So where did the chicken come from?
So where did the chicken come from?
An egg, obviously.
So where did the chicken come from?
An egg, obviously.
Where did the egg come from?
So where did the chicken come from?
Across the road.
Where did the egg come from?So where did the chicken come from?
An egg, obviously.
Why a chicken of course! Didn't you read the Foxnews article??
I think it was a reprint from The Sun.So where did the chicken come from?
An egg, obviously.
Where did the egg come from? Why an egg! Didn't you read the Foxnews article??
Huh. I could've sworn it was The Arizona Republic.
Where did the egg come from?So where did the chicken come from?
An egg, obviously.
Why a chicken of course! Didn't you read the Foxnews article??
Ok, but where did the chicken come from?
I think it was a reprint from The Sun.
Now, I do believe both the egg and the chicken came from the Sun.
I thought we had figured this out already. Because of a slight genetic change, a chicken-like ancestor produced chicken eggs, what developed into chickens.
I thought we had figured this out already. Because of a slight genetic change, a chicken-like ancestor produced chicken eggs, what developed into chickens.
Where did the "chicken-like ancestor" come from?
I thought we had figured this out already. Because of a slight genetic change, a chicken-like ancestor produced chicken eggs, what developed into chickens.Where did the "chicken-like ancestor" come from?
A different egg. ;)
I thought we had figured this out already. Because of a slight genetic change, a chicken-like ancestor produced chicken eggs, what developed into chickens.
Agreed - which essentially makes the article above false. The egg has to come first, laid by something that was not quite a chicken.
I want a new egg.
I thought we had figured this out already. Because of a slight genetic change, a chicken-like ancestor produced chicken eggs, what developed into chickens.Where did the "chicken-like ancestor" come from?
A slightly different chicken-like ancestor. That is how evolution works. Something changes in the environment or needs of the critter and it's body slowly adapts. So it's decedents are passes the gene. At some point those changes make it's children different then it was.
So to me it's always been clear the Egg came first in the chicken, but if ya go back far enough you'll have something that did not lay eggs.
Why are people picking on Nicole Eggert?
I thought we had figured this out already. Because of a slight genetic change, a chicken-like ancestor produced chicken eggs, what developed into chickens.Agreed - which essentially makes the article above false. The egg has to come first, laid by something that was not quite a chicken.
I'm broke and unemployed, but never let it be said that a BS in Evolutionary Anthropology doesn't come in handy in a pinch.
Why are people picking on Nicole Eggert?
Bacause she was hot until she got a boob job.
I thought we had figured this out already. Because of a slight genetic change, a chicken-like ancestor produced chicken eggs, what developed into chickens.Where did the "chicken-like ancestor" come from?
A slightly different chicken-like ancestor. That is how evolution works. Something changes in the environment or needs of the critter and it's body slowly adapts. So it's decedents are passes the gene. At some point those changes make it's children different then it was.
So to me it's always been clear the Egg came first in the chicken, but if ya go back far enough you'll have something that did not lay eggs.
You missed my implied Gag-Question: "How did it all begin?" I was trying to be funny...
sigh.
Ok, but where did the chicken come from?
Because Tom Petty is famous!
Scientists cracked the puzzle after discovering that the formation of eggs is possible only thanks to a protein found in chicken's ovaries. That means eggs have to be formed in chickens first.
This makes absolutely no sense. There are plenty of animals other than chickens that lay eggs without using a chicken ovary as a prop.
|
I thought we had figured this out already. Because of a slight genetic change, a chicken-like ancestor produced chicken eggs, what developed into chickens.Agreed - which essentially makes the article above false. The egg has to come first, laid by something that was not quite a chicken.
Look, something had to get laid before the egg did.
Look, something had to get laid before the egg did.I thought we had figured this out already. Because of a slight genetic change, a chicken-like ancestor produced chicken eggs, what developed into chickens.Agreed - which essentially makes the article above false. The egg has to come first, laid by something that was not quite a chicken.
lol V funny.
I figured it was only a matter of time before biologist Jerry Coyne picked this up:
Godawful Science Reporting.
Biologist PZ Myers sums up the article as "Bleh," describing the reporting as "terrible":
Chickens, eggs, this is no way to report on science
Good ol' Fox news. Always asking the hard questions.
Don't you mean the 'hard boiled questions'?
Good ol' Fox news. Always asking the hard questions.
MSNBC has the exact same article -- I didn't check them side-by-side, but they seem verbatim, from what I recall.
Idiots.
I thought we had figured this out already. Because of a slight genetic change, a chicken-like ancestor produced chicken eggs, what developed into chickens.Where did the "chicken-like ancestor" come from?
A slightly different chicken-like ancestor. That is how evolution works. Something changes in the environment or needs of the critter and it's body slowly adapts. So it's decedents are passes the gene. At some point those changes make it's children different then it was.
So to me it's always been clear the Egg came first in the chicken, but if ya go back far enough you'll have something that did not lay eggs.
Reminds me that mammary glands are actually modified sweat glands. Very good, nice, and good and nice good modified sweat glands.
The chicken embryo is formed before the shell, so the chicken comes first.
