C'mon, stop locking the threads


Website Feedback

151 to 200 of 275 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | next > last >>
Liberty's Edge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Wu Nakitu wrote:
3.5 Loyalist wrote:

Good points Ernest. What about some sort of block posts from this poster feature?

People see a problem and a trend, people delete it from their very eyes (and all posts from said agitators) and carry on. FB allows this.

Facebook has a somewhat larger budget, and to be honest, Paizo shouldn't need to employ that kind of feature because of a vocal minority.

Also, while sticks and stones may break my bones, posts on the internet from strangers shouldn't really impact your life in any meaningful way if you aren't like a 5 year old or something.

I know it doesn't roll off the tongue...I'll work on it...

Shadow Lodge

ciretose wrote:
Sean K Reynolds wrote:
In general, if your posts are a problem, the Paizo staff will send you a message, either via email or boards PM.
And they are very polite about it, by the way.

I kno, rite? Even to me!


1 person marked this as a favorite.
3.5 Loyalist wrote:

Good points Ernest. What about some sort of block posts from this poster feature?

People see a problem and a trend, people delete it from their very eyes (and all posts from said agitators) and carry on. FB allows this.

For Firefox and Chrome, look HERE


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
ciretose wrote:
Sean K Reynolds wrote:
In general, if your posts are a problem, the Paizo staff will send you a message, either via email or boards PM.
And they are very polite about it, by the way.

Well, that explains why your posts have become so readable over the last months. :p

Wu Nakitu wrote:
3.5 Loyalist wrote:

Good points Ernest. What about some sort of block posts from this poster feature?

People see a problem and a trend, people delete it from their very eyes (and all posts from said agitators) and carry on. FB allows this.

Facebook has a somewhat larger budget, and to be honest, Paizo shouldn't need to employ that kind of feature because of a vocal minority.

An ignore function is one of the most requested forum features. There is a third party script which works out fine ( only one person on it for me and, man, is the place suddenly better ), but official support would be appreciated, as in everything relating to Paizo. ^^


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Ignoring is for "people or topics you don't like," people actively misbehaving should just get booted.

Liberty's Edge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Ernest Mueller wrote:
Ignoring is for "people or topics you don't like," people actively misbehaving should just get booted.

What some people call "Misbehaving" others of us find to be the most interesting and amusing posts on the board.

This is Paizo's board, much like when people hang out at my house, it is my house.

Last night, my friends came over and we drank heavily and played Cards Against Humanity because we are all off tomorrow. It was great and horrible at the same time.

The expectations of decorum and courtesy in the room were...low. And good times were had by all.

Now before my daughter went to bed...same people, very, very different conversation.

Where Paizo decides to put the bar of decorum in their house is fine. But let us not pretend that going past the bar can't have value or merit.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Ernest Mueller wrote:
Ignoring is for "people or topics you don't like," people actively misbehaving should just get booted.

Sometimes those are the same people, only that, ahem, they shill for the company and attack people who criticise some game design decisions. So they are not touched by the staff.


Pathfinder Maps, Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Charter Superscriber; Starfinder Charter Superscriber

Who's this Trevor you're talking about?

Silver Crusade

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Zaister wrote:
Who's this Trevor you're talking about?

3.5 Royalists' RL name (which he did have for some time in his public profile). I like to remind him occasionally that nobody is anonymous on the Internet. The NSA and CIA know everything!

Silver Crusade

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
magnuskn wrote:
Ernest Mueller wrote:
Ignoring is for "people or topics you don't like," people actively misbehaving should just get booted.
Sometimes those are the same people, only that, ahem, they shill for the company and attack people who criticise some game design decisions. So they are not touched by the staff.

Hey, where's my 'Untouchable Shill' forum title?

Liberty's Edge

magnuskn wrote:
Ernest Mueller wrote:
Ignoring is for "people or topics you don't like," people actively misbehaving should just get booted.
Sometimes those are the same people, only that, ahem, they shill for the company and attack people who criticise some game design decisions. So they are not touched by the staff.

