GM Slothsy's PFS# 7-09: The Blakros Connection (5-9) (Inactive)

Game Master Slothsy


51 to 100 of 127 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>
Dark Archive

Half-orc Growling Blade 11 | HP: 91/91 | DISRUPTIVE & SPELLBREAKER | AC: 25 | T: 16 | FF: 23 | CMD: 29 | Fort: +11 | Ref: +15 | Will: +12 | Init: +3 | Perc: +4 | SM: -1 | Speed 30 ft.
Tracked resources:
Bardic Performances: 24/25 ; Spells: 0 - 6 ; 1st - 6/6 ; 2nd - 5/5 ; 3rd - 25/4 ; 4th - 2/2 ; Weapon's Spell (Arcane Bond): 1/1

noooooo xD

Sovereign Court

Male Human Skald (Spell Warrior) 6
stats:
HP: (42/42) AC 22 (FF 22, Touch 12) CMD 18 FS +8, RS +6, WS +6, Initiative: +7 Perception: +8

Are any of you guys going to Gen Con? My brother, my friend, and I played in an awesome pathfinder game last year and are doing so again, but we need two more people to round out our 5-person team. If you're going to gen con and you want some more info, send me a PM. It's a game run by the 4 Horseman--really good stuff.

Sovereign Court

Male Human Oracle (Heavens) 1 / Imperious/Arcane Sorcerer (Crossblooded) 8
Stats:
HP: (52/58) AC 16 (FF 12, Touch 14) CMD 14 F+4, R+4, W+6, Initiative: +2 Perception: +4

I'm going to GenCon, but I'll be mostly running Thralls of the Shattered God. I believe that's the only scenario I'm scheduled to run.

Liberty's Edge

they/them pronouns

I'll be there, but I'll be running PFS in the Sagamore most of the weekend (aka, 8/10 slots).

Silver Crusade

Male Nagaji Paladin 8 | AC: 25/11/24 (22/11/21 without shield) | HP: 86/86 | CMB: +12, CMD: 23 | F +13, R +7, W +12 | Perc +4 | Init +1
Attack:
Gamin +13/+7 (1d8+12/19-20), +4 (+8) smite evil

I'll be there, but probably only on Saturday and therefore probably only in one game.

-Posted with Wayfinder

Grand Lodge

Male Dwarf Inquisitor 10 [HP: 75/75 | AC: 24/13/22 CMD: 24 | F+12 R+8 W+12* (+5 vs. spells/spell-like, +2 vs. Necromancy, +1 vs. Evocation) | Init +4 | Perc +12 SM +16 Darkvision]

I think I'll be there.

Dark Archive

Half-orc Growling Blade 11 | HP: 91/91 | DISRUPTIVE & SPELLBREAKER | AC: 25 | T: 16 | FF: 23 | CMD: 29 | Fort: +11 | Ref: +15 | Will: +12 | Init: +3 | Perc: +4 | SM: -1 | Speed 30 ft.
Tracked resources:
Bardic Performances: 24/25 ; Spells: 0 - 6 ; 1st - 6/6 ; 2nd - 5/5 ; 3rd - 25/4 ; 4th - 2/2 ; Weapon's Spell (Arcane Bond): 1/1

Haha I would if I didn't live in Europe! xD
and we have a convention in Geneva just after the GenCon, if you guys want to visit us... A open air convention ^^

Grand Lodge

Male Dwarf Inquisitor 10 [HP: 75/75 | AC: 24/13/22 CMD: 24 | F+12 R+8 W+12* (+5 vs. spells/spell-like, +2 vs. Necromancy, +1 vs. Evocation) | Init +4 | Perc +12 SM +16 Darkvision]

I'd trade Gencon for Christmas markets...

