Mairkurion {tm} |
The 8th Dwarf wrote:will look for it in Chinatown next Friday.Freehold DM wrote:The 8th Dwarf wrote:i truly loved the weather woman series.Aberzombie wrote:What you need to do is watch the Weather Woman and the Weather Woman Returns .... that will fully acclimatise you to Japan's weather, Then watch Wild Zero for cultural hints on how to be a Zombie in Japan.Mothman wrote:I meant how was the travel / journey.Let me put it this way.....
AAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!
They are so strange and bent that they are good... I love the way the Japanese tell stories and make movies.... the end is not as important as the who and the how.
I need to find this movie Space Battleship YAMATO .
Forget about it, Freehold. It's Chinatown.
taig RPG Superstar 2012 |
Weeeesley |
Spockurion wrote:By the way, is anybody else doing a Star Trek: The Original Series rewatch on Netflix? Fascinating.Our office goes all out for Halloween - we decorate and do coordinated costumes and each department competes against the other. Last year we lost only because out Matrix theme was lost on two of the three judges...the CEO and EXVP in charge of Aquisition had never seen the movie before (WTH, even I've seen that movie!).
So we're trying to think of a theme that these guys will be aware of, and yet won't suck. I offered the suggestion that instead of Landmark Aviation, we are "Landmark Spaceways", offering commercial transporation throughout Federation Space.
What? We're IT! We're supposed to be geeks!
Now I need a star trek uniform outfit. And we're going for original series / new movie, not the next generation or any of those. So...boots too. Hmmm.
All of this is to say...I need to do research! :D
.
Must. Have. Pictures.
David Wickham |
David Wickham wrote:Mairkurion {tm} wrote:Yes?By the way:
I AM HERE CALLING OUT MR. WICKHAM.
If you are a man and of unquestioned parentage, you will answer this post, Mr. Wickham. Otherwise, you will branded by FAWTLite society from this day until The End of Time.
I think you know why you are here. You need to change your ways.
Shall I spell out m- that is, OUR demands?
I'm quite sure I don't know what you are talking about.
Perhaps you could be more specific?
Patrick Curtin |
Mmmm. Muffins.
Hi all, what did I miss?
Xavier and Selene decided that kidnapping young Harvey Portmanteau IV for ransom would finally net them the cash they needed for their new drive-through Paella restaurant Shrimp-A-Go-Go. Joseph and Christine discovered love under the docks of Port City, but unfortunately Joseph's wife also found them discovering it as well. Richard tryed his hand at ...
Oh wait, that's my soap opera.
Mairkurion {tm} |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Mairkurion {tm} wrote:David Wickham wrote:Mairkurion {tm} wrote:Yes?By the way:
I AM HERE CALLING OUT MR. WICKHAM.
If you are a man and of unquestioned parentage, you will answer this post, Mr. Wickham. Otherwise, you will branded by FAWTLite society from this day until The End of Time.
I think you know why you are here. You need to change your ways.
Shall I spell out m- that is, OUR demands?I'm quite sure I don't know what you are talking about.
Perhaps you could be more specific?
It is simple, Mr. Wickham.
Our Demands:1. Thou shalt speak only of FAWTL in favorable tones, whether thou posteth in the forums or on the chats or wheresoever thou mayest be.
2. Thou shalt not hide behind winky smileys to sneak snark against the FAWTL our thread. For we the FAWTLies are a jealous lot, punishing snark unto the seventh generation (but rewarding snark of our own kind).
3. Thou shalt not go by David in chat. For lo, it is not Austenian enough. Wickham shalt thou be, for it rolls off the tongue and sticks to the memory and annoyeth not the Pony that sparkles like unto God's bow set in the heavens.
Finally, we offer this option. If thy work offendest against thy posting, cut it off. {Note: Only 1-3 are to be taken as binding, save that thy wealth be of an independent nature.]