Its funny you should mention this. I have been accused of being a Paizo "Superfriend" and from my perspective, Paizo staff are more likely to come down on those of us who speak up on their behalf, in an inappropriate manner, that those who speak out against them. I suspect, as a result of this thread and its predecessors, that any difference in moderation is rather merely a matter of perception.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
graywulfe wrote:
magnuskn wrote:
Ernest Mueller wrote:
Ignoring is for "people or topics you don't like," people actively misbehaving should just get booted.
Sometimes those are the same people, only that, ahem, they shill for the company and attack people who criticise some game design decisions. So they are not touched by the staff.
Its funny you should mention this. I have been accused of being a Paizo "Superfriend" and from my perspective, Paizo staff are more likely to come down on those of us who speak up on their behalf, in an inappropriate manner, that those who speak out against them. I suspect, as a result of this thread and its predecessors, that any difference in moderation is rather merely a matter of perception.

I guess we frequent different thread types, because I must admit I never noted you much before. No, I am talking about the one person on my ignore list, who constantly attacks people who criticise Paizo game design decisions and gets away with it all the time. I guess the passive-agressive "Oh, I'm just joking, but really I am making a personal attack" attitude he prefers simply flies under the mod radar.

Liberty's Edge

Gorbacz wrote:
Zaister wrote:
Who's this Trevor you're talking about?
3.5 Royalists' RL name (which he did have for some time in his public profile). I like to remind him occasionally that nobody is anonymous on the Internet. The NSA and CIA know everything!

People always freak out when the obvious becomes obvious.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Aww, how come I never get polite emails from the staff about my shenanigans? I try to cross the line every now and then...

Liberty's Edge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Evil Lincoln wrote:
Aww, how come I never get polite emails from the staff about my shenanigans? I try to cross the line every now and then...

One does not simply "try" and cross the line :)

Shadow Lodge

I like using it for hopscotch.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Maps, Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Charter Superscriber; Starfinder Charter Superscriber

"Royalist" lol


3.5 Loyalist wrote:

Might, and mod powers, does not make right. So thanks for bringing it up.

I don't know if anyone has pointed this out to you yet but this isn't like other sites. Normal people aren't given mod powers for the site(I'm 99% sure of this). To be on mod on this site you actually have to be an employee of Paizo. So its not like other users were given mod powers like on other sites. The people who are locking threads are working for the company and have every right to do so since they, as representatives of the company, know what the comapny does and does not want taking place on their forums.

Sorry to any Paizo employees if this post gets in the way of Paizocon prep or enjoying you're 4th. Hopefully its an enjoyable weekend for all of you.

Paizo Employee PostMonster General

Some of us are here in the office but we're busy preparing for PaizoCon. mathpro18 is correct, all moderators here are Paizo employees with regular full-time jobs doing other things. Note that not every staff member has moderator privileges because not everybody has the temperament, time or inclination for it.


and some of us, are just not fit to be moderators

like myself, and many of the regulars among the users within these forums.


ciretose wrote:
Ernest Mueller wrote:
Ignoring is for "people or topics you don't like," people actively misbehaving should just get booted.

What some people call "Misbehaving" others of us find to be the most interesting and amusing posts on the board.

This is Paizo's board, much like when people hang out at my house, it is my house.

Last night, my friends came over and we drank heavily and played Cards Against Humanity because we are all off tomorrow. It was great and horrible at the same time.

The expectations of decorum and courtesy in the room were...low. And good times were had by all.

Now before my daughter went to bed...same people, very, very different conversation.

Where Paizo decides to put the bar of decorum in their house is fine. But let us not pretend that going past the bar can't have value or merit.

Yeah there is that problem, misbehaving being fun, for entertainment. I know I've been flagged when I am not misbehaving, some people are very sensitive.


magnuskn wrote:
graywulfe wrote:
magnuskn wrote:
Ernest Mueller wrote:
Ignoring is for "people or topics you don't like," people actively misbehaving should just get booted.
Sometimes those are the same people, only that, ahem, they shill for the company and attack people who criticise some game design decisions. So they are not touched by the staff.
Its funny you should mention this. I have been accused of being a Paizo "Superfriend" and from my perspective, Paizo staff are more likely to come down on those of us who speak up on their behalf, in an inappropriate manner, that those who speak out against them. I suspect, as a result of this thread and its predecessors, that any difference in moderation is rather merely a matter of perception.
I guess we frequent different thread types, because I must admit I never noted you much before. No, I am talking about the one person on my ignore list, who constantly attacks people who criticise Paizo game design decisions and gets away with it all the time. I guess the passive-agressive "Oh, I'm just joking, but really I am making a personal attack" attitude he prefers simply flies under the mod radar.

