| Todd Stewart Contributor |
Thanks, folks! I'm glad people are as excited about the book as I am. It's time we got some plane-hopping up in here... :)
So earlier in the year, you teased on the boards in a thread about protean speach and language, that one of them might show up in a novel at some point. Would this be it? :D
| James Sutter Contributor |
Would asking about how Salim is bound to Pharasma's church ruin anything in the book?
Quite possibly! I'll try to give you two different answers, organized by amount of spoilage, and hopefully without giving EVERYTHING away. But before you read either, ask yourself: do I REALLY want to know? Or should I just wait until November to find out? Only you can decide. :D
Some slight spoilage:
He's not actually part of the church hierarchy, but rather works for the goddess's extraplanar functionaries directly, handling problems a normal priest wouldn't be equipped to without all the usual duties and responsibilities of the priesthood. Essentially a special agent.
Lots of spoilers:
A former Rahadoumi priest-hunter, he made some bad decisions and ended up bound to Pharasma's service. And believe me, while he's good at the job, he is not happy about it.
| James Sutter Contributor |
Thanks, everybody!
Also, a brief plug for folks who like reviewing things: If you enjoy a novel (whether mine, some other PF Tales book, or a totally unrelated book), please post a review on its page at Amazon.com! Posting an Amazon review is one of the best things you can do to help an author--even if it's not a 5-star one--as it helps raise the book's profile, and people pay a lot of attention to what other readers have to say on there. This is especially true if you're already reviewing it on Paizo.com--it's easy to crosspost.
| Itchy |
Just finished Chapter 2, and I'm really enjoying it so far. I will probably need to leave this book home Thanksgiving weekend so that I don't spend family visiting time with my nose in a book! ;)
Good sauce so far. And Mr Sutter reminded me in an above post that I need to get my reviews written for all the Pathfinder Tales Novels.
-Aaron
Edit: @Jester: I would recommend subscribing to the Tales line. They really are great fiction.
| Kata. the ..... |
Thanks, everybody!
Also, a brief plug for folks who like reviewing things: If you enjoy a novel (whether mine, some other PF Tales book, or a totally unrelated book), please post a review on its page at Amazon.com! Posting an Amazon review is one of the best things you can do to help an author--even if it's not a 5-star one--as it helps raise the book's profile, and people pay a lot of attention to what other readers have to say on there. This is especially true if you're already reviewing it on Paizo.com--it's easy to crosspost.
Crosspost? That sounds like work. :) But, I'll probably go ahead and do it.
I enjoyed the book (especially because I was paid very well while reading it). The only really odd moment I had
Matthew Morris
RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8
|
Well except for the jarring language (which I won't rehash) I enjoyed the book.
Oh, one thing
Two things surprised me.
1)
2)
@Kata
| Joseph Mandato |
Also, a brief plug for folks who like reviewing things: If you enjoy a novel (whether mine, some other PF Tales book, or a totally unrelated book), please post a review on its page at Amazon.com! Posting an Amazon review is one of the best things you can do to help an author--even if it's not a 5-star one--as it helps raise the book's profile, and people pay a lot of attention to what other readers have to say on there. This is especially true if you're already reviewing it on Paizo.com--it's easy to crosspost.
Happily done! Hopefully, Amazon approves the review soon and there will be another five star rating of your novel on Amazon :-).
Zahariel
|
This is most likely an editing mistake, but having the book I couldn't help but download the Chronicle Sheet. It says on page one:
• In order for the Chronicle sheet to be considered legal for play, the player must show to the GM a copy of Plague of Shadows, either in printed or digital format.
I assume that instead of Plague of Shadows that should read Death's Heretic?
Vic Wertz
Chief Technical Officer
|
This is most likely an editing mistake, but having the book I couldn't help but download the Chronicle Sheet. It says on page one:
Chronicle Sheet wrote:• In order for the Chronicle sheet to be considered legal for play, the player must show to the GM a copy of Plague of Shadows, either in printed or digital format.I assume that instead of Plague of Shadows that should read Death's Heretic?
Yep... we'll get that fixed. Thanks!
Gorbacz
|
I really enjoyed Death's Heretic. My review is up and I lament the fact that I couldn't select 3.5 stars, which reflects my actual rating. Good job, I'm keen to hear more about Salim in the future.
Tangential: from reading your review, it seems that you enjoyed the book. Yet you gave it 3 (or 3,5) stars, which pretty much screams "average" for me if I ever wanted to make a purchasing decision.
| LoreKeeper |
LoreKeeper wrote:Tangential: from reading your review, it seems that you enjoyed the book. Yet you gave it 3 (or 3,5) stars, which pretty much screams "average" for me if I ever wanted to make a purchasing decision.I really enjoyed Death's Heretic. My review is up and I lament the fact that I couldn't select 3.5 stars, which reflects my actual rating. Good job, I'm keen to hear more about Salim in the future.
Not for me, a 3 is a good solid performance (more so a 3.5 of course). A 4 is at the level where I buy the book for others to read. At 5 the story is a work of literary genius that transcends the pages it is written upon.
To put it into context: I'm a fan, so a typical book by Terry Pratchett rates around 4 for me, with individual works by the author reaching 4.5. The absolute highpoint, for me, in his body of work he co-authored with Neil Gaiman: Good Omens. Which I give a 5 for.
Now, compared against these ratings and values, I cannot with a straight-face give Death's Heretic a "4".
It is part of the distortion of values that it is easy to in the spur-of-the-moment hand out 1s or 5s. The internet likes such extremes. But the actual fact of the matter is that a "3" is a good book that tells an enjoyable story. More so a 3.5, of course. I've tried to reflect this positive experience in my review of it. And I'm looking forward to reading Master of Devils, once it reaches me in a month or so. It is by a different author, but I'm still keen to see where this Pathfinder Tales will be going and how it grows.
| gbonehead Owner - House of Books and Games LLC |
I'm with LoreKeeper. I haven't finished the book yet (and I only tend to review things that I'll give glowing reviews to), but I tend to feel constrained by the 5-star system. In fact, the 5-star system is one of the reasons I don't like doing reviews.
I know it's a bit late in the game, but I'd much much rather see a 7 or 10 star system than a 5-star system. For me a 3 is a decent book, a 4 is a good book that I am willing to recommend, and a 5, being the best ranking one can give, better mean that the book is among the best in the genre.
Everyone uses the rankings differently, of course.
Vic Wertz
Chief Technical Officer
|
I know it's a bit late in the game, but I'd much much rather see a 7 or 10 star system than a 5-star system. For me a 3 is a decent book, a 4 is a good book that I am willing to recommend, and a 5, being the best ranking one can give, better mean that the book is among the best in the genre.
Everyone uses the rankings differently, of course.
That's actually precisely why we chose the 5-star system: the more rankings there are to choose from, the more people's own impressions of the system vary.
For example, if given a 1-to-100 scale, some people assume 50 is average because it's right in the middle, and others assume 70 is average because it's a "C" in well-known educational grading systems. And people used to scoring wine on a 100-point scale would probably consider anything lower than about 85 a failure hardly worthy of mention.
With the 5-star system, I think most people peg "3" as "average."