
bookrat |

Because at that point you've moved past the peasant economy.
I think it nicely underlines that you're dealing with treasures and rarities, not everyday goods.
Why is a level 20 Formula or a Level 9 spell a part of peasant economy, but a level 1 alchemical item (such as tanglefoot) or a level 1 snare (such as a caltrop snare) not?

![]() |

Voss wrote:Why is a level 20 Formula or a Level 9 spell a part of peasant economy, but a level 1 alchemical item (such as tanglefoot) or a level 1 snare (such as a caltrop snare) not?Because at that point you've moved past the peasant economy.
I think it nicely underlines that you're dealing with treasures and rarities, not everyday goods.
This. To a long term player, this distinction and the exchange rate will be easy, but to new players it will be a massive turn off. 1st time players will look at this and get confused about which currency you are talking about and we'll get money flubbing problems and new GM's will get annoyed trying to remember and cross reference the currency in the very first game meeting when their players are building things.
Standardize the writing to 1 option and move from there. I like the Silver option since it puts things in a more normal person perspective in the world and helps keep everyone constantly aware of both what a gp means to the bulk of the world and the PCs usual place of economic privilege to everyone else.

Turgin |
Hello all, two things here.
1 - List all GP starting money pools in silver piece units. Far easier.
2 - Talents is a much better word for this system layout than feats. Saga edition used Talents, and I think the precedent for something as complex as this might need both Talents and Feats, but, choosing just one, Talents is the only way to realistically go, from here.

Voss |

Voss wrote:Why is a level 20 Formula or a Level 9 spell a part of peasant economy, but a level 1 alchemical item (such as tanglefoot) or a level 1 snare (such as a caltrop snare) not?Because at that point you've moved past the peasant economy.
I think it nicely underlines that you're dealing with treasures and rarities, not everyday goods.
Because like a lot of this book, they got the cross referencing wrong.