If you could summon any type of bear with it, even descriptive, gay men looking for company would have a new class to be their champion.
Augmented!
No, you're thinking of Mount.
I dunno, is a trouser snake a snake?
What if you magically separated the bear from the owl using a vorpal sword? Would the bottom half count as a bear? Do bears need heads to count as bears?
Javascript is even worse than putting me in an owl mask.
...
Please don't put me in an owl mask.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
*blink*
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
Eh, I'd allow it. The stat blocks for an owlbear and a grizzly aren't appreciably different, and they're both listed as 4th-level options for Summon Nature's Ally. Besides, the ability in question just says "bears" - there's nothing restricting it to the animal type.
This was my thinking. Hell, I'd allow werebear if it was on the 4th-level list. Bear is bear. :P
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Agreed with the majority.
Just because a sword is long, it's not necessarily a long sword.
A dragonne is not a dragon.
Secure shelter is not a spell with "cure" in the name.
Uh...
A sword that is long is a long sword. Not a "longsword", but a long sword. A sword that is long is literally a long sword.
Secure shelter does have "cure" in the name, although it's not a cure spell. Cure spells heal people by (sl)d8+(cl) damage, or a number of people for a lesser amount. And secure shelter does not have "cure" as its own word, which is a key point.
I think you kind of missed the point.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Where is that writ? Where does it say totemic summons are animal-only? The druid is channeling the ideal of "bear", not the ideal of "Ursidae". ;P
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Owlbears do not throw better parties, though.