David Wickham |
David Wickham wrote:Mairkurion {tm} wrote:David Wickham wrote:Mairkurion {tm} wrote:Yes?By the way:
I AM HERE CALLING OUT MR. WICKHAM.
If you are a man and of unquestioned parentage, you will answer this post, Mr. Wickham. Otherwise, you will branded by FAWTLite society from this day until The End of Time.
I think you know why you are here. You need to change your ways.
Shall I spell out m- that is, OUR demands?I'm quite sure I don't know what you are talking about.
Perhaps you could be more specific?
It is simple, Mr. Wickham.
Our Demands:
1. Thou shalt speak only of FAWTL in favorable tones, whether thou posteth in the forums or on the chats or wheresoever thou mayest be.
2. Thou shalt not hide behind winky smileys to sneak snark against the FAWTL our thread. For we the FAWTLies are a jealous lot, punishing snark unto the seventh generation (but rewarding snark of our own kind).
3. Thou shalt not go by David in chat. For lo, it is not Austenian enough. Wickham shalt thou be, for it rolls off the tongue and sticks to the memory and annoyeth not the Pony that sparkles like unto God's bow set in the heavens.Finally, we offer this option. If thy work offendest against thy posting, cut it off. {Note: Only 1-3 are to be taken as binding, save that thy wealth be of an independent nature.]
Its fun to make more or less unreadable demands on the internet, but you aren't the republican party, I'm not going to just agree. What is in it for me?
Ashe Ravenheart |
Jess Door wrote:Spockurion wrote:By the way, is anybody else doing a Star Trek: The Original Series rewatch on Netflix? Fascinating.Our office goes all out for Halloween - we decorate and do coordinated costumes and each department competes against the other. Last year we lost only because out Matrix theme was lost on two of the three judges...the CEO and EXVP in charge of Aquisition had never seen the movie before (WTH, even I've seen that movie!).
So we're trying to think of a theme that these guys will be aware of, and yet won't suck. I offered the suggestion that instead of Landmark Aviation, we are "Landmark Spaceways", offering commercial transporation throughout Federation Space.
What? We're IT! We're supposed to be geeks!
Now I need a star trek uniform outfit. And we're going for original series / new movie, not the next generation or any of those. So...boots too. Hmmm.
All of this is to say...I need to do research! :D
.
Must. Have. Pictures.
Agreed.
Sebastian Bella Sara Charter Superscriber |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Mairkurion {tm} wrote:Its fun to make more or less unreadable demands on the internet, but you aren't the republican party, I'm not going to just agree. What is in it for me?David Wickham wrote:Mairkurion {tm} wrote:David Wickham wrote:Mairkurion {tm} wrote:Yes?By the way:
I AM HERE CALLING OUT MR. WICKHAM.
If you are a man and of unquestioned parentage, you will answer this post, Mr. Wickham. Otherwise, you will branded by FAWTLite society from this day until The End of Time.
I think you know why you are here. You need to change your ways.
Shall I spell out m- that is, OUR demands?I'm quite sure I don't know what you are talking about.
Perhaps you could be more specific?
It is simple, Mr. Wickham.
Our Demands:
1. Thou shalt speak only of FAWTL in favorable tones, whether thou posteth in the forums or on the chats or wheresoever thou mayest be.
2. Thou shalt not hide behind winky smileys to sneak snark against the FAWTL our thread. For we the FAWTLies are a jealous lot, punishing snark unto the seventh generation (but rewarding snark of our own kind).
3. Thou shalt not go by David in chat. For lo, it is not Austenian enough. Wickham shalt thou be, for it rolls off the tongue and sticks to the memory and annoyeth not the Pony that sparkles like unto God's bow set in the heavens.Finally, we offer this option. If thy work offendest against thy posting, cut it off. {Note: Only 1-3 are to be taken as binding, save that thy wealth be of an independent nature.]