Sovereign Court

Male Human Skald (Spell Warrior) 6
stats:
HP: (42/42) AC 22 (FF 22, Touch 12) CMD 18 FS +8, RS +6, WS +6, Initiative: +7 Perception: +8

Did I need to move forward to be able to see it? All I wanted to do was draw a chakram and throw it, not run after the creature. I'm only a front-liner when I have to be. :-)

Liberty's Edge

they/them pronouns

Ah, your token had been moved on the map, so I assumed you were moving up after throwing the chakram for some odd reason. You saw it fine from your original place.

Sovereign Court

Male Human Skald (Spell Warrior) 6
stats:
HP: (42/42) AC 22 (FF 22, Touch 12) CMD 18 FS +8, RS +6, WS +6, Initiative: +7 Perception: +8

Nope, I didnt move it. My bad, I didn't even know there was a map but I see it now in your sig. *facepalm*

Literally this entire game I never knew there was a map, so I'm sorry for any confusion I may have been causing. I'm fine with however you adjudicate because it was my oversight.

Liberty's Edge

they/them pronouns

To get within your first range increment of the chakram, you'll still end up triggering the trap. I'll move you to right within range and call it good.

Dark Archive

Half-orc Growling Blade 11 | HP: 91/91 | DISRUPTIVE & SPELLBREAKER | AC: 25 | T: 16 | FF: 23 | CMD: 29 | Fort: +11 | Ref: +15 | Will: +12 | Init: +3 | Perc: +4 | SM: -1 | Speed 30 ft.
Tracked resources:
Bardic Performances: 24/25 ; Spells: 0 - 6 ; 1st - 6/6 ; 2nd - 5/5 ; 3rd - 25/4 ; 4th - 2/2 ; Weapon's Spell (Arcane Bond): 1/1

My bad, Rolando! I thought you forgot to move your mini and I did it. Sorry about that! Well... it didn't turn out bad, did it? :)

Sovereign Court

Male Human Skald (Spell Warrior) 6
stats:
HP: (42/42) AC 22 (FF 22, Touch 12) CMD 18 FS +8, RS +6, WS +6, Initiative: +7 Perception: +8

Well, with the changes to the Jingasa, looks like Rolando is gonna be in the market for some new headgear after this scenario is done!

Dark Archive

Half-orc Growling Blade 11 | HP: 91/91 | DISRUPTIVE & SPELLBREAKER | AC: 25 | T: 16 | FF: 23 | CMD: 29 | Fort: +11 | Ref: +15 | Will: +12 | Init: +3 | Perc: +4 | SM: -1 | Speed 30 ft.
Tracked resources:
Bardic Performances: 24/25 ; Spells: 0 - 6 ; 1st - 6/6 ; 2nd - 5/5 ; 3rd - 25/4 ; 4th - 2/2 ; Weapon's Spell (Arcane Bond): 1/1

What changed?

Sovereign Court

Male Human Skald (Spell Warrior) 6
stats:
HP: (42/42) AC 22 (FF 22, Touch 12) CMD 18 FS +8, RS +6, WS +6, Initiative: +7 Perception: +8

Jingasa now provides a +1 deflection instead of luck bonus. More importantly, the crit/sneak attack negation is one time EVER instead of once per day.

Grand Lodge

Male Dwarf Inquisitor 10 [HP: 75/75 | AC: 24/13/22 CMD: 24 | F+12 R+8 W+12* (+5 vs. spells/spell-like, +2 vs. Necromancy, +1 vs. Evocation) | Init +4 | Perc +12 SM +16 Darkvision]

Yep. It could have stayed a luck bonus and still been useful. It could have not provided any AC bonus and still been very useful.

As it is, that's 5k gp that will buy Torean a shiny new Bane Baldric.

Liberty's Edge

they/them pronouns

I dunno, I'm going to be keeping it on my characters, as having the ring slot free is going to pretty handy. Then again, I make ample use of my ring slots and often went with the jingasa instead of a ring.

Sorry for the low posting this weekend; I was at a family wedding.

