Lisa Stevens CEO |
March now? Seriously? How many delays can this book get?
Until it is as great as we can make it. This is a book that we want to keep in print for a LONG time, so taking the extra time to look it over one more time and catching a few more errors is worth it. A lot of companies are willing to sacrifice quality in order to hit deadlines. Not us. I would rather have a book be a lot late than to have it be something that we aren't proud of. And having stayed at work until almost midnight on Friday giving this book the last once-over, I have to say that I am very proud of this book and think it may very well be the single best campaign book I have ever seen. :)
-Lisa
joela |
Kvantum wrote:March now? Seriously? How many delays can this book get?Until it is as great as we can make it. This is a book that we want to keep in print for a LONG time, so taking the extra time to look it over one more time and catching a few more errors is worth it. A lot of companies are willing to sacrifice quality in order to hit deadlines. Not us. I would rather have a book be a lot late than to have it be something that we aren't proud of. And having stayed at work until almost midnight on Friday giving this book the last once-over, I have to say that I am very proud of this book and think it may very well be the single best campaign book I have ever seen. :)
-Lisa
Also give us a chance to get any government tax refunds....
Charles Evans 25 |
Kvantum wrote:March now? Seriously? How many delays can this book get?Until it is as great as we can make it. This is a book that we want to keep in print for a LONG time, so taking the extra time to look it over one more time and catching a few more errors is worth it. A lot of companies are willing to sacrifice quality in order to hit deadlines. Not us. I would rather have a book be a lot late than to have it be something that we aren't proud of. And having stayed at work until almost midnight on Friday giving this book the last once-over, I have to say that I am very proud of this book and think it may very well be the single best campaign book I have ever seen. :)
-Lisa
Hey, not fair! With the additional pages in the revision I was hoping to get the errata/reference thread for the next Campaign Setting to 1000+ posts in record time.... :D
If it hasn't gone to the printers yet, what about indicating the date of the extent of the empires indicated on the map if you've retained the 'lost kingdoms map'? For example the map on page 223 of the current campaign setting indicates Jistka, Tekritan (meant to be Tekritanin League?), and Ancient Osirion, which all arose some time after the Earthfall and may well have existed contemporaneously at some point with the indicated boundaries. However Thassilon is also shown on the map, and Thassilon ceased to exist around about the time of Earthfall and is certainly not contemporaneous to the empires in northern Garund.To further confuse matters Ancient Osirion later expanded its boundaries to encompass part or all of the territory which belonged to the Tekritanin League....
Hmm... This post is starting to seem familiar. Sorry if I've raised it before. Anyway, a date in each kingdom on the lost kingdoms map to indicate when that kingdom had those boundaries would be handy, and if you've already done something like that, just checking.... ;)
Sketchpad |
Kvantum wrote:March now? Seriously? How many delays can this book get?Until it is as great as we can make it. This is a book that we want to keep in print for a LONG time, so taking the extra time to look it over one more time and catching a few more errors is worth it. A lot of companies are willing to sacrifice quality in order to hit deadlines. Not us. I would rather have a book be a lot late than to have it be something that we aren't proud of. And having stayed at work until almost midnight on Friday giving this book the last once-over, I have to say that I am very proud of this book and think it may very well be the single best campaign book I have ever seen. :)
-Lisa
And that's the reason why I keep giving Paizo my money ;)
Gorbacz |
Lisa Stevens wrote:Also give us a chance to get any government tax refunds....Kvantum wrote:March now? Seriously? How many delays can this book get?Until it is as great as we can make it. This is a book that we want to keep in print for a LONG time, so taking the extra time to look it over one more time and catching a few more errors is worth it. A lot of companies are willing to sacrifice quality in order to hit deadlines. Not us. I would rather have a book be a lot late than to have it be something that we aren't proud of. And having stayed at work until almost midnight on Friday giving this book the last once-over, I have to say that I am very proud of this book and think it may very well be the single best campaign book I have ever seen. :)
-Lisa
Or a new job ...
