Kellid

ConanTheGrammarian's page

32 posts. Alias of quibblemuch.


RSS


Vanykrye wrote:
In 1980 Yoda was pretty controversial too.

To talk wrongly our children teach he did! Future generations, suffer will they from OSV awkwardness! The worst muppet, was he.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Ah yes, of course. The ancient code of noble Japanese yardwork... bushido.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Ed Reppert wrote:
DungeonmasterCal wrote:
Serpent Kingdoms is one of the only Realms specific books I own from 3.5.
One thing I've never understood: how can there be more than one "only"? :-)

Natural language != mathematical language.

Same reason something can be the "most" unique. Or how double (or quadruple or more) negatives can add emphasis instead of cancelling each other out like arithmetic terms. The algorithms that let you generate sentences allow for meanings to be conveyed beyond the strictest limits of geometrical precision.

Now, if you'll excuse me *hefts greatsword* I'm off to savagely split some English infinitives.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

The only character class that should be spell-less are barbarians. NONE OF THIS LITERACY NONSENSE!

I'll show myself out...


People who use “methodology” as a synonym for “method.”


5 people marked this as a favorite.

I believe it's a vigorous form of calligraphy. Using one's fists, dipped in ink.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
DeathQuaker wrote:

It really annoys me when people confuse nominative versus objective pronouns, but it especially irritates me when people "correct" what SHOULD be the objective to the nominative thinking it makes them sound smarter. GRRRR!

/grammar nerd

Confession: Sometimes I'll say "whom" even when it's wrong, just because I like sounding like an Ent.

Also, have you seen The Oatmeal's take on who/whom?


3 people marked this as a favorite.
TriOmegaZero wrote:
People who try to police other peoples grammar.

Police?

No.
Crush your solecisms, see them driven before me, and hear the weeping and lamentation of their women?
Mebbe.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Fallout Rampage Cap'n Yesterday wrote:
I sold Trashcan Carla 2 Fatmans, that was safe, I'm sure.

2 Fatmen. You might be wandering a post-apocalyptic wasteland hocking hand-held weapons of nuclear destruction, but let's not forget the little things like correct plurals.


9 people marked this as a favorite.
Sara Marie wrote:
Let's not get to carried away with spelling or grammar derails in product discussion threads.

HRNGH!

Ok... *slinks off dejectedly*


1 person marked this as a favorite.

*eye twitch*


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Cliche British Guy Sipping Tea wrote:
Vidmaster7 wrote:
I don't feel like my posts get enough favorites I think we should enforce more favoriteing. I'm just saying I'm hilarious
Maybe you just neede to put moure u's evrywheure and tack on more unnecessary e's on the ende of everye wourd, like a true Englishman.

I believe it's spelt Eungluishmuan, guvnor.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Oblivious Plotholes wrote:

I've found every class is viable.

If you do EXACTLY as I say.

And another thing! What's with the use of the word "viable" to mean "works better than anything else in that slot"?! When people demand that something be "viable" all they're asking for is that you can play it without guaranteed failure. "Viable" is literally the lowest bar there is above "entirely non-functional". IT DOESN'T MEAN AWESOME!!! HRNGH!

Where's Tableflip's meditation app, aromatherapy candle, and inspirational cat poster?!


4 people marked this as a favorite.

"After countless incarnations spun out by the wheel of fate, after being kings and insects and gods and bodhisattvas, after having sampled every experience a being can experience, after dwelling in the bliss of nirvana for ten billion billion years and suffering in the pyres of hell for that long as well, I have concluded that I got it right the first time: The greatest thing is to crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of their women."


That which belongs to you not what?


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Master Han Del of the Web wrote:
A 'soul' is not a biological component.

Fun fact: The word "animal" is the adjectival form of the Latin "anima" meaning "soul" (translation of Greek psyche). The Latin translation of Aristotle's "On the Soul" (Περὶ Ψυχῆς) was titled "De Anima" and is not a metaphysical treatise at all. Rather, it is a work of biology, discussing the different kinds of souls that various living things have. It's clear that at least some authors of antiquity believed the soul to be a physical/biological entity (see: Augustine's discussion of whether you've cut a worm's soul up when you cut the worm up into pieces and the individual pieces remain animated).

#TheMoreYouKnow


4 people marked this as a favorite.

Wise => wizard is a mistaken folk etymology.

The word wizard correctly derives from OE "weosian", meaning "to dry up, shrivel", related to German "verwesen" (to decay, to rot) and Modern English "wizened." It refers to the fact that wizards dump Strength, can't do a push-up to save their lives, and, no matter what the Age line on the character sheet says, appear as shriveled and spotted as year-old-potatoes.

#TheMoreYouKnow


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Klorox wrote:
Clement of Alexandria said 'barbarian' to mean 'pagan' pejoratively, he's not representative of pre christian thought.

Given the paucity of primary sources, can anyone really be said to be representative of the era?

