Retraining more limited than seems to be intended


Rules Discussion


1 person marked this as a favorite.

If for example a fighter joins a house of perfection at level 7, they would be unable to retrain their 2nd, 4th, or 6th level class feats take the student of perfection dedication feat because they were not a member of a house of perfection at level 2, 4, or 6.

This is because of the text in the retraining section on page 481 "When retraining, you generally can’t make choices you couldn’t make when you selected the original
option. For instance, you can’t exchange a 2nd-level
skill feat for a 4th-level one, or for one that requires
prerequisites you didn’t meet at the time you took the
original feat."

So you did not meet the prerequisite at levels 2, 4 or 6 because you were not a member of a house of perfection yet.

This seems harsher than intended.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

...retrain whatever your lower-level feat you want to retrain is to the dedication to join the house of perfection, instead of using your 7th level feat choice for it?

Doesn't seem harsh at all.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

"Generally." Don't outsmart yourself.

Grand Lodge

Doesn’t really seem that harsh there


thenobledrake wrote:

...retrain whatever your lower-level feat you want to retrain is to the dedication to join the house of perfection, instead of using your 7th level feat choice for it?

Doesn't seem harsh at all.

The whole point is you can't retrain to that feat with a lower level feat. Joining a house of perfection is a prerequisite for the dedication feat.


Also, if you ever leave the organization all your feats and focus powers stop working, because you lose abilities you get when you don't meet their prerequisites anymore.

Joining an organization should not be a prerequisite because of these implications.


Another thing, a level 6 barbarian it's unable to retrain the level 2 feat to the student of perfection dedication because they were not an expert in unarmed attacks until level 5.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

You're assuming it is intended to plan out complicated builds rather than fix errors you made when levelling.


citricking wrote:
thenobledrake wrote:

...retrain whatever your lower-level feat you want to retrain is to the dedication to join the house of perfection, instead of using your 7th level feat choice for it?

Doesn't seem harsh at all.

The whole point is you can't retrain to that feat with a lower level feat. Joining a house of perfection is a prerequisite for the dedication feat.

I think you misread what I said, because what I said was don't take the dedication feat as your 7th level feat and then be unable to retrain your other feats to things that have the dedication feat as a requisite.

Do retrain your lower-level feat to pick up the dedication feat, and then you can proceed to take the other feats you were wanting.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
thenobledrake wrote:
citricking wrote:
thenobledrake wrote:

...retrain whatever your lower-level feat you want to retrain is to the dedication to join the house of perfection, instead of using your 7th level feat choice for it?

Doesn't seem harsh at all.

The whole point is you can't retrain to that feat with a lower level feat. Joining a house of perfection is a prerequisite for the dedication feat.

I think you misread what I said, because what I said was don't take the dedication feat as your 7th level feat and then be unable to retrain your other feats to things that have the dedication feat as a requisite.

Do retrain your lower-level feat to pick up the dedication feat, and then you can proceed to take the other feats you were wanting.

He already addressed that. When you were 2nd level, you were not a member of a house of perfection. Therefore, because you did not meet that prerequisite for the House of Perfection dedication when you were 2nd level, you cannot retrain your 2nd level feat to the House of Perfection dedication.


No, what he address was that certain classes couldn't take the dedication feat until a particular level because they don't meet the requirements for the dedication feet until then.

The "I wasn't already in the house of perfection at that level" thing is a different and entirely avoidable issue.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
citricking wrote:
Another thing, a level 6 barbarian it's unable to retrain the level 2 feat to the student of perfection dedication because they were not an expert in unarmed attacks until level 5.

well, that's cetainly as intended.

if you don't meat a direct mechanical requirement at a level, you certainly can't retrain to something that requires it before you get said mechanical benefit.

If a "social" requirement, or one that you COULD theoritacally fullfill at said level but you didn't, is also included, is up to more debate.

Imo the rai is seperated by if you "could" have said feat at said level.