Sovereign Court

Male Human Oracle (Heavens) 1 / Imperious/Arcane Sorcerer (Crossblooded) 8
Stats:
HP: (52/58) AC 16 (FF 12, Touch 14) CMD 14 F+4, R+4, W+6, Initiative: +2 Perception: +4

Work cut off any access to Paizo.com, so I'll only be posting in the evenings and weekends. :-(

Liberty's Edge

they/them pronouns

Hey guys, I'll be travelling to a convention this weekend and likely won't be able to post until Monday (this may vary, but Monday at the latest). I've given you the results based off the best check so far, but it may be better after everyone posts.

If you'd like, please give me 3 research checks (each taking their own day) and an equal number of will saves (v a fear spell). This means we'll be able to take care of a few days of research all at once when I get back :)

The use of buffs that people have been stating seem fine to me, so I'll take those all into account.

Sovereign Court

Male Human Skald (Spell Warrior) 6
stats:
HP: (42/42) AC 22 (FF 22, Touch 12) CMD 18 FS +8, RS +6, WS +6, Initiative: +7 Perception: +8

Do any of you guys know the order of scenarios to keep following this storyline? I'd really like to follow this and ultimately help save Aram Zey with Rolando, if possible.

Liberty's Edge

they/them pronouns

I know that Captive in Crystal and Abducted in Aether both deal with this plot line.

Grand Lodge

Male Dwarf Inquisitor 10 [HP: 75/75 | AC: 24/13/22 CMD: 24 | F+12 R+8 W+12* (+5 vs. spells/spell-like, +2 vs. Necromancy, +1 vs. Evocation) | Init +4 | Perc +12 SM +16 Darkvision]

Interesting. I'll make those a priority for Torean.

Grand Lodge

Male Dwarf Inquisitor 10 [HP: 75/75 | AC: 24/13/22 CMD: 24 | F+12 R+8 W+12* (+5 vs. spells/spell-like, +2 vs. Necromancy, +1 vs. Evocation) | Init +4 | Perc +12 SM +16 Darkvision]

Hey GM, are we close to the end of the scenario? I had hoped to be able to play in another soon, but if we're not close, I can give up my spot.

Liberty's Edge

they/them pronouns

We're not that close. Maybe 2/3rds of the way through it. Sorry, this is a long one AND investigations just take a long time in PbP. I'm trying to expedite things as much as possible, though.

Silver Crusade

Male Nagaji Paladin 8 | AC: 25/11/24 (22/11/21 without shield) | HP: 86/86 | CMB: +12, CMD: 23 | F +13, R +7, W +12 | Perc +4 | Init +1
Attack:
Gamin +13/+7 (1d8+12/19-20), +4 (+8) smite evil

I was thinking that. Two months at a good pace and we aren't even done yet; this is a long one.

-Posted with Wayfinder

Liberty's Edge

they/them pronouns

My plan is to skip the optional encounter. Is everyone okay with that? I don't have a strict timeline, per se, but I also don't want to drag this out too long.

Grand Lodge

Male Dwarf Inquisitor 10 [HP: 75/75 | AC: 24/13/22 CMD: 24 | F+12 R+8 W+12* (+5 vs. spells/spell-like, +2 vs. Necromancy, +1 vs. Evocation) | Init +4 | Perc +12 SM +16 Darkvision]

Fine with me, but also no need to rush on my account either.

-Posted with Wayfinder

Dark Archive

Half-orc Growling Blade 11 | HP: 91/91 | DISRUPTIVE & SPELLBREAKER | AC: 25 | T: 16 | FF: 23 | CMD: 29 | Fort: +11 | Ref: +15 | Will: +12 | Init: +3 | Perc: +4 | SM: -1 | Speed 30 ft.
Tracked resources:
Bardic Performances: 24/25 ; Spells: 0 - 6 ; 1st - 6/6 ; 2nd - 5/5 ; 3rd - 25/4 ; 4th - 2/2 ; Weapon's Spell (Arcane Bond): 1/1

I'm ok with it too :)

Sovereign Court

Male Human Skald (Spell Warrior) 6
stats:
HP: (42/42) AC 22 (FF 22, Touch 12) CMD 18 FS +8, RS +6, WS +6, Initiative: +7 Perception: +8

I've got +17 Perform (Sing). Can anyone beat that?

