Search Posts
Thanks for the help. I am the GM of the group and so far I haven't invoked cover in this situation when it comes up for ease of play, but after reviewing the cover rules in PC I suddenly am not sure if RAW it should be applied. If you run it that way technically you also have cover in this situation, which is a bit weird (line touches the corner of M): A
Hi everyone, I would like to know if in this example, lesser cover is supposed to be applied to the defender. A - Attacker
All of them are medium-sized creatures. A M
If you draw a line between A and B, the line touches the corners of both minions. Reading the text from Cover in PC 424, it seems B should have lesser cover since both Ms are creatures and not "hard blockers" like a wall corner. Is this correct? Thank you! Part of the Cover rules: "Usually, the GM can quickly decide whether your target has cover. If you're uncertain or need to be more precise, draw a line from the center of your space to the center of the target's space. If that line passes through any terrain or object that would block the effect, the target has standard cover (or greater cover if the obstruction is extreme or the target has Taken Cover). If the line passes through a creature instead, the target has lesser cover. When measuring cover against an area effect, draw the line from the effect's point of origin to the center of the creature's space. See the diagram for examples."
Hello everyone. One of my players has a twisting tree magus, and while playing today's session some questions have popped up, hope you can help me get some clarity: - As a twisting tree magus, she has reach with the staff while using it two-handed. During one of the combats, she attacked an enemy 10 feet away, with an ally standing between her and the enemy. Does the enemy get the lesser cover bonus? (+1 to AC) - One of the enemies in that combat had the Reactive Strike ability and 10-foot reach. When the magus used Spellstrike, the ability triggered because the spell used as part of the Cast a Spell subordinate action had the manipulate trait. The enemy got a critical success on the attack roll. Is the whole Spellstrike disrupted, or just the spell? I can't find anything specific about this on the subordinate actions and disrupting actions sections: Subordinate Actions
Spoiler:
An action might allow you to use a simpler action—usually one of the Basic Actions—in a different circumstance or with different effects. This subordinate action still has its normal traits and effects, but it's modified in any ways listed in the larger action. For example, an activity that tells you to Stride up to half your Speed alters the normal distance you can move in a Stride. The Stride would still have the move trait, would still trigger reactions that occur based on movement, and so on. The subordinate action doesn't gain any of the traits of the larger action unless specified. The action that allows you to use a subordinate action doesn't require you to spend more actions or reactions to do so; that cost is already factored in. Using an activity is not the same as using any of its subordinate actions. For example, the quickened condition you get from the haste spell lets you spend an extra action each turn to Stride or Strike, but you couldn't use the extra action for an activity that includes a Stride or Strike. As another example, if you used an action that specified, “If the next action you use is a Strike,” an activity that includes a Strike wouldn't count, because the next thing you are doing is starting an activity, not using the Strike basic action
Disrupting Actions
Spoiler:
Various abilities and conditions, such as a Reactive Strike, can disrupt an action. When an action is disrupted, you still use the actions or reactions you committed and you still expend any costs, but the action's effects don't occur. In the case of an activity, you usually lose all actions spent for the activity up through the end of that turn. For instance, if you began to Cast a Spell requiring 3 actions and the first action was disrupted, you lose all 3 actions that you committed to that activity. The GM decides what effects a disruption causes beyond simply negating the effects that would have occurred from the disrupted action. For instance, a Leap disrupted midway wouldn't transport you back to the start of your jump, and a disrupted item hand off might cause the item to fall to the ground instead of staying in the hand of the creature who was trying to give it away. - The magus used the Wooden Double spell to reduce damage received by a critical hit. The spell has this trigger: "You're critically hit by a damage-dealing effect or Strike". Am I right by thinking that you need to decide if you cast this spell before knowing how much damage are you taking? I am not sure because the double basically functions as a shield, with some hardness and hitpoints of its own, and I know the step to use shields is when applying damage (that you already calculated). Is this spell intended to be used in the same step as shields? Thanks!
Thank you for the answers! Since my player is a psychic and uses occult spells, I suppose applying the weakness to vitality and his spells (regardless of tradition) is the simplest way to convert it. And it helps psychic excel at its role of damage dealing caster.
Wow how could I miss that? that I think answers my question about damage runes on the ghost touch weapon not being reduced by the incorporeal resist all damage standard ability. About the rest of the rules elements mentioned, I agree with NorrKnekten. There are certain cases where damage is added to the strike, and others where damage is triggered by a Strike but not part of it, and so it is not affected by the Ghost Touch rune. Also, I hope one day we get an official ruling about "instances of damage" :-) Thanks a bunch for the answers!
