Whispers to Ravens's page

Organized Play Member. 9 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists. 7 Organized Play characters.


RSS


Caldeathe Baequiannia wrote:
Caldeathe Baequiannia wrote:
Whispers to Ravens wrote:
If your not here for full pvp you should not be playing in a sandbox game,,,,, a themepapark game with pvp is better suited to that kind of play.
This is a great idea, and Gol Phyllain take it under consideration.
And my apologies to Phyallain if he takes umbrage at that, but I don't think he will.

If you don't care why are you bothering to reply?


Caldeathe Baequiannia wrote:
Whispers to Ravens wrote:
You seem to think other join afther is was sighned will blindly follow this agreement. Yow Also seem to for get the How Aragorn is a more chaotic settlement and you "Laws" Means nothing to us devoted to chage and will rebel agains the stagnation caused by Treaties like Nap.
You seem to have a terrible grasp of what I think, which doesn't surprise me.

I would say you didn't do enough research. When i looked into it early on they very clearly mentioned it wass going to be a sandbox game.


Caldeathe Baequiannia wrote:
David Nicholson 817 wrote:
Like I if you want back waht was taken do something, otherwise stop wasting time witt your useless jsutifications Big Brother.

You, along with several others, seem to want to turn the NAP insto some kind of police state. We don't care what settlements do, as long as they don't take each other's core six towers, and if they do, we don't "take them back" we just stop giving them the protection for their own.

And, once more, if the pressure of people we actually know and interact with on a regular basis doesn't bother us, the peer pressure of people who create an account just to egg us on to do something is of such little consequence that I really can't imagine why you thought it would work.

You seem to think other join afther is was sighned will blindly follow this agreement. Yow Also seem to for get the How Aragorn is a more chaotic settlement and you "Laws" Means nothing to us devoted to chage and will rebel agains the stagnation caused by Treaties like Nap.


Swiss Mercenary wrote:

Certainly not Hammerfall, though we could definitely do with more towers.

One problem is that there are small population settlements, I mean I have been on my own for the last 4-5 days. Where as it takes 83 minutes to take a tower for me, if one of Hammerfall's core six towers were taken there is probably no way I could get it back on my own.

This is where the NAP comes in, Hammerfall is protected by this otherwise it would most probably be overrun, again, in minutes.
The settlement has to rely on the protection from the NAP and other companies.

If the game descended into a free for all PvP brawl, you would see an exodus from the server.
Not everyone like full PvP, but we have to live with it and try to work around it.
I played on an full open PvP server in another game, you had gankers standing at the new player spawn point and they would kill new characters as they appeared, just for the kill count, not something I would like to see here.

If your not here for full pvp you should not be playing in a sandbox game,,,,, a themepapark game with pvp is better suited to that kind of play.


Caldeathe Baequiannia wrote:
David Nicholson 817 wrote:

Not imposed,,,,, test to keep affilieates in line.....

???????????

I have no idea what you're trying to say.

That explains alot.


Like I if you want back waht was taken do something, otherwise stop wasting time witt your useless jsutifications Big Brother.


Not imposed,,,,, test to keep affilieates in line.....

???????????


All parties agreed to it? Not from what i heard.


From what i unerstand a core group that wants to quietly build its power is imposing the "nap" on others so they don't actually have to earn what they have.

To hell with that, if you want we was taken, then take it back, words are useless.