GM, do I have to do both Perform (Sing) AND Knowledge (Planes), or is it either Knowledge (Arcana) OR Perform (Sing) OR Knowledge (Planes)?

Liberty's Edge

they/them pronouns

It is

* Knowledge (Arcana)

OR

* Knowledge (Planes) AND Perform (Sing)

Dark Archive

Half-orc Growling Blade 11 | HP: 91/91 | DISRUPTIVE & SPELLBREAKER | AC: 25 | T: 16 | FF: 23 | CMD: 29 | Fort: +11 | Ref: +15 | Will: +12 | Init: +3 | Perc: +4 | SM: -1 | Speed 30 ft.
Tracked resources:
Bardic Performances: 24/25 ; Spells: 0 - 6 ; 1st - 6/6 ; 2nd - 5/5 ; 3rd - 25/4 ; 4th - 2/2 ; Weapon's Spell (Arcane Bond): 1/1

Nope, only +12. I can auto-aid growling, though.

Sovereign Court

Male Human Skald (Spell Warrior) 6
stats:
HP: (42/42) AC 22 (FF 22, Touch 12) CMD 18 FS +8, RS +6, WS +6, Initiative: +7 Perception: +8
Slothsy wrote:

It is

* Knowledge (Arcana)

OR

* Knowledge (Planes) AND Perform (Sing)

Thanks, GM!

Ok, in that case I have +14 Knowledge (Arcana) with my buffs. That's probably better than needing two checks per round.

Can anyone beat +14?

Dark Archive

Half-orc Growling Blade 11 | HP: 91/91 | DISRUPTIVE & SPELLBREAKER | AC: 25 | T: 16 | FF: 23 | CMD: 29 | Fort: +11 | Ref: +15 | Will: +12 | Init: +3 | Perc: +4 | SM: -1 | Speed 30 ft.
Tracked resources:
Bardic Performances: 24/25 ; Spells: 0 - 6 ; 1st - 6/6 ; 2nd - 5/5 ; 3rd - 25/4 ; 4th - 2/2 ; Weapon's Spell (Arcane Bond): 1/1

Shamak doesn't but maybe Ser Ras'ka does.

Silver Crusade

Male Nagaji Paladin 8 | AC: 25/11/24 (22/11/21 without shield) | HP: 86/86 | CMB: +12, CMD: 23 | F +13, R +7, W +12 | Perc +4 | Init +1
Attack:
Gamin +13/+7 (1d8+12/19-20), +4 (+8) smite evil

Nope. I could have aided Perform (untrained) with my pretty decent Cha, but no Knowledges.

-Posted with Wayfinder

Sovereign Court

Male Human Oracle (Heavens) 1 / Imperious/Arcane Sorcerer (Crossblooded) 8
Stats:
HP: (52/58) AC 16 (FF 12, Touch 14) CMD 14 F+4, R+4, W+6, Initiative: +2 Perception: +4

Sorry about my absence, I should be back for the weekend and I'll try and keep up during the week. Work has been rough.

Though Ras'ka is a more powerful caster, Rolando is way better with
skill checks. Ras'ka will attempt to aid.

Sovereign Court

Male Human Skald (Spell Warrior) 6
stats:
HP: (42/42) AC 22 (FF 22, Touch 12) CMD 18 FS +8, RS +6, WS +6, Initiative: +7 Perception: +8

Gm Slothsy--Technically I have zero ranks in sense motive, but I have 6 ranks in Perform (Sing) which I use in place of Sense Motive due to Versatile Performance. So do I deal 1d8 + Int or 1d12 + Int?

