Hama |
The trailer left me fairly underwhelmed. Which is good. I hate to be psyched about a movie that could turn out to be a piece of crap. Pros that i can see are:
- More Kat Dennings (mmm both physically and intellectually)
- Christopher Eccleston
- Antony Hopkins
- Zachary Levi
Cons as i see are:
- Not directed by Kenneth Branagh.
Vaziir Jivaan |
"Devil's Advocate" |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
The first Thor movie wasnt terrible. You just gotta remember that its a set-the-stage movie. Unlike the Hulk or Spiderman, Thor hasnt had a few other movies to introduce him, and isnt really the same as the mythology, so they had to establish a lot in the movie so that people can understand him and whats going on (non comi fans) establish a new cosmotology and history, and establish a reasonable way that he would be motivated to act as he did in both it and the avengers. Also had to set the stage for Loki and other characters, too. Thats a lot when other characters tend to either get multiple movies to build up, aleady have some familiarity, or appear in other movies.
Malachi Silverclaw |
Looking forward to more sif to be honest.
Woof!
The more the better!
I've always been fascinated by the subject of Sif's hair. As you know, her original (blonde) hair was shaved off by Loki as a 'joke'.
Sif was not happy. After articulating her views to him, Loki saw the wisdom of replacing her hair (keeping his suggestions about 'wearing a hat' to himself) and got some random dwarves to forge new hair...out of gold. As you do.
So, Sif got new, golden hair. But then it turned black!
So, black gold.
I thought 'black gold' was another name for 'oil'. Does Sif now have oily hair?
Perhaps Loki should suggest a shampoo....