*Pats on back*

Yeah I've seen that a bit.


Good posts.

Did some digging. Here is the non-broken link for the ignore feature:

http://paizo.com/threads/rzs2p3rb?Ignore-v4

V4 forever!

Gorb, I asked you to stop using my name, much like I asked you to stop making jokes about my dead parents to try and get a rile out of me. You didn't comply with both those requests.

So guess who gets the first ignore, which will never be revoked?

You!

*click*

Good thread.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

@3.5 Loyalist: You know if you ignore posters that cause problems...you will never see the posts that get threads locked....which will lead you to create more threads like this one. Really it is just a vicious cycle.


Naa, Gorb doesn't get threads locked much. He gets away with a lot of snark, but that is no longer my problem (tee hee!).

This will in all likelihood be the last one of these (unless there is a lot more ridicu-locks in the future).

I can break the cycle! And have a good time.


9 people marked this as a favorite.
Gorbacz wrote:
magnuskn wrote:
Ernest Mueller wrote:
Ignoring is for "people or topics you don't like," people actively misbehaving should just get booted.
Sometimes those are the same people, only that, ahem, they shill for the company and attack people who criticise some game design decisions. So they are not touched by the staff.
Hey, where's my 'Untouchable Shill' forum title?

Woah woah woah, if anybody deserves to get a fricking title for being a shill, I think we can all agree it ought to be me.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Scott Betts wrote:
Gorbacz wrote:
magnuskn wrote:
Ernest Mueller wrote:
Ignoring is for "people or topics you don't like," people actively misbehaving should just get booted.
Sometimes those are the same people, only that, ahem, they shill for the company and attack people who criticise some game design decisions. So they are not touched by the staff.
Hey, where's my 'Untouchable Shill' forum title?
Woah woah woah, if anybody deserves to get a fricking title for being a shill, I think we can all agree it ought to be me.

I was trying to work out if you had a goateed double from the opposite universe.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Scott Betts wrote:
Gorbacz wrote:
magnuskn wrote:
Ernest Mueller wrote:
Ignoring is for "people or topics you don't like," people actively misbehaving should just get booted.
Sometimes those are the same people, only that, ahem, they shill for the company and attack people who criticise some game design decisions. So they are not touched by the staff.
Hey, where's my 'Untouchable Shill' forum title?
Woah woah woah, if anybody deserves to get a fricking title for being a shill, I think we can all agree it ought to be me.

I think "Rabid Defender of 4E" would be a better title. ;)


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Scott Betts wrote:
Gorbacz wrote:
magnuskn wrote:
Ernest Mueller wrote:
Ignoring is for "people or topics you don't like," people actively misbehaving should just get booted.
Sometimes those are the same people, only that, ahem, they shill for the company and attack people who criticise some game design decisions. So they are not touched by the staff.
Hey, where's my 'Untouchable Shill' forum title?
Woah woah woah, if anybody deserves to get a fricking title for being a shill, I think we can all agree it ought to be me.

I think they were refering to the "Pathfinder/Pazio Shill"...you are defintly the Number 1 "WotC shill" here though.


magnuskn wrote:
Scott Betts wrote:
Gorbacz wrote:
magnuskn wrote:
Ernest Mueller wrote:
Ignoring is for "people or topics you don't like," people actively misbehaving should just get booted.
Sometimes those are the same people, only that, ahem, they shill for the company and attack people who criticise some game design decisions. So they are not touched by the staff.
Hey, where's my 'Untouchable Shill' forum title?
Woah woah woah, if anybody deserves to get a fricking title for being a shill, I think we can all agree it ought to be me.
I think "Rabid Defender of 4E" would be a better title. ;)

4E Loyalist. That is my vote, lol.


6 people marked this as a favorite.

