![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
viker |
So I'm DMing a party that's fighting a wraith. It's an incorporeal creature, so I've been ruling that all their magic attacks (except for Force Spells and Channel Energy) do 50% damage as stated in the Incorporeal Creature description.
We're playing on Roll20, and one of my players was at a coffee shop when a Regional Pathfinder Society Manager wanders by and informs him that the cure light wounds spells that I've been ruling as doing half-damage should be doing full damage.
So we find a few conflicting discussions. This one says that healing spells don't do their full damage. This one cites the Errata for Bestiary I and says they do.
I checked the errata and couldn't find the entry. I'm pretty sure the PF Society manager would be correct, but I can't find the source. Can anyone help clear this up? It seems like such a simple thing that no one can agree on!
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
![]() |
The Society Manger unfortunately has it wrong. In a game system this large, it happens to the best of us.
The ruling you're looking for is Incorporeal under the Universal Monster rules. Relevant text follows.
An incorporeal creature has no physical body. It can be harmed only by other incorporeal creatures, magic weapons or creatures that strike as magic weapons, and spells, spell-like abilities, or supernatural abilities. It is immune to all nonmagical attack forms. Even when hit by spells or magic weapons, it takes only half damage from a corporeal source (except for channel energy). Although it is not a magical attack, holy water can affect incorporeal undead. Corporeal spells and effects that do not cause damage only have a 50% chance of affecting an incorporeal creature. Force spells and effects, such as from a magic missile, affect an incorporeal creature normally.
He might be making an assumption that cure spells operate under the channel energy guidelines. That's a DM call.
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
![]() |
The Society Manger unfortunately has it wrong. In a game system this large, it happens to the best of us.
The ruling you're looking for is Incorporeal under the Universal Monster rules. Relevant text follows.
An incorporeal creature has no physical body. It can be harmed only by other incorporeal creatures, magic weapons or creatures that strike as magic weapons, and spells, spell-like abilities, or supernatural abilities. It is immune to all nonmagical attack forms. Even when hit by spells or magic weapons, it takes only half damage from a corporeal source (except for channel energy). Although it is not a magical attack, holy water can affect incorporeal undead. Corporeal spells and effects that do not cause damage only have a 50% chance of affecting an incorporeal creature. Force spells and effects, such as from a magic missile, affect an incorporeal creature normally.
He might be making an assumption that cure spells operate under the channel energy guidelines. That's a DM call.
While it doesn't change the fact that Cure spells only work half as well on incorporeal undead, that's not what my copy of the Bestiary says (nor is it what the PRD says).
Incorporeal (Ex) An incorporeal creature has no physical body. It can be harmed only by other incorporeal creatures, magic weapons or creatures that strike as magic weapons, and spells, spell-like abilities, or supernatural abilities. It is immune to all nonmagical attack forms. Even when hit by spells or magic weapons, it takes only half damage from a corporeal source. Although it is not a magical attack, holy water affects incorporeal undead. Corporeal spells and effects that do not cause damage only have a 50% chance of affecting an incorporeal creature (except for channel energy). Force spells and effects, such as from a magic missile, affect an incorporeal creature normally.
A strict reading of that would seem to imply that even Channel Energy is halved, since it's not mentioned in the "half damage" bit.
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
![]() |
![Fey Creature](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/PZO1120-FeyCreature_90.jpeg)
I disagree. Cure spells are channeled positive energy. It says so in the spell description:
When laying your hand upon a living creature, you channel positive energy that cures 1d8 points of damage + 1 point per caster level (maximum +5). Since undead are powered by negative energy, this spell deals damage to them instead of curing their wounds. An undead creature can apply spell resistance, and can attempt a Will save to take half damage.
So cure spells would do full damage or half if they make the save.
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
![]() |
![Fey Creature](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/PZO1120-FeyCreature_90.jpeg)
LazarX wrote:The Society Manger unfortunately has it wrong. In a game system this large, it happens to the best of us.
The ruling you're looking for is Incorporeal under the Universal Monster rules. Relevant text follows.
An incorporeal creature has no physical body. It can be harmed only by other incorporeal creatures, magic weapons or creatures that strike as magic weapons, and spells, spell-like abilities, or supernatural abilities. It is immune to all nonmagical attack forms. Even when hit by spells or magic weapons, it takes only half damage from a corporeal source (except for channel energy). Although it is not a magical attack, holy water can affect incorporeal undead. Corporeal spells and effects that do not cause damage only have a 50% chance of affecting an incorporeal creature. Force spells and effects, such as from a magic missile, affect an incorporeal creature normally.
