|
...and HERE is the link that I knew existed.
Thanks for the link Nefreet.
I thought they'd be not legal cos they weren't specifically called out as legal in the additional resources.
That line about them being available "to those who associate with Skinwalkers" is the annoying bit.
But then, until there's skinwalkers in PFS, even as NPCs, they don't exist in the PFS campaign, and so therefore, (deep breath) no one can associate with them, therefore no feats.
I get that. Never mind, it was such a nice feat too, and perfect for my PFS pc...
|
Hello there. Just thought i would bring up something discussed, but not resolved, a while back. When first talking about improved familiars another user brought up the Tidepool Dragon. From everything i can see in additional resources it is a perfectly legal familiar, its a Spell caster, and has claws like the Faerie Dragon so i would think it could use a wand. Not sure why this little guy does not get the love that other familiars do, he is pretty nice. Anyway. I looked back and the question on the Tidepool was never answered so thought i would bring it up again.
Pathfinder Adventure Path #55: "The Wormwood Mutiny"
Equipment: Besmara's tricorne, boarding pike of repelling, hospitality's hammock, shackles of compliance, steadfast grapple, tidewater cutlass, vindictive harpoon; Familiars: all familiars listed on pages 88–89; Misc: customized summon list are legal for Besmaran clerics and Besmaran familiars are legal for clerics and rangers of Besmara; Spells: advanced scurvy, cloud of seasickness
Tidepool Dragon is not on the on pages 88-89, its on 82 so it is not listed as available. So unless he shows up in another source....
My guess is that they'll post another update after after the ACG is out so they can get the big stuff and the rest all done at once.
|
My guess is that they'll post another update after after the ACG is out so they can get the big stuff and the rest all done at once.
They are starting shipping of the August subscription releases today, so the ACG is already in a finished state, meaning they could already have a copy on Mike Brock's desk.
I expect the update will likely be next week on Wednesday, though I would be thoroughly surprised and grateful to see an update prior to that.
If they're adding the ACG, what of People of the River?
|
|
Typo:
Feats: all feats on pages 137–159 are legal for play, except Animal Soul, Divine Protection, Evolved Companion, and Spirited Gift.
This should be Spirit's Gift and not Spirited Gift.
Grammar:
Fallback Strategy are not legal from this sourcebook and have been updated to a new version in Pathfinder Campaign Setting: Inner Sea Gods.
Should be "is" and not "are".
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
If they're adding the ACG, what of People of the River?
Welp question's been answered.
No nanite bloodline? Really?
Balls to that.
|
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
If they're adding the ACG, what of People of the River?Welp question's been answered.
No nanite bloodline? Really?
Balls to that.
That seems like a wonderful thing for Mike & John to give access to on a chronicle sheet this year.
(Note that I don't have any special insight about this, so this is just speculation.)
If they're adding the ACG, what of People of the River?Welp question's been answered.
No nanite bloodline? Really?
Balls to that.
That seems like a wonderful thing for Mike & John to give access to on a chronicle sheet this year.
(Note that I don't have any special insight about this, so this is just speculation.)
A man can dream, I guess. Or get really lucky.
|
|
Out of curiosity, why don't warpriests of non-Core deities get blessings?
I don't have the final text of the Warpriest, but in the playtest version it reads
Each warpriest can select two blessings from among those granted by his deity (each deity grants the blessings tied to its domains).
I can' tell if the language in the new Guide invalidates that.
|
|
So did Investigators lose their crafting ability in the ACG? I am under the impression that one reason Investigators were not allowed to craft was that they might lose the ability in the official release? Was the Investigator description changed to eliminate this line:
Alchemy (Ex): Investigators are highly trained in the creation of mundane alchemical substances and magical potion-like extracts.
When using Craft (alchemy) to create an alchemical item, an investigator gains a competence bonus equal to his class level on the skill check. In addition an investigator can use Craft (alchemy) to identify potions as if using detect magic. He must hold the potion for 1 round to make such a check.
Without crafting, this class takes a kick to the crotch, imo, especially if nothing is given to replace that ability. Would appreciate someone letting me know if the crafting has been removed from the official release so I can just retire both of these characters, and if so, and save myself the expense of buying the new guide.
From other threads, I believe the Investigator still has Swift Alchemy (since an archetype swaps it out), so I'm pretty sure they still have Alchemy.
