|
These minis look great!
Thank you for the info which ones were from Reign of Winter, i find that very interesting. Maybe you could tell us if there are more minis that were cut but are upcoming and which ones?
I see two small errors:
1. The normal Wood Golem is medium sized.
So this seems to be an advanced model that can also be used as a Clockwork Golem. ;-)
2. A normal Dracolisk is large size.
The miniature looks pretty big but the base is small.
Maybe this is just a wrong base or it is a young creature template...
The Veiled Master Aboleth looks specially cool!
Thx Eric.
1. The wood golem looks to be a clockwork golem (the pawn version).
2. A normal dracolisk as in the bestiary is medium sized. Only the Tome of Horrors dracolisk is large sized.
Love these minis, and it's generous of you to share so many in one go!
Love these minis, and it's generous of you to share so many in one go!
Erik, did you see other cool toys that you really liked at the fair? Any big new additions to your no doubt epic collection?
|
Looking great. That is most assuredly a clockwork golem. So far This is looking to be a great set. More fey is always welcome, and the puckwugie and nuglub look great. I like the fact that the golem can pass for both types and the creepy little blood vessel waggling out the top of the creeping claw is awesome. Sadly I imagine the veiled master is. A rare? Very nice indeed. The centipede looks to be a masterpiece of sculpting, the legs and antennae really stand out in the pic. Is that a bat familiar in the first photo? Perhaps an ochre jelly and a giant tick in the second?
The only week points for me- the griffon looks like it has duck feet, now I imagine it the photo but at the moment, hmmmmmm
And I really hope the dracolich isn't as unstable as it looks, very top heavy looking and given the photos that show it toppled over I can't help but think it may be one of those frustrating minis that always falls over on the table.
Over all this looks to be an awesome set, come on June.
|
|
1. The wood golem looks to be a clockwork golem (the pawn version).
2. A normal dracolisk as in the bestiary is medium sized. Only the Tome of Horrors dracolisk is large sized.
Now i know why i made the mistake.
This is actually the Half-Dragon from the Bestiary aka Half-black dragon basilisk aka dracolisk.
Cool - another missing entry from Bestiary (1).
I actually write inside my bestiaries when a pathfinder or d&d miniature has been made of a monster and which number and series it is from and then mark it green when i got it.
It would be cool if a little photo of the miniature would be included in the monster entry (maybe i´ll do that) and if you like it and need it you know where to find it and can order it per QR-code directly from paizo or wizkids.
But that is the future i´m talking about - note to self: stop doing that. ;-)
Kidding aside there are not many creatures still missing from the first Bestiary who need to be made into miniatures.
Mostly it´s HUGE or GARGANTUAN sizes now.
I can see a HUGE miniatures line coming up in the future.
But there needs to be a Gargantuan and colossal pawn collection.
I just had the idea how to make them:
Create 6 card or plastic pieces that fit together to form a die (or create an actual die) and just use stickers on each side with a picture from the monsters front, back, sides and top.
Put a Pathfinder logo underneath and sell them for $5 (GARGANTUAN) or $10 (COLOSSAL)!
I know i would buy them.
Sorry if i got off topic a little - i want all pathfinder creatures presented in 3 dimensions on my flip-mats. ;-)
Fixed the golem error, as well as pukwudgie typo.
Wow! Okay, those are cool. Is that the same Four Horsemen that's supplying one of our Superstar judges for the next round, or a different Four Horsemen?
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Here looks to be a surprising lack of detailling on the goblin. Single tone to skin, black mouth ( teeth not picked out like on previous). I hope it matches the standard we've been getting, would hate the only archer to be the badly detailed figure. Odd, hopefully it's just a bad pic.
Took a look at the pic, the teeth seem to be picked out in white.
I see that Bone Golem peeking out, and it excites me. (Last pic)
Rats. I just started a Curse of the Crimson Throne campaign - there's no way that Daughter of Urgathoa is going to get to me in time. :(
|
|
Here looks to be a surprising lack of detailling on the goblin. Single tone to skin, black mouth ( teeth not picked out like on previous). I hope it matches the standard we've been getting, would hate the only archer to be the badly detailed figure. Odd, hopefully it's just a bad pic.Took a look at the pic, the teeth seem to be picked out in white.
2nd pic here? Blobby feet, paint bleed onto the bow, black mouth. Not talking about the previously shown pics which was a render. Is thee another pic of the actual model somewhere? I've only seen the one here in the second picture above.
I'm not too fussed, rest of the set looks fantastic
Here looks to be a surprising lack of detailling on the goblin. Single tone to skin, black mouth ( teeth not picked out like on previous). I hope it matches the standard we've been getting, would hate the only archer to be the badly detailed figure. Odd, hopefully it's just a bad pic.Took a look at the pic, the teeth seem to be picked out in white.
2nd pic here? Blobby feet, paint bleed onto the bow, black mouth. Not talking about the previously shown pics which was a render. Is thee another pic of the actual model somewhere? I've only seen the one here in the second picture above.
I'm not too fussed, rest of the set looks fantastic
There is another close up from Toy Fair, I'll post the link if I can find it. And yes the bow and the feet are still pretty bad, but the teeth have been picked out, just not as nicely as in the digital render. They look single coat dry-brushed in the close up. I'm with you in hoping that the Archer holds up to at least the detail level of the other goblins produced so far.
HI! It's me!
Tire Golem?
Bestiary says Aboleths are huge.
http://paizo.com/pathfinderRPG/prd/monsters/aboleth.html#aboleth
also the art doesn't quite fit
It's a veiled master not an aboleth. Veiled masters are more magic and trickery focused and thus only large.
sounds better, I might have use for one of them.
It's a veiled master not an aboleth. Veiled masters are more magic and trickery focused and thus only large.
Sounds great. Do you happen to remember what the source material is for these creatures?
Thanks. These look great!