This is the weakest excuse for a lynch mob I've ever seen. Announcing charges? Offering the accused the opportunity to speak? Let's just get a half dozen ropes and hang David and the five people standing closest to him and not threatening his life.
Frontier justice, baby.
David Wickham |
David Wickham wrote:Mairkurion {tm} wrote:Its fun to make more or less unreadable demands on the internet, but you aren't the republican party, I'm not going to just agree. What is in it for me?David Wickham wrote:Mairkurion {tm} wrote:David Wickham wrote:Mairkurion {tm} wrote:Yes?By the way:
I AM HERE CALLING OUT MR. WICKHAM.
If you are a man and of unquestioned parentage, you will answer this post, Mr. Wickham. Otherwise, you will branded by FAWTLite society from this day until The End of Time.
I think you know why you are here. You need to change your ways.
Shall I spell out m- that is, OUR demands?I'm quite sure I don't know what you are talking about.
Perhaps you could be more specific?
It is simple, Mr. Wickham.
Our Demands:
1. Thou shalt speak only of FAWTL in favorable tones, whether thou posteth in the forums or on the chats or wheresoever thou mayest be.
2. Thou shalt not hide behind winky smileys to sneak snark against the FAWTL our thread. For we the FAWTLies are a jealous lot, punishing snark unto the seventh generation (but rewarding snark of our own kind).
3. Thou shalt not go by David in chat. For lo, it is not Austenian enough. Wickham shalt thou be, for it rolls off the tongue and sticks to the memory and annoyeth not the Pony that sparkles like unto God's bow set in the heavens.Finally, we offer this option. If thy work offendest against thy posting, cut it off. {Note: Only 1-3 are to be taken as binding, save that thy wealth be of an independent nature.]
This is the weakest excuse for a lynch mob I've ever seen. Announcing charges? Offering the accused the opportunity to speak? Let's just get a half dozen ropes and hang David and the five people standing closest to him and not threatening his life.
Frontier justice, baby.
In his defense, his charges aren't really that clear, something about smiley faces and sparkling ponies I haven't really figured out what it says yet...
David Wickham |
Welcome to FaWTL, David!
Hi taig, nice to see you.
You should come visit the chatroom more often.
taig RPG Superstar 2012 |
taig wrote:Welcome to FaWTL, David!
Hi taig, nice to see you.
You should come visit the chatroom more often.
I should. Thanks for the reminder (and the invite).
I believe the crux of Mairkurion's flowery (florid?) out-calling was an offhand comment of yours about a posting limit affecting FaWTL being a feature not a fault (I'm paraphrasing here). I think he was returning the snarkery in kind.
Gruumash . |
Sebastian wrote:In his defense, his charges aren't really that clear, something about smiley...David Wickham wrote:Mairkurion {tm} wrote:Its fun to make more or less unreadable demands on the internet, but you aren't the republican party, I'm not going to just agree. What is in it for me?David Wickham wrote:Mairkurion {tm} wrote:David Wickham wrote:Mairkurion {tm} wrote:Yes?By the way:
I AM HERE CALLING OUT MR. WICKHAM.
If you are a man and of unquestioned parentage, you will answer this post, Mr. Wickham. Otherwise, you will branded by FAWTLite society from this day until The End of Time.
I think you know why you are here. You need to change your ways.
Shall I spell out m- that is, OUR demands?I'm quite sure I don't know what you are talking about.
Perhaps you could be more specific?
It is simple, Mr. Wickham.
Our Demands:
1. Thou shalt speak only of FAWTL in favorable tones, whether thou posteth in the forums or on the chats or wheresoever thou mayest be.
2. Thou shalt not hide behind winky smileys to sneak snark against the FAWTL our thread. For we the FAWTLies are a jealous lot, punishing snark unto the seventh generation (but rewarding snark of our own kind).
