Mark Moreland Director of Brand Strategy |
I really love Alpha 2 and was wondering if we have an ETA on ALPHA 3 ???
One we have Alpha 3, we should have the complete Alpha playtest document, is that right? Then, next comes the bog bad Beta? Or ... could there be some tweaks first to the Alpha 3 doc? Alpha 2.1, Alpha 2.2 etc???
It comes out later.
Erik Mona Chief Creative Officer, Publisher |
Marc Radle |
Marc Radle 81 wrote:It comes out later.I really love Alpha 2 and was wondering if we have an ETA on ALPHA 3 ???
Once we have Alpha 3, we should have the complete Alpha playtest document, is that right? Then, next comes the big bad Beta? Or ... could there be some tweaks first to the Alpha 3 doc? Alpha 3.1, Alpha 3.2 etc???
Uh, that was helpful - thanks.
Oh, and thanks for the actual ETA Erik!
Mark Moreland Director of Brand Strategy |
Uh, that was helpful - thanks.Oh, and thanks for the actual ETA Erik!
Sorry. I am just wary to get my hopes up and build the anticipation too much after last release. The less I think about how soon it comes out the less I'll obsess about it. If my own anxiety and cynicism has rubbed off on you, I apologize.
Lisa Stevens CEO |
Erik Mona wrote:Alpha 3 is looking like it should be available late next week. Or so.A3 is the last one, right, before PFRPG goes into beta?
Yep. Basically, there will be a few weeks to get feedback and then Jason will massage the alpha documents into the beta document that will be released at GenCon. Then we will playtest the heck out of that beta document for the next 10 months or so.
-Lisa
Navdi |
This from here: http://paizo.com/pathfinder/pathfinderRPG
"This coming August, Paizo will release a massive, full-color, softcover Pathfinder RPG Beta release for $24.99. This book will be available on paizo.com, at Gen Con, as well as through hobby distribution at local game stores. Just like the Alpha releases, the Beta release will be available as a free PDF download on paizo.com."
Mark Moreland Director of Brand Strategy |
Saurstalk |
Will there be significant changes between A2 and A3?
There are LOTS of comments on these boards on class reconstruction, feat builds, condensed skills, and so forth.
I know that Paizo may be reluctant to tell us how it's narrowing its work . . . at the risk of alienating members of its consumer base . . . but it would be nice to know whether people are spending undue time on things Paizo has no sense in changing. E.g., condensing skills further.
If you'd rather not say, I understand.
P.S. If I order the Beta, as a subscriber or no, from Paizo, is there any chance of a discount? : )
Lisa Stevens CEO |
Saurstalk |
How complete is the Beta going to be? Meaning - I still have to refer to the PHB (and DMG) a lot with the current alpha versions . . . including for the core classes in the alpha version.
Will the Beta be completely inclusive . . . at least as a PHB? (I'd like to look my D&D 3.5 PHB away and start hanging onto the Beta religiously . . . at least until next year.)
Prime Evil |
Alpha 3 is looking like it should be available late next week. Or so.
One of the most interesting things for me about the whole open playtest process is seeing the way that certain sections of the document change between versions.
By noting the sections of the document that change and those that don't, I am getting a better idea of the direction that Paizo is taking the game in.
Paizo seem to be confident about the changes that they are making to the 3.5 rules in some areas, but willing to explore a variety of different options in other areas. The open playtest process obviously serves as a form of market research, enabling the folks at Paizo to get a sense of community reaction to some of the bolder changes.
Xaaon of Xen'Drik |
Erik Mona wrote:Alpha 3 is looking like it should be available late next week. Or so.One of the most interesting things for me about the whole open playtest process is seeing the way that certain sections of the document change between versions.
By noting the sections of the document that change and those that don't, I am getting a better idea of the direction that Paizo is taking the game in.
Paizo seem to be confident about the changes that they are making to the 3.5 rules in some areas, but willing to explore a variety of different options in other areas. The open playtest process obviously serves as a form of market research, enabling the folks at Paizo to get a sense of community reaction to some of the bolder changes.
