![]() ![]()
![]() Dresdran wrote: After a busy week I have returned and I have a rather important question, what exactly would this guy's motives be to go adventuring? Does he believe being an adventurer might lead him to accumulation of enough capital in order to pursue other business or is he doing this because he is down on his luck and is desperate for a cash infusion? Might not even consider it "adventuring". He could easily just consider it aggressive marketing, trade route building, and reclaiming lost wealth... With a bit of competition removal as an added bonus. lol ![]()
![]() Wishcrafter or Impossible bloodline can really up the fact that the fictional butler is always breaking the laws of reality to be/have exactly what their master needs. The other obvious choice would be a Vigilante. Doesn't truly hide the fact that he can wipe the floor with everyone in the room but even those who are close to them forget what they can do more often than not. ![]()
![]() Could do a damaged Song of Extinction (Music Box). Have it so that it can only play X number of times but the PCs don't know it. Very cinematic and deadly but so long as none of the PCs are bards that can learn it while they are in the middle of it then once the music box breaks you don't need to worry about balance anymore. ![]()
![]() Deyvantius wrote:
Back on topic since I derailed it: As with all things involving Paladins doing anything even a little gray I would talk to your GM and give them a summary of what you are wanting to do and why. Mechanically I think you are good but I can see fluff killing you. ![]()
![]() Rysky wrote:
It is stated that Galt is one of her major centers of worship and that her herald was a member of the Red Revolution up until shortly before her death. As it only started about 50 years ago Milani backed it officially until not to long ago if she no longer supports it. I want to say that it was in Hell's Rebels (specifically in the cleric's entry) that it said she was still going strong with members of the Red Revolution but I don't have the book with me to double check so I might be wrong. ![]()
![]() Lorewalker wrote:
Asmodeus, Nethys, and Pharasma at the very least should all know the answer just as part of their portfolios. Actually for that matter literally every Usher and Archdevil should be able to answer it as part of their day to day job function... ![]()
![]() Mangenorn wrote:
I imagine some of that kind of thing is just keeping your head down. A wizard who spends 700 years locked in their study is probably considered less of a threat than the Immortal King who has been openly ruling their country for the last 3 generations. ![]()
![]() johnlocke90 wrote:
"The effects of this infusion may have serious repercussions for a creature suddenly struggling with a new outlook. Many see it as little more than forced insanity, and some good faiths outlaw its use." That is from the Change Alignment discovery and is the closest I could find right off. It is flavor text and could be taken a few different ways but it does imply that it forcefully changes how they think. ![]()
![]() Cuup wrote: I feel like a LG creature would be better friends with a CG creature, but would rather work with a LE creature. Good/Evil axis is leisure, and Lawful/Chaotic axis is business. This feels right to me with any alignment pair. Speaking from working with a very broad range of people I think this is probably the best way to look at it. One of my best friends is almost comically CG. Great guy, love hanging out with him, but I would NEVER voche to have him work with me as I would spend more time cleaning up after him than I would doing my work. By the same token one of my old bosses was always one step away from being criminally abusive to their employees and yet it was my favorite job (most days) because the place ran with clockwork efficiency. ![]()
![]() Kazaan wrote: No, it doesn't look like I actually forgot anything. That thing about not being able to enchant them seems to be a load of hokum. lol Oh I am not arguing that point at all. Just that by the same rulings that have been making this thread a headache they can't be and you should ignore the mound of evidence to the contrary. Response that boil down to "Yes what we just said goes counter to everything else before this but only the newest opinion matters" is where you get people questioning if common sense rulings from before still hold. Doubly so when there is no justification beyond "that is how it was suppose to be from the start". ![]()
![]() You will have a LOT of "does the GM like me?" moments. Honestly for me I would do my best to basically ignore that I have that ability outside of administering the Test to prospective Hellknights. Even with that in place expect to atone more than feels necessary. I have seen GMs try to punish Paladins for going Order of the Torrent which is called out as being very Lawful Good. I can only imagine that it will be more irritating as Order of the Gate which is called out as very Lawful Evil. ![]()
![]() Scott Wilhelm wrote:
Probably because it makes as much sense as the Secret Service agent having to wait till the assassin puts the gun against the President's head before they can take the bullet for them. ![]()