Shem |
While archetypes are indeed cool... they also take up a lot of room. There'll be a lot more of them in our rulebooks next year, and I would expect them to be showing up relatively regularly in the Player's Companion line.
The idea of building archetypes for a bunch of Golarion stuff REALLY appeals to me, though, since we can't actually draw upon world flavor in the rulebook line. There's just not enough room to do the topic justice in the Inner Sea World Guide, alas.
The Galorian Book of Archetypes... A great campaign line book.
Lisa Stevens CEO |
If it hasn't gone to the printers yet...
It is going this today and is in its final proofing phase. No more additions or my staff will lynch me! Plus, we need to get it out the door so James Jacobs will actually TAKE his first long vacation since he started at Paizo. :)
-Lisa
Dark_Mistress |
You almost make me want the book. Maybe sometime down the line I'll pick it up. Here's to hoping it stays in print a good long while. :)
Pretty sure now that it has been updated that it is meant to be a evergreen book. At least until they make Pathfinder 2 game in 10 years are so. :)
James Jacobs Creative Director |
If it hasn't gone to the printers yet, what about indicating the date of the extent of the empires indicated on the map if you've retained the 'lost kingdoms map'? For example the map on page 223 of the current campaign setting indicates Jistka, Tekritan (meant to be Tekritanin League?), and Ancient Osirion, which all arose some time after the Earthfall and may well have existed contemporaneously at some point with the indicated boundaries. However Thassilon is also shown on the map, and Thassilon ceased to exist around about the time of Earthfall and is certainly not contemporaneous to the empires in northern Garund.
To further confuse matters Ancient Osirion later expanded its boundaries to encompass part or all of the territory which belonged to the Tekritanin League....
Hmm... This post is starting to seem familiar. Sorry if I've raised it before. Anyway, a date in each kingdom on the lost kingdoms map to indicate when that kingdom had those boundaries would be handy, and if you've already done something like that, just checking.... ;)
It hasn't gone to the printer yet (but hopefully will today), but even if we had weeks left, altering the appearance of the Lost Empires map that much isn't really an option. That map is supposed to show the basic size and shape and location of those ancient empires; in some cases (notably with ancient Osirion) that size fluctuated GREATLY over the centuries, but we don't want to overlap it into the other nations because that would reduce clarity. The text that talks about the lost empires has been expanded to two and a half pages, though, which gives us a lot more info about those kingdoms. But in the end, the book is not about the past, but about the present, and thus we just don't want to spend too much time on that topic.
As for including dates... that too would clutter and overcomplicate the map. We want a simple, visual effect for the map... and we don't want to nail things down with TOO much detail. Same for the world map that appears a few pages before the lost empires map; when and if we do a book that investigates and presents these regions in greater detail, we want to have as much creative room to explore those regions as possible, and that means NOT pinning things down with exact scales (for the world map) or exact dates (for the lost empires map).
EDIT: Been thinking about this more or less constantly since my original post, and adding "circa" dates to the Lost Empires map DOES sound like a good idea. And since the book's not been shipped yet... I'm gonna put those dates in.
But after this evening (or hopefully this afternoon!) it'll be too late for changes!!!
James Jacobs Creative Director |
You almost make me want the book. Maybe sometime down the line I'll pick it up. Here's to hoping it stays in print a good long while. :)
Since this is the first time this book has had the time it needs to become as perfect as possible, and in this case and more importantly, actually has a rules system we control and are confident won't go anywhere or won't change anytime soon... yes. The book will stay in print quite a long time.
(And for folks who aren't quite ready to shell out the full price for the print copy, there's always the ten dollar PDF for the revision-curious.)
Asgetrion |
LoreKeeper wrote:Ah it's a pity that an archetypes per class didn't feature - I think that would've made a good "this is Golarion in classes" exhibition. I certainly would've voted in archetypes over prestige classes.
