Paizo Update from Jeff Alvarez

Monday, September 20, 2021

My public statement on Wednesday was a fundamental expression of Paizo’s commitment to diversity and inclusion, values that I share both personally and professionally. It was an opening statement—not the final word on the topic by any means.

Words are important.

But I also know that actions are even more important.

As a result, I want to share with you a number of actions that address some of the concerns that have been brought to our attention over the last week.

The welfare and safety of our employees is paramount. No employee will ever be fired for whistleblowing or advocating for employee safety and wellbeing, and we have never fired an employee for doing so.

Following our return from Gen Con, the Executive Team will schedule individual meetings with our managers to give them a chance to share concerns directly. In the coming weeks, Paizo will issue an independently managed employee engagement survey to provide all employees with an anonymous means to provide candid feedback. The information provided through this process is aimed at addressing employee concerns and driving change to create a more positive workplace.

We take all claims of harassment seriously. Our CEO Lisa Stevens released a statement in 2019 that underscores Paizo’s stance on this matter, and it applies today as well. You can read that here: https://paizo.com/community/guidelines.

We held staff-wide in person anti-harassment training in 2018 and initiated annual mandatory online training earlier in 2021.

We are currently finalizing a job description to fill a vacant full-time HR position. You’ll see this posted in the next few business days, and we’ll be looking for a candidate with expertise in diversity, equity, and inclusion. It is important to all of us that this professional can help us to maintain Paizo’s shared commitment to our values in recruitment, hiring, and daily operations.

In the meantime, we are encouraging our employees to make use of the free independent human resources hotline Paizo initiated in 2018, where they can report grievances of any kind in complete confidentiality.

Paizo makes decisions about employee convention attendance based on the business and community needs of the show, irrespective of gender or gender identity. However, it is time that Paizo evolves from the longtime practice of employees sharing rooms during convention and business travel. As such, we have enacted a one-employee-per-room policy that will be our standard moving forward. Employees can request to share a room if they so choose.

We are extending Paizo’s existing work-from-home timeline through at least the end of the year. Employees that want to work from the office can continue to do so but will need to abide by the company’s existing vaccination and mask policies. We will continue to follow CDC guidelines and keep our employees as safe as possible during the pandemic by offering work-from-home and a safe office space for those who prefer that option.

Over the last several years, we have invested heavily in Project Management to help the company get a better sense of workload in the Creative Department, implementing company-wide project management software and increasing the size of the project management team. This work has already resulted in increased production schedule lead times, and Paizo will continue to leverage this valuable resource to provide better work/life balances for our employees.

In the same period, the creation of additional management positions within the Creative Department has also helped give staff better access to managers, and to empower those managers to better gauge deadlines and workloads. As with our Project Management initiatives, this is an ongoing process, but it is already bearing fruit and improving not just Paizo’s products, but the lives of the brilliant creatives who make them possible.

To clear up some confusion that has worked its way into the conversation, freelancer relations remains the purview of the Creative Department. Paizo freelancers who appreciate their strong relationship with our developers, editors, and art team can be assured that we have made no changes on this front.

Finally, based on feedback from the staff, we changed professional cleaning services in 2017, and the offices have been cleaned and vacuumed on a regular basis since then.

These aren’t the only things we are doing. We are building strategies to address the challenges facing the company and will strive to be more transparent about our plans as we build stronger lines of communication with everyone at Paizo. We are committed to listening. We are committed to continuing to improve based on the feedback of our teams. There will be more messages, and more concrete actions, to come.

--Jeff

More Paizo Blog.
Tags: Paizo
1,401 to 1,450 of 1,466 << first < prev | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | next > last >>

14 people marked this as a favorite.

What I'm expecting to see:
1. An in depth explanation of how Paizo leadership intend to address the damage they have been doing to the moderation team over the last few years through neglect, mismanagement, and possible outright corruption, which culminated in the firing of Sara Marie. Will they be rehiring Sara Marie? Will they be employing a full-time team? Have they pursued a third party investigation yet, and if not, when will they?

2. A full apology for the misuse of private information and an explanation of what has been done to ensure that no one person will have easy access to customer data like that anymore.

3. An acknowledgement of the transphobic policies, an apology, a commitment to do better, and an explanation of how they will do better--and an assurance that accountability will be a priority. See re: "third party investigation".

4. A status update on union negotiations that shows that management has engaged in full good faith. For instance, the union asked for greater transparency of salaries, right? That seems easy enough. No reason for management to fight that.

If we don't see something at least approaching these benchmarks, I'm sorry, I really am, but I don't know. It's been two months. The fact is, Sara Marie never should have been fired. I will never forgive that, nor Crystal Frasier's treatment. It shows such rank disregard for the soul of the company and the people who've made the company great. I need to see that something meaningful has changed. Barring that, I just... don't think I like it here much anymore.

