silverhair2008 |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Wolfgang, If you are asking for opinions on whether to include HeroLab files or not, put me in the wanting HeroLab files. If it would require an increase in the cost of the PDF or the HeroLab files being a separate purchase I would be fine with either one. I use HeroLab and would like to use some of your stuff but I am a total illiterate when it comes to adding files into HeroLab.
I am presently playing a Dwarf Reaver Rogue in a Northlands campaign. I had to build him on paper cause what I wanted to use wasn't in HeroLab.
Just my 2 cp.
Wolfgang Baur Contributor; Publisher, Kobold Press; RPG Superstar Judge |
If I charged for Hero Lab files as a separate purchase, of course I could pay people to create them. And chances are good this would mean more Hero Lab files would be created for Kobold Press more quickly.
If people prefer to get the Hero Lab files for free with the purchase of a regular PDF, then I'm pretty much in the position of depending on volunteers to create the Hero Lab files. That can be fine, but it's slower and the file quality might vary quite a bit.
Hm. Appreciate the input, Silverhair2008.
Marc Radle |
I've never used HeroLab or any other character creation software - nothing against it, I just don't personally have any interest in using software to create or maintain my characters. Having said that, I know there are those out there that do use HeroLab and having HL files for classes is a nice perk.
I guess my question is how many folks do use HeroLab and therefore could use the HL file and how many folks do NOT use it and therefore an HL file is meaningless to them.
I actually kind of like Silverhair2008's idea - pay someone to create these files and then offer them as a separate purchase. The number of purchases would also give some kind of idea how many people actually want these HL files going forward ...
Just thinking out loud :)
silverhair2008 |
Realize I may be alone in my willingness to purchase a separate file for HeroLab. I was under the impression that Wolfgang was asking for opinions, so I gave him mine. But there are quite possibly more people that don't want a separate file for purchase and they are just as happy with the occasional free HeroLab file. Here's hoping some more people express their opinions.
Just my additional 2 cp.
calamus |
Wait, the complaint is that the free Hero Lab file made by a volunteer doesn't contain everything in the PDF?
I see. Look, the addition of Hero Lab files is a bonus here and a bit of an experiment. We don't charge for them. I would certainly love to have an updated file that covers every single element of the PDF, but for now, I think covering most of it in a free HL file is a pretty nice extra.
The other option here is simply to remove the HL element from this download. I'm fine with that solution as well.
What's the preference, generally?
I'm confused by this response. First off, I asked a question in what I believe was a polite manner, and I asked if it was included. I dont think i was complaining. On the other hand, it was the primary reason I purchased it. I was then told that it was being updated. To b e honest, at no point did I know that it wasnt done by staff. I was told by the person that a new one was being sent, and was also informed via another site that the paizo one (ie: here) had been updated. I downloaded to test, and simply reported that it hasn't been updated yet.
I don't think I'm the bad guy that your response implies.
Wolfgang Baur Contributor; Publisher, Kobold Press; RPG Superstar Judge |
Sorry, I thought at first that the HL file download was somehow missing, and that we would update it. So I worked with Liz to figure that out, but the file is still there for download.
When I realized that the concern was about getting an update to the content, I was curious about whether the more important element is the free add-on of HL content, or the more important element would be to have a complete add-on (which would likely be a separate or add-on cost). Mostly just trying to figure out whether it's worth investing time and effort here beyond the current system.
I don't think my response implies you are a bad guy, though I guess the word "complaint" can be all too easily misconstrued (and apologies, wasn't a slam). But it made me wonder about the right priorities for handling HL files, so I asked.
To return to the original request: an updated SLR HL file came in from the volunteer last week, but the file is still being tested. It's not quite working and ready yet.
Maverick |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Count me in as a HeroLab user who would be willing to pay more for HL files. While I would love to get the information for free, I wouldn't mind a "PDF and HeroLab Bundle" that charged a little extra for the HL file in order to ensure that everything from the PDF was included. That's not always easy to do (as someone who has played around with the HL editor a bit, adding a new archetype is rarely as easy as it sounds), but would certainly be appreciated.
