So, are we seriously wrapping up 1E without an XXXXXX class option?


Pathfinder First Edition General Discussion

201 to 205 of 205 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | next > last >>

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Somewhere a bridge is lonely.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Gorbacz wrote:
Ryan Freire wrote:
PossibleCabbage wrote:
I feel like "printing in China no longer saves money" is more of a concern for Paizo than "some forumites are still unhappy" by a considerable margin.
I guess we'll see in a year or two
*Adds Ryan Freire to his deliciously long 'will come back to you in 2 years' list*

Do you actually have a list of people to hassle in the next 2 years?

Silver Crusade

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
avr wrote:
Gorbacz wrote:
Ryan Freire wrote:
PossibleCabbage wrote:
I feel like "printing in China no longer saves money" is more of a concern for Paizo than "some forumites are still unhappy" by a considerable margin.
I guess we'll see in a year or two
*Adds Ryan Freire to his deliciously long 'will come back to you in 2 years' list*
Do you actually have a list of people to hassle in the next 2 years?

Are you seriously doubting that I have one? I mean, wow, people, I don't have THAT good a memory, I need to write down the list of groceries and folks whom I'm going to roundhouse from behind with some definitive statement ("X will fail", "I won't ever be playing Y", "I'll never give Z my money again") post they've made 3 years earlier.

One of the reasons people make such statements is that, apart from being sure that they're correct, they anticipate that even if they're wrong, nobody will be around to point that out. They think to, because they, correctly, assume 99% of people here are normal folks who don't recall what was said or posted 3 years earlier, because let's face it - who does?

I'm the 1%.


An archetypeless vigilante must rely on magic items or allies to fly.


Ryan Freire wrote:
blahpers wrote:
PossibleCabbage wrote:
I feel like "printing in China no longer saves money" is more of a concern for Paizo than "some forumites are still unhappy" by a considerable margin.
In their defense, some forumites will always be unhappy. That's entertainment.
I appreciate that im going to get painted with this brush but tbh i was pretty open to 2.0 and pretty happy with the product prior to 2.0 as well, if generally disappointed that things organized play removed generally did more to increase the gap between martials and casters than fix it.

Sorry, I worded that ambiguously. I didn't mean to posit that there are some specific forumites who will always be unhappy; I meant there is no non-pathological state in which no forumites are unhappy.

201 to 205 of 205 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / General Discussion / So, are we seriously wrapping up 1E without an XXXXXX class option? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.