He might be making an assumption that cure spells operate under the channel energy guidelines. That's a DM call.
While it doesn't change the fact that Cure spells only work half as well on incorporeal undead, that's not what my copy of the Bestiary says (nor is it what the PRD says).
Current Bestiary wrote:Incorporeal (Ex) An incorporeal creature has no physical body. It can be harmed only by other incorporeal creatures, magic weapons or creatures that strike as magic weapons, and spells, spell-like abilities, or supernatural abilities. It is immune to all nonmagical attack forms. Even when hit by spells or magic weapons, it takes only half damage from a corporeal source. Although it is not a magical attack, holy water affects incorporeal undead. Corporeal spells and effects that do not cause damage only have a 50% chance of affecting an incorporeal creature (except for channel energy). Force spells and effects, such as from a magic missile, affect an incorporeal creature normally.A strict reading of that would seem to imply that even Channel Energy is halved,...
Are you looking at d20pfsrd or the actual Paizo PRD because this is the wording from the PRD:
An incorporeal creature has no physical body. It can be harmed only by other incorporeal creatures, magic weapons or creatures that strike as magic weapons, and spells, spell-like abilities, or supernatural abilities. It is immune to all nonmagical attack forms. Even when hit by spells or magic weapons, it takes only half damage from a corporeal source (except for channel energy). Although it is not a magical attack, holy water can affect incorporeal undead. Corporeal spells and effects that do not cause damage only have a 50% chance of affecting an incorporeal creature. Force spells and effects, such as from a magic missile, affect an incorporeal creature normally.
Notice where the "(except for channel energy)" is.
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
![]() |
Jeff Merola wrote:...LazarX wrote:The Society Manger unfortunately has it wrong. In a game system this large, it happens to the best of us.
The ruling you're looking for is Incorporeal under the Universal Monster rules. Relevant text follows.
An incorporeal creature has no physical body. It can be harmed only by other incorporeal creatures, magic weapons or creatures that strike as magic weapons, and spells, spell-like abilities, or supernatural abilities. It is immune to all nonmagical attack forms. Even when hit by spells or magic weapons, it takes only half damage from a corporeal source (except for channel energy). Although it is not a magical attack, holy water can affect incorporeal undead. Corporeal spells and effects that do not cause damage only have a 50% chance of affecting an incorporeal creature. Force spells and effects, such as from a magic missile, affect an incorporeal creature normally.
He might be making an assumption that cure spells operate under the channel energy guidelines. That's a DM call.
While it doesn't change the fact that Cure spells only work half as well on incorporeal undead, that's not what my copy of the Bestiary says (nor is it what the PRD says).
Current Bestiary wrote:Incorporeal (Ex) An incorporeal creature has no physical body. It can be harmed only by other incorporeal creatures, magic weapons or creatures that strike as magic weapons, and spells, spell-like abilities, or supernatural abilities. It is immune to all nonmagical attack forms. Even when hit by spells or magic weapons, it takes only half damage from a corporeal source. Although it is not a magical attack, holy water affects incorporeal undead. Corporeal spells and effects that do not cause damage only have a 50% chance of affecting an incorporeal creature (except for channel energy). Force spells and effects, such as from a magic missile, affect an incorporeal creature normally.A strict reading of that would seem to imply that
The actual PRD. I just double checked and the wording I quoted is listed twice on the PRD, while yours is listed once. And the one I quoted matches the current wording in the most recent Bestiary 1, 2, and 3 (I don't have a copy of 4 handy to check).
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
viker |
I disagree. Cure spells are channeled positive energy. It says so in the spell description:
Cure Light Wounds wrote:When laying your hand upon a living creature, you channel positive energy that cures 1d8 points of damage + 1 point per caster level (maximum +5). Since undead are powered by negative energy, this spell deals damage to them instead of curing their wounds. An undead creature can apply spell resistance, and can attempt a Will save to take half damage.So cure spells would do full damage or half if they make the save.
I found this.
Q: Does positive energy from Channel Energy only cause half damage to Incorporeal undead?