To paraphrase: prestige classes are old and busted, and archetypes are the new hotness ;)
Well... the four prestige classes we DID put in the book are already established parts of the world, and we use all of them a fair amount in our publications, so updating them is more or less a requirement... if only for ourselves! :)
While archetypes are indeed cool... they also take up a lot of room. There'll be a lot more of them in our rulebooks next year, and I would expect them to be showing up relatively regularly in the Player's Companion line.
Why not a whole Companion book devoted to archetypes and prestige classes? Or even separate books for each?
And I'm still waiting for my 'Haunts & Hazards' -book filled with traps, haunts (although 'Carrion Crown' will help a bit with this) and environmental/terrain stuff (hazards + more terrain features to "spice up" encounters with).
deinol |
Why not a whole Companion book devoted to archetypes and prestige classes? Or even separate books for each?
They already include prestige classes in companions. I suspect archetypes will start showing up more frequently as well. I think they prefer to do books around themes still, so either location or race based books. Races are almost done though, and locations seem to be taking a break to do the religion books for a while.
They may start doing a 'class in Golarion' sort of series in the future, which would be a perfect place to expand on archetypes.
Enlight_Bystand |
Asgetrion wrote:Why not a whole Companion book devoted to archetypes and prestige classes? Or even separate books for each?They already include prestige classes in companions. I suspect archetypes will start showing up more frequently as well. I think they prefer to do books around themes still, so either location or race based books. Races are almost done though, and locations seem to be taking a break to do the religion books for a while.
They may start doing a 'class in Golarion' sort of series in the future, which would be a perfect place to expand on archetypes.
There are several archetypes in the Inner Sea Primer...
Charles Evans 25 |
Charles Evans 25 wrote:If it hasn't gone to the printers yet, what about indicating the date of the extent of the empires indicated on the map if you've retained the 'lost kingdoms map'? For example the map on page 223 of the current campaign setting indicates Jistka, Tekritan (meant to be Tekritanin League?), and Ancient Osirion, which all arose some time after the Earthfall and may well have existed contemporaneously at some point with the indicated boundaries. However Thassilon is also shown on the map, and Thassilon ceased to exist around about the time of Earthfall and is certainly not contemporaneous to the empires in northern Garund.
To further confuse matters Ancient Osirion later expanded its boundaries to encompass part or all of the territory which belonged to the Tekritanin League....
Hmm... This post is starting to seem familiar. Sorry if I've raised it before. Anyway, a date in each kingdom on the lost kingdoms map to indicate when that kingdom had those boundaries would be handy, and if you've already done something like that, just checking.... ;)
It hasn't gone to the printer yet (but hopefully will today), but even if we had weeks left, altering the appearance of the Lost Empires map that much isn't really an option. That map is supposed to show the basic size and shape and location of those ancient empires; in some cases (notably with ancient Osirion) that size fluctuated GREATLY over the centuries, but we don't want to overlap it into the other nations because that would reduce clarity. The text that talks about the lost empires has been expanded to two and a half pages, though, which gives us a lot more info about those kingdoms. But in the end, the book is not about the past, but about the present, and thus we just don't want to spend too much time on that topic.
As for including dates... that too would clutter and overcomplicate the map. We want a simple, visual effect for the map... and we don't want to nail things down with TOO much detail. Same for the world map that appears a few pages before the lost empires map; when and if we do a book that investigates and presents these regions in greater detail, we want to have as much creative room to explore those regions as possible, and that means NOT pinning things down with exact scales (for the world map) or exact dates (for the lost empires map).
EDIT: Been thinking about this more or less constantly since my original post, and adding "circa" dates to the Lost Empires map DOES sound like a good idea. And since the book's not been shipped yet... I'm gonna put those dates in.
But after this evening (or hopefully this afternoon!) it'll be too late for changes!!!
Hurray! <ticks last thing off Campaign Setting 'report/suggest' list> Double check those dates for factual accuracy and pesky typos, then off to the printers!!!! And enjoy your well earned holiday. :)
Asgetrion |
Guys, I bought the 'Inner Sea Primer' and I'm well aware of archetypes in it, and that more will be published in upcoming products; however, if only possible, I'd prefer a tome of archetypes and prestige classes to carrying 20+ slimmer books for gaming sessions. But I can understand why Paizo may be reluctant to do this.
