
![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

While I did notice that there are references to Goblin's love of fire, tendency to sing and the use of the Dogslicer, with the change to Goblins becoming more civilized, have Goblins given up on some of their old beliefs? Namely, that writing steals words from your head or that a horse's hooves will steal your soul? One of my favorite details from the We Be Goblins series is that the Goblin Alchemist's formula book uses pictographs rather than words.

PossibleCabbage |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

"All goblins believe writing steals words out of your head" is like "all elves find ginger disgusting" or "All Dwarves find the color blue unfashionable". It's a thing that, if true, is ridiculous since there are all kinds of these folks on a bunch of different continents. If they all believed the same things about anything that would be bizarre.

![]() |

"All goblins believe writing steals words out of your head" is like "all elves find ginger disgusting" or "All Dwarves find the color blue unfashionable". It's a thing that, if true, is ridiculous since there are all kinds of these folks on a bunch of different continents. If they all believed the same things about anything that would be bizarre.
At least in 1E, goblins were not meant to be taken seriously. From their first appearance, they were played for comedy as much as or more than for horror.
That said, they are probably meant to be taken more seriously now.
(Also, fantasy races are basically exaggerated human stereotypes anyway, and there is no reason to expect anything better.)

PossibleCabbage |

I mean, you could have a story where when the Dwarves emerged from the Darklands they considered wearing the color of the sky taboo. But it's been like 10,000 years since that happened and in the meantime sartorial preferences will have shifted- a Dwarf who was born under the sky and spent their entire life under it wouldn't feel the same kind of awe as someone who saw it for the first time in the 200th year of their life. We can preserve that story with something like "some particularly traditional dwarves believe the color blue is unlucky" rather than a statement about what all dwarves everywhere are like.
I don't think it's wrong to expect our imaginary people to fundamentally be people, even if they have nonhuman bodies.

![]() |

I don't think it's wrong to expect our imaginary people to fundamentally be people, even if they have nonhuman bodies.
I don't disagree, but since most of the peoples all but an exceptionally creative few seem to be capable of imagining are humans in all but name, I question the utility of giving them non-human bodies.
Contrariwise, once you've given a thing a non-human body, if you're not going to do a rewrite you might as well embrace the inevitable goofiness.

thejeff |
I mean, you could have a story where when the Dwarves emerged from the Darklands they considered wearing the color of the sky taboo. But it's been like 10,000 years since that happened and in the meantime sartorial preferences will have shifted- a Dwarf who was born under the sky and spent their entire life under it wouldn't feel the same kind of awe as someone who saw it for the first time in the 200th year of their life. We can preserve that story with something like "some particularly traditional dwarves believe the color blue is unlucky" rather than a statement about what all dwarves everywhere are like.
I don't think it's wrong to expect our imaginary people to fundamentally be people, even if they have nonhuman bodies.
OTOH, there are such things as dwarven gods who might continue to teach such traditions to all their people. There can be reasons in a fantasy world that such things don't necessarily parallel the real world.
In some cases it might be even be intrinsic to the psychology or biology of a particular race.

Dragonchess Player |

Horse hate is probably still a thing in 2e. The description of horses in the Bestiary implies that it's mutual.
Goblins probably still dislike dogs, as well. However, the goblins that are more integrated in "normal" society are likely to avoid them rather than attack/poison/etc.
Reading is probably one of those "most goblins are superstitious about writing, but some are not."

![]() |
6 people marked this as a favorite. |

Dragonchess Player wrote:Reading is probably one of those "most goblins are superstitious about writing, but some are not."My concern is that it's usually assumed that Pathfinder Society members write reports of their adventures. Does that rule out illiterate goblins in PFS?
Give them a box of crayola. The big ones. We’ll get plenty of we’ll documented pictures.

![]() |
6 people marked this as a favorite. |

And besides, some of the wiser goblins (rare, I know) will probably tell you that learning isn't all that useful if it's just sitting on a shelf.
"Read them, have you?"
"Well, I..."
"Page-turners, they were not."
And yes, I made this entire post for a Last Jedi reference and because I totally wanna play a goblin monk/druid who's basically just medieval Yoda! :P

UnArcaneElection |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

^I also wouldn't mind seeing a savvy Goblin Alchemist/Rogue who's basically Medieval/Renaissance/Baroque Maz Kanata.