I want to be optimistic. Sometimes I'm not. Hopefully in the morning I'll be in better spirits.


I have already promised to run Fists of the Ruby Phoenix - I hope it doesn't end up being the last Paizo product I purchase.


14 people marked this as a favorite.

Remember that this is likely distinct from anything that'll be covered by the union negotiations, which I expect to likely take several more weeks, if not months.

I'm personally here for the transphobia allegations, and I've got pretty high standards for what I'll be happy with. Eager to see.

Liberty's Edge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I don't expect much. I would be delighted to be wrong though.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

To be clear, I don't think a boycott should be called without the union requesting it, and I wouldn't expect refraining from purchases to affect anything if it's not part of a formal boycott. Don't feel guilty about helping to pay the salaries, commissions and wages of a bunch of union employees and brave activist freelancers. :)

It's still valid to feel uninterested in buying more products after this, especially if the results aren't what they ought to be.

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Kobold Cleaver wrote:
...the union asked for greater transparency of salaries, right? That seems easy enough. No reason for management to fight that.

While I certainly hope that Paizo negotiates in good faith, I would expect them to do everything in their power to prevent their P&L from becoming public. Personally, I think many of Paizo's business practices are pretty bad, but if I were on the executive committee I would opposed any effort to expose the financials unless it was compulsory.

Silver Crusade

Why?

Silver Crusade

11 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Maps, Starfinder Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Society Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber

Also I don't think the Union wants the P&L to be public, they want transparency internally on that information and on salary. There's no reason it has to be public.


Cori Marie wrote:
Also I don't think the Union wants the P&L to be public, they want transparency internally on that information and on salary. There's no reason it has to be public.

That's my understanding as well. Paizo may still not want to share it, but as part of negotiations it's hard to argue they can't afford to pay higher wages while also keeping financials hidden.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I assume TK means, though I had to do a double-take because the wording on it was a little awkward, that he anticipates Paizo leadership doing so, not that they should. And like I said, if they fight a push for transparency, well, that alone tells us a lot. :)

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Actually, no, I believe in a private company's right to privacy. If they are not a publicly traded company or one that falls within the legal regulations that require them to publish their financials, they are entitled to and should keep them private. That assumes of course that there are no indications of unlawful salary manipulation by the company which would revoke their right to privacy. YMMV

Depending on how they negotiate with the UPW, they may not have to disclose their financials. A lot depends on what excuses they make for why they cannot meet any salary demands the union makes. What matters more is how much of an increase the union asks for and how closely Paizo is willing to come to that number. It may work out that the union demands are met and no disclosure is necessary. Course I have little confidence in Paizo negotiating in good faith, nor doing much of anything voluntarily. So, this is all just speculation and hypothesis based on my experience with union matters. You just never really know until the negotiating team returns with something tangible for the membership to review and vote on. I wish them luck!


6 people marked this as a favorite.

Corporations aren't people, and I don't think they have any right to privacy from the employees of the company. It's insanely hard to negotiate for an "increase" without knowing the company finances, and separating the two makes no sense to me.


^In principle, I agree with you. Unfortunately, in practice, we have Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. to contend with.


9 people marked this as a favorite.

Well, yeah, legally it's another matter. But legality isn't morality. :P

Liberty's Edge

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Kobold Cleaver wrote:
Corporations aren't people, and I don't think they have any right to privacy from the employees of the company. It's insanely hard to negotiate for an "increase" without knowing the company finances, and separating the two makes no sense to me.

Companies' finances are the most important piece of info you can have on them. Anyone that has this info could pretty much destroy the company by leaking it to competitors. And disgruntled employees who turn against their company for vengeance or out of spite do exist. As do those who are only there for power or money and will think nothing of betraying their employer if they can get more.

That is why getting an increase is a negotiation. The employee does not really know how much they can get from the company and the company does not know how much will be enough for the employee.

Nothing prevents the company from being open about its finances with the employees they trust though.

It all depends on the company's culture as created by the founders and kept alive by the managers, especially those at the top.

Silver Crusade

4 people marked this as a favorite.

“Anyone that has this info could pretty much destroy the company by leaking it to competitors.”

… how?

Dark Archive

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Rysky wrote:

“Anyone that has this info could pretty much destroy the company by leaking it to competitors.”

… how?

