|
| 17 people marked this as a favorite. |
Alright, new thread! Since the old URL is not in use anymore, and we cannot edit the first post anymore since it is years old, new thread.
The old thread is still around if you are looking for older statements: http://paizo.com/threads/rzs2t5ah?Our-PFS-sessiontracker
So I've build a tracker for your PFS (and SFS) sessions, you can track them and try to match with other players who have played or not played certain content.
The URL is: https://www.pfstracker.net
This URL will not change as long as I run the service. :)
If you are afraid it might go offline, you can transfer your entire played history to an excel file in the profile page.
This is my profile: https://www.pfstracker.net/#/players/25642/
Questions, suggestions, missing content, etc. go here. :) Thanks peeps!
|
|
@TimD: It is still on my list. All I can say, it is under the character page rework stuff.
@The Masked Ferret: Unlikely, I don't cache much. If so it is on the client side. Maybe the nightly job of recalculating the statistics failed... I oughta look into that.
@James Anderson: I shall add the 1-98 and the faction is also tied to the character page rework. So on the short list!
|
|
| 4 people marked this as a favorite. |
I really wish I could EDIT stuff after a few hours :( Third post it is.
Character page now supports SFS characters and you can use as many characternumbers as you want. Oh and I squashed a bug that did not allow you to change the campaign of a character after it was created.
Venture-Captain, California—San Francisco Bay Area North & East
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Maybe I'll be able to pass Bramnik at Gencon and snag 3rd place for complete GM...
For completeness, Into the Perplexity was a 5-6.
Is there a report option to see statistics for a given scenario? Like "how many people have played ___ game?" Just a curiosity thing really.
|
|
Maybe I'll be able to pass Bramnik at Gencon and snag 3rd place for complete GM...
For completeness, Into the Perplexity was a 5-6.
Is there a report option to see statistics for a given scenario? Like "how many people have played ___ game?" Just a curiosity thing really.
Alright then, 5-6 it is. I do not calculate how many peeps played a scenario at this time. Nightly (my time) I calculate the top 10s. So, nope. :) But if you want to know a specific scenario I can do a DB query if you want.
SFS 01-16 Dreaming of the Future is a Quest and a Repeatable, but it is not currently marked as being a repeatable.
Well that will not do at all! It is now a evergreen. Thanks, once again, for pointing that out.
---
So the race is on! ;)
|
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Aaannddd we're back. Operating system upgraded. Everything seems good. Had some issues with the webserver, but not with the pfstracker-service (it is a custom node server).
Because of the time I took to upgrade I am not going to do cloudflare work as well right now, it would mean more downtime. I will do more downtime sensitive stuff in like a month or so.
Please let me know if something is not working, because to me everything is in the green. :)
|
Pathfinder Society Playtest Scenario #1: The Rose Street Revenge (link)
Pathfinder Society Playtest Scenario #2: Raiders of Shrieking Peak (link)
Pathfinder Society Playtest Scenario #3: Arclord's Envy (link)
Pathfinder Society Playtest #4: The Frozen Oath
Pathfinder Playtest Adventure: Doomsday Dawn (link)
Contains 7 different adventures:
* The Lost Star
* In Pale Mountain’s Shadow
* Affair at Sombrefell Hall
* The Mirrored Moon
* The Heroes of Undarin
* Red Flags
* When the Stars Go Dark
|
|
Alright there is now a playtest season. You can also report for this season. I have not added the 7 parts of Doomsday Dawn yet, I am still contemplating how to tackle that one. :) The tracker was never meant to have specific content like this so I am bending a few rules.
Oh and I am aware you do not see the progression of the playtest season on your profile overview, I'll add that in later. The reason is that the tracker expects a season to be a number. :)
|
I am not Simon, but as a developer, if people needed it to be translated, it would generally need:
1) The ability to switch languages
2) The text that needs to be translated
Pending Simon's response, I would guess that we could work on #2 - gathering all of the text that needs to be translated and getting it translated, while he works on #1. I don't know the time frame of his availability for that.
I have started a rough translation guide here. I may be jumping the gun here, but if we work together, I think we can assist Simon with the translation, and he can do the coding part. I have put some Spanish examples in the system - my Spanish is terrible, but it should be useable as an example.
If you have English text that you want to replace, put the English phrase in Column A, and then the phrase that you are translating into the column appropriate for your language. I started with what text is on the Statistics page.
Simon, if this is not a helpful idea, please let me know.
|
|
Hey, ah the translation situation. :) Some year(s) ago someone was trying to code that in. Did not end up getting finished.
Your assumptions are pretty spot on though. At the moment the tracker does not support it, but to support it I would need to replace all the strings in the tracker with a reference to a text file with the strings in it. That text file then needs to be another one if another language is selected.
There are standards and best practices for this sort of thing, but yeah I do not speak spanish. :P
Anyhow it does also bring up a thing though. There is the interface, which you can translate like that, but then there is also the entire database, scenario names, descriptions, the like. I have no idea, but I think paizo does not publish those in spanish? It would also mean adding a lot of data to the database... not really keen on doing that.
I can totally get a language swapper going, and hand over a version of the text file for english though. Not got a lot of time to implement that feature at the moment. Dealing with where to stick the playtest module first.
I thought about seperating it as a new campaign, but the way things work under water at the moment won't make that an option. I am still slowly slogging along with changing the entire structure, but that is still months away from being finished. I think I will just put them under modules for now, can always change it later.
|
|
Simon, maybe when you get the chance, you can produce that Text file with the English text, and if the community is interested in translating the text, we can get some of that done. Once we have some translations in hand, then we can modify the website.
As for the Scenario Names, Descriptions and everything... we should just Start with the UI stuff. Most of the scenarios people report have identifiable numbers, and Non-English speakers can use those for the time being. I believe Vincent above was requesting that the UI be updated, but not everything else.
|
All sanctioned content should now be available again! :) Including Doomsday Dawn.
I don't see Ruins of Azlant on there, which is now sanctioned. Am I missing it somewhere?
|
|
@Dennis: Ruins of Azlant is on the tracker now
@Jason: That is a very good catch. I checked the database and noticed a query with season 0 brings up 32 hits, of which 9 are retired. Bringing us to 23. Why though has it changed? Turns out the 4 playtest scenarios are being counted as season 0 for some reason. So it is 19 real season 0 scenarios + 4 PF 2.0 playtest scenarios.
This is most definately a display bug that I will be fixing asap. Thanks for pointing it out.