
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 people marked this as a favorite. |

The Ooze Companion feat would require an update to present the oozes using the same animal companion format as is used in the Pathfinder rules system. At this time, Ooze Companion uses the 3.5 rules. Should that happen, I imagine Mike and I would take a good look at the feat/option/archetype/whatever and decide whether it were appropriate for Pathfinder Society Organized Play.
We usually approve such new options.

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

The Ooze Companion feat would require an update to present the oozes using the same animal companion format as is used in the Pathfinder rules system. At this time, Ooze Companion uses the 3.5 rules. Should that happen, I imagine Mike and I would take a good look at the feat/option/archetype/whatever and decide whether it were appropriate for Pathfinder Society Organized Play.
We usually approve such new options.
That's great to hear, thanks!
@The Beard: If you like that, my character is meant to up the ante - a Human Druid with the Eye For Talent alternate racial ability, putting the +2 ability bonus into Intelligence...and then maybe another point or two of ability score increase, creating an Ooze with an Intelligence of 3 or 4. Linguistics rank, anyone?
Needless to say, this would be a Chaotic Neutral Druid who worships Yog-Sothoth.

![]() |
4 people marked this as a favorite. |

Ultimate Equipment mentions that a higher-end deck of playing cards can be made out of all kinds of materials, including metal sheets - I was thinking that were I really going to raise my ooze's Intelligence all the way to 4, I'd buy it a deck of metal cards or whatever other material its acid couldn't corrode (probably with braille indentations, since they don't have eyes as such), and teach it to play. Sure, it would never be very good...but it and I would always have fun together.

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

A giant cube with primitive intelligence that I feed cards with raised bumps in order to predict the future...I might have to call it Eniac.
I'd been thinking Totem Guide Archetype going into this...but a Gelatinous Cube Racer would be...well. Res ipsa loquitur.

![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 people marked this as a favorite. |

I believe the first challenge I would attempt to surmount is giving the little jello mold an actual AC. 'Cause they just sorta sit there and get hit. >_> Well, that and the thought of a gelatinous cube in fullplate barding is hilarious to me. It would just be a metal cube hopping along behind its druid master.

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

I did see that;
The definition of legal is if it is on there.
If something isn't on there it is not legal. Even if you found a thread that says "it is legal" it still isn't legal.
This feat isn't legal because it isn't able to be made rules-wise.
There is insufficient information to create the companion. This is because the feat was written as a 3.5 feat and doesn't conform to pathfinder rules for companions.
Edit: when I replied I guess I used a previously loaded page because John's reply and many others were not on the page.

Tumskunde |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
For those with out of place animal companions or familiars, there is an oft unlocked upon ability that has cause untold amusement for me.
Share Spell is awesome, as you can Polymorph your companion into something else for the time in town. Anything from Alter Self to Vermin Shape.
Nothing says surprise than a tree turning into a Tiger, or a Halfling into an Eagle, or Butterfly into a Bear.
Be it from surprising bandits, smuggling a Bear into a ballroom or a cunning halfling/eagle swap in the middle of a neutral stronghold, it's an amazing and amusing ability.
Heck, I've even seen it be used to turn an Elemental Familiar into a skeleton along with it's master, so the fighter could (badly) impersonate a Necromancer.
Derailment aside though, an Ooze companion named Major Mucus is amusing. Much like my fascination with using an Awakened Goldfish Sorcerer as a villain in a dungeon.

![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

The Beard wrote:... Yeah, I can't say much. I've got a civilized character riding around on a spinosaurus.....Did you cut a hole out of the fin or something?
Or is it retractable and your saddle doubles as an ejector seat when the frill goes up?
Saddle is clearly an ejector seat. Things go south? The amazing flying halfling quickly enters orbit. It can also double as a means of attack! Step 1.) Grab lance. Step 2.) Get launched. Step 3.) Descend swiftly on the enemy lance first. Step 4.) Hope the spinosaurus doesn't mistake you for popcorn after you land in front of it.