I could see that maybe being a problem for a publicly traded company on the stock market Since details could be released (especially if there doing worse than there letting on) that could send stock into freefall. For a private company not on the stock market I'm not sure that would be a problem though

Silver Crusade

7 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Maps, Starfinder Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Society Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber
TwilightKnight wrote:

Actually, no, I believe in a private company's right to privacy. If they are not a publicly traded company or one that falls within the legal regulations that require them to publish their financials, they are entitled to and should keep them private. That assumes of course that there are no indications of unlawful salary manipulation by the company which would revoke their right to privacy. YMMV

Depending on how they negotiate with the UPW, they may not have to disclose their financials. A lot depends on what excuses they make for why they cannot meet any salary demands the union makes. What matters more is how much of an increase the union asks for and how closely Paizo is willing to come to that number. It may work out that the union demands are met and no disclosure is necessary. Course I have little confidence in Paizo negotiating in good faith, nor doing much of anything voluntarily. So, this is all just speculation and hypothesis based on my experience with union matters. You just never really know until the negotiating team returns with something tangible for the membership to review and vote on. I wish them luck!

Again disclosing to the Union and disclosing to the public are two entirely different things, and there are safeguards they can use to protect that information if disclosing to the union. A disgruntled employee isn't going to risk a life-destroying lawsuit to leak that information.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Cori Marie wrote:
TwilightKnight wrote:

Actually, no, I believe in a private company's right to privacy. If they are not a publicly traded company or one that falls within the legal regulations that require them to publish their financials, they are entitled to and should keep them private. That assumes of course that there are no indications of unlawful salary manipulation by the company which would revoke their right to privacy. YMMV

Depending on how they negotiate with the UPW, they may not have to disclose their financials. A lot depends on what excuses they make for why they cannot meet any salary demands the union makes. What matters more is how much of an increase the union asks for and how closely Paizo is willing to come to that number. It may work out that the union demands are met and no disclosure is necessary. Course I have little confidence in Paizo negotiating in good faith, nor doing much of anything voluntarily. So, this is all just speculation and hypothesis based on my experience with union matters. You just never really know until the negotiating team returns with something tangible for the membership to review and vote on. I wish them luck!

Again disclosing to the Union and disclosing to the public are two entirely different things, and there are safeguards they can use to protect that information if disclosing to the union. A disgruntled employee isn't going to risk a life-destroying lawsuit to leak that information.

It would also generally be to the union negotiating committee, not to the membership at large.

Silver Crusade

8 people marked this as a favorite.
Kevin Mack wrote:
Rysky wrote:

“Anyone that has this info could pretty much destroy the company by leaking it to competitors.”

… how?

I could see that maybe being a problem for a publicly traded company on the stock market Since details could be released (especially if there doing worse than there letting on) that could send stock into freefall. For a private company not on the stock market I'm not sure that would be a problem though

Um, by law publicly traded companies have to release lots of information to the public and even more to shareholders.

In fact, one VERY effective thing to do if you're an employee of a publicly traded company is to buy at least one share. Amazing how much information that gets you :-) (not everything, of course, but lots).

Liberty's Edge

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Kevin Mack wrote:
Rysky wrote:

“Anyone that has this info could pretty much destroy the company by leaking it to competitors.”

… how?

I could see that maybe being a problem for a publicly traded company on the stock market Since details could be released (especially if there doing worse than there letting on) that could send stock into freefall. For a private company not on the stock market I'm not sure that would be a problem though

Details about how your cash flows, where you actually make a lot of money and where you underspend, how you price your product compared to the costs, how much (and what) you outsource, where you invest, how much you owe the banks and at what interest rate, if you have staying financial power or are always running after the next input of cash...


Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber

In addition, depending on level of disclosure, what charities and write-offs a company uses can be weaponized against a company.

If, deities forbid, a company that was known for being inclusive and open also was funding alt-hate groups, that'd be an issue.

I'm NOT saying this is the case with Paizo. It has come up with some companies and charities in the past.


5 people marked this as a favorite.

Looking forward to tomorrow’s message. I hope it’s substantial.


5 people marked this as a favorite.

I hope we get to hear how they're going to improve the moderation situation. The team deserves better than this.

Grand Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Rysky wrote:
how?

For this specific instance, Paizo's financials would be become public* while their competitors would remain private. That provides a lot of competitive advantage to the ones who need to make spending decisions to maximize their limited resources.

*note, that the suggestion the financials would remain just in the hands of a few negotiators is a bit naive. It doesn't take much research and/or experience to know how much of what happens in contract negotiations makes its way into the public view, usually in some kind of anonymous way.


Sources?

Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Pretty sure everyone knows WotC makes more and pays more.

Grand Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.

Certainly seems to be true based on commentary from past and present employees, though its hard to say with any certainty why. Perhaps WotC is just a better place to work? Or maybe they are underpaid too and Paizo staff is just more underpaid? Or maybe Paizo just sucks when it comes to compensation? Or maybe its because WotC has a better revenue to expense position being that D&D is the flagship branding? Or maybe its because WotC has enjoyed the benefit of the massive cash-cow that is MtG to supplement their revenue*? Or maybe [probably] its a combination of some/all of those factors.

