
![]() |

So what I want to know is set size booster size and booster brick and case prices cause I must own a complete set of these
WizKids is still finalizing the details on the product mix and exact release date, so while we do not yet have a product page for the set...

![]() |

Anyone else look at the ghoul and think
Alas, poor Yorick! I ate him, Horatio; a fellow of infinite jest, of most excellent taste; he hath filled my nagging belly a thousand times; and now, how abhorred in my imagination it is! My gorge rises at it. Here hung those lips that I have rudely chewed off. Where be your ribs now?

Green Left Eye |

The words for how excited I am about the Denizen of Leng? I don't have any that don't completely understate it.
The only disappointing thing for me about the HM set was how generic most of the pieces were; I can't think of anything from that set that I didn't already have represented via my old D&D minis. This set is where things are starting to get interesting.
Also: Paizo, your mascot is a GOLEM. When are we gonna get a PAIZO GOLEM mini?

![]() |

The clear plastics were definitely missed in H&M and these look great. It's hard to tell from just a pic, but I rather like the grill attempt Erik - just sayin'.
There is really "nothin but net" in terms of the quality of the sculpts and paints on these. I am impressed. Great call on the common ghoul, too!

Kor - Orc Scrollkeeper |

Definately some unique minis in set. I really like the Denizen of Leng.
The Pathfinder Minis gallery has been updated.
Erik, the orc fan in me just has to ask if there is any chance you could tell us if there are any more orcs coming in this set? If so, would it be possible to leak us with some teaser info, such as their names?

Trollish |

Anyone else look at the ghoul and think
Alas, poor Yorick! I ate him, Horatio; a fellow of infinite jest, of most excellent taste; he hath filled my nagging belly a thousand times; and now, how abhorred in my imagination it is! My gorge rises at it. Here hung those lips that I have rudely chewed off. Where be your ribs now?
I was actually thinking he is about to go bowling. Denizen of Leng is the definite winner in my mind out of those four. So far my favorite is the Bugbear however.

![]() |

Is there any specific reason Malfeshnekor was chosen to be uncommon (instead of rare)? Such unique creatures seem more naturally to fit into the rare category to me, on the basis of usability of likely duplicates in a case. (In fact, I'd prefer these to be the apparent 'super rare' category).
My guess is even though it is a named single NPC in the path, as a general creature it is plenty possible to encounter more than one in a different higher level campaign.

![]() |

Steve Geddes wrote:Is there any specific reason Malfeshnekor was chosen to be uncommon (instead of rare)? Such unique creatures seem more naturally to fit into the rare category to me, on the basis of usability of likely duplicates in a case. (In fact, I'd prefer these to be the apparent 'super rare' category).My guess is even though it is a named single NPC in the path, as a general creature it is plenty possible to encounter more than one in a different higher level campaign.
This.
Also, sometimes there are technical reasons why certain figures are more advantageous to fit on the same mold, which can have rareness implications. I'm not saying this is the case here, but it has happened before and will happen again.

Majuba |

Scanderig and Denizen of Leng look fabulous!
Agreed, particularly the Scanderig - just as frightening as it should be.
However...
Runelords:

![]() |

Awesome selection, still looking forward to the case incentive mini. Hey Erik think we could get a look at that now? I mean you've been teasing us with it since before Christmas.
My guess would be that Erik is waiting until Wizkids have finalised the packaging for the sety before showing off the Rune Giant case incentive.

Aaron aka Itchy |

Anyone else look at the ghoul and think
Alas, poor Yorick! I ate him, Horatio; a fellow of infinite jest, of most excellent taste; he hath filled my nagging belly a thousand times; and now, how abhorred in my imagination it is! My gorge rises at it. Here hung those lips that I have rudely chewed off. Where be your ribs now?
I got as far as "Alas, poor Yorick!" Then I saw the rest of the minis and went no farther.
Did you see the Sir Patrick Stewart/ David Tenant version of Hamlet that was released to DVD last year? It was very well done. I wish that I could have seen the stage version.

Anguish |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

From the pictures, it seems to me like the Scanderig would look better with the "grill" on the back. It seems to me like it would look strange to have the entire backside of the monster just be open.
I suspect the problem is that the rear bars are painted on as opposed to textured. If it was raised opaque plastic matching the rest of its body it might work. Either way, I trust Eric's judgement.

![]() |

Did you see the Sir Patrick Stewart/ David Tenant version of Hamlet that was released to DVD last year? It was very well done. I wish that I could have seen the stage version.
The first half looked a lot like the back of a fat guys head. The second half was much more interesting, as he didn't make it back from the interval (I have an alibi). Alas, it was during the period where Tenant had hurt his back, but his understudy was pretty good.

Christine Brockley-Blatt |

Aaron aka Itchy wrote:The first half looked a lot like the back of a fat guys head. The second half was much more interesting, as he didn't make it back from the interval (I have an alibi). Alas, it was during the period where Tenant had hurt his back, but his understudy was pretty good.
Did you see the Sir Patrick Stewart/ David Tenant version of Hamlet that was released to DVD last year? It was very well done. I wish that I could have seen the stage version.
Don't worry Sweetheart... I have the dvd you can watch later. You can sit in the toddler seat for that complete theatre experience.

Aaron aka Itchy |

Aaron aka Itchy wrote:Did you see the Sir Patrick Stewart/ David Tenant version of Hamlet that was released to DVD last year? It was very well done. I wish that I could have seen the stage version.The first half looked a lot like the back of a fat guys head. The second half was much more interesting, as he didn't make it back from the interval (I have an alibi). Alas, it was during the period where Tenant had hurt his back, but his understudy was pretty good.
I am jealous!
I did get to see Patrick Stewart in Macbeth a few years back. That was the best stage production I have ever seen. I have the DVD of that production and, though it is good, it is not as good as the stage version.