![]() |

^I also wouldn't mind seeing a savvy Goblin Alchemist/Rogue who's basically Medieval/Renaissance/Baroque Maz Kanata.
Complete with personal Blair Mountain?
Maz is Worst Character, full stop, just for that little stunt.

![]() |

^I wonder if that dispute had more to it than at first appears. But either way, I didn't say that this would be Good, just that I wouldn't mind seeing this. (Insert guilty pleasure at seeing the latest batch of Star Wars movies.)
You have a business owner discharging firearms at her workers, and calling it a "labor dispute." What more do you need to know?

![]() |
6 people marked this as a favorite. |

UnArcaneElection wrote:You have a business owner discharging firearms at her workers, and calling it a "labor dispute." What more do you need to know?^I wonder if that dispute had more to it than at first appears. But either way, I didn't say that this would be Good, just that I wouldn't mind seeing this. (Insert guilty pleasure at seeing the latest batch of Star Wars movies.)
Workers are not universally and inevitably correct in all disputes with their employers. Guns don't change that, especially when she seemed to be the one outnumbered. And particularly when one employs serous professional criminals, something she's been strongly implied to do.
Now, workers are in the right more often than not in conflicts with employers, but it's hardly a law of nature.

![]() |
8 people marked this as a favorite. |

Goblins have a broader range in where they fall on literacy now, because they've been influenced more by other cultures and societies. For many of the Inner Sea's goblins, reading is still strange and possibly distrusted, writing even more so, and dogs and horses can be trusted about as far as the average goblin can throw them.
Self-delusion, necessity, and curiosity can all warp and change those factors. One of the goblins in We Be Heroes has a "wolf" that is pretty obviously not a wolf, Fumbus is perfectly happy to rifle through other people's souls by reading their books and helping himself to their knowledge, and the goblin merchant Yigrig Moneymaker down in Katapesh (and one of the very few old goblins in all of Golarion) is pretty much over conceits like superstition and is perfectly willing to read or write as necessary to protect and advance his business.
And for Pathfinder Society specifically, some goblins get over their distrust of reading and writing, while others are technically literate but still prefer to just craft a goblin song about their explorations and let someone else write it all down.

littlediegito |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Fromper wrote:Give them a box of crayola. The big ones. We’ll get plenty of we’ll documented pictures.Dragonchess Player wrote:Reading is probably one of those "most goblins are superstitious about writing, but some are not."My concern is that it's usually assumed that Pathfinder Society members write reports of their adventures. Does that rule out illiterate goblins in PFS?
I have a PFS character who cannot read or write. He is learning and is getting better (I have had several folks at tables who have helped him and given him some lessons). His journal was mostly pictures early on, and kind of still is, but he is starting to be able to give more text reports.

![]() |

Rysky wrote:I have a PFS character who cannot read or write. He is learning and is getting better (I have had several folks at tables who have helped him and given him some lessons). His journal was mostly pictures early on, and kind of still is, but he is starting to be able to give more text reports.Fromper wrote:Give them a box of crayola. The big ones. We’ll get plenty of we’ll documented pictures.Dragonchess Player wrote:Reading is probably one of those "most goblins are superstitious about writing, but some are not."My concern is that it's usually assumed that Pathfinder Society members write reports of their adventures. Does that rule out illiterate goblins in PFS?
Yay!

![]() |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

I’d have the goblin language consist entirely of pictographs and hieroglyphs and what not all the while specifically claiming that it doesn’t count as written words.
(Basically goblins are hypocrites who think that everybody’s written languages but their own steals words from your head.)
I mean, the line between alphabetic and other forms of writing is both broad and bright.

![]() |

^I keep having visions of a fantasy setting in which the common language (both spoken and written) is 13375p3@k . . . .
That would be more like an outer space science fantasy (like Starfinder) than pure fantasy. Maybe there could be a droid with the designation L3-37 or something like that.