A: (Jason Bulmahn 12/1/09) As for this particular issue, there is nothing in the rules exempting channel energy from being reduced by the incorporeal UMR (universal monster rule). Using the rules as written, this means that it is reduced. That said it probably should not be, but that is a matter I will take up when we get to errata for that book.
Update: The Universal Monster Rules for Incorporeal creatures updated the rules to reflect that Channel Energy is NOT reduced by 50%.
He seems to be referencing the Channel Energy ability, not the positive energy from CLW. Does this change anything?
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
![]() |
Hmm, that's interesting. I just checked Bestiary 4 and it says the same as your quote. So, I guess the real question is which is correct? Did they change it in the one I found and just overlook the Bestiary entries or is it correct in the Bestiary(s)?
Given that Channel Energy definitely does damage, I'd hazard a guess that the Bestiary entries are mistakes. I just found the RAW situation amusing.
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
![Fey Creature](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/PZO1120-FeyCreature_90.jpeg)
anthonydido wrote:I disagree. Cure spells are channeled positive energy. It says so in the spell description:
Cure Light Wounds wrote:When laying your hand upon a living creature, you channel positive energy that cures 1d8 points of damage + 1 point per caster level (maximum +5). Since undead are powered by negative energy, this spell deals damage to them instead of curing their wounds. An undead creature can apply spell resistance, and can attempt a Will save to take half damage.So cure spells would do full damage or half if they make the save.I found this.
Q: Does positive energy from Channel Energy only cause half damage to Incorporeal undead?
A: (Jason Bulmahn 12/1/09) As for this particular issue, there is nothing in the rules exempting channel energy from being reduced by the incorporeal UMR (universal monster rule). Using the rules as written, this means that it is reduced. That said it probably should not be, but that is a matter I will take up when we get to errata for that book.
Update: The Universal Monster Rules for Incorporeal creatures updated the rules to reflect that Channel Energy is NOT reduced by 50%.
He seems to be referencing the Channel Energy ability, not the positive energy from CLW. Does this change anything?
That answers my question then. The one I quoted seems to be the correct version and they just haven't errata'd the bestiaries yet.
Now, that question seems to be directed towards the Channel Energy ability but the "channel energy" in the incorporeal description is not capitalized so to me it is referencing all channeled energy, not just the ability.
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
![]() |
![Kobold](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/d1_avatar.jpg)
Now, that question seems to be directed towards the Channel Energy ability but the "channel energy" in the incorporeal description is not capitalized so to me it is referencing all channeled energy, not just the ability.
I don't think it's a standard practice to capitalize class feature names, so I'm not sure you can actually infer that.
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
![]() |
![The Red Raven](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/PZO9469-RedRaven_500.jpeg)
I would be fine with thaX's approach as the darn things are indeed hard enough. Con drain is permanent and the only way I know how to fix it is via a restoration spell (read: the most spell effective way, as there might be higher level spells than restoration that do it, whereas I'm not aware of lower level spells that do).
(Note: NOT lesser restoration... the actual "restoration" spell, which necessitates 100gp of diamond dust as well...)
I just read Death Ward again and since you're immune to energy damage, you'd be immune to the wraith's "energy damage + con drain" attack as well, in the same way you're immune to injected poison if the damage is not high enough to go through damage reduction.
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
![]() |
![The Red Raven](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/PZO9469-RedRaven_500.jpeg)
Here's the wording on damage reduction and poison:
PRD:
Whenever damage reduction completely negates the damage from an attack, it also negates most special effects that accompany the attack, such as injury poison, a monk's stunning, and injury-based disease. Damage reduction does not negate touch attacks, energy damage dealt along with an attack, or energy drains. Nor does it affect poisons or diseases delivered by inhalation, ingestion, or contact.
So damage reduction specifically does nothing against touch attacks, good to know.
However when you have Death Ward, it's not damage reduction, it's immunity to negative energy damage... so by extension the "plus Con drain" part should be cancelled as well. That's how I'll interpret it unless the devs have ruled otherwise... 'cause Con drain really blows for players and Death Ward is no small spell to begin with...
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
![]() |
![Kellid](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/PZO9428-Barbarian_90.jpeg)
Whenever people say it does half damage, there's something that seems a bit off.
When people use the half-damage quotes, it says:
Even when hit by spells or magic weapons, it takes only half damage from a corporeal source (except for channel energy).