![]() |

The Ooze Companion feat would require an update to present the oozes using the same animal companion format as is used in the Pathfinder rules system. At this time, Ooze Companion uses the 3.5 rules. Should that happen, I imagine Mike and I would take a good look at the feat/option/archetype/whatever and decide whether it were appropriate for Pathfinder Society Organized Play.
We usually approve such new options.
I do have one wish - if this were to be done, it would be nice if the prerequisites for the Ooze Companion feat could be liberalized in some manner in order to make it possible for Blight Druids to be able to acquire one, since it seems entirely in character.

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

I'm Hiding In Your Closet wrote:I did see that;The definition of legal is if it is on there.
If something isn't on there it is not legal. Even if you found a thread that says "it is legal" it still isn't legal.
This feat isn't legal because it isn't able to be made rules-wise.
There is insufficient information to create the companion. This is because the feat was written as a 3.5 feat and doesn't conform to pathfinder rules for companions.Edit: when I replied I guess I used a previously loaded page because John's reply and many others were not on the page.
Or instead of edit you could have pressed 'Delete'

![]() |

The Ooze Companion feat would require an update to present the oozes using the same animal companion format as is used in the Pathfinder rules system. At this time, Ooze Companion uses the 3.5 rules. Should that happen, I imagine Mike and I would take a good look at the feat/option/archetype/whatever and decide whether it were appropriate for Pathfinder Society Organized Play.
We usually approve such new options.
Any news/progress on this front?

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

Wait.
If my PC gets turned into an Ooze, by Flesh to Ooze, and I make my Will save, do I get to play session to session, as an Ooze?
If the polymorph effect is not removed at the end of the scenario that it is gained. The character would be reported as dead and removed from play.

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

John Compton wrote:Any news/progress on this front?The Ooze Companion feat would require an update to present the oozes using the same animal companion format as is used in the Pathfinder rules system. At this time, Ooze Companion uses the 3.5 rules. Should that happen, I imagine Mike and I would take a good look at the feat/option/archetype/whatever and decide whether it were appropriate for Pathfinder Society Organized Play.
We usually approve such new options.
None

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

John Compton wrote:Any news/progress on this front?The Ooze Companion feat would require an update to present the oozes using the same animal companion format as is used in the Pathfinder rules system. At this time, Ooze Companion uses the 3.5 rules. Should that happen, I imagine Mike and I would take a good look at the feat/option/archetype/whatever and decide whether it were appropriate for Pathfinder Society Organized Play.
We usually approve such new options.
If a Paizo product (Player Companion, Campaign Setting) was to release an updated version of the feat then the PFS leadership would approve it (or not). But they don't write or update feats specifically for PFS.

![]() |
I believe the first challenge I would attempt to surmount is giving the little jello mold an actual AC. 'Cause they just sorta sit there and get hit. >_> Well, that and the thought of a gelatinous cube in fullplate barding is hilarious to me. It would just be a metal cube hopping along behind its druid master.
^^ Metal Slime!

![]() |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

My ooze companion would look like a Blancmange and would have a taste for professional tennis players.
Nice catch. I'll have to keep this under consideration....
The real problems begin when all the NPCs begin turning into Scotsmen and heading north...
Okay, Mr. Brock, you ready? Add something else to the wish-list: a flesh to Scot spell.

Kobold Catgirl |

John Compton wrote:I do have one wish - if this were to be done, it would be nice if the prerequisites for the Ooze Companion feat could be liberalized in some manner in order to make it possible for Blight Druids to be able to acquire one, since it seems entirely in character.The Ooze Companion feat would require an update to present the oozes using the same animal companion format as is used in the Pathfinder rules system. At this time, Ooze Companion uses the 3.5 rules. Should that happen, I imagine Mike and I would take a good look at the feat/option/archetype/whatever and decide whether it were appropriate for Pathfinder Society Organized Play.
We usually approve such new options.
Also, cave druids. Seriously. They're all about oozes. Gimme my companion cube!

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

I don't suppose there are any updates to be found on this front? Still quietly rooting for Society-legal Ooze Companions over here....
This post is still representative of our stance, and I do not know of any product line that has an ooze companion feat in the works.

![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Also, cave druids. Seriously. They're all about oozes. Gimme my companion cube!.
This post is still representative of our stance, and I do not know of any product line that has an ooze companion feat in the works.
There's always room for jello.