Elemental Rage (Su): While raging, all of the barbarian's melee attacks deal an additional 1d6 points of energy damage (acid, cold, electricity, or fire). The type is chosen when the barbarian begins her rage. A barbarian must have the lesser elemental rage power to select this rage power. A barbarian must be at least 8th level to select this rage power. Note that the barbarian can still use her lesser elemental rage power while using this rage power, but she must select a different energy type. Is there any reason that one couldn't use a Shock Weapon and add an additional +1d6 Electricity to the attack? So weapon damage +2d6 Electricity?
"Alignment: Because of their nature as visually duplicitous tricksters, shadowdancers do not fit comfortably into the lawful category, as many use their talents to avoid the eyes of legitimate authority. Yet though they are allies of darkness, shadowdancers are neither inherently evil nor predisposed to good. To them, the darkness is simply the darkness, without any of the usual moral connotations made by the unenlightened." That still means they can be any alignment right? It doesn't flat out say that they cannot be Lawful, but I imagine Lawful Shadowdancers would be rare.
Interzone wrote:
Yeah... I agree... Still a fun idea for a character: Dwarven Brewmaster! :)
Belafon wrote:
I think you can't swap abilities the other archetype swaps. I wish they used the word "MAY" select a power. I don't know... CAN you? lol *Elementary school flashbacks*
Drunken Brute Barbarians are known for their ability to consume potent drink, but drunken brutes turn drinking into a combat tactic, using the potent liquor to fuel their rage and grant them additional powers. A drunken brute has the following class feature. Raging Drunk (Ex): While raging, the drunken brute can drink a potion, or a tankard of ale or similar quantity of alcohol, as a move action that does not provoke attacks of opportunity. A potion has its normal effect, while an alcoholic drink allows the barbarian to maintain her rage that round without expending a round of rage for the day (instead of the alcohol's normal effects). For each alcoholic drink consumed while raging, the barbarian is nauseated for 1 round when her rage expires, in addition to the normal fatigue that follows a rage. Tireless rage does not negate this nauseated condition but the internal fortitude rage power does. This ability replaces fast movement. My question, can a multiclassed Barbarian/Alchemist drink extracts while raging?
pad300 wrote:
I could go either way on it, it'd be nice to have a few extra spells of the 'arcane' variety on my oracle's list, but if it's ever cleared up and I can't, that's fine too.
Tatterdash wrote:
After really looking at the Cleric spell list I've realized that there is little to no point in using Eldritch Heritage to learn a few Arcane spells... There are so many great Divine damage spells, I just never noticed... lol Implosion? Stormbolts? That's insane damage! :)
Tatterdash wrote:
Even an Oracle with Magic Missile would be good fun. The Time Mystery in Ultimate Magic is my favourite thing I've seen yet.
OK, how about if an Oracle wants a familiar, take Eldritch Heritage (Arcane), easy enough. Then Improved Eldritch Heritage, and take the 9th Level Arcane Bloodline power: 'New Arcana (Ex): At 9th level, you can add any one spell from the sorcerer/wizard spell list to your list of spells known. This spell must be of a level that you are capable of casting. You can also add one additional spell at 13th level and 17th level.' Did anyone else's brain just melt? 'For purposes of using that power, treat your sorcerer level as equal to your character level – 2, even if you have levels in sorcerer. You do not gain any of the other bloodline abilities.' 'This spell must be of a level that you are capable of casting.' Technically, is an Oracle capable of casting a Sorcerer/Wizard spell? 'For purposes of using that power, treat your sorcerer level as equal to your character level – 2, even if you have levels in sorcerer.' Help! ;)
When you buy a donkey or mule for example, is it trained for Riding or Heavy Labour? Is a Riding Dog trained for Riding? Is a Horse trained for Riding or Combat Training? Seems a bit weird that you buy an animal but it knows no tricks at all. Was this ever clarified? A stabler selling animals for mounts wouldn't really be doing his job if he wasn't training them. Also, the loads they carry don't line up with the Strength scores of the animal, the chart was copied from 3.5, which didn't line up either.
Shizvestus wrote: I havn't any problems with the game as it is :) Likewise! (Always joining topics late) What I have noticed is that it doesn't matter how powerful a character is, if you roll low it won't usually work out so well. It doesn't matter if you have a weak character, if you roll high it'll usually work out pretty well. I see things like this happen all the time (often when I am a player, some days I cannot roll my way out of a paper bag... lol)
seekerofshadowlight wrote: Oh it needs polished, which is the point of the playtest. But I agree I see no need to scrap it and start over. Yeah... I plan to playtest it a bit soon. I guess I felt bad for the designers, who work very hard to come with an idea that will please as many players as possible and create some new ideas and mechanics, and have it met with such harsh criticism. But I guess this is a necessary situation, and it certainly beats most game designers's "like it or lump it" approach. I guess as a guy who hates confrontation I should be reading something else other than this forum? lol The Magus reminds me of an amped-up Warmage, one must admit the Magus is consderably better than that... Even from the standpoint of the name (Is it just me, or does 'Warmage' sound like the rate at which something warms up?)
I like the Magus! It certainly will be a nice sub for Bladesingers in my campaign. I'm sure there will be some changes, but it doesn't seem as bad as everyone is saying. Thank Mr. Bulmahn and crew! Seriously, I am not trying to be a suck up or anything, I read through and didn't see this massive list of problems lots of people are seeing. It looks fun and I am looking forward to the finished product.
Brogue The Rogue wrote: As Wraithstrike said, if you use your natural attack as part of a full attack action, you can no longer use that limb for any form of attack as a part of that full attack action. I see, so said warforged would have to have "2 slams" as natural attacks to do said attack routine? A bite would work better I guess...
wraithstrike wrote:
Never heard of that, doesn't really make sense for a battlefist (although I must say, some of the Warforged Components are a little vague rule-wise). Technically it doesn't really say a slam is done with a fist anyways, a slam does add 1 1/2 Str bonus, but not if you use it at -5 as a secondary attack. So if you want to do better damage, it's better to slam as a primary attack. Just the idea of slamming and then moving away and shooting is cool.
OK... I know I using some whacky Eberron stuff in this example, but bear with me: A Warforged armed with an Armbow (+2 Repeating Light Crossbow that can be fired with one hand with no penalty and reloading is a free action). Is in melee with something. Can said creature use a full attack action to slam the target in melee (at -5 for using a natural attack in combination with a weapon attack in a full attack action), 5' step back and fire off a full attack's worth of bolts with its Armbow? There has to be some other situations where combining a natural melee attack with a 5' step and continue with ranged attacks might come up. Any thoughts?
armac wrote:
I've heard Neil is an awesome DM, but weirdly, after being in the same gaming community for many many years, we've never been on opposite sides of the table. Always fun to game with that's for sure! Chikken-a-Snak-a! [sp]
VikingIrishman wrote:
Yes... and for some reason I want a candy bar now... lol
Marc Radle wrote:
And being someone who is always a little behind the times, what does "crunch" mean? Is it the same as "fluff" (Which means background story information that has little bearing on the actual rules). Forgive my ignorance, I am so ignorant I don't even know where the terminology list is! lol
Malachi Tarchannen wrote:
I'd like if I could have a feat where I get a re-flip... ;) But yes, I agree with what is being said here, I've never liked the B-word, and I never will.
|