Liberty's Edge

they/them pronouns

Use your Perform (Sing) to determine the Sense Motive KP.

Sovereign Court

Male Human Skald (Spell Warrior) 6
stats:
HP: (42/42) AC 22 (FF 22, Touch 12) CMD 18 FS +8, RS +6, WS +6, Initiative: +7 Perception: +8

Cool, thanks!

Dark Archive

Half-orc Growling Blade 11 | HP: 91/91 | DISRUPTIVE & SPELLBREAKER | AC: 25 | T: 16 | FF: 23 | CMD: 29 | Fort: +11 | Ref: +15 | Will: +12 | Init: +3 | Perc: +4 | SM: -1 | Speed 30 ft.
Tracked resources:
Bardic Performances: 24/25 ; Spells: 0 - 6 ; 1st - 6/6 ; 2nd - 5/5 ; 3rd - 25/4 ; 4th - 2/2 ; Weapon's Spell (Arcane Bond): 1/1

Just letting know that I'll be AFK until Satursday evening. Bot Shamak if needed, his [dices] are on his character sheet. If there's one more fight, he'll mainly inspire courage. :)

Liberty's Edge

they/them pronouns

I'll be happy to bot you. I doubt Shamak is wanting to look into the pools much at this point ;)

Liberty's Edge

they/them pronouns

"Quiet Friday afternoon in the summer" has blown up; I'll update before I go to bed tonight.

However, keep going with those research checks. (I am 90% this is our last library, if that makes you feel better?)

Liberty's Edge

they/them pronouns

I apologize; this weekend has been extremely hectic in ways I didn't expect. This week, my work schedule is also going to be a bit intense, so expect only on update/day instead of the two I've been trying to go for.

Sovereign Court

Male Human Skald (Spell Warrior) 6
stats:
HP: (42/42) AC 22 (FF 22, Touch 12) CMD 18 FS +8, RS +6, WS +6, Initiative: +7 Perception: +8

Do we know that they're incorporeal?

Liberty's Edge

they/them pronouns

I can imagine that incorporealness is easy enough to identify, so I can't imagine why you wouldn't know.

Liberty's Edge

they/them pronouns

Shamak, I laughed super hard at that picture.

Liberty's Edge

they/them pronouns

Head's up - we're done with combat, but you have time to ask whatever questions you want. We're pretty much at the end, so I'll start preparing the chronicle sheets. Anyone need/want any extra notes?

Dark Archive

Half-orc Growling Blade 11 | HP: 91/91 | DISRUPTIVE & SPELLBREAKER | AC: 25 | T: 16 | FF: 23 | CMD: 29 | Fort: +11 | Ref: +15 | Will: +12 | Init: +3 | Perc: +4 | SM: -1 | Speed 30 ft.
Tracked resources:
Bardic Performances: 24/25 ; Spells: 0 - 6 ; 1st - 6/6 ; 2nd - 5/5 ; 3rd - 25/4 ; 4th - 2/2 ; Weapon's Spell (Arcane Bond): 1/1

I had fun making this meme ;)

No notes needed for me! ^^

Silver Crusade

Male Nagaji Paladin 8 | AC: 25/11/24 (22/11/21 without shield) | HP: 86/86 | CMB: +12, CMD: 23 | F +13, R +7, W +12 | Perc +4 | Init +1
Attack:
Gamin +13/+7 (1d8+12/19-20), +4 (+8) smite evil

Not for me. I'm guessing the continual flame goes away after this scenario, right? I was skeptical at first, but that was actually pretty cool to have!

-Posted with Wayfinder

Liberty's Edge

they/them pronouns

No, actually I'll need to note that on your chronicle. Each character can have one continual flame persist across scenarios. So, yay!

51 to 100 of 127 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Online Campaigns / Play-by-Post Discussion / GM Slothsy's PFS# 7-09: The Blakros Connection (5-9) Discussion All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.