Limbless Unarmed Strikes


Rules Questions

Grand Lodge

4 people marked this as FAQ candidate.

Can creatures without limbs make unarmed strikes?

If I have used Vermin Shape to become a Giant Leech, Giant Rot Grub, Giant Sea Anemone, or other headless, limbless creature, do I lose the ability to make unarmed strikes?

If I create an Animated Cannonball via Craft Construct, add the Brain Bioconstruct Modification to give it the Improved Unarmed Strike feat, can it make no use of it?


You should be able to make unarmed strikes as a giant leech and such. Unarmed strike is a strike that doesn't use a weapon like a sword for example.

You still have a body that you could throw at your opponent in some form or other.

The other part I have no clue about. I haven't read up on constructs.

Grand Lodge

Well, an Animated Cannonball is just that.


Doesn't the animated cannonball already get a slam attack?

Grand Lodge

That is irrelevant.

Having a natural attack does not prevent unarmed strikes.


I know, I'm just wondering why you would still want unarmed strikes. XD

Grand Lodge

Unarmed strikes can be used more often at higher BAB.

They can also be used with a number of other feats, that cannot be used with natural attacks.

There is a number of reasons why.


blackbloodtroll wrote:

Unarmed strikes can be used more often at higher BAB.

They can also be used with a number of other feats, that cannot be used with natural attacks.

There is a number of reasons why.

Just had a few amusing mental images from this.

"How...on earth...does a cannonball emulate a [i]snake[/] in its fighting style?"

and

"Did that cannonball just do piercing damage!?" O_o

Grand Lodge

Still, the questions remain.

The Exchange

If it doesn't make sense as a GM or PC you probably shouldn't do it.

That said, unarmed strike can be made with any part of the body. And I wouldn't assume a ball of metal is perfectly smooth, especially after taking any damage. So it rolls in a fashion kinda like a charmed snake and bounces at you focusing on its jagged edges.


Simple answer: Yes. To my knowledge, all creatures of all types possess an "Unarmed Strike."

Grand Lodge

I have been told by some, that you need a special body, of some kind, to do something, I was sure, all corporeal creatures could do.

If there is some kind of RAW evidence, to help me be sure?


This thread makes me giggle.

This simple answer is yes. Anything living can have an unarmed strike as per raw I believe, even constructs and slugs. A snake could whip you with its tail, jump on you, etc. AS a GM I'd still require you to be able to describe some ways that the creature in question could realistically attack you with just it's natural body.

The more complicated answer is how would you animate a cannonball? It has no arms or legs, no mouth and essentially no way to interact with the outside world. Congrats: it's sentient but unable to manipulate the world around it (and yes, in this case I'd personally rule that it has no unarmed strike. Or a landspeed for that matter.)

Grand Lodge

A cannonball is a more than legal target for the Animate Objects spell.

This means you can make a permanent, undispelable Animated Cannonball.

It will have a 20 ft. speed, as per RAW.


Unarmed strikes are different from natural attacks. If something has natural attacks listed, you should use that. The bestiary says that “Some creatures do not have natural attacks. These creatures can make unarmed strikes just like humans do.”

Grand Lodge

That is not the question.

The question, is if they can.

I could list several reasons why they might choose to do so, but that's not the core issue.

Grand Lodge

Well, a limbless creature can make unarmed strikes normally.

Grand Lodge

I agree, but there are times when RAW support is needed.

If anyone can find RAW support either for, or against, it would be helpful.

Dark Archive

There's no reason it can't have unarmed strikes.

Grand Lodge

I know there was evidence of it being true in 3.5, as on the WotC website Elite Opponents article had a Fiendish Gelatinous Cube Monk.

Is there evidence that this changed?


There's a

RotR spoiler:
flying mummy monk
in Rise of the Runelords that uses unarmed strikes even though he can't move his limbs.

Grand Lodge

Ah. That helps.

He still has limbs though.

Grand Lodge

So, a Monk who is a target of a Flesh to Ooze spell, can still flurry?


2 people marked this as a favorite.
blackbloodtroll wrote:
So, a Monk who is a target of a Flesh to Ooze spell, can still flurry?

Slurry of blows

Grand Lodge

darkwarriorkarg wrote:
blackbloodtroll wrote:
So, a Monk who is a target of a Flesh to Ooze spell, can still flurry?
Slurry of blows

Clever girl.

Grand Lodge

A bit of necro, but curious if anything official has crawled out of the woodwork.


As the Unarmed Attacks entry does not mention a prerequisite (like for instance the ranged attacks entry does) I say it is save to assume that you can make unarmed attacks if you have a body of any kind.

The more dire question is: can you make unarmed attacks and hit anything with them, because the monk can't and so why should you?

Grand Lodge

When it comes to unarmed strike debates, someone always mentions limbs.

This is why I ask.

Grand Lodge

Also, the Flesh to Oozed unarmed fighter sounds awesome.

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Rules Questions / Limbless Unarmed Strikes All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.