This is ridiculous. There are so many threads which haven't been locked! C'mon, stop not-locking threads! And to "prove" that not enough threads have been locked, I'm going to link to a bunch of unlocked threads and pretend that that means something!
Here, this one obviously needs to be locked:
http://paizo.com/threads/rzs2p3rb?Ignore-v4
Or this one:
http://paizo.com/threads/rzs2px1f?Android-font-problem
Or this one:
http://paizo.com/threads/rzs2nybj?Dodgy-accounts-spamming-the-forums-with
Or this
http://paizo.com/threads/rzs2pw06?VOannounce-subforum
Ooh, what about this one:
http://paizo.com/threads/rzs2pwyw?Cmon-stop-locking-the-threads
I mean, seriously, that last one contains the word "locking" in its title, and it still isn't locked! C'mon Paizo, get on it, lock every thread in the forum which I haven't posted in! It's obvious that not-locking threads doesn't solve anything, it just let's flaming continue, therefore all threads should be locked. And no, this is not my opinion, it is unassailable fact, and if you have a different opinion about when threads should be locked, you are obviously a tyrant-flamer/wrong. And ya know, unless you lock all these threads right away, I'm going to start making a ton of threads complaining about other unlocked threads, and post links to any threads that I think should be locked, and declare all of them to be objectively requiring locking! This is terrible, the power-mad mods are abusing their power to not lock threads!
[/sarcasm]
And yes, the links I picked were just the top 5 unlocked threads on this board, no offense to those thread-starters.

But seriously, 3.5 Loyalist, how is my sarcastic rant any different from your rants, aside from the fact that I didn't actually mean it and you apparently do?

Silver Crusade

9 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Dear Trevor,

It's funny how when people (eg. staff) ask you of something, you fart in their face, wrap yourself in some faux human rights defender flag and pretend you're some underdog hero fighting against the oppression. In fact, you seem to draw some insane joy in being the obstruction.

But when YOU ask anybody of something, it's DEAD SERIOUS and not following your requests results in DIRE CONSEQUENCES of being, erm, ignored. Complete with the obligatory "You're gone forever from my life, I won, you lost, muhahahahahaha" private message (no, I'm not kidding).

And now you're not even able to retort :)


4 people marked this as a favorite.
Gorbacz wrote:
Complete with the obligatory "You're gone forever from my life, I won, you lost, muhahahahahaha" private message (no, I'm not kidding).

You must be all broken up about this. What a loss.

Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

I'd cry if I had eyes.


4 people marked this as a favorite.

Honestly, I find the Paizo mods far too lenient for my tastes. I was a mod on one of the bigger Resident Evil communities for a long time, and while we got nowhere near the volume of traffic Paizo does we got a lot of bad posters. It was tiring, stressful and draining having to do it day after day for years. Any extra prestige I got from it was not nearly enough to make it enjoyable, especially since I was only working there as a favor.

Frankly, I would have banned a lot of the people here for there actions. I find it incredibly rude that when the staff here basically say, 'Look, we're desperately trying to get ready for a massive event, please behave for a weekend' that some members decide to be asses about it. It would be so much easier to ban those posters, and would be exactly what I would do.

We're here because Paizo has chosen to create a community for us to interact in - it's there ball, there rules, and I'm quite happy with that. Although I am definitely going to look into that ignore function - there are a few people are, frankly, too damned creepy to want to read every again.

I'd be fine with Paizo locking fewer threads - just ban the posters derailing them and they'll probably get better anyway.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

The one kind of people I dislike more than actual trolls are netcops. :-/


Frankly, I see little merit in banning people.

Merely opening another shiny new sockpuppet account is just a couple of clicks away... and this would lead to an arms race I doubt Paizo is willing to enter.


Yes, people who are being disruptive may come back again and continue to be disruptive. I'm not entirely sure how that's worse than letting them stay and continue to be disruptive.

In my experience, one of three things usually happen - the person leaves, either deciding they're not wanted or they're too good for the forum, the person returns to continue to be an ass or the person returns under a new alt and behaves, knowing that it's not impossible for them to be banned. The first is most likely, the second tends to happen with only a small number of dedicated trolls who were causing problems anyway, and the third doesn't happen as often as I'd like. But that is my personal experience.