That said, I was actually the opposite. I purchased the PDF, and was pleasantly surprised to find the HeroLab file included. This lead to a bit of disappointment that the next two New Paths documents didn't have HeroLab files included, until I read through the forums and saw that the HeroLab files were created and shared by a volunteer. I think that shows the strength of the Pathfider and Kobold community, that a user would not only take the time to create this for him- or herself, but that they would then contact the company behind the PDF and offer that datafile for distribution to the community at large. Bravo for that!
HeroLab makes things much easier for those who have a limited amount of time for prep-work, those with a LOT of characters to track, or those who just love a quick-and-easy way to try out new (or higher-level) builds for characters. It's also quite handy for those who often miss or skip the minor things, like encumberance for gold or whether you are still under the effects of the ACP and how that modifies which skills. It's certainly not a requirement for Pathfinder play, but it can make your play much more fulfilling by taking a lot of the minor inconveniences and tracking them for you, allowing you to concentrate more fully on the adventure and how your character can shine in it. :)
I think the surge in tablets/laptops-at-the-table, widespread availability of internet access, and the cratering prices of computers and consumer electronics that function like computers affords a fantastic opportunity. Since HeroLab is the officially-licensed character creation software for Pathfinder, having 3rd party publishers such as Kobold add support for it along with their products benefits everyone. If the work is unfeasable to do for free (for whatever reason, and they could be legion), I like the idea of offering the file as part of a separate offering for those willing to "put their money where their mouth is" by being willing to support the development of the things they want. Like Kickstarter, but on a much more personal scale. Just my two coppers' worth.
calamus |
Sorry if i took offense. I guess i read your post wrong.
I find the use of HeroLab incredibly useful and in some ways the most important part. I run a game which has some in person, some skype/distance people. i keep track of all characters through hero lab. to be honest when i came acorss this product, it was the hero lab component that interested me more than the PDF. When I looked at the production description, it does say no additional cost, but that wasnt the reason i purchased it. I purchased it, because i thought it was the person who made the pdf also made the hero lab. i assumed it was "official". the product blurb doesnt state that it was done by a volunteer. If it said that i:
1. wouldnt have requested the archetypes be included.
2. wouldnt have assumed it was part of the download.
but here's the interesting thing: i might not have purchased the pdf. I might have, but i dont know. because the reason i purchased it was for the hero lab component. I own pretty much all of paizo's official hero lab components, but not all of their books. Some of them cost almost as much as the books. Why is that? Well, if a player wants to use a feat i need to have the book in hero lab. Also i might have searched the net to find out if anyone has converted it on their own.
I _COMPLETELY_ get that if you were to support it officially, you would need to pay someone and make money on it. I just assumed that was happening.
In the meantime, i think it might make sense to update the description, because while it says "hero lab files included at no additional cost", its a little confusing, and it might be good to state what the hero lab files cover and what it doesnt, or at the very least that its done by a volunteer so it might have issues.
Long story short: I will ABSOLUTELY pay extra for supported "official" hero lab components.
Arknight |
I want to apologize for being the source of the uproar. I missed the issue with the way I was doing the prerequisite checks for the feats in HL.
I've sent version 1.2 of the ESR .hl file to Wolfgang with this fixed as well as the inclusion of the archetypes, and I'm sure as soon as it's through the testing process on their end, it'll be included in the official download.
If anyone finds any issues in this or the Expanded Shaman file, please feel free to send me a PM and I'll see what I can do about it. I am also working on the Expanded Archer file at the moment, so hopefully it won't be too long before I can send that for inclusion in it's download. :)
Again, apologies for the issues.
TC
PS: if anyone knows about using the editor to fix your user file and ca't wait for an official update ( :) ), I've posted the solution I came up with on the Lone Wolf Herolab Forums. You can pop over there and look (I'm TCArknight on those boards) or PM me and I'll let you know the solution.
Quiche Lisp |
If official Hero Lab files were included with every Kobold Press product, I would be okay to pay more for said products.
And I also would be okay to purchase separate Hero Lab files associated with the products.
@Arknight:
Thank you for the time and work you put in your Hero Lab files ; it's much appreciated !
Wolfgang Baur Contributor; Publisher, Kobold Press; RPG Superstar Judge |
Marc Radle |
I want to apologize for being the source of the uproar. I missed the issue with the way I was doing the prerequisite checks for the feats in HL.