Dark_Mistress |
Guys, I bought the 'Inner Sea Primer' and I'm well aware of archetypes in it, and that more will be published in upcoming products; however, if only possible, I'd prefer a tome of archetypes and prestige classes to carrying 20+ slimmer books for gaming sessions. But I can understand why Paizo may be reluctant to do this.
Pfft you and your love of orderly books, revel in the Chaos.
Vic Wertz Chief Technical Officer |
(And for folks who aren't quite ready to shell out the full price for the print copy, there's always the ten dollar PDF for the revision-curious.)
Don't listen to him—the PDF is only $9.99. James is just trying to execute his hare-brained scheme that involves siphoning all of those rounded-off pennies into his own store credit account. The guy is a criminal mastermind, I tell ya!
Marc Radle |
James Jacobs wrote:(And for folks who aren't quite ready to shell out the full price for the print copy, there's always the ten dollar PDF for the revision-curious.)Don't listen to him—the PDF is only $9.99. James is just trying to execute his hare-barined scheme that involves siphoning all of those rounded-off pennies into his own store credit account. The guy is a criminal mastermind, I tell ya!
And we all know how well that worked for the guys in Office Space!
James Jacobs Creative Director |
James Jacobs wrote:(And for folks who aren't quite ready to shell out the full price for the print copy, there's always the ten dollar PDF for the revision-curious.)Don't listen to him—the PDF is only $9.99. James is just trying to execute his hare-barined scheme that involves siphoning all of those rounded-off pennies into his own store credit account. The guy is a criminal mastermind, I tell ya!
Dang. There goes Criminal Mastermind Plan #421, wherein I stash 1 cent of every PDF sale in a vault deep under Easter Island and then cash those pennies in after another plan strips the world of all OTHER pennies, therefore making the ones I've stashed away super valuable.
KnightErrantJR |
Vic Wertz wrote:Dang. There goes Criminal Mastermind Plan #421, wherein I stash 1 cent of every PDF sale in a vault deep under Easter Island and then cash those pennies in after another plan strips the world of all OTHER pennies, therefore making the ones I've stashed away super valuable.James Jacobs wrote:(And for folks who aren't quite ready to shell out the full price for the print copy, there's always the ten dollar PDF for the revision-curious.)Don't listen to him—the PDF is only $9.99. James is just trying to execute his hare-barined scheme that involves siphoning all of those rounded-off pennies into his own store credit account. The guy is a criminal mastermind, I tell ya!
Its okay James, somewhere along the lines you'd put a decimal in the wrong place and start taking .10 off of every PDF, and someone would notice, and you'd have to have someone burn down the office . . . best to play it safe.
Kain Darkwind |
Lisa Stevens wrote:And that's the reason why I keep giving Paizo my money ;)Kvantum wrote:March now? Seriously? How many delays can this book get?Until it is as great as we can make it. This is a book that we want to keep in print for a LONG time, so taking the extra time to look it over one more time and catching a few more errors is worth it. A lot of companies are willing to sacrifice quality in order to hit deadlines. Not us. I would rather have a book be a lot late than to have it be something that we aren't proud of. And having stayed at work until almost midnight on Friday giving this book the last once-over, I have to say that I am very proud of this book and think it may very well be the single best campaign book I have ever seen. :)
-Lisa
+1. The Paizo quality and thought that goes into every product makes me happy to have spent so much on this stuff. Looking forward to this one.
DM Wellard |
Vic Wertz wrote:Dang. There goes Criminal Mastermind Plan #421, wherein I stash 1 cent of every PDF sale in a vault deep under Easter Island and then cash those pennies in after another plan strips the world of all OTHER pennies, therefore making the ones I've stashed away super valuable.James Jacobs wrote:(And for folks who aren't quite ready to shell out the full price for the print copy, there's always the ten dollar PDF for the revision-curious.)Don't listen to him—the PDF is only $9.99. James is just trying to execute his hare-barined scheme that involves siphoning all of those rounded-off pennies into his own store credit account. The guy is a criminal mastermind, I tell ya!
