|1 person marked this as a favorite.|
Umbriere Moonwhisper wrote:I think we've already established that most if not all paladin enthusiasts would consider that paladin in name alone—a violation of the class' intended and proper spirit.Jaelithe wrote:it would actually draw me to the class, though i would make it simply any nonevil for the Chaotic Good Players.Lincoln Hills wrote:Jaelithe wrote:Lawful good, in some measure because 70% of the PCs I play are paladins.I'm glad to hear the class has some fans. Out of curiosity, however, if paladin limitations were merely "non-chaotic, non-evil," do you think you'd take advantage of other alignment options?
It would likely drive me away from the class entirely.
I am not averse to archetypes or alternate classes that allow for Non-LG Paladins though, but the core paladin must be LG.
I allow "Any Evil" for Antipaladins though. (And call them Blackguards because that's such a better name.)