![]() whew wrote:
Related and back on topic: When Lawful Good is played (or forced to play) Lawful Stupid and Chaotic Neutral is played as "roll the dice and see what they do". ![]()
![]() BadBird wrote:
Honestly that sounds like a dick GM... The classic wizard/mage/academic in most stories is going to have a junk charisma score. Hell, anyone walking up to a different culture will automatically come across as "off" just do to the nature of what people view as normal. Making a seemingly direct and active attempt to punish a player because you don't like it as apposed to just saying no go is pretty petty... ![]()
![]() TriOmegaZero wrote: The word "adventurer" is like "trouble-shooter" or whatever you want to compare it to. A general term for someone who deals with the unusual situations that PCs encounter. NPC: So what exactly do you DO for a living? PC: I am an IT Technician. NPC: ...IT Technician? PC: "Issue Termination Technician" It means you give me an issue and I break things in ways you can't even imagine until your issue goes away. NPC: ... PC: So what do you need me to "fix"? ![]()
![]() Person 1: Alright. We need a group of people to kill the bandits in the area, slay the dragon, clean up the graveyard, and preferably do so for next to no money. Person 2: ... So a bunch of homicidal morons? Person 1: Yes but do you want to call someone who can kill a dragon a moron? Person 2: No. I like my head where it is... So what do we say? "Brave knights wanted"? Person 1: Maybe... We might just get more people like the old guy attacking the windmills out back though... Person 2: That's true.... I got it! "Adventures" It sounds glamorous while still meaning does crazy on the cheap. Person 1: Perfect! "Adventures wanted" it is. ![]()
![]() 7. At the end of a battle where you watched your friends all fall before you, you take a fatal blow. As you start to fall into death you watch an enemy warrior cut open your chest so that the last thing you see is your own heart... You and your friends wake the next day, all with near fatal wounds. It seems that the enemy left you for dead and moved on. When you check your chest it is no more injured than the rest of you, so you try and ignore the hollow feeling. The fact that your wounds only seem to bleed when you look at them is harder to ignore... ![]()
![]() Starglim wrote:
My first thought was from Oblivion... "Praying to yourself, my Lord? That's not a good sign. Or perhaps it is. Prince of Madness, and all that." ![]()
![]() Claxon wrote: Well, it would help if you tell us how you reached the +12. I did 8 levels of Gunslinger(Gun Tank) and 8 levels of Hellknight and then took Swift Iron Style. That gives you effectively 6 levels of armor training so when wearing Celestial Plate it gives you a max dex bonus of +12 (+6 from the armor, +2 from Gun Tank, +3 from Hellknight, and +1 from Swift Iron). This thread is actually a lot more interesting thought experiment than I thought it would be. :) ![]()
![]() If you are willing to put the time into it you could try the MMO method. Be the buffer/healer/everyone's best friend and roleplay as the exasperated parent. "You decided it was a good idea to stand in the fire... Again... No, you don't get healed/buffed until you stop wasting them. Now you can sit there and watch the others do good and think about what you did." Might not make everyone happy but it will let you make your point in character while not disrupting the rest of party. Making a small show of limited resources each time can make it more convincing. Just my $0.02 ![]()
![]() As far as describing the different outsiders it is mostly a matter that we have a more developed cultural idea of what Good and Evil look like than we do Law and Chaos. If you want to see how those descriptions have changed take this scene: "The hairs of its head were white, like ice. Its eyes burned with fire, its feet were like burnished bronze, refined in a furnace, and its voice was like the roar of many waters. In its right hand it held seven stars, from its mouth came a sharp two-edged sword, and its face burned to hot to lay eyes on. When I saw it, I collapsed at its feet." Have and NPC say that and I can promise the players will plan for everything other than a lawful good native outsider. (This is a slightly modified version of the how Jesus is described in Revelations.) *edit* The "Four Living Creatures" are even worse. "In the center, around the throne, were four living creatures, and they were covered with eyes, in front and in back. The first living creature was like a lion, the second was like an ox, the third had a face like a man, the fourth was like a flying eagle. Each of the four living creatures had six wings and was covered with eyes all around, even under its wings." ![]()
![]() KainPen wrote:
Armored Spellcasting, Hellknight Aegis, and Signifer Armor Training call Hellknight Armor "any armor with “Hellknight” in the name" so the leather armor would count for those and probably count for anything else that calls for Hellknight armor but doesn't directly say Hellknight Plate. |