I do think people need to realize that the blame doesn't stand with evil teams of moderators, hunting the forum for threads to lock and users to accost, but with problem users causing problems for everyone else.

Liberty's Edge

Scott Betts wrote:
Gorbacz wrote:
magnuskn wrote:
Ernest Mueller wrote:
Ignoring is for "people or topics you don't like," people actively misbehaving should just get booted.
Sometimes those are the same people, only that, ahem, they shill for the company and attack people who criticise some game design decisions. So they are not touched by the staff.
Hey, where's my 'Untouchable Shill' forum title?
Woah woah woah, if anybody deserves to get a fricking title for being a shill, I think we can all agree it ought to be me.

Well played, sir. Well played.

Liberty's Edge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Gorbacz wrote:

Dear Trevor,

It's funny how when people (eg. staff) ask you of something, you fart in their face, wrap yourself in some faux human rights defender flag and pretend you're some underdog hero fighting against the oppression. In fact, you seem to draw some insane joy in being the obstruction.

But when YOU ask anybody of something, it's DEAD SERIOUS and not following your requests results in DIRE CONSEQUENCES of being, erm, ignored. Complete with the obligatory "You're gone forever from my life, I won, you lost, muhahahahahaha" private message (no, I'm not kidding).

And now you're not even able to retort :)

Not true. I believe that now that I am responded, he can see my post and therefore how heartbroken you are.

Also, from my experience many people say they put you on ignore, but miraculously they seem to see posts that they want to refute.

It's an internet miracle!


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Midnight_Angel wrote:

Frankly, I see little merit in banning people.

Merely opening another shiny new sockpuppet account is just a couple of clicks away... and this would lead to an arms race I doubt Paizo is willing to enter.

That's what IP bans are for, isn't it?


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Even IP bans can be gotten around, I'm afraid. Although it's usually pretty easy to spot a proxy IP.


JonGarrett wrote:

Honestly, I find the Paizo mods far too lenient for my tastes. I was a mod on one of the bigger Resident Evil communities for a long time, and while we got nowhere near the volume of traffic Paizo does we got a lot of bad posters. It was tiring, stressful and draining having to do it day after day for years. Any extra prestige I got from it was not nearly enough to make it enjoyable, especially since I was only working there as a favor.

Frankly, I would have banned a lot of the people here for there actions. I find it incredibly rude that when the staff here basically say, 'Look, we're desperately trying to get ready for a massive event, please behave for a weekend' that some members decide to be asses about it. It would be so much easier to ban those posters, and would be exactly what I would do.

We're here because Paizo has chosen to create a community for us to interact in - it's there ball, there rules, and I'm quite happy with that. Although I am definitely going to look into that ignore function - there are a few people are, frankly, too damned creepy to want to read every again.

I'd be fine with Paizo locking fewer threads - just ban the posters derailing them and they'll probably get better anyway.

When they banned someone, did they send them the message "YOU DIED"?


magnuskn wrote:
The one kind of people I dislike more than actual trolls are netcops. :-/

Hands in the air, keyboard criminal!


137ben wrote:
That's what IP bans are for, isn't it?

Umm... Dial-up or DSL connections tend to get assigned a new IP on each connect. Would you care to ban a whole adress range, effectively banning all customers who share the same provider?


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
3.5 Loyalist wrote:
magnuskn wrote:
The one kind of people I dislike more than actual trolls are netcops. :-/
Hands in the air, keyboard criminal!

More like the "Hurrdurr, if I'd be a mod, I'd ban everyone" kind of crowd.


Yeah, excessiveness is never cool. Adolescent power fantasy, but never cool.

Liberty's Edge

3.5 Loyalist wrote:

Gorb, I asked you to stop using my name, much like I asked you to stop making jokes about my dead parents to try and get a rile out of me. You didn't comply with both those requests.

So, do you feel that one should be able to do or say pretty much anything you like on a company's message board, with no moderation whatsoever?

Also, can we call you T Wilson?

1 to 50 of 275 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Paizo / Website Feedback / C'mon, stop locking the threads All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.