I mean, aside from Agatharchides. That guy was, like, all up in that Hellenism, what what?


miscdebris wrote:
ConanTheGrammarian wrote:
O.J. Pinckert wrote:
The best way to make players say "Oh F-"... As they are looking around, calmly say "You hear an audible click..."

My players would point out that you can't, by definition, hear an inaudible click. They would then ask if they saw any invisible people or smelled any non-olfactory odors.

At this point, someone would break into "To Dream the Impossible Dream," substituting "To Hear the Inaudible Click!"

And then I would probably be the one saying "oh f---".

Because that. Is how. We roll.

Emphasis mine. (Your username demanded correction. heh)

That was my point. If you hear it, the click is by definition audible. Therefore, they would have pointed out that any click that is heard doesn't need that adjective, unless I was implying by using an adjective that it was necessary. And since the only other alternative for kinds of clicks, vis a vis hearability, is "inaudible," they would excessively mock me by pretending to hear an inaudible click at every turn.

Lousy pedants...

:)


2 people marked this as a favorite.
O.J. Pinckert wrote:
The best way to make players say "Oh F-"... As they are looking around, calmly say "You hear an audible click..."

My players would point out that you can't, by definition, hear an inaudible click. They would then ask if they saw any invisible people or smelled any non-olfactory odors.

At this point, someone would break into "To Dream the Impossible Dream," substituting "To Hear the Inaudible Click!"

And then I would probably be the one saying "oh f---".

Because that. Is how. We roll.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
WormysQueue wrote:
Hythlodeus wrote:
Now I'm curious. Can you provide examples? anecdotes? I always love stories about the Deutsch-Österreichische Freundschaft
I'm sorry, but I have nothing specific ready, it's probably too long that I was part of those discussions. I think I remember that Lastwall would serve as a good example (that ended up as Finismur in the german version , which is ironically more of a latinization than a german translation), but I can't remember any alternative suggestions. I think generally that brainstorming location names brought us some laughs, because those differ heavily between northern germany and southern germany/Austria.

I'd imagine that in the north if you rolled a 1, the situation would be serious, but not hopeless. Whereas in the south, it would be hopeless, but not serious...


6 people marked this as a favorite.
PossibleCabbage wrote:
I guess we can talk about Oprahs.

What would be the collective noun for a group of Oprahs?

EDIT: Figured it out. A host. A host of Oprahs.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
SilvercatMoonpaw wrote:
Theconiel wrote:
My daughter calls me "a dirty prescriptivist" for such rants.
Incidentally what would be the correct plural if we were to go by the Greek system?

It would be dirty prescriptivists.


4 people marked this as a favorite.
WormysQueue wrote:
ConanTheGrammarian wrote:
Huh. I wonder if they could reverse-translate. Like the German version would have 'Geist' for the 'ghost' bestiary entry, but then put 'Ghost' for the 'geist' bestiary entry...

When I was part of the translation team for the Pathfinder products...

...Add to that that we had team members from different parts of Germany (and Austria), which makes sometimes for a very different kind of vocabulary, and things could get very hilarious during those meetings.

I bet! I used to have to worry about that kind of thing for work all the time. And it only gets more wacky when machine translation gets involved. Trying to figure out which grammatical construction would offend the fewest languages when we plugged it into translation software gave me no end of headaches... :)

By the end of every project, the whole team was so punchy from going over the words, that I'm pretty sure none of us was speaking any known language--it had all become just noises and symbols. This may explain why comprehend languages is one of my favorite fantasies...


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Fabius Maximus wrote:
I personally am annoyed by Paizo just taking words that mean 'ghost' from different languages and apply them to their critters. We already have a 'Geist' in the German translation, thank you very much.

Huh. I wonder if they could reverse-translate. Like the German version would have 'Geist' for the 'ghost' bestiary entry, but then put 'Ghost' for the 'geist' bestiary entry...

...and I'm sure that would never cause any confusion ever.


It's proʊnʌnʐ.

Good grief. I've been reduced to IPA jokes.


6 people marked this as a favorite.

May I interject to say that the oft-heated rhetoric around grammar arguments suggests that perhaps something more than grammar is being argued about?


1 person marked this as a favorite.
I'm Hiding In Your Closet wrote:
It's a friggin' plural.

Oh, I see what you did there! Repurposing a word that started with a different lexical value as a colloquially acceptable substitution for a more common, but taboo, profanity word with its own distinct etymology and meaning--to pretend to object to a linguistic change of the same type! Clever... ten thousand spoons clever...


Poof! Your genitalia are now adrift in the sea.

I wish for a complete disambiguation of all language.


*splits infinitive with greataxe*


Ravingdork wrote:
According to the random treasure tables of Ultimate Equipment, diamonds worth 25,000gp for wish spells simply don't exist. ;)

Well, you see, the only way to get a 25,000 gp diamond is to cast a wish spell to ask that prior to the casting of the spell, you were the possessor of a diamond worth 25,000 gp...

...the past subjunctive is really a key part of wish.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Usage smashes dictionary definitions! Fight Big Lexicon! Power to the people!