"could a barbarian have expert proficiency with unarmed at level 2?"
"no"
so he can't retrain to a feat requiring expert unarmed as his 2nd level feat

"could you be a part of a House at level 2?"
"yes"
so you can retrain to a feat requiring to be a part of said House as your 2nd level feat.


What shroud said, and I apologize for assuming it was obvious to everyone the rules were talking about mechanical requirements because the example given in the book was about what levels the feats in question were, not whether the character's story at that particular level involved particular details.


thenobledrake wrote:
What shroud said, and I apologize for assuming it was obvious to everyone the rules were talking about mechanical requirements because the example given in the book was about what levels the feats in question were, not whether the character's story at that particular level involved particular details.

Well they give the example of the you not being able to take a feat of a different level, which is obvious. But after that there's the text "or for one that requires prerequisites you didn’t meet at the time you took the original feat". The prerequisites are not the level requirements, there's an "or" in that sentence.


I feel like the prerequisites you need to have met at the time of the feat are things like "proficiency level" or "you have a high enough stat to meet the multiclass dedication". Not something like "you can't find a Hellknight to witness you singlehandedly killing a higher level devil for a while."


citricking wrote:
Well they give the example of the you not being able to take a feat of a different level, which is obvious.

It's kinda not though... yes, it might seem obvious given your particular familiarity with this and/or other games, but for someone who has never read an RPG before coming in and reading the retraining rules, other than providing the example using level as they do, there is nothing in the text that explicitly says you can't retrain all your options based on the level your character currently happens to be - which is a thing that could seem to line up with the general rule of being able to select an option of your current level or lower every time you are picking out a new option.

That said, after reading the feat in question again and seeing that I was remembering their being a clear split between the mechanical requirements and the story requirements... I can propose what I view as a fix: anything mechanical in nature required goes in the requirements section. Any story requirement gets moved over to the "acess" section with the other story requirements already present there.


thenobledrake wrote:
citricking wrote:
Well they give the example of the you not being able to take a feat of a different level, which is obvious.

It's kinda not though... yes, it might seem obvious given your particular familiarity with this and/or other games, but for someone who has never read an RPG before coming in and reading the retraining rules, other than providing the example using level as they do, there is nothing in the text that explicitly says you can't retrain all your options based on the level your character currently happens to be - which is a thing that could seem to line up with the general rule of being able to select an option of your current level or lower every time you are picking out a new option.

That said, after reading the feat in question again and seeing that I was remembering their being a clear split between the mechanical requirements and the story requirements... I can propose what I view as a fix: anything mechanical in nature required goes in the requirements section. Any story requirement gets moved over to the "acess" section with the other story requirements already present there.

Ah, I meant it was obvious given they gave that example explicitly. I didn't mean it was obvious without the example. And that would be a great fix I think.


Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber
Pickles Grr wrote:
You're assuming it is intended to plan out complicated builds rather than fix errors you made when levelling.

I mean, there are feats that depreciate in power as you level and stuff like multiclassing which care about the order in which you take the feats, so retraining as a way to manage complex builds definitely seems intended to at least some degree.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Retraining should not be possible at all.

This just give option to exchange a feature that you took because of lack of knowing how mechanics for your class Works.

It is pretty generous.


citricking wrote:

If for example a fighter joins a house of perfection at level 7, they would be unable to retrain their 2nd, 4th, or 6th level class feats take the student of perfection dedication feat because they were not a member of a house of perfection at level 2, 4, or 6.

This is because of the text in the retraining section on page 481 "When retraining, you generally can’t make choices you couldn’t make when you selected the original
option. For instance, you can’t exchange a 2nd-level
skill feat for a 4th-level one, or for one that requires
prerequisites you didn’t meet at the time you took the
original feat."

So you did not meet the prerequisite at levels 2, 4 or 6 because you were not a member of a house of perfection yet.

This seems harsher than intended.

This makes sense. The solution would be to try getting into the dedication earlier and then retrain things.

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder Second Edition / Rules Discussion / Retraining more limited than seems to be intended All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Rules Discussion