![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
SillyString |
![Dinvaya](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/PZO9086-Dinvaya2_90.jpeg)
Possibly, what feats and abilities?
Well the first one I was looking at was Panache.
Then I started looking at Precise Strike, which specifies "To use this deed, a swashbuckler cannot attack with a weapon in her other hand" which I would assume would mean it cant hold the main weapon either, but I might aswell check while i'm asking about panache!
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
![]() |
![Areelu Vorlesh](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/PZO9078-Areelu_500.jpeg)
Rysky wrote:Yeah, those require your other hand to be free, so no two-handing.I expected Precise Strike would require a free hand, but panache as well? source?
(I do believe you, just wanting to check)
Panache is just a pool, the things you do with said pool usually require you to have your hand free.
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
SillyString |
![Dinvaya](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/PZO9086-Dinvaya2_90.jpeg)
Panache is just a pool, the things you do with said pool usually require you to have your hand free.
Well, yes, I never said it wasn't a pool... but as far as I can see the only deed that requires (the equivalent of) a free hand is precise strike, hence why i'd like a source on panache requiring a free hand :)
Wouldn't you take a -4 or something?
I... Wait, why would I take a -4?
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
![]() |
![Areelu Vorlesh](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/PZO9078-Areelu_500.jpeg)
Rysky wrote:Panache is just a pool, the things you do with said pool usually require you to have your hand free.Well, yes, I never said it wasn't a pool... but as far as I can see the only deed that requires (the equivalent of) a free hand is precise strike, hence why i'd like a source on panache requiring a free hand :)
Hmm, looking over the combat deeds you're correct, though you should stop saying "panache requires a free hand" since panache isn't something you do.
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
SillyString |
![Dinvaya](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/PZO9086-Dinvaya2_90.jpeg)
SillyString wrote:Hmm, looking over the combat deeds you're correct, though you should stop saying "panache requires a free hand" since panache isn't something you do.Rysky wrote:Panache is just a pool, the things you do with said pool usually require you to have your hand free.Well, yes, I never said it wasn't a pool... but as far as I can see the only deed that requires (the equivalent of) a free hand is precise strike, hence why i'd like a source on panache requiring a free hand :)
Ah of course, what I mean is would the "Each time the swashbuckler confirms a critical hit with a light or one-handed piercing melee weapon, she regains 1 panache point." part of Panache function while wielding a one-handed weapon with both hands? Or would that re-classify it as a two-handed weapon, thus voiding that aspect of panache?
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
Zaister |
Well the panache class feature includes the way you regain panache points, and that is by scoring a critical hit or reducing an opponent to 0 hp or less with a light or one-handed piercing weapon – which is something you do.
You can indeed question if "one-handed weapon" would include a weapon wielded in two hands. I would say yes, since some rules, such as for Power Attack, explicitly refer to both "two-handed weapon" and "one handed weapon using two hands" separately.
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
SillyString |
![Dinvaya](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/PZO9086-Dinvaya2_90.jpeg)
Snazzy, thanks for the clarification, I assumed a one-handed wielded in two hands would still be a "one-handed". Interesting to note that swashbucklers could get 1-1/2 str (and increased power attack) and still be able to regain panache, shame they lose out on precise strike, but I expected as much.
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
Zaister |
It's difficult to get two hand into that basket :)
The estoc doesn't work in two hands for the swashbuckler, because it says "When you wield an estoc with one hand, treat it as a one-handed weapon; when you wield an estoc with two hands, treat it as a two-handed weapon"
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
![]() |
![Areelu Vorlesh](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/PZO9078-Areelu_500.jpeg)
It's difficult to get two hand into that basket :)
The estoc doesn't work in two hands for the swashbuckler, because it says "When you wield an estoc with one hand, treat it as a one-handed weapon; when you wield an estoc with two hands, treat it as a two-handed weapon"
I always imagined it as one hand on the grip and the other palming the butt and pushing when you thrust.
And ah.
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
![]() |
![Welton Grompus](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/PZO9522-Baker.jpg)
The rapier is a finesse weapon that is bigger than a normal Light weapon, hence the restriction. Think of it as a hybrid, like the Bastard sword for one handed/two handed thing.
The weapon counts as it is being wielded for effects that require it, like power attack, str mod damage and the like. I think the right conclusion has been proffered, it is still a One Handed weapon designation despite being wielded with two hands, so Panache would trigger its renewals for the particulars for using the One Handed (Medium, as Mathew had paralleled the armor qualities) weapon.