What alchemical items are you hoping to craft that make it a dealbreaker for the class?
|
|
Out of curiosity, why don't warpriests of non-Core deities get blessings?I don't have the final text of the Warpriest, but in the playtest version it reads
Each warpriest can select two blessings from among those granted by his deity (each deity grants the blessings tied to its domains).I can' tell if the language in the new Guide invalidates that.
Warpriest: To utilize a blessing, a character must be a worshiper of the listed deity.
The only deities listed in the Advanced Class Guide underneath the Blessings are Core Deities.
|
|
Out of curiosity, why don't warpriests of non-Core deities get blessings?I don't have the final text of the Warpriest, but in the playtest version it reads
Each warpriest can select two blessings from among those granted by his deity (each deity grants the blessings tied to its domains).I can' tell if the language in the new Guide invalidates that.Warpriest: To utilize a blessing, a character must be a worshiper of the listed deity.
The only deities listed in the Advanced Class Guide underneath the Blessings are Core Deities.
Then that would indeed be unfortunate if non-core Warpriests lose one of their class features.
RPG Superstar 2014 Top 16
|
| 4 people marked this as FAQ candidate. 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
Yeah, I've got a warpriest of Nivi Rhombodazzle that will be extremely sad if he has to change to another deity just to be able to use his blessings. The text of this should probably say "A warpriest is limited to choosing Blessings which match the domains of his deity."
|
|
From other threads, I believe the Investigator still has Swift Alchemy (since an archetype swaps it out), so I'm pretty sure they still have Alchemy.
What alchemical items are you hoping to craft that make it a dealbreaker for the class?
If PFS is going to disallow crafting for the class, what use is Swift Alchemy?
What was I hoping to craft? Anything and Everything.
...
I'd also think with a new book like the Alchemy Manual, you'd want another class that could craft. *shrug*
It wasn't a leading question, I just honestly don't know of that many alchemical items that I'd bother crafting with my Investigator. I was just asking because I'm curious what specific items are worthwhile (aside from Poison, since I'm planning to swap out Poison use with an Archetype anyway).
Venture-Captain, California—Sacramento
|
Copy paste error:
Pathfinder Player Companion: Blood of Fiends
To create an aasimar, you must have a Chronicle sheet that opens the race as a legal option at character creation.*Note: Tieflings may only be half-human. Other races, including but not limited to dwarf, elf, gnome, halfling, half-orc, tengu, and any other race, are not legal in PFS.
should say tiefling
|
Venture-Captain, California—Sacramento
|
Then that would indeed be unfortunate if non-core Warpriests lose one of their class features.Out of curiosity, why don't warpriests of non-Core deities get blessings?I don't have the final text of the Warpriest, but in the playtest version it reads
Each warpriest can select two blessings from among those granted by his deity (each deity grants the blessings tied to its domains).I can' tell if the language in the new Guide invalidates that.Warpriest: To utilize a blessing, a character must be a worshiper of the listed deity.
The only deities listed in the Advanced Class Guide underneath the Blessings are Core Deities.
Well, there go my plans for playing a war priest.
|
|
Yeah, I've got a warpriest of Nivi Rhombodazzle that will be extremely sad if he has to change to another deity just to be able to use his blessings. The text of this should probably say "A warpriest is limited to choosing Blessings which match the domains of his deity."
Wholeheartedly agreed (and tagged for FAQ)
|
|
Yeah, I've got a warpriest of Nivi Rhombodazzle that will be extremely sad if he has to change to another deity just to be able to use his blessings. The text of this should probably say "A warpriest is limited to choosing Blessings which match the domains of his deity."Wholeheartedly agreed (and tagged for FAQ)
Surely you should be able to play war priests of the non-core deities, or what was the point of making most of Inner Sea Gods PFS legal?
|
|
Yeah, I've got a warpriest of Nivi Rhombodazzle that will be extremely sad if he has to change to another deity just to be able to use his blessings. The text of this should probably say "A warpriest is limited to choosing Blessings which match the domains of his deity."
I'm sure this is the case and will be updated after Gencon as all but two (scalykind and void) of the domains are represented. Which will probably be found in a book coming out soon that will detail the missing domains....like Champions of Corruption perhaps.