![]()
![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() This is a more than reasonable response. The training, survey, and heightened sensitivity towards transphobia should be more than enough to correct the hostile environment, which does NOT seem widespread to begin (notably, most Paizo employees are as shocked and horrified as us). I've been at a company that had a hostile culture similar to this and we instituted similar policies. Additionally, we created a liason team between managers and the employees (I was one such employee). It solved our culture problem within a year or two, requiring that management took it seriously. I tend to stick with reform over punishment when referencing accountability and this is a big step in the right direction. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() It is impossible to make an unbiased judgment on her claims. I will say that I do not appreciate that the piece reads like a gossip column, which undermines the real claims. That being said, that doesn't invalidate the very serious allegations. I will watch to see how Luis, Mark, Eleanor and other staff behave following the departure (and if they stay). ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Elfteiroh wrote: Just a warning: Currently, that module have been broken by the most recent Foundry update, and the module creature is working on it, but have limited time to do so, so we don't have any timeline on when it will be fixed. Poor creature working so hard. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() James Jacobs wrote:
I will buy, not only because it is awesome, but because I'm ready for more juicy secrets. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() 1) Tome of Magic: Feat Options/Archetypes for Spellcasters (Wizards & Witch - Something to give up familiar options for hex cantrips beyond level 1) 2) Lost Omens: Everything Setting - Jalmeray & Beyond 3) Book of Monsters: Playable monster classes/archetypes a la Savage Species... ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Witch is the most conservative of the new classes and the most boring. It didn't capture the essence of the 1e witch and its decided shtick (familiar) isn't that interesting. The witch should get way better scaling hex cantrips and more of them introduced as they level. Focus powers are what everyone else does. Such a disappointment. EDIT: This can be fixed by feats; than God the core system is so good. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Mellored wrote:
I really love this. Is there a way to make all your forks magical? ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Claxon wrote:
Usually trying to min/max some way to get pounce (or its off brand), to be honest. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Zapp wrote:
I'm most certainly not one of those posters (I lurk), but I find the entire accusation offensive. People who disagree with you are not Paizo apologists trying to subvert the truth. Perhaps balance is a bit subjective and there isn't some universal truth? ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() KrispyXIV wrote:
Sure, if you want to exclude traits and feats and archetypes you feel are "gamey" and "min/max", you're right. Of course, if you don't, it's not even close and the OP is right. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() oholoko wrote:
Ah, duh, thanks! ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() I'm a little confused; can non-casters gain access to Halycon spells? If so, how do they prepare them? This is in reference specifically to the Halycon Speaker Dedication. The Attendant dedication gives them training in spell rolls, but does not specify whether they are spontaneous or prepared (or simply have in their repertoire). I'm assuming they can't get them, but just checking. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() This is a great series. I've tried Oblivion Oath (needs more aggressive players), Critical Role, Acquisition Incorporated, and some others, but they've really never garnered my attention. This one, I think, is something that I'd want to listen to long term. It's a shame it's only 8 episodes. Also, Omelette is amazing. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Marco Massoudi wrote:
I quite enjoyed "The World's Largest Dungeon". There can be opportunities to RP in a dungeon. I would reconsider declaring what other players enjoy; I, a player of 25+ years, enjoy a good hack and slash every now and then. I would love a Castlemaker AP and I know my players would as well. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() keftiu wrote:
I would also highlight that they gain access to spellcasting, particularly transmutation and illusion spells. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Xenocrat wrote:
Reign of Kiwi campaign incoming. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() kaid wrote: I was not subbed I preordered all three books right when they first became available. It looks like due to that they held the other two books until this one becomes available. In the customer service thread a few other people responded to me that they had basically the same issue. I did the same. They moved my Lost Omens World Guide to a "sidecart" after I noticed the delay, which allowed my other material to be delivered prior to release. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() NemoNoName wrote:
No problem. I was trying to be helpful and show you that Pathfinder still lets you do any wacky builds you want, like a wizard with a dogslicer at level 1 that is almost as effective as any other class at it. Imo, Wizards are such nerds that they need to do extra work to catch up. I think that Wizards will still be quite powerful, especially with the 10 minute spell slot switch ability (Spell Substitution). Either way, I reserve final judgment until I see one in action. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() NemoNoName wrote:
Actually, your claim was that it was useless. I showed you this was not the case. Then you moved the goal posts and said you didn't want a feat tax. Now you're trying to argue semantics about what we call classes to prove your point? The fact is, it's not useless. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() NemoNoName wrote:
How is that useless? To help you, weapon proficiency and fighter multiclass exist if you want battle wizard. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Alchemist 23 wrote:
As you say, melee classes are all about hitting things. Maybe you're looking for something like the Book of 9 Swords? The danger then becomes melee being too similar to magic. I, personally, wouldn't mind the option, though. As for class locking feats, they'd feel even more the same if everyone had access to the same feat pool. Monk with crane style and shield has pretty high AC, as does anyone with expert armor. Anyone could take this style by level 4 wth multiclassing.
|