I've sent version 1.2 of the ESR .hl file to Wolfgang with this fixed as well as the inclusion of the archetypes, and I'm sure as soon as it's through the testing process on their end, it'll be included in the official download.
Again, apologies for the issues.
Thanks so much for doing these Arknight! I know the HL users appreciate it!
calamus |
I want to apologize for being the source of the uproar. I missed the issue with the way I was doing the prerequisite checks for the feats in HL.
I've sent version 1.2 of the ESR .hl file to Wolfgang with this fixed as well as the inclusion of the archetypes, and I'm sure as soon as it's through the testing process on their end, it'll be included in the official download.
If anyone finds any issues in this or the Expanded Shaman file, please feel free to send me a PM and I'll see what I can do about it. I am also working on the Expanded Archer file at the moment, so hopefully it won't be too long before I can send that for inclusion in it's download. :)
Again, apologies for the issues.
TC
PS: if anyone knows about using the editor to fix your user file and ca't wait for an official update ( :) ), I've posted the solution I came up with on the Lone Wolf Herolab Forums. You can pop over there and look (I'm TCArknight on those boards) or PM me and I'll let you know the solution.
No apology needed. Thanks for all the work.
Jessie Scott |
Hey guys,
I'm a fan of this archetype, but my DM thinks it's too powerful (has too many other options for what the spell-less ranger gives up from a normal ranger).
Is there anything you can recommend to bring it more in line to be "balanced" with the Paizo canon classes?
I'd really like to play this type of ranger, but as it stands I don't think I'll get a chance to and instead just get to keep looking longingly at the concept you created in the document.
Thanks!
pluvia33 |
I'm a fan of this archetype, but my DM thinks it's too powerful (has too many other options for what the spell-less ranger gives up from a normal ranger).
I had a similar knee-jerk reaction when I first looked over the class. Especially the fact that this version of the ranger starts getting new class features before the standard ranger gains spell casting. But then I had to remind myself that even before the ranger gets the ability to actually cast spells, he still has the ability to use spell-trigger items (like wands) of any spell on the ranger list which can be very useful. Then you also have to consider that all of the new ranger class features other than the ranger talents have to either be used in one of the ranger's favored terrains or against a favored enemy. Personally, I think it is very balanced with all things considered, especially since the spell-less ranger doesn't have access to the Instant Enemy spell unless he trains UMD. You should talk it over with your GM, bringing up these points and maybe he'll reconsider??
Is there anything you can recommend to bring it more in line to be "balanced" with the Paizo canon classes?
I'd say if you just remove Stealth Attack the class would maybe seem more in line with the standard ranger by your GM's perception if he doesn't reconsider. Unless that's one of the main features you wanted? Otherwise I don't really know what to suggest.
Jessie Scott |
Jessie Scott wrote:I'm a fan of this archetype, but my DM thinks it's too powerful (has too many other options for what the spell-less ranger gives up from a normal ranger).I had a similar knee-jerk reaction when I first looked over the class. Especially the fact that this version of the ranger starts getting new class features before the standard ranger gains spell casting. But then I had to remind myself that even before the ranger gets the ability to actually cast spells, he still has the ability to use spell-trigger items (like wands) of any spell on the ranger list which can be very useful. Then you also have to consider that all of the new ranger class features other than the ranger talents have to either be used in one of the ranger's favored terrains or against a favored enemy. Personally, I think it is very balanced with all things considered, especially since the spell-less ranger doesn't have access to the Instant Enemy spell unless he trains UMD. You should talk it over with your GM, bringing up these points and maybe he'll reconsider??
Jessie Scott wrote:Is there anything you can recommend to bring it more in line to be "balanced" with the Paizo canon classes?I'd say if you just remove Stealth Attack the class would maybe seem more in line with the standard ranger by your GM's perception if he doesn't reconsider. Unless that's one of the main features you wanted? Otherwise I don't really know what to suggest.
I was actually thinking the same thing, remove the stealth attack. In addition, I forgot about the wand usage. As you've said, many features are only usable in favored terrain so they become moot anywhere else.
Marc Radle |
Hi Jessie!
As pluvia33 points out, once you really study the class, you will see that it is actually quite balanced. In particular, many of the Spell-less Ranger's abilities work only in a favored terrain and/or against a favored enemy.