3. Thou shalt not go by David in chat. For lo, it is not Austenian enough. Wickham shalt thou be, for it rolls off the tongue and sticks to the memory and annoyeth not the Pony that sparkles like unto God's bow set in the heavens.Finally, we offer this option. If thy work offendest against thy posting, cut it off. {Note: Only 1-3 are to be taken as binding, save that thy wealth be of an independent nature.]
This is the weakest excuse for a lynch mob I've ever seen. Announcing charges? Offering the accused the opportunity to speak? Let's just get a half dozen ropes and hang David and the five people standing closest to him and not threatening his life.
Frontier justice, baby.
"You are really supposed to understand the charges young man. We understand them enough for you."
looking back at the mob we and under his breath we do understand them right?.
By the way welcome.
David Wickham |
David Wickham wrote:taig wrote:Welcome to FaWTL, David!
Hi taig, nice to see you.
You should come visit the chatroom more often.
I should. Thanks for the reminder (and the invite).
I believe the crux of Mairkurion's flowery (florid?) out-calling was an offhand comment of yours about a posting limit affecting FaWTL being a feature not a fault (I'm paraphrasing here). I think he was returning the snarkery in kind.
I remember saying that, but I don't remember Mairkurion being there...
There must be a rat in the chat. :-k
I would guess Gary, but everyone likes him so I'll blame Justin Franklin.
Sebastian Bella Sara Charter Superscriber |
Sebastian Bella Sara Charter Superscriber |
Justin Franklin |
Hapless Census Taker wrote:Am I in the wrong place?Nope. Hold this rope.
Room for two more folks. Line em on up!
Karelzarath was there, as was Sebastian!
Mairkurion {tm} |
Huh-huh-huh...you almost said, "Wood."
Use Emperor7, he's a treant.
So we're moving on to hanging? Heck, I figured he'd just promise to speak reverentially of FAWTL and always go by WICKHAM rather than David in the chat from here on. But some people always want to do things the hard way.
Sebastian Bella Sara Charter Superscriber |
Sebastian wrote:Karelzarath was there, as was Sebastian!Hapless Census Taker wrote:Am I in the wrong place?Nope. Hold this rope.
Room for two more folks. Line em on up!
Clearly this man is also a witch. Good thing there's some *snigger* hard wood *snigger* available - we can use it to set a baseline for buoyancy when we throw it and Justin in a lake to see if he floats.
Justin Franklin |
Justin Franklin wrote:Clearly this man is also a witch. Good thing there's some *snigger* hard wood *snigger* available - we can use it to set a baseline for buoyancy when we throw it and Justin in a lake to see if he floats.Sebastian wrote:Karelzarath was there, as was Sebastian!Hapless Census Taker wrote:Am I in the wrong place?Nope. Hold this rope.
Room for two more folks. Line em on up!
You are clearly distorting the truth as you often do cough 4e cough .
Callous Jack |
Sebastian wrote:You are clearly distorting the truth as you often do cough 4e cough .Justin Franklin wrote:Clearly this man is also a witch. Good thing there's some *snigger* hard wood *snigger* available - we can use it to set a baseline for buoyancy when we throw it and Justin in a lake to see if he floats.Sebastian wrote:Karelzarath was there, as was Sebastian!Hapless Census Taker wrote:Am I in the wrong place?Nope. Hold this rope.
Room for two more folks. Line em on up!
Ouch.
Our Most Benevolent King David |
Sebastian wrote:You are clearly distorting the truth as you often do cough 4e cough .Justin Franklin wrote:Clearly this man is also a witch. Good thing there's some *snigger* hard wood *snigger* available - we can use it to set a baseline for buoyancy when we throw it and Justin in a lake to see if he floats.Sebastian wrote:Karelzarath was there, as was Sebastian!Hapless Census Taker wrote:Am I in the wrong place?Nope. Hold this rope.
Room for two more folks. Line em on up!
It is going to be ok Justin, by this time next year the poni boi will be singing the praises 5e. ;)
Edit:
Also, I am awesome, and this page is mine now!