
Vasyazx |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Vasyazx wrote:Rysky wrote:vasyazx wrote:1 It is also perfectly moral because animate dead spell dont have evil tagDebatable, and you’re jumping through a LOT of hoops trying to justify this whole thing.vasyazx wrote:2.Demon spies in army are pretty typical thing in WOTR for exampleK, you’re just gonna ignore when you straight up lied up above.vasyazx wrote:3 I do not cast divine lance on random people i cast it under specific circumstance with all preparation to make it safe and only if people consent on its usage on themYeah you’re a psychopath who casts it on random people and then flails about uselessly trying every conceivable way to justify it.vasyazx wrote:That not the point the point is that Iomedae approved his action and not remove him from position of power his status as antagonist for player kinda irrelevant hereThat’s not how gods work. Hulrun was not a divine outsider servant, his position was a political one. His status as a Villian who committed great evils is very relevant since you’re putting him up on a pedestal to justify your own evil.1.Well its up to you to prove its evilness
2.Not sure about what exacly you telling me can you please pointed out
3 i do not cast it on anyone unless they agree to become spell target and even then i specifically make it the way that least harm may given
4 i do not care about that becase he still has autority over part of Iomedae church and thus still has her approval.I also do not justify any of his action1) you’re the one using it as an additional fetch for justification.
2) you say thing, people call you on it, you say you didn’t say it, then go back to saying it.
3) You cast it on random targets and try to justify it however you can.
4) that is not how gods work in Pathfinder, he was not appointed by Iomedae. He does not have her approval. And you’re using him, a villain, as a justification for yours.
Vasyazx wrote:Anyway can we please stop debating alignment...
I'm just pointed out that if anyone want to continue conversation on alignment its better move into thread that specifically was made for that
https://paizo.com/threads/rzs43t36&page=last?Alignment-damage-and-heavy -alignment
CaptainRelyk |

Rysky wrote:...Vasyazx wrote:Rysky wrote:vasyazx wrote:1 It is also perfectly moral because animate dead spell dont have evil tagDebatable, and you’re jumping through a LOT of hoops trying to justify this whole thing.vasyazx wrote:2.Demon spies in army are pretty typical thing in WOTR for exampleK, you’re just gonna ignore when you straight up lied up above.vasyazx wrote:3 I do not cast divine lance on random people i cast it under specific circumstance with all preparation to make it safe and only if people consent on its usage on themYeah you’re a psychopath who casts it on random people and then flails about uselessly trying every conceivable way to justify it.vasyazx wrote:That not the point the point is that Iomedae approved his action and not remove him from position of power his status as antagonist for player kinda irrelevant hereThat’s not how gods work. Hulrun was not a divine outsider servant, his position was a political one. His status as a Villian who committed great evils is very relevant since you’re putting him up on a pedestal to justify your own evil.1.Well its up to you to prove its evilness
2.Not sure about what exacly you telling me can you please pointed out
3 i do not cast it on anyone unless they agree to become spell target and even then i specifically make it the way that least harm may given
4 i do not care about that becase he still has autority over part of Iomedae church and thus still has her approval.I also do not justify any of his action1) you’re the one using it as an additional fetch for justification.
2) you say thing, people call you on it, you say you didn’t say it, then go back to saying it.
3) You cast it on random targets and try to justify it however you can.
4) that is not how gods work in Pathfinder, he was not appointed by Iomedae. He does not have her approval. And you’re using him, a villain, as a justification for yours.
Vasyazx wrote:Anyway can we please
Yeah I created that thread so we could move the convo there

i26c2 |
keftiu wrote:I can share what convinced me: the setting is much more considered now thanks to the diversity of staff, without losing any of the old Pathfinder theme park fun. You couldn’t pay me to engage with the Darkest Africa “cannibals and headhunters everywhere” 1e approach to the Mwangi, while the 2e book on it is one of the finest setting supplements in the d20 sphere.
The old Dragon Empires books have aged like milk in places. I’m excited to see how a bunch of awesome Asian talent tackles Tian Xia for 2e soon.
Definitely, I had no desire to visit Mgwani before beyond, I'm pretty sure it's the last place the Tarrasque was seen? And there was a floating city there once? Is there an adventure path that explores those ruins that would be awesome.
But in 2e: that magic school AP looks really, really fun. I'm not even a Harry Potter fan.
I'm playing SoT right now and tis a ton of fun