Didn't Richard Pryor do this in Superman III?
graywulfe |
Vic Wertz wrote:And we all know how well that worked for the guys in Office Space!James Jacobs wrote:(And for folks who aren't quite ready to shell out the full price for the print copy, there's always the ten dollar PDF for the revision-curious.)Don't listen to him—the PDF is only $9.99. James is just trying to execute his hare-barined scheme that involves siphoning all of those rounded-off pennies into his own store credit account. The guy is a criminal mastermind, I tell ya!
It would have worked perfectly if they had not chickened out. Also double checking the code would have helped.
deinol |
I'm just worried about delays for the sake of delays, not for the sake of improving the book. Just so long as "Paizo Time" doesn't start to mean the same thing as "Valve Time". (Exactly when were we supposed to get Half-Life 2: Episode 3 again?)
"Valve Time" has nothing on "Duke Nukem Forever Time". ;)
Jam412 |
Personally i would rather it be a couple of months late and perfect or as near to perfect as a book can get, then rushed and have errors or have James be unhappy with it.
Agreed. As happy as I am to buy this book, I don't want to buy it for a third time in another couple years.
voska66 |
I'm just worried about delays for the sake of delays, not for the sake of improving the book. Just so long as "Paizo Time" doesn't start to mean the same thing as "Valve Time". (Exactly when were we supposed to get Half-Life 2: Episode 3 again?)
There's a half-life episode 3? I gave up on that years ago I guess.
Asgetrion |
Asgetrion wrote:Guys, I bought the 'Inner Sea Primer' and I'm well aware of archetypes in it, and that more will be published in upcoming products; however, if only possible, I'd prefer a tome of archetypes and prestige classes to carrying 20+ slimmer books for gaming sessions. But I can understand why Paizo may be reluctant to do this.Pfft you and your love of orderly books, revel in the Chaos.
Hhohhh... I ignore your pitiful attemps at insulting me, foul succubus! We all know how poor your taste is anyway -- at least when it comes to handsome dwarven male librarians! ;P
Hobbun |
First, glad to hear you are taking the extra time to make sure all the i's are dotted and t's are crossed. The extra effort is truly appreciated.
Question, you said the book went to the printer this week, but due out in March? I did not realize the leeway time was that long between the print run and release?
James Sutter Contributor |
Question, you said the book went to the printer this week, but due out in March? I did not realize the leeway time was that long between the print run and release?
Yeah, printing books (and then shipping them back to us, getting them out to distributors, etc.) takes a lot longer than you'd think!
Kvantum |
First, glad to hear you are taking the extra time to make sure all the i's are dotted and t's are crossed. The extra effort is truly appreciated.
Question, you said the book went to the printer this week, but due out in March? I did not realize the leeway time was that long between the print run and release?
The problems of using a printer in China. The books literally have to take a slow boat from China to get here, then sit at the mercy of customs officials.
Mark Moreland Director of Brand Strategy |
Considering that Paizo hired Mr OCD, sorry, Mark Moreland - I'm kind of feeling safe about Canon Integrity in the new CS book :)
Thanks...I think. ;-) I'm pretty confident we managed to cover all our bases and the ability to revise the book from the previous printing means we had the room and time to incorporate many canon elements defined since Aug 2008 into the book as well.
Gorbacz |
Gorbacz wrote:Considering that Paizo hired Mr OCD, sorry, Mark Moreland - I'm kind of feeling safe about Canon Integrity in the new CS book :)Thanks...I think. ;-) I'm pretty confident we managed to cover all our bases and the ability to revise the book from the previous printing means we had the room and time to incorporate many canon elements defined since Aug 2008 into the book as well.
PET PEEVE: Have the ... umm ... McArtorisms in regards to dragons been stomped out ? Because I was really let down by Dragons Revisited in regard to extend of "dragons mingle with humans all the time, totally" present in that book.