I had the same problems when I read the spell, too confusing for my taste and a pain in the back to run at the table. In my game I homebrewed a version of the spell that our group found easier to use, based on the earlier text in the playtest: Disappearance [two actions] Spell 8
You shroud a creature from others' senses. The target receives the benefits of a 2nd-Rank invisibility spell, with the following exceptions: - The target is masked by the spell but not really invisible, so spells that reference the invisible condition, like see the unseen, don't work against disappearance. - If the target uses a hostile action, the spell doesn't end. - If a creature has a special sense that would change the state of detection of the target from Undetected or Hidden to Observed, that special sense doesn't work. The target of the spell can still reveal its position depending on the actions it takes, making it Hidden. A creature can also use the Seek action to change the state of detection to Hidden.
Hi everyone. One of my players wants to take this archetype for his character (psychic), and I don't know exactly how to convert part of the "Hallowed Ground" focus spell to be compatible with the remaster. Hallowed Ground [two-actions] Focus 1
This spell also automatically attempts to counteract any attempt to raise undead in the area (if either the undead would appear in the area or the effect's caster or creator is in it). If you Cast this Spell again, any previous hallowed ground you had cast ends. So it is my understanding that the positive damage turns to vitality, and the good damage to spirit (holy) damage. The problem is, I dunno how to convert the "weakness 1 to your necromancy spells while in the area" part. I'm leaning towards applying the weakness to any spell that deals damage to simplify things, but maybe there's a better way to handle it? Thank you.
Hi everyone. This question appeared in our last session as a character with a flaming ghost touch weapon hit a wraith. That creature has the following ability: Resistances all damage 5 (except force, ghost touch, spirit, or vitality; double resistance vs. non-magical) Does a creature with that kind of resistance take full damage only from the weapon damage dice and applies the resist all 5 to the flaming rune, or does it take full damage from both types of damage? Thank you!
As a player I got to max level on a Kingmaker campaign, can't remember if it was 17 or higher. That one was very interesting. We started it using 4Es rules, then changed to 4E Essentials classes and finally we used PF1 rules to end the campaign. Took like 6 years to complete. Aside from that, I have played some one-shots and PFS games but never got far in levels. As a GM I have DM'ed several campaigns, most of them to the maximum level allowed: - Savage Tide with D&D 3.5, I stopped the game at module 3 I believe due to personal circumstances. - finished Red Hand of Doom converted to 4E, then continued with the higher level official Wizards modules up to lvl 21 epic tier I think. Didn't finish the campaign due to burnout. - finished Age of Worms AP converted to PF1 rules, lvl 20. - finished Rise of the Runelords PF1, lvl 18. - finished Wrath of the Righteous PF1, lvl 20/Mythic Tier 10. - finished Dead Suns Starfinder 1E, lvl 13 o 14 I believe. - finished Age of Ashes PF2E, lvl 20. - DMing Blood Lords, lvl 5 at the moment but I plan to finish it at lvl 20n with some mythic lvls added. Success is mainly because of consistency and my particular method to run campaigns. I seek players interested in a long time game commitment and I explain to them why so we know we are on the same page. Basically if they come to the game, I promise them to deliver the full campaign experience customized for the characters' backstories. We play once every week on Sundays. I have 5 players and if at least three of them can make the game, we usually play. I always have some NPCs that are built into the story and fill the missing slot to support the group. Since I do weekly recaps by email after every session, the missing players can keep up with what is happening in game, and also reference those texts to remember names, places, important plot points, etc. I had the same group up to Wrath of the Righteous, then after some abrupt changes in my life I formed another one for Dead Suns onwards. Very happy right now in that regard.
Yeah this ability caught my attention when I read the monster section. IMHO It is pretty bad as written if it is always active, for the reasons already stated. I'll probably change the ability in my games to be something like this: - You can activate it after rolling a saving throw and knowing the degree of success to improve it one step, at the cost of one mythic point. - Change the text of the ability so it reads similar to the abilities characters get with levels to upgrade some of their saving throws: "Mythic Resilience (1st): Choose one save, starting with the creature's highest.It gets the first benefit of this ability: when the creature rolls a success on that save, it gets a critical success instead. The second time the creature gets this mythic ability, you must pick the same save you did the first time. The creature then gets a second benefit: When the creature rolls a critical failure on the selected save, it gets a failure instead. When the creature fails a save against an effect that deals damage, the damage taken is halved. After taking Mythic Resilience with the same save twice, you can select a different save to apply the first benefit. Prioritize the next highest save the creature has."
Thank your for the contributions. As I expected, there is table variation about this and no answer from the designers. I think I'll run hardness as applying once against the total aggregate damage, whatever types it includes. As for Shield Block, I'll allow it to block physical damage only. I'll assume the triggering damage types are those that can be blocked. We can also argue about what counts as an "attack" for the SB trigger, on that front I think I'll allow the players to block things that have attack rolls and deal physical damage. So you can block a Strike or a Telekinetic Projectile but not a Trample or Swallow Whole.
Bumping this once in case someone can help.