I would actually strongly recommend that you ask your GM to read the reviews here as well as maybe some of the discussion (although reading through 270 some posts is kind of a tall order!:)
Then, ask your GM to let you play the class as written for a session or two and see if he has any balance issues with the class once he sees it in play. I really think he will see the class works quite well without any modification.
If you must modify, removing stealth attack is certainly an option I suppose, although stealth attack is kind of one of the Spell-less Ranger's cooler abilities ...
Andrew Betts |
Question on the Companion Bound archetype. The ability "Enhanced Companion" gives you bonus feats selected from Greater Animal Companion,
Improved Animal Companion, Increased Devotion, Invulnerable Animal Companion. A number of these feats require the Hunter's Bond ability which was replaced by the Teamwork ability at 4th level, which means you'll never meet the prereqs to take Improved AC, Greater AC, or Invulnerable AC.
Well I guess it's not much of a question, more of a pointing out a bug. Unless I'm misreading something.
Marc Radle |
Hey Andrew!
Good question! You are correct that the Teamwork class feature at 4th level replaces hunter's bond. However, the Animal Companion class feature the Companion Bound ranger gets at 3rd level already granted an animal companion a level earlier.
The feats you mention say:
Prerequisites: Hunter’s bond or nature’s bond class feature; you must have an animal companion.
So, it should be pretty clear that the Companion Bound ranger archetype qualifies for these feats, especially since the primary intent of the archetype is to improve the ranger's animal companion and enhance the way the ranger and his animal companion work together.
I certainly can see how, just to be crystal clear, the feat(s) could have said:
Prerequisites: Hunter’s bond, nature’s bond or similar class feature; you must have an animal companion
Hope that helps!
Dallimar |
A few things. First, thank you guys for a great product. I've used this in a few different one-shot games and in my current campaign. Second, I know I may be a bit late on the bandwagon, but I'd pay for HL files in a heartbeat. Third, I noticed that the file, according to the posts here, was last updated in may to include the archetypes. My downloads is still showing the last update having been in February, so I was just wondering if I'm missing an update option somewhere on the page or if I should just hold up and wait a little longer for it to show up there. I'd be happy either way.
-Cheers
Marc Radle |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Hey Dallimar, really glad you're enjoying the Spell-less Ranger! Although it was the first class I created for Kobold Press (since then, there has been the Shaman, the White Necromancer, the Battle Scion AND the soon to be released {redacted} ) it still holds a very special place in my heart! :)
Regarding the HeroLab file(s) I have no info alas. I will be sure to point the appropriate piwers-that-be to this thread though:)
Marc Radle |
Mister Radle, can we expect to see the White Necromancer released sometime in the New Paths series?
Hmmm ... well ... officially, only the Great Kobold Himself can say for sure ...
But, just between you and me (he says, looking around to be sure no one else is listening) fans of the White Necromancer should keep an eye on the Kobold Press web site over the next week or two :)
In fact ... "the next week or two" might be a pretty darn good answer to your question ... but, again, you didn't hear that from me ;)
Marc Radle |
Just a heads up that the The White Necromancer will be released very soon:)
You can even learn a bit more here:
The Expanded White Necromancer Design Blog
Regnirok |
Hey all, I just downloaded the Expanded Spell-Less Archer PDF but found that the Hero Lab file is no longer included in it? Looking back through the thread it looks like an updated one was submitted to Wolfgang and was pending to be added. Was it ever added? Is it available? I would love to get this!
Thanks!
Regnirok |
Thanks Marc, and I am really enjoying it!
My DM ended up buying the PDF off of the Kobold Quarterly site, which included the Hero Lab file, so it appears to only not be included on the Paizo download. My DM provided me with the file to go with my Paizo copy of the PDF.
Thanks again and keep up the great work!
Wolfgang Baur Contributor; Publisher, Kobold Press; RPG Superstar Judge |
Wolfgang Baur Contributor; Publisher, Kobold Press; RPG Superstar Judge |
Wolfgang Baur Contributor; Publisher, Kobold Press; RPG Superstar Judge |
Marc Radle |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
So, speaking of the brand-new spell-less ranger archetype ...
Wouldn't it be cool if it was part of a much bigger, really awesome product? Maybe even something that was related to the entire New Paths series ... ?
You didn't hear it from me, but ... keep your eyes open for a pretty cool announcement this Friday :)