|
I was wondering if wearing multiple Rings of Wizardry stack? AKA could you wear 2 Rings of Wizardry I for 4 xs the number of first level spells? It does not say anywhere that I could find if this would work or not, I was just wondering what the community thought about it. We have two Wizards in our party and each has a ring, one of them bought the farm last game and the player wants to bring in a different type of character instead of us having him raised. The DM is kind of new and not sure how this would work. Her internet was down so I said that I would post this question. We know that ultimately it is up to the Dm but she wanted to see what other more experienced DM's thought before she makes up her mind. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Not 4X. Each would add back the number. Thus, if you could cast 5 1st level spells and wore one ring, then you'd have 10. Two rings= 15, not 20.
Just out of curiosity, why do you want/need that many 1st level spells anyway?
|
If a fighter had a feat that let him do double damage and he rolled a crit with his scimitar would you tell him it didn't count because he already did double damage?I don't believe you can. You can wear different level rings. And really, that's probably better. Get one second and one first level ring of wizardry. I wouldn't allow it
The reason is the text which says: "The wearer’s arcane spells per day are doubled for one specific spell level."
If you wear one, it's doubled. If you wear two, it's still doubled.
A keen weapon and improved critical don't stack.
A keen weapon and improved critical don't stack.
Because they say they don't.
Follow the normal rules for applying this kind of effect with the double double = triple rule... Take the base, add the same amount, then add the same amount again.
If you have 4, that'd be 4+4+4= 12 + bonus
You only get two rings, if someone wants to use em both and 40k gold to simply triple their 1st level spells per day... ha, let em.
|
|
A keen weapon and improved critical don't stack.Because they say they don't.
Follow the normal rules for applying this kind of effect with the double double = triple rule... Take the base, add the same amount, then add the same amount again.
If you have 4, that'd be 4+4+4= 12 + bonus
You only get two rings, if someone wants to use em both and 40k gold to simply triple their 1st level spells per day... ha, let em.
It was about the example he made, not about the ring of wizardry.
Taking in consideration the gp cost of a ring of wizardry and the opportunity cost of wearing a second ring of wizardry instead of a ring of protection, I have no problem with the wizard tripling his first level spells.
|
|
Just out of curiosity, why do you want/need that many 1st level spells anyway?
My character already has a Ring of Wizardry I. My adventuring partner also had one but he died. I figured might as well put his on since I dont have any other rings. Not spending money for another one just being opportunistic
Just out of curiosity, why do you want/need that many 1st level spells anyway?My character already has a Ring of Wizardry I. My adventuring partner also had one but he died. I figured might as well put his on since I dont have any other rings. Not spending money for another one just being opportunistic
Hrm, sell it to Raise him?
|
Hrm, sell it to Raise him?Just out of curiosity, why do you want/need that many 1st level spells anyway?My character already has a Ring of Wizardry I. My adventuring partner also had one but he died. I figured might as well put his on since I dont have any other rings. Not spending money for another one just being opportunistic
Original post says that the player of the dead Wizard didn't want him raised, he wanted to play something else entirely.
While the extra 1st level spells aren't going to be terribly unbalancing, it might work better for the party to sell the spare ring for funds for some more... generally useful items for everyone in the party.
Or save it for that cohort Wizard...
Original post says that the player of the dead Wizard didn't want him raised, he wanted to play something else entirely.
Ha, all the more reason to do it!
>.>
<.<
|
|
Hrm, sell it to Raise him?Just out of curiosity, why do you want/need that many 1st level spells anyway?My character already has a Ring of Wizardry I. My adventuring partner also had one but he died. I figured might as well put his on since I dont have any other rings. Not spending money for another one just being opportunistic
Will probably sell it when we get somewhere I can but we are in the middle of a dungeon about a hundred miles from civilization right now. I was wondering for the shortterm gain it it was stackable.