
QXL99 |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Last night's episode wasn't to my taste; the SF angle was mildly clever, but didn't drive the story enough to overcome my distaste for hostage scenarios. However, I am impressed by the small background touches in panning/establishing shots--FX that don't slap you in the face but do what they're supposed to do.

Arnwyn |

Last night's episode wasn't to my taste; the SF angle was mildly clever, but didn't drive the story enough to overcome my distaste for hostage scenarios. However, I am impressed by the small background touches in panning/establishing shots--FX that don't slap you in the face but do what they're supposed to do.
This. Oh-so-this in every regard.

![]() |

[snooty European] Going by the trailers I think I'll stick to the Swedish show it's based on.[/snooty European]
You mean the one that was based on the American science fiction stories of Isaac Asimov featuring a human detective (Elijah Baley) and his robot partner (R. Daneel Olivaw)from 1953, like every other cop/robot partner story?

Ambrosia Slaad |

Yeah, while the Fringe approach to technology bugs me a bit, this show has all the camaraderie and humor lacking in the not-quite-awful Agents of SHIELD.
So, yes, I fully expect Fox to cancel it halfway through its first season.

QXL99 |

This week's episode was batter than last week's, I thought--quite a bit of enjoyable banter. Once again, though, the SF of the show was marginal at best--this could have been a contemporary police drama with little adjustment. And that's a problem as I don't care all that much for procedurals--unless the SF gets amped back up, I don't know how long I'll stick with this show...

![]() |

This week's episode was batter than last week's, I thought--quite a bit of enjoyable banter. Once again, though, the SF of the show was marginal at best--this could have been a contemporary police drama with little adjustment. And that's a problem as I don't care all that much for procedurals--unless the SF gets amped back up, I don't know how long I'll stick with this show...
My guess is they are working inside a budget right now. They probably want to focus on the banter as much as possible to draw attention away from the sci-fi elements. Its working for me right now but wont forever. Hopefully this thing has a chance to get green lit so they can up the ante.

Kalshane |
Honestly, the only real difference between this and other procedurals is this one actually admits the science involved is sci-fi.
That being said, I'm continuing to find it entertaining. I was a little curious about the bad guys'

HolmesandWatson |

Making a buddy cop show with a sci-fi slant shouldn't be something out of the ordinary, but it is. Because of that, they've hit an under-used niche (and the buddy-cop thing is all over the place). This show feels kinda fresh because it's moving in the sci-fi field.
Michael Ealy was costar of Common Law, a buddy cop show on USA Network that was undeservedly cancelled after its debut season. It was solid and should have gotten another year.
His partner had a small part as a radar operator (or something like that) on the battleship in The Avengers.

Scott Betts |
3 people marked this as a favorite. |

Honestly, the only real difference between this and other procedurals is this one actually admits the science involved is sci-fi.
You don't think the whole exploration of what it means to be a person (and what it means to relate more to something that isn't considered a person than actual people) is a noteworthy deviation from the norm of procedural drama?

![]() |

Kalshane wrote:Honestly, the only real difference between this and other procedurals is this one actually admits the science involved is sci-fi.You don't think the whole exploration of what it means to be a person (and what it means to relate more to something that isn't considered a person than actual people) is a noteworthy deviation from the norm of procedural drama?
Well, considering that they've barely touched on it since the first episode, really?
I was hooked by the first couple eps for that very reason, but the more recent two have been pretty by-the-numbers efforts that didn't have much to offer beyond what I could get from any cop show on TV right now.

Kalshane |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
You don't think the whole exploration of what it means to be a person (and what it means to relate more to something that isn't considered a person than actual people) is a noteworthy deviation from the norm of procedural drama?
Sorry, that was more meant to be a pithy comment on the ridiculous "science" on modern cop shows than a knock on Almost Human.
That being said, we haven't seen much exploration of that dynamic yet, outside of the pilot.

![]() |

HolmesandWatson wrote:His partner had a small part as a radar operator (or something like that) on the battleship in The Avengers.Are you talking about Karl Urban? i.e. "Bones" McCoy from the Star Trek reboot.
I think he was still referring to Early's co-star from Common Law, who was indeed the blink-and-you'll-miss-him bridge dude on the helicarrier.
I think he was the only SHIELD person on the Helicarrier bridge (or the entire helicarrier, come to think of it) who had a speaking line apart from Fury and Hill.

Scott Betts |

Scott Betts wrote:
You don't think the whole exploration of what it means to be a person (and what it means to relate more to something that isn't considered a person than actual people) is a noteworthy deviation from the norm of procedural drama?Sorry, that was more meant to be a pithy comment on the ridiculous "science" on modern cop shows than a knock on Almost Human.
That being said, we haven't seen much exploration of that dynamic yet, outside of the pilot.
It pops up every now and then (olive oil on the leg; thinking that stabbing your cybernetic leg is a cool trick to show a kid IT TOTALLY IS; risking your life to save an android about to be shot; altering speech patterns or mimicking other voices entirely in order to make the other person more cooperative; etc.). Right now it's being used as spice to flavor the social interactions, but I think it's safe to assume they'll be revisiting it in a more in-depth way later this season.

Ambrosia Slaad |

Kalshane wrote:It pops up every now and then (olive oil on the leg; thinking that stabbing your cybernetic leg is a cool trick to show a kid IT TOTALLY IS; risking your life to save an android about to be shot; altering speech patterns or mimicking other voices entirely in order to make the other person more cooperative; etc.). Right now it's being used as spice to flavor the social interactions, but I think it's safe to assume they'll be revisiting it in a more in-depth way later this season.Scott Betts wrote:That being said, we haven't seen much exploration of that dynamic yet, outside of the pilot.
You don't think the whole exploration of what it means to be a person (and what it means to relate more to something that isn't considered a person than actual people) is a noteworthy deviation from the norm of procedural drama?
I liked the "synthetics" as a slur in the first episode, and Dorian's interactions/reactions with/toward the sexbots in the second episode.

Kalshane |
Oh, there's definitely callbacks to the pilot, but I'm not sure how much that's actually playing up the "what does it mean to be human" thing.
I will say, there is still an interesting dynamic between the characters, and how Kennex treats Dorian (I'd almost say it feels like he occasionally forgets Dorian is an android, and then feels the need to be an ass to make up for it when he realizes it) and how the two of them approach different situations (like the aforementioned sexbots) but other times it feels like there should be more of a commentary/emphasis on the difference/similarities between them and it doesn't happen.
Of course, this is a sci-fi show early in its first season. If history is any indicator, this show should be knocking it out the park come season 2 or 3. :)

HolmesandWatson |

Vanulf Wulfson wrote:HolmesandWatson wrote:His partner had a small part as a radar operator (or something like that) on the battleship in The Avengers.Are you talking about Karl Urban? i.e. "Bones" McCoy from the Star Trek reboot.I think he was still referring to Early's co-star from Common Law, who was indeed the blink-and-you'll-miss-him bridge dude on the helicarrier.
I think he was the only SHIELD person on the Helicarrier bridge (or the entire helicarrier, come to think of it) who had a speaking line apart from Fury and Hill.
Yes, him. I think he spoke twice in the Avengers. I meant that he was Ealy's partner on Common Law. It really was a decent show.

Eben TheQuiet |

I think they've been using that "what is human" theme to varying degrees since the pilot. It took a back seat for a few episodes (which I appreciate; i don't want to drown in the theme), but we got shades of it again in this last episode with the sidekick's request for a place of his own.
I've enjoyed the show so far.