*Though as I understand it, Hasbro has severed the connection between the two products leaving WotC only over the RPG line. If that is true, it could mean that WotC will tighten their belt and could see a downward trend in compensation packages.

Silver Crusade

“though its hard to say with any certainty why.”

WoTC, backed by Hasbro, makers of DND and MTG…


6 people marked this as a favorite.
TwilightKnight wrote:
Perhaps WotC is just a better place to work?

WotC has been publicly accused of being pretty massively racist internally by multiple workers who were people of color, on both the D&D and MtG sides. There’s also the fact that one of their lead designers said a known abuser and sexual predator’s detractors “just wanted attention,” who they shuffled out of the public view but did not fire.

They make #PaizoAccountability sound like sunshine and rainbows… but the brand is so massive that any similar movement is fighting uphill in a big way, and had struggled to gain momentum.

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I admit I don't follow much of what is going on at WotC the past few years. Was this someone with a past history of sexual predation or that it was actively happening and mgmt covered it up?

I'm not a customer nor a follower of WotC for some time, so I'm not going to invest a lot of time researching, but it certainly seems they have their share of problems. I tried to google what you said and it returned numerous reports with multiple names. Just that very broad exposure does suggest that WotC may be significantly worse than Paizo. Though being the less bad of two terribles is not a badge of honor worth bragging about to be sure and simply having a better salary package would not make up for the rest.


4 people marked this as a favorite.
keftiu wrote:
TwilightKnight wrote:
Perhaps WotC is just a better place to work?

WotC has been publicly accused of being pretty massively racist internally by multiple workers who were people of color, on both the D&D and MtG sides. There’s also the fact that one of their lead designers said a known abuser and sexual predator’s detractors “just wanted attention,” who they shuffled out of the public view but did not fire.

They make #PaizoAccountability sound like sunshine and rainbows… but the brand is so massive that any similar movement is fighting uphill in a big way, and had struggled to gain momentum.

Don't forget that Mearls also forwarded all the emails he got from the accusers TO said abuser, and that said predator is the only playtester to get a "special thanks" on the PHB despite having no visible contributions.


Wait, did we make it to Zak S again?


1 person marked this as a favorite.

If someone asks...

Dark Archive

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Sporkedup wrote:
Wait, did we make it to Zak S again?

Yep, we did!

Silver Crusade

15 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Maps, Starfinder Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Society Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber

If footing a higher bill means others get out of poverty I'm all for that.

Silver Crusade

9 people marked this as a favorite.

Seconded, cost increases due to actually paying their employees more is the last thing that would get me to unsubscribe.

Dark Archive

I'm ok with a price increase too to help the employees, but all so wonder what was as customers can do to help out, like what's the best way to buy things to help out more.

Dark Archive

Thought I read somewhere that today was when Paizo was going to finally make an announcement, hoping that is true...


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Hopefully, when the union leadership is given greater transparency on Paizo's financials, they will be better equipped to suggest what we as customers can do to help. :)


I am fine to pay bit more. Hey we have whole countries with well salaried employees, pensions, health insurance etc which do fine……


9 people marked this as a favorite.

Yeah, the "oho, be careful what you wish for, you might have to pay $5 extra for a sourcebook" shtick is... kind of quaint, I guess, and not just because you've been making it for months and nobody's really cared. This is an expensive hobby. If you'd rather save a few bucks than help the creators obtain a living wage, then I guess that's your money and your prerogative. I can't understand that mindset.

Personally, I know I would feel horribly uncomfortable to attend a PaizoCon and look the staff in the eye if that was the choice I made, but, well, I guess PaizoCon tickets might become a little more expensive too if Paizo leadership decides to actually try to address sexual harassment problems, so maybe PaizoCon will also be two dollars outside your budget.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Maps, Starfinder Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Society Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber
Ashbourne wrote:
Thought I read somewhere that today was when Paizo was going to finally make an announcement, hoping that is true...

They did say they were making one. It is still very early in the day on that coast, so it will likely come in the next couple of hours.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Leg o' Lamb wrote:
Sporkedup wrote:
Wait, did we make it to Zak S again?
Yep, we did!

I only know his involvement with Wizards pretty vaguely. I'm more active in OSR circles, so I keep forgetting he worked on D&D to some degree.

I doubt the language filter will allow me to describe my thoughts on him, though.

1,401 to 1,450 of 1,466 << first < prev | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Paizo / General Discussion / Paizo Blog: Paizo Update from Jeff Alvarez All Messageboards