Mazym |
I applaud the addition of dates to the lost empires map. The book is about the present, but important elements of the product line are oriented around investigating the past:
- ruined / lost cities products
- adventure paths and scenarios/modules focused on ancient secrets, ruins, artifacts, and resurrected threats
- a big chunk of the reason the Pathfinder Society exists is to explore the mysteries of the past
- etc.
I've been hoping for good information about the past because there are some lost empires and regions that looked cool as background for PFS scenario submissions. But I didn't want to head down that path without good CS documentation, because of the risk of being canonically incorrect.
James Jacobs Creative Director |
Mark Moreland wrote:PET PEEVE: Have the ... umm ... McArtorisms in regards to dragons been stomped out ? Because I was really let down by Dragons Revisited in regard to extend of "dragons mingle with humans all the time, totally" present in that book.Gorbacz wrote:Considering that Paizo hired Mr OCD, sorry, Mark Moreland - I'm kind of feeling safe about Canon Integrity in the new CS book :)Thanks...I think. ;-) I'm pretty confident we managed to cover all our bases and the ability to revise the book from the previous printing means we had the room and time to incorporate many canon elements defined since Aug 2008 into the book as well.
I have indeed decided that dragons on Golarion generally do not constantly and always mingle with humans; that's actually pretty rare. Nothing in the core hardcover expands upon this (with the notable exception of Hermea, which is pretty cool) unless the interaction between humans and dragons is violent, but nor do we go back and retcon what's in Dragons Revisited. It's just not a route we'll be continuing to follow with dragons much at all in the future.
Gorbacz |
Gorbacz wrote:I have indeed decided that dragons on Golarion generally do not constantly and always mingle with humans; that's actually pretty rare. Nothing in the core hardcover expands upon this (with the notable exception of Hermea, which is pretty cool) unless the interaction between humans and dragons is violent, but nor do we go back and retcon what's in Dragons Revisited. It's just not a route we'll be continuing to follow with dragons much at all in the future.Mark Moreland wrote:PET PEEVE: Have the ... umm ... McArtorisms in regards to dragons been stomped out ? Because I was really let down by Dragons Revisited in regard to extend of "dragons mingle with humans all the time, totally" present in that book.Gorbacz wrote:Considering that Paizo hired Mr OCD, sorry, Mark Moreland - I'm kind of feeling safe about Canon Integrity in the new CS book :)Thanks...I think. ;-) I'm pretty confident we managed to cover all our bases and the ability to revise the book from the previous printing means we had the room and time to incorporate many canon elements defined since Aug 2008 into the book as well.
Hermea is very cool, every time I introduce new players to Golarion I tell them about Hermea, which results in jaws being dropped.
But please, please, avoid the FR syndrome of "for every nice town there's at least one bronze dragon who comes round for Friday night drikinig". Pleeease.
Kelebrar |
Kvantum wrote:March now? Seriously? How many delays can this book get?Until it is as great as we can make it. This is a book that we want to keep in print for a LONG time, so taking the extra time to look it over one more time and catching a few more errors is worth it. A lot of companies are willing to sacrifice quality in order to hit deadlines. Not us. I would rather have a book be a lot late than to have it be something that we aren't proud of. And having stayed at work until almost midnight on Friday giving this book the last once-over, I have to say that I am very proud of this book and think it may very well be the single best campaign book I have ever seen. :)
-Lisa
I really hope that Paizo will continue to produce rpg books of this quality for many years.
I don't own the 2008 edition, so it's a MUST-BUY for me.
James Jacobs Creative Director |
Eric Hinkle |
James Jacobs wrote:(And for folks who aren't quite ready to shell out the full price for the print copy, there's always the ten dollar PDF for the revision-curious.)Don't listen to him—the PDF is only $9.99. James is just trying to execute his hare-brained scheme that involves siphoning all of those rounded-off pennies into his own store credit account. The guy is a criminal mastermind, I tell ya!
Hmm, to pick up the PDF first and see what it's like before going for the hardcover? Or to simply stock up the pennies and get the hardcover, like I know I will?
Decisions, decisions...