Which if Wizards had been more open in their development of 4e, more people would be willing to see it through...but instead they chose the corporate NDA and lie to the public about release dates and development.
I love what Paizo is with 3.5, and will be supporting it as much as possible.
CrackedOzy |
How complete is the Beta going to be? Meaning - I still have to refer to the PHB (and DMG) a lot with the current alpha versions . . . including for the core classes in the alpha version.
Will the Beta be completely inclusive . . . at least as a PHB? (I'd like to look my D&D 3.5 PHB away and start hanging onto the Beta religiously . . . at least until next year.)
I'm curious about this too.
Fox_Reeveheart |
baaaaaards.
I have never played a bard, not even once. Some months ago I started getting the itch to play one but for some reason I just can't bring myself to play it, maybe how you feel that you are suddenly only have 1 available role as a bard and thats a buffer. Probably why i never played a cleric either so i'm not seen as a heal battery.
I would be so ever grateful if bards are given either feats or powers or anything so that they more options other than (i give my team +2 ac). This song of doom seems fun, I wouldn't mind seeing some good debuffers be in their also. And how about some mastery over sonic?!
Prime Evil |
How complete is the Beta going to be? Meaning - I still have to refer to the PHB (and DMG) a lot with the current alpha versions . . . including for the core classes in the alpha version.
I'm curious to see whether the beta will tackle the prestige classes from the DMG. I presume that the remaining core classes will be tackled in the final Alpha release, so I wonder whether the prestige classes will get a similar treatment during the Beta phase.
Personally, I'd love to see updated versions of some of these - particularly the assassin, the mystic theurge, and the blackguard.
(For the record, I never liked the magic-heavy version of the assassin presented in 3e. I preferred the flavor of the 1e version, even if it the game mechanics were badly broken. To me, the D&D assassin should be modeled on the classic sword & sorcery assassins from Fritz Leiber's Lankhmar stories).
Timespike |
baaaaaards.
I have never played a bard, not even once. Some months ago I started getting the itch to play one but for some reason I just can't bring myself to play it, maybe how you feel that you are suddenly only have 1 available role as a bard and thats a buffer. Probably why i never played a cleric either so i'm not seen as a heal battery.
Having played a number of clerics, the "heal battery" only lasts until around level 7 or so. After that, in my experience anyway, you alternate between "pious freight train" and "he/she who makes everybody in the party even better at what they do."
Xaaon of Xen'Drik |
Saurstalk wrote:How complete is the Beta going to be? Meaning - I still have to refer to the PHB (and DMG) a lot with the current alpha versions . . . including for the core classes in the alpha version.I'm curious to see whether the beta will tackle the prestige classes from the DMG. I presume that the remaining core classes will be tackled in the final Alpha release, so I wonder whether the prestige classes will get a similar treatment during the Beta phase.
Personally, I'd love to see updated versions of some of these - particularly the assassin, the mystic theurge, and the blackguard.
(For the record, I never liked the magic-heavy version of the assassin presented in 3e. I preferred the flavor of the 1e version, even if it the game mechanics were badly broken. To me, the D&D assassin should be modeled on the classic sword & sorcery assassins from Fritz Leiber's Lankhmar stories).
Just remember that they're shooting for backwards compatibility, so they wouldn't remove the magic from the assassin, though they might make more options, but personally I think PrCs don't need alot of fixing, except for a few broken ones.
hida_jiremi |
I'm really hoping that Alpha 3 is out in time for my next Monday session. The party is likely to hit level 4 next week (maybe the week after), and one of my PCs is a gnome druid who plans to multiclass over to bard. I'd hate for him to have to delay a level on that. Not to mention that I'm psyched about the next release. ^_^
Jeremy Puckett
joela |
Any word on if we are still aiming for an end-of-the-week release of Alpha 3? or is it looking like early next week? Not wanting to rush things, just wondering and anxious to see the Bard (my favorite class).
Any more news? rpg.net is running a "Fantasy Review Week" during the week of June 16th through the 21st and I'd like to submit AR3 as one of my reviews.
Erik Mona Chief Creative Officer, Publisher |