |
MadScientistWorking wrote:Ok. Im really enjoying reading this and can't wait to run it but I have a question. I get the one Pathfinder Society reference but is there any significance to the scenario that is name-dropped in chapter 3.There's a significant NPC in that chapter who played a very important role several years back in Pathfinder Society, but apart from setting up where that NPC is today in the context of this adventure (both mentally and physically), that scenario doesn't have a lot of tie-in to Stolen Fate. At least, not intentionally.
That one I entirely got and is very thematically relevant. It also brought back the happy memories of me getting back into Pathfinder again after a break.
I was more referring to theOoo one last thing but amazing job incorporating the Grand Bazaar. You included one of my favorite NPCs to appear in 2e
James Jacobs Creative Director |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Random question that I'll spoiler just in case.
Spoiler:In 1e Uniilas were incorporeal, and now in 2e that seems to not be the case. Is this a retcon, correcting an error in 1e, or an error with 2e?
This is a correction to a conceptual mis-step from 1st edition.
redeux |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
Time traveler wrote:Any word on when the Foundry module will be out?It is already out and linked on the above product
It is not linked alongside other partners such as "Fantasy Grounds Virtual Tabletop" and "Archives of Nethys" though which is where many people look to see where adventures are supported.
Cori Marie |
silversarcasm wrote:It is not linked alongside other partners such as "Fantasy Grounds Virtual Tabletop" and "Archives of Nethys" though which is where many people look to see where adventures are supported.Time traveler wrote:Any word on when the Foundry module will be out?It is already out and linked on the above product
It's not linked there because those are external links. It's literally linked immediately below, like every other Foundry module, because those are on the internal shop.
redeux |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
redeux wrote:It's not linked there because those are external links. It's literally linked immediately below, like every other Foundry module, because those are on the internal shop.silversarcasm wrote:It is not linked alongside other partners such as "Fantasy Grounds Virtual Tabletop" and "Archives of Nethys" though which is where many people look to see where adventures are supported.Time traveler wrote:Any word on when the Foundry module will be out?It is already out and linked on the above product
The section reads "This product is also available on the following platforms" and Foundry Virtual tabletop is another platform.
And no, not every other foundry module. Outlaws listed FVTT in this section, and part of Bloodlords did as well but it seems whomever is doing the tagging hasn't been keeping up with it.
We can say that, yes, the foundry product is linked as a note directly under the section but this is much less visible and misleading for FVTT to not be listed under "available on the following platforms."
Anyway, not my job to tell paizo how to sell their products but this is confusing more users than just time traveler, to share just one example.
Muertee |
I don't normally post much, but having a new player sign up for my Stolen Fate game starting next month, it was brought to my attention. The Stolen Fate Players guide states -
"Lump Sum: This method grants a lump sum of 4,500 gp to each PC to spend as they wish on any common items of level 10 or less..."
When Lump Sum for level 11 is 3200gp and for level 12 is 4500gp.
Just wanted to point this out to everyone that may not have known or overlooked this typo as I did :)
Doc Midnight |
Could you update this page to include the Foundry modules for the Stolen Fate AP? I've been waiting for them for months, only to discover that they've been out for a while. They also don't show up in the list of Foundry modules on Paizo.com. I had to go to the Paizo page on Foundry's website to find them.
https://foundryvtt.com/creators/paizo/
Barachiel Shina |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Barachiel Shina wrote:Oh this would have been nice to run for my players...
If only we had a PF1e Version of this...
Shame. As usual.
At what point does one stop beating the dead horse?
PF2 launched four years ago, and has been doing quite well for itself. Paizo's been nothing but honest about how unfeasible straddling multiple rulesets is for their team. PF1 got a decade of content, more than any one table can ever hope to see all of - so why do this? Being publicly bitter and spiteful won't change the realities of their staffing or the interests of their writers, it just looks unflattering.
If the AP sounds interesting, buy it. If you don't want to convert it - something people do for both editions of Pathfinder and every other RPGs all the time - then don't. It's really that simple.
Your statement is completely invalid due to Paizo launching a 5th Edition conversion of Abomination Vaults...they promoted their RIVALS as opposed to converting that AP to PF1e to sell to actual Paizo customers and PF fans. Make it make sense.
Cori Marie |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Also worth pointing out that the 5E Abomination Vaults has been repeatedly delayed so that's not a priority for them to get out either. They're also making new books every month for Paizo and Pathfinder fans.