There are two ways to read this: if the spell itself is corporeal or if the caster is corporeal. I would read it as the spell. In that case, I would definitely say that positive energy (such as that from cure spells) isn't a corporeal force. Fire? That's a physical world thing, so corporeal. Rocks smashing together? Obviously corporeal. Intangible energy that's just kind of there being beamed into things? Not corporeal. I would read it as full damage.
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
Robert A Matthews |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
![Red Dragon](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/DragonSacrifice_final.jpg)
I'd like to note that in 3.5, incorporeal creatures took full damage from cure spells. It looks like they editted the text a little when converting to Pathfinder. Can't say for certain if it is intended for incorporeal creatures to take half damage from cure spells.
Incorporeal Subtype
An incorporeal creature has no physical body. It can be harmed only by other incorporeal creatures, magic weapons or creatures that strike as magic weapons, and spells, spell-like abilities, or supernatural abilities. It is immune to all nonmagical attack forms. Even when hit by spells or magic weapons, it has a 50% chance to ignore any damage from a corporeal source (except for positive energy, negative energy, force effects such as magic missile, or attacks made with ghost touch weapons). Although it is not a magical attack, holy water can affect incorporeal undead, but a hit with holy water has a 50% chance of not affecting an incorporeal creature.
It would appear from a strict reading of the current text that cure spells do indeed only deal 50% damage. I'd probably house rule the full effect in my games considering it worked in 3.5, especially if there isn't a character in the party that can channel energy.
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
![]() |
![Orc Ranger](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/PZO9413-OrcRanger_90.jpeg)
*cast thread necro*
I heard someone say - there's the "spirit" of the rule and the strict letter of the rule. (as an actual lawyer I like this :) )
Given that Pathfinder comes from 3.5 I think the spirit is to say that positive energy from a cure spell fully affects incorporeal save for half with a touch attack.
clw - from PRD "When laying your hand upon a living creature, you channel positive energy"
" it takes only half damage from a corporeal source (except for channel energy)"
I'm a PFS regional VL and I've always ruled it like thaX said. (see above)
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
Balacertar |
![Brodert](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/X2_Sage-Brodert-Quink.jpg)
I heard someone say - there's the "spirit" of the rule and the strict letter of the rule. (as an actual lawyer I like this :) )
Even when hit by spells or magic weapons, it takes only half damage from a corporeal source (except for channel energy).
If you read it strictly the parenthesis exception has no sense, as the Channel Energy feature is neither a spell or a magic weapon, but a supernatural ability that is not even magical in essence. Besides, as already cited in this thread, the cure and inflict spells specify you channel positive/negative energy on the target when you cast them.
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
artmarks7 |
I see it as order of operation of rules. Any general spell that does damage is subject to incorporeal. In this instance we have a spell that heals but has specific special rules when effecting undead specifically. The universal rule should be superseded by the spell specific rules for a valid target. The cantrip that deals damage to undead specifically should also bypass incoporeal, it's undead specific and the target is valid so the general incoporeal rule gets bypassed by the special spell rules that say this is a valid target. PF can't put every exception for every rule everywhere so I really think these rules in spells that specifically target a type of creature should override that creatures more general rules unless the spell in question is called out by a power or feat of the monster. I mean, you can't rule out positive energy resistant undead.
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
Meirril |
How many times are people going to cast Raise Dead on this discussion...
Personally I'm just surprised nobody pointed out that the exception for Holy Water is to let it do damage at all. Not that it should do full damage. Considering where it is located in the text, Holy Water should do half damage to incorporeal undead.
Holy Water is not magical. It does 2d4 damage when a vial of it broken or poured on an undead or evil outsider. Without the exception made in incorporeal, Holy Water would have no effect on incorporeal undead.
The two exceptions to the half damage thing in the description of incorporeal are for channel energy.
Even when hit by spells or magic weapons, it takes only half damage from a corporeal source (except for channel energy).
and for Force effects.
Force spells and effects, such as from a magic missile, affect an incorporeal creature normally.
The wording could be much better. Calling something 'normally' isn't anywhere near as clear as saying 'has full effect' or 'ignores incorporeal rules', but it is generally taken to mean that spells that use the force descriptor have full effect against incorporeal creatures.
Holy Water is mentioned to be effective, but not to be an exception to the damage reduction or to work 'normally'. Therefore I believe Holy Water should be treated as any other effect that works vs incorporeal creatures (magic weapons and spells), not as being exempt from having its damage halved.