Hi everyone. I am looking through the Player Core searching for answers regarding Hardness but there is only a section in the Damaging Objects and Shields that doesn't really explain this: does it apply to damage dealt as a whole, or does it reduce each type of damage separately? I have read on the forums about this and I don't know if it has been clarified or not. I assume it is only applied once, as when shields block damage. For example, lets say an Animated Colossus (Hardness 15) receives an attack that deals 20 bludgeoning and 20 fire damage. How much damage of each type does it take after applying Hardness? 5 bludgeoning and 5 fire, or 5 bludgeoning and 20 fire? Related to that question, does a shield's hardness allow it to mitigate other types of damage besides physical? (bludgeoning, slashing and piercing). The trigger for Shield Block requires taking physical damage from an attack, but doesn't specify in the descripcion that it can only block those three types of damage: "You snap your shield in place to ward off a blow. Your shield prevents you from taking an amount of damage up to the shield’s Hardness. You and the shield each take any remaining damage, possibly breaking or destroying the shield." Thanks!
Thanks a lot for the answers! they are really helpful. For the drink a potion/Stealth situation, I'll allow the player to make a Stealth check as a separate action to remain undetected if the potion was on the PC's body outside of a container (such as the bandolier Claxon mentioned). For the dragon I'll go with the "it's a summoned ally so you shouldn't be afraid of it" ruling.
Hi everyone. In my last game two situations came up, and I would like to get some imput from fellow DMs out there about how you would resolve them. - A character observed by some enemies turned invisible and then used Sneak to move to another position secret Sneak check went well and he became undetected to enemies. Then he took a potion and drank it. Is grabbing/drinking a potion while undetected considered an unobtrusive action? Rules talk about allowing this type of actions with a new Stealth roll to try not to give away your position. I ruled it was unobtrusive so a new Stealth could be rolled. What do you think? - In the same combat, the same character used a Summon Dragon spell (9th) to conjure a lvl 13 Adult Blue Dragon. This creature has the Frightful Presence monster ability: Frightful Presence (aura, emotion, fear, mental) 90 feet, DC 32 This ability doesn't seem to differentiate between allies and enemies, so it should affect everyone inside the aura, but that kinda defeats the purpose of using a summoned dragon... I ruled that the dragon could appear without the aura active to not mess with the PCs, but I have found nothing in the rules to support this. How would you run this? Many thanks.
I'm fine with characters having limitations, but I believe that a newly created ghost without an entry-level environment interaction tool/rule is very problematic, as there are some situations were the ghost would be screwed because neither they nor the other PCs can do anything (see the "you fall into a pit, how do you get out?" example). Ghost touch gauntlets is a nice solution, but I prefer to give the character an innate ability instead of having to rely on an specific item.
I think the important part about Ghostly Grasp is the object interaction, not the advanced undead benefits. Those are not mandatory by any means. Also, Ghostly Grasp and Pass Through don't do the same thing, so the first doesn't get obsolete when you take the second.
Ok, I'll try to answer these since I will have a ghost in my party (I'm the GM), and I honestly believe this archetype needs some thinking on the GM part to make it viable. 1. Yes, with the Arrest a Fall, as the previous poster indicated. 2. RAW you cannot exit the wall using Pass Through, but the Success text in the feat includes a clause that you can also exit using "some other means of moving through a solid object". For my games I am ignoring the slowed 1 text, so you have three actions and can try to exit using Pass Through. 3. RAW no, you cannot climb without that ability. 4. Again, no. And you imagined a pretty favourable situation, since one of your party members can open the door for you. If you are a lvl2 ghost and you fall into a pit, you are pretty much screwed, not even your friends can do anything about it. They can't throw you a rope, you can't climb out of the pit, and I don't think there are teleportation spells/abilities at this level to get the ghost out... you get the idea. 5. I would say that your hand goes through the cup or table. My understanding is that the Pass Through feat exists to allow you to pass objects with the entirety of your body, and the Ghostly Grasp for fine manipulation. At my table I have houseruled that a ghost without Ghostly Grasp can interact with objects in the material plane if the character can concentrate for 10 minutes (same time as if you wanted to turn an item incorporeal to carry it), so outside of combat, with some time you can do on your own most things that a character is expected to be able to do in an adventure. You still need the Ghostly Grasp for the advanced undead benefits, and also to interact more quickly with your environment by rolling Athletics or Thievery, which can be useful in combat. To pass through objects you still need the corresponding feat, although I'm ignoring the slowed 1 part so you can still use the feat again to exit.
Resurrecting this thread since I have some questions as well about this spell... "A cloak of swirling colors shrouds the target. Creatures are dazzled while adjacent to it, and attacking the target causes a brilliant flash of light. A creature that hits the target with a melee attack must attempt a Will save.
The creature is temporarily immune until the end of its turn; this effect has the incapacitation trait." 1- I assume that "the creature is temporarily immune until the end of its turn" means that the attacker only has to save once against the spell even if it makes several attacks against the target protected by the cloak of colors. Is that right? 2- The same line says that the effect has the incapacitation trait. Is it referring to the blinded condition, the stunned condition, both..? Thanks!
Quick update: I sent Paizo CS an email a while ago to see if they could update the original link. I can see the document now even if I'm not logged in GD, so I assume everyone should be able to access it with no problems.
Hello! It seems that after Google Drive updated their policies last year, the link on the document went dead. Here you have it:
Hi everyone. It seems that due to changes in the GD policy, the old link to the WotR document is dead. Several people have asked me to access the document. Here you have the new link.
Dear Paizo CS, Please cancel all my subscriptions (Pathfinder AP and Starfinder AP) ASAP, due to a raise in shipping and taxes on my country it's impossible for me to maintain them. Thank you.
This seems to contradict the sidebar on page 622. It says that if you get stunned on your turn, you don't change the number of actions you have in that moment. This section, unless I am misreading, talks about Stunned (value): Gaining and Losing Actions
If what you are saying is that the Stunned (duration) takes away all your actions for the duration (normal actions, reactions, free actions) and affects you righ away, then we are in agreement. The second paragraph of the same sidebar also seems to exclude Stunned (value) as a condition that takes away your reactions, since it only changes the number of actions you regain: Some conditions prevent you from taking a certain subset of actions, typically reactions. Other conditions simply say you can’t act. When you can’t act, you’re unable to take any actions at all. Unlike slowed or stunned, these don’t change the number of actions you regain; they just prevent you from using them. That means if you are somehow cured of paralysis on your turn, you can act immediately. IMHO the text in the stunned condition is confusing and could benefit from clarification.
I think in the case of stunned it is different if Stunned has a value or a set duration. If your are stunned 1 its the same from a mechanics standpoint as slowed. When you regaint actions at the start of your turn, you lose some actions/all of them depending on the value of the condition. If you are stunned for 1 round, you have no capacity to act during that time, including your reaction. No normal actions, no reaction, no free actions of any kind. The "you can't act" seems to relate to the set duration variation: "If you can’t act, you can’t use any actions, including reactions and free actions." If that would apply to the value version, the number would be meaningless. Stunned 1 would be the same as stunned 3. Maybe I'm reading it wrong. My 2 cents.
Could you please detail a bit how did the combat went? I read about your changes to Veshumirix and Ilssrah (and plan on implementing them). Was the challenge ok? In this edition it seems hard to counter a strategy based on enemies that change terrain at the start and at the end of their turn due to the limits on the Ready action. How did the players dealt with this "lava bomb" tactic? what's your party composition? did the elementals that fight with the dragon proved effective? Many thanks.
Hi Raychael. Thanks for the quick response. Please cancel the clockwork dragon and ship the rest of the order ASAP. Thank you!
Hi. I made this order a while ago. At the time all was ok. Usually Paizo orders take a 2-3 weeks to reach my home, but today I wondered why the order has not arrived yet, and I saw a message on the order regarding the shipping method, a problem that I needed to contact CS to solve. What's the problem? Thanks.
Hi everyone. Reading this spell, I have two questions about it. Hope you can help me. - Can you fulfill the requirement for the contingency to activate by yourself? So the trigger would be something simple but with some details to not worry about triggering it by accident, like "I touch my forehead with two fingers" (goku style). I think the answer to this is yes, but would like to check anyway. - I'm not sure to what is referring the text when it says "During the casting, choose a trigger under which the spell will be cast, using the same restrictions as for the trigger of a Ready action". I have read the Ready action, but it doesn't really talk about restrictions, only that you cannot ready a free action that already has a trigger. Can anyone explain this part of the spell to me? Contingency:
Contingency Spell 7 Abjuration Source Core Rulebook pg. 326 2.0 Traditions arcane Deities Nalinivati, Valmallos Cast 10 minutes (material, somatic, verbal) Duration 24 hours You prepare a spell that will trigger later. While casting contingency, you also cast another spell of 4th level or lower with a casting time of no more than 3 actions. This companion spell must be one that can affect you. You must make any decisions for the spell when you cast contingency, such as choosing a damage type for resist energy. During the casting, choose a trigger under which the spell will be cast, using the same restrictions as for the trigger of a Ready action. Once contingency is cast, you can cause the companion spell to come into effect as a reaction with that trigger. It affects only you, even if it would affect more creatures. If you define complicated conditions, as determined by the GM, the trigger might fail. If you cast contingency again, the newer casting supersedes the older. Heightened (8th) You can choose a spell of 5th level or lower.
Ready Action:
Ready Two Actions Concentrate Source Core Rulebook pg. 470 2.0You prepare to use an action that will occur outside your turn. Choose a single action or free action you can use, and designate a trigger. Your turn then ends. If the trigger you designated occurs before the start of your next turn, you can use the chosen action as a reaction (provided you still meet the requirements to use it). You can’t Ready a free action that already has a trigger. If you have a multiple attack penalty and your readied action is an attack action, your readied attack takes the multiple attack penalty you had at the time you used Ready. This is one of the few times the multiple attack penalty applies when it’s not your turn.
Thanks!
the Interact action explicitly says that you need your hand to do something. You cannot do that if the hand is holding something, unless going by the rules that "something" doesn't take up your hand. The only thing I know that has the manipulate trait and explicitly tells you that you not need a free hand to execute is the somatic component when casting a spell, such as Lay on Hands. The somatic component also covers the spells that require a touch. This is different. In my game I ruled that you need a free hand to touch the recipient of the spell and get the healing. If you have a weapon in hand, you either have to drop it or stow it. One hand is enough, you don't need to free both of your hands. But of course the GM can rule otherwise.
I completely forgot about See Invisibility when I made my post, sorry about that. See Invisibility should be the spell to go in this particular case. Thank you!
My players have talked about this as well. My plan is to let them, and have stronger results based on what they do: - If they use the Consecrate ritual and the help of the cleric of Desna from Breachill, they will be able to use the tree of dreams again, and share the effects of the Dreamstone. - If they go the extra mile and work really hard, like summoning a desna-related celestial with planar binding to help with the repairs, I'll allow them to benefit from a vision, similar to the ones you could have with the tree of nightmares, but with different mechanics. Basically if they rest in the beds near the tree, I'll allow them a Will save with a DC based on their level at the moment +8 or +10 (still deciding), and on a success (only one vision per adventure), they'll get a small glimpse of things to come, that can help them with some difficult encounters. My 2 cents.
Hi everyone. I have an encounter I'll have to run some sessions away. This encounter features the monster Poltergeist. This creature has the following ability: Natural Invisibility A poltergeist is naturally invisible. It becomes visible only when it uses Frighten. Since my casters have True Seeing, I'm wondering how this two game elements interact if they cast the spell in combat. True Seeing:
True Seeing Spell 6 Divination Revelation Source Core Rulebook pg. 378 2.0 Traditions arcane, divine, occult, primal Bloodlines diabolic, genie Cast Two Actions somatic, verbal Duration 10 minutes You see things within 60 feet as they actually are. The GM rolls a secret counteract check against any illusion or transmutation in the area, but only for the purpose of determining whether you see through it (for instance, if the check succeeds against a polymorph spell, you can see the creature's true form, but you don't end the polymorph spell). Natural Invisibility doesn't have the illusion keyword, but it is basically a permanent invisibility effect... would you allow for true seeing to work against it? for the record, these poltergeists are more powerful than the one in the Bestiary. Thanks.
Hi CS folks, Today I have tried to make a new order, using the holidays promo code. When I reach the 4th step in the checkout, the system doesn't correctly display the 10% discount from Paizo for the shipping, and the 10% discounto from the promo code. Reading the terms&conditions, both should apply, unless I'm missing something. Could you please take a look at this so I can place the order? Thank you!
The spell only describes how it works against spells and magic items, and the "target" section is quite clear, so in my games I only allow to use it that way. I think the "effect" word may be a fragment of an earlier draft of the spell before the rules were finalized.
Thanks guys!
Hi everyone. A player of mine has asked me a question about this two game elements and the order of resolution in a situation where both apply. I have tried searching the internet for answers but I find nothing on this specifically. Imagine two PCs. One of them has a shield raised, it is hit by an enemy, and uses Shield Block. This PC has another ally, a champion, that is in range and uses Retributive Strike to reduce the damage of the attack. How do you resolve this? wich one goes first, Shield block or Retributive Strike? Thanks! Shield Block:
Shield Block Reaction Feat 1 General Source Core Rulebook pg. 266 2.0 Trigger: While you have your shield raised, you would take damage from a physical attack. You snap your shield in place to ward off a blow. Your shield prevents you from taking an amount of damage up to the shield’s Hardness. You and the shield each take any remaining damage, possibly breaking or destroying the shield. Retributive Strike: Retributive Strike Reaction Champion Source Core Rulebook pg. 107 2.0 Trigger: An enemy damages your ally, and both are within 15 feet of you.You protect your ally and strike your foe. The ally gains resistance to all damage against the triggering damage equal to 2 + your level. If the foe is within reach, make a melee Strike against it.
After reviewing the quarry, I wanted to improve the areas where the giants live, and got some ideas after reading the Minderhal article in the Giantslayer AP. What I'll probably do is modify the room where Jaggaki is, so it has runes hidden in the walls that you can use to activate the portal to Stonepeak (Minderhal's realm). Jaggaki has procured himself some sacred stones (required for the ritual), but he seems incapable of using them. the critical part is the order of activation of the runes hidden in the walls, and that you need to sing a paean to Minderhal while doing it to complete the ritual. So depending on how the PCs play this part, and if they roll well enought to investigate the cave and deduce its purpose and what's needed, they may be able to open the portal(aiding Jaggaki, or after defeating him). That will summon Great Elder Iuu (Minderhal's Herald), accompanied by some fiendish stone giants. My group ALWAYS try to socialize with NPCs (and they passed the checks to recognize the symbols that Canton Jhaltero saw in the quarry before he closed it, so they know more or less the ), so I suspect this will be a social encounter that the PCs can use to get an edge against the Triad. If the conversation with Iuu goes well, he may gift them a lesser version of Anfaru to use temporarily, until they "clean" the quarry and leave the chambers of Minderhal to new generations of stone giants. If things don't go well, Iuu will rebuke them and tell them not to activate the portal again or suffer a severe punishment. If thing go SUPER WELL, maybe Iuu will offer to teach the group about creating some magic items in their next downtime. I have a halfing druid with an affinity for stone and the Magical Crafting feat, so I think this will be a cool opportunity for him to get some interesting formulas. If Jaggaki is still alive and the portal opens... well, that can lead to an interesting situation since the lich is not a follower of Minderhal and only want to summon devils from Stonepeak to fullfill his own agenda. If the players know this, maybe they will use it to gain Iuu's trust in the conversation.
Hi everyone. I'm not sure how to resolve the following situation, hope you can help me: You have a character that has the wounded 3 condition. An enemy knocks the character unconscious by attacking and dealing enough damage to reduce the PC to 0 hitpoints. Can the PC spend a hero point through Hero Recovery to avoid gaining the dying condition, wich will put it at dying 4 (dying 1 + wounded 3), killing it instantly? The thing that makes me doubt if this is possible is the fact that Heroic Recovery requires the dying value to increase. Does it count as an "increase" if you go from normal status to dying 1? Just to be clear, in this example the character doesn't have any feat or game element that affects the standard value of the dying condition that it can acquire before dying. Thanks! Heroic Recovery:
Heroic Recovery Source Core Rulebook pg. 460 If you have at least 1 Hero Point (page 467), you can spend all of your remaining Hero Points at the start of your turn or when your dying value would increase. You lose the dying condition entirely and stabilize with 0 Hit Points. You don’t gain the wounded condition or increase its value from losing the dying condition in this way, but if you already had that condition, you don’t lose it or decrease its value. Wounded Condition: Wounded Source Core Rulebook pg. 623 2.0 You have been seriously injured. If you lose the dying condition and do not already have the wounded condition, you become wounded 1. If you already have the wounded condition when you lose the dying condition, your wounded condition value increases by 1. If you gain the dying condition while wounded, increase your dying condition value by your wounded value. The wounded condition ends if someone successfully restores Hit Points to you with Treat Wounds, or if you are restored to full Hit Points and rest for 10 minutes.
I see no problem here. I did the same as you, and considered the gold taint magical in nature, and the arsenic statblock just a guidance about how the taint affects a body. It worked perfectly. My players don't look at gold the same way anymore after finishing this part :-) As for the wizard knowing about the flaw... well, he may not know the specifics and just have a theory. My players thought about that on their own when the ekujae told them their legend, after seeing for themselves the manifestation of Dahak and the damage inside Huntergate.
We have played two more sessions, and as I predicted, the PCs defeated the sixth and seventh floors, and then retreated because they were depleted of resources. Barushak and his minions fled, and now I'm thinking about how to position this new forces in the quarry. - The two scarlet triad thugs will be in the trail (area J1) watching over the tunnel. They know they have enemies, and Laslunn is smart. There is no way that they will leave this part undefended. This two guys will periodically switch positions with those in areas J3-J4, so there will be gaps in the defense that smart players can exploit. - Barushak will be with Laslunn in J11. For ease of play on my side, I will change his summon spells with other spells. He can do some nasty things by throwing a wall of force and using collective tranposition (teleportation effects work through the wall) to bring the PCs he wants to the other side, so his allies can defeat them more comfortably. I you were to change his summon spells, wich spells will you add? I'm looking for some suggestions. At one point I thought about substituting the velstracs that accompany him for a stronger monster (a hellcat or a more powerful kyton like a sacristan), but right now I lean toward keeping the three evangelists and making them elite (7th lvl, so they shouldn't be a big problem for 11th level characters). Again, any suggestions about this will be appreciated. - I don't know what to do about the rakshasas that appear in the Longroads coffehouse. My party never got to the place to experience the encounter, only the aftermath. For my game I have established that Vaklish and his two rakshasa cronies went to the Terapasillion, and there did a ritual that allowed them to tap into the remnants of Barzillai by using his original mace as a focus. Maybe the two rakshasas went back to this place and won't appear at the quarry? If you had this same situation, will you use them in the quarry? where? The mace will be in Vaklish posession, so if the PCs defeat him, they can undo the ritual at the Terapasillion to stop the remnants/hauntings from appearing ever again. Also, I noticed that the module doesn't describe how high are the exterior walls of the quarry. Smart PCs may want to climb them to have a tactical advantage or to do some scouting. I'm thinking 50-60 ft. should be enough. What do you think?
Hi everyone. So after the new errata you define all your carried items in one of three categories: held, worn, and stowed Is there something preventing a character from declaring every item as worn? (aside from DM intervention). The only limit seems to be the max. 2 Bulk on worn tools, and I assume every character will stow some items inside their backpack to benefit from the "2 free bulk". Is this how it is supposed to work from now on? Thanks!
So it seems that RAW you keep all your racial traits except those that are specifically disallowed by the spell, such as attacks other than what the beast form you adopt allows.
Hi everyone. I think this may be a stupid question, but I would like to check if I'm right about this. So in my game I have a halfling druid. He casts the spell Animal Form. Does he lose access to heritage mechanics, like Keen Eyes? Does he lose access to the Halfling Luck feat? I think the answer to both is no he doesn't, by reading the spell and the polymorpth trait rules. He gains the animal trait and that's it. Maybe I'm missing something. Thanks! Polymorph Trait:
Polymorph Source Core Rulebook pg. 635 1.1 These effects transform the target into a new form. A target can’t be under the effect of more than one polymorph effect at a time. If it comes under the effect of a second polymorph effect, the second polymorph effect attempts to counteract the first. If it succeeds, it takes effect, and if it fails, the spell has no effect on that target. Any Strikes specifically granted by a polymorph effect are magical. Unless otherwise stated, polymorph spells don’t allow the target to take on the appearance of a specific individual creature, but rather just a generic creature of a general type or ancestry. If you take on a battle form with a polymorph spell, the special statistics can be adjusted only by circumstance bonuses, status bonuses, and penalties. Unless otherwise noted, the battle form prevents you from casting spells, speaking, and using most manipulate actions that require hands. (If there’s doubt about whether you can use an action, the GM decides.) Your gear is absorbed into you; the constant abilities of your gear still function, but you can’t activate any items.
Animal Form: Animal Form Spell 2 Polymorph Transmutation Source Core Rulebook pg. 317 1.1 Traditions primal Deities Angazhan, Cernunnos, Geryon, Kazutal, Lamashtu, Stag Mother of the Forest of Stones, Wadjet Cast Two Actions somatic, verbal Duration 1 minute You call upon primal energy to transform yourself into a Medium animal battle form. When you first cast this spell, choose ape, bear, bull, canine, cat, deer, frog, shark, or snake. You can decide the specific type of animal (such as lion or snow leopard for cat), but this has no effect on the form's Size or statistics. While in this form, you gain the animal trait. You can Dismiss the spell. You gain the following statistics and abilities regardless of which battle form you choose: AC = 16 + your level. Ignore your armor's check penalty and Speed reduction.
You also gain specific abilities based on the type of animal you choose: Ape Speed 25 feet, climb Speed 20 feet; Melee Single Action fist, Damage 2d6 bludgeoning.
Heightened (3rd) You instead gain 10 temporary HP, AC = 17 + your level, attack modifier +14, damage bonus +5, and Athletics +14.
The fact that the wall has AC and hardness proves that you can attack it. And as such, even if objects can pass through (as they obviously don't have to make a save) someone's weapons will not if he believes in the wall. It's the magic of illusions! My thoughts exactly. Also, regarding the defensive capacity of the invisible wall, I noticed that objects in the CRB don't have immunity to critical hits or precision damage (pg.273 in the Core Rulebook), so I think the reasoning posed earlier that the wall should be immune to crits/precision because it is an inanimate object is not correct. Heck, this wall is not even an object, it only exist in your mind after seeing someone mime it! I'm not a number-cruncher, but it may be important for the balance of the game that this cantrip wall doesn't have the same immunities as other wall spells that require spending slots.
I think they believe there is a invisible wall where there is none; not that they cannot do anything about it with the weapon in hand. If the intent of the wall is to act as a "demoralizing barrier" as you say, the description probably would say something like "the enemies believe the wall is impenetrable and cannot take offensive actions against it". Or something like that. Also the fact that the spell tells you the AC, Hardness and hitpoints means IMHO that enemies should be able to interact violently with the imaginary wall if they don't disbelieve it. You may argue that a specific enemy may not know what spell it is dealing with, and because of this lack of knowledge, tries to avoid the wall instead of hitting it to destroy it. But I think that is a different type of discussion that depends on the type of creature/personality/background.
Thank you for answering all the questions, much appreciated!
I'm not sure I follow your reasoning here. The wall is invisible and if you are a bad guy you can clearly see your enemies (the PCs) on the other side of it. I honestly can't think of a reason why you can't fire a bolt at it, as you could against a Wall of Force for example, to take it down and reach them. Even if there are no PCs in sight, the enemy might just want to take the wall down to keep moving, because (insert reason for bad guy to move from point A to point B)
Hi everyone. The bard PC in my group has taken this cantrip, and after reading it I have some questions about how to run it correctly. I think it is quite open to interpretation, and I would like to know how other GMS run/adjudicate it. House of Imaginary Walls:
House of Imaginary Walls Cantrip 5 Uncommon Bard Cantrip Composition Illusion Visual Source Core Rulebook pg. 386 1.1 Cast Single Action somatic Range touch Duration 1 round You mime creating an invisible 10-foot-by-10-foot stretch of wall adjacent to you and within your reach. The wall is solid to those creatures that don't disbelieve it, even incorporeal creatures. You and your allies can voluntarily believe the wall exists to continue to treat it as solid, for instance to climb onto it. A creature that disbelieves the illusion is temporarily immune to your house of imaginary walls for 1 minute. The wall doesn't block creatures that didn't see your visual performance, nor does it block objects. The wall has AC 10, Hardness equal to double the spell's level, and HP equal to quadruple the spell's level. - The spell creates "an invisible 10-foot-by-10-foot stretch of wall adjacent to you and within your reach". The description seems ambiguous regarding how thick it is. Should it be a 10-foot length/5-foot width/10-foot high wall? (4 squares in total) or is it a 10x10x10 wall? (8 squares in total) - "The wall is solid to those creatures that don't disbelieve it, even incorporeal creatures". Ok, so according to the general rules regarding illusions (Core Rulebook pg.298), if a creature tries to step through the invisible wall, it should roll a Perception check against the caster Spell DC (this cantrip is not a mental effect, so Will shouldn't be used). Is this correct? - Are the caster's allies affected by the wall by default? It seems they are not affected because they are given a choice to consider the wall solid when that is beneficial in some way. - The description says that "The wall doesn't block creatures that didn't see your visual performance, nor does it block objects". So, if an enemy fires a crossbow through the wall, does it have to roll Perception to disbelieve (the bolt interacts with the wall), or does the bolt go through the invisible wall unimpeded? I use a crossbow as an example, but this question should apply to any weapon that can reach a character on the other side of the wall. I think the general question should be: is there a difference between an object wielded by a creature and an object that is not wielded when establishing if the object ignores the wall or not? - The last part of the spell talks about the statistics (AC, Hardness, and HP). However, unlike most of the other "wall" spells that I have read, it doesn't say that the wall is immune to critical hits and precision damage, so I assume you can crit it and also deal sneak attack damage. Is this correct? Thanks!
Yeah, my idea is to reinforce the quarry with Barushak & co. Regarding the slaves, as you said, I think he values them for the money. If the slavers can exit Kintargo in the night to go to the quarry, Barushak would surely keep the slaves. As xcmt suggested, Laria will escape. Where she ends and how the characters will meet her, that depends on how the game flows. Killing the prisoners is an extreme measure that Barushak may use depending on how the characters try to deal with the tower. I think that's what the adventure comments when it says that he will strike some kind of deal (this was cut in the final draft, it seems). The other thing to keep in mind is what happens in the other two locations: Lady Docur's and Long roads Coffeehouse. I think if my players have too much trouble, maybe Mialari will end up in Tanessen Tower to help them fight the Triad, after interrogating or releasing the slavers by herself. As for the rakshasas and barzillai spectres in the Coffeehouse, after one or two hours, the rakshasas will probably relocate to the quarry, reinforcing it. The spectres I don't know... maybe I'll keep them were they are, and the characters will face them as stated in the module; or maybe the city guards will find out about the situation (at some point someone has to notice the strange things happening inside the coffeehouse) and deal with it, of course with some deaths. The PCs will find about this when they visit the location and talk to a pair of guards that keep the place closed until a group of clerics from the city guard can "declare it clean" from the supernatural apparitions. This is something I'll have to think about for my next session.
Any thoughts on what y'all would do if your players defeated the lower and middle floor of Tanessen Tower and then decided to leave for an eight hour rest? I'm on the same boat as you. My party reached Tanessen tower after the fight with the gelugon (following the trail, their rolls were high enough) and bypassed the sixth floor (the enemies didn't detect them). They were discovered by golems on the seventh floor, and right now they hare dealing with the 3 poisoners and one golem (the other was defeated). Since they have made a a lot of noise, and one of the poisoners called for help, the whole tower is on alert. I think Deadmanwalking's is the way I'll approach the situation if the party defeats the sixth and seventh floor, and then run away to rest. The fight in Sunset Imports and Kite Hill took quite a lot of resources from them so I see it as the most probable situation, although it may be that my players will try to finish the tower and deal